How many guys have kissed Anna? On the special status of V2 relative clauses in spoken German

The aim of the present paper is twofold: first, to introduce the problem represented by so-called 'Verb-Second (V2) relative clauses' in German, a phenomenon which occurs exclusively in spoken language, thereby recapitulating the arguments put forth in the literature for their paratactic c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Linguistik online 2014-01, Vol.67 (5), p.45-67
1. Verfasser: Catasso, Nicholas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:ger
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 67
container_issue 5
container_start_page 45
container_title Linguistik online
container_volume 67
creator Catasso, Nicholas
description The aim of the present paper is twofold: first, to introduce the problem represented by so-called 'Verb-Second (V2) relative clauses' in German, a phenomenon which occurs exclusively in spoken language, thereby recapitulating the arguments put forth in the literature for their paratactic categorization in light of Den Besten's (1983) assumptions on the structural properties of V2 (e.g. Gartner 2001, 2002; Den Dikken 2005; Endriss/Gartner 2005); in the second place, to propose an alternative analysis based on the following postulates: (i) such constructions, which are generally classified as belonging to 'non-canonical' phenomena of spoken German, are neither to be ascribed to a deficient syntactic planning nor can they be defined as 'false relatives' (cf. Ravetto 2006), but are rather part of a specific syntactic pattern with speaker-oriented implications that is directly related to the syntax-speaker's attitude interface; (ii) these structures display features shared by both asyndetically coordinated clauses (e.g. their word-order and, in principle, the surface form of the d-element introducing them) and standard relative constructions, but a paratactic analysis in classical terms (namely one in which it is assumed that clause1 and clause2 are two conjuncts of a coordinative pattern playing the same syntactic role) does not explain most of the distributional properties that 'V2 relative clauses' exhibit. The conclusions of the analysis proposed in this paper rest upon evidence of prosodic, syntactic and semantic-pragmatic nature. Adapted from the source document
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1735642242</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1735642242</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_17356422423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjLsKwkAQRRdR8PkPU9oIeWy0FBE1nY3YSRjixKxudmNmV8nfm8LC1urc4tzTE6NwGSaLOAhl_2cPxZj5HgRxImUwEpfUvqFC08LNtwwlvggeipmusDEG13A04EoCrilXqIEdOs9gCzhH0JBGp7pHrtEzMSjTifZBBg7UdNWpGBSomWZfTsR8vztt00Xd2KcndlmlOCet0ZD1nIWrOFnKKJJR_If6AVIUR-Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1735642242</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How many guys have kissed Anna? On the special status of V2 relative clauses in spoken German</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Catasso, Nicholas</creator><creatorcontrib>Catasso, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of the present paper is twofold: first, to introduce the problem represented by so-called 'Verb-Second (V2) relative clauses' in German, a phenomenon which occurs exclusively in spoken language, thereby recapitulating the arguments put forth in the literature for their paratactic categorization in light of Den Besten's (1983) assumptions on the structural properties of V2 (e.g. Gartner 2001, 2002; Den Dikken 2005; Endriss/Gartner 2005); in the second place, to propose an alternative analysis based on the following postulates: (i) such constructions, which are generally classified as belonging to 'non-canonical' phenomena of spoken German, are neither to be ascribed to a deficient syntactic planning nor can they be defined as 'false relatives' (cf. Ravetto 2006), but are rather part of a specific syntactic pattern with speaker-oriented implications that is directly related to the syntax-speaker's attitude interface; (ii) these structures display features shared by both asyndetically coordinated clauses (e.g. their word-order and, in principle, the surface form of the d-element introducing them) and standard relative constructions, but a paratactic analysis in classical terms (namely one in which it is assumed that clause1 and clause2 are two conjuncts of a coordinative pattern playing the same syntactic role) does not explain most of the distributional properties that 'V2 relative clauses' exhibit. The conclusions of the analysis proposed in this paper rest upon evidence of prosodic, syntactic and semantic-pragmatic nature. Adapted from the source document</description><identifier>ISSN: 1615-3014</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-3014</identifier><language>ger</language><ispartof>Linguistik online, 2014-01, Vol.67 (5), p.45-67</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Catasso, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><title>How many guys have kissed Anna? On the special status of V2 relative clauses in spoken German</title><title>Linguistik online</title><description>The aim of the present paper is twofold: first, to introduce the problem represented by so-called 'Verb-Second (V2) relative clauses' in German, a phenomenon which occurs exclusively in spoken language, thereby recapitulating the arguments put forth in the literature for their paratactic categorization in light of Den Besten's (1983) assumptions on the structural properties of V2 (e.g. Gartner 2001, 2002; Den Dikken 2005; Endriss/Gartner 2005); in the second place, to propose an alternative analysis based on the following postulates: (i) such constructions, which are generally classified as belonging to 'non-canonical' phenomena of spoken German, are neither to be ascribed to a deficient syntactic planning nor can they be defined as 'false relatives' (cf. Ravetto 2006), but are rather part of a specific syntactic pattern with speaker-oriented implications that is directly related to the syntax-speaker's attitude interface; (ii) these structures display features shared by both asyndetically coordinated clauses (e.g. their word-order and, in principle, the surface form of the d-element introducing them) and standard relative constructions, but a paratactic analysis in classical terms (namely one in which it is assumed that clause1 and clause2 are two conjuncts of a coordinative pattern playing the same syntactic role) does not explain most of the distributional properties that 'V2 relative clauses' exhibit. The conclusions of the analysis proposed in this paper rest upon evidence of prosodic, syntactic and semantic-pragmatic nature. Adapted from the source document</description><issn>1615-3014</issn><issn>1615-3014</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVjLsKwkAQRRdR8PkPU9oIeWy0FBE1nY3YSRjixKxudmNmV8nfm8LC1urc4tzTE6NwGSaLOAhl_2cPxZj5HgRxImUwEpfUvqFC08LNtwwlvggeipmusDEG13A04EoCrilXqIEdOs9gCzhH0JBGp7pHrtEzMSjTifZBBg7UdNWpGBSomWZfTsR8vztt00Xd2KcndlmlOCet0ZD1nIWrOFnKKJJR_If6AVIUR-Y</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Catasso, Nicholas</creator><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>How many guys have kissed Anna? On the special status of V2 relative clauses in spoken German</title><author>Catasso, Nicholas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_17356422423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>ger</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Catasso, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Linguistik online</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Catasso, Nicholas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How many guys have kissed Anna? On the special status of V2 relative clauses in spoken German</atitle><jtitle>Linguistik online</jtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>45</spage><epage>67</epage><pages>45-67</pages><issn>1615-3014</issn><eissn>1615-3014</eissn><abstract>The aim of the present paper is twofold: first, to introduce the problem represented by so-called 'Verb-Second (V2) relative clauses' in German, a phenomenon which occurs exclusively in spoken language, thereby recapitulating the arguments put forth in the literature for their paratactic categorization in light of Den Besten's (1983) assumptions on the structural properties of V2 (e.g. Gartner 2001, 2002; Den Dikken 2005; Endriss/Gartner 2005); in the second place, to propose an alternative analysis based on the following postulates: (i) such constructions, which are generally classified as belonging to 'non-canonical' phenomena of spoken German, are neither to be ascribed to a deficient syntactic planning nor can they be defined as 'false relatives' (cf. Ravetto 2006), but are rather part of a specific syntactic pattern with speaker-oriented implications that is directly related to the syntax-speaker's attitude interface; (ii) these structures display features shared by both asyndetically coordinated clauses (e.g. their word-order and, in principle, the surface form of the d-element introducing them) and standard relative constructions, but a paratactic analysis in classical terms (namely one in which it is assumed that clause1 and clause2 are two conjuncts of a coordinative pattern playing the same syntactic role) does not explain most of the distributional properties that 'V2 relative clauses' exhibit. The conclusions of the analysis proposed in this paper rest upon evidence of prosodic, syntactic and semantic-pragmatic nature. Adapted from the source document</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1615-3014
ispartof Linguistik online, 2014-01, Vol.67 (5), p.45-67
issn 1615-3014
1615-3014
language ger
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1735642242
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB Electronic Journals Library
title How many guys have kissed Anna? On the special status of V2 relative clauses in spoken German
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T14%3A39%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20many%20guys%20have%20kissed%20Anna?%20On%20the%20special%20status%20of%20V2%20relative%20clauses%20in%20spoken%20German&rft.jtitle=Linguistik%20online&rft.au=Catasso,%20Nicholas&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=67&rft.pages=45-67&rft.issn=1615-3014&rft.eissn=1615-3014&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1735642242%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1735642242&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true