Novel strategy for laparoscopic treatment of pT2 gallbladder carcinoma
Background This study evaluated our new strategy for treating suspected T2 gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) using a laparoscopic approach. Methods We examined 19 patients with suspected T2 GBC who were treated laparoscopically (LS group) between December 2007 and December 2013; these patients were compar...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgical endoscopy 2015-12, Vol.29 (12), p.3600-3607 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3607 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 3600 |
container_title | Surgical endoscopy |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Itano, Osamu Oshima, Go Minagawa, Takuya Shinoda, Masahiro Kitago, Minoru Abe, Yuta Hibi, Taizo Yagi, Hiroshi Ikoma, Naruhiko Aiko, Satoshi Kawaida, Miho Masugi, Yohei Kameyama, Kaori Sakamoto, Michiie Kitagawa, Yuko |
description | Background
This study evaluated our new strategy for treating suspected T2 gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) using a laparoscopic approach.
Methods
We examined 19 patients with suspected T2 GBC who were treated laparoscopically (LS group) between December 2007 and December 2013; these patients were compared with 14 patients who underwent open surgery (OS group). Laparoscopic staging was initially performed to exclude factors making the patients ineligible for curative resection. Intraoperative pathological examination of the surgical margin of the cystic duct was performed prior to laparoscopic gallbladder bed resection, and pathological examination was again performed to confirm the presence of carcinoma and the depth of tumor invasion. Surgery was completed when the pathological findings indicated that the patient was cancer free. Lymph node dissection was performed according to the depth of tumor invasion.
Results
None of the patients required conversion to laparotomy. For three patients with benign lesions, only gallbladder bed resection was required. Additional regional lymph node dissection was performed in 16 patients in the LS group. The mean operative time (309 vs. 324 min,
p
= 0.755) and mean number of dissected lymph nodes (12.6 vs. 10.2,
p
= 0.361) were not significantly different between the LS and OS groups. The intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower (104 vs. 584 mL,
p
= 0.002) and the postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter (9.1 vs. 21.6 days,
p
= 0.002) for LS patients than for those in the OS group. In the LS group, one patient developed postoperative pneumonia, but all patients survived without recurrence after a mean follow-up of 37 months.
Conclusion
Our strategy for suspected T2 gallbladder GBC is safe and useful, avoids unnecessary procedures, and is associated with similar oncologic outcomes as the open method. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00464-015-4116-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1735336061</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3868984161</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-94eb10c693637c12d8ee15812ede7158f6db75f68d083a511a2f8be015d507c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLxDAQhYMo7rr6A7xIwYuXaiZJ0_Yo4qqw6GU9hzSdLl3apiat0H9vll1FBE8zMN-8efMIuQR6C5Smd55SIUVMIYkFgIynIzIHwVnMGGTHZE5zTmOW5mJGzrzf0oDnkJySGUtSQSXP5mT5aj-xifzg9ICbKaqsixrda2e9sX1tosGhHlrshshWUb9m0UY3TdHoskQXGe1M3dlWn5OTSjceLw51Qd6Xj-uH53j19vTycL-KjRBsiHOBBVAjcy55aoCVGSIkGTAsMQ1NJcsiTSqZlTTjOgHQrMoKDA-WCU0N4wtys9ftnf0Y0Q-qrb3BptEd2tErSHnCuaQSAnr9B93a0XXB3Y7imWAgd4Kwp0z42DusVO_qVrtJAVW7kNU-ZBU8qF3Iago7VwflsWix_Nn4TjUAbA_4MOo26H6d_lf1C5G6hk0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1733842162</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Novel strategy for laparoscopic treatment of pT2 gallbladder carcinoma</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Itano, Osamu ; Oshima, Go ; Minagawa, Takuya ; Shinoda, Masahiro ; Kitago, Minoru ; Abe, Yuta ; Hibi, Taizo ; Yagi, Hiroshi ; Ikoma, Naruhiko ; Aiko, Satoshi ; Kawaida, Miho ; Masugi, Yohei ; Kameyama, Kaori ; Sakamoto, Michiie ; Kitagawa, Yuko</creator><creatorcontrib>Itano, Osamu ; Oshima, Go ; Minagawa, Takuya ; Shinoda, Masahiro ; Kitago, Minoru ; Abe, Yuta ; Hibi, Taizo ; Yagi, Hiroshi ; Ikoma, Naruhiko ; Aiko, Satoshi ; Kawaida, Miho ; Masugi, Yohei ; Kameyama, Kaori ; Sakamoto, Michiie ; Kitagawa, Yuko</creatorcontrib><description>Background
This study evaluated our new strategy for treating suspected T2 gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) using a laparoscopic approach.
Methods
We examined 19 patients with suspected T2 GBC who were treated laparoscopically (LS group) between December 2007 and December 2013; these patients were compared with 14 patients who underwent open surgery (OS group). Laparoscopic staging was initially performed to exclude factors making the patients ineligible for curative resection. Intraoperative pathological examination of the surgical margin of the cystic duct was performed prior to laparoscopic gallbladder bed resection, and pathological examination was again performed to confirm the presence of carcinoma and the depth of tumor invasion. Surgery was completed when the pathological findings indicated that the patient was cancer free. Lymph node dissection was performed according to the depth of tumor invasion.
Results
None of the patients required conversion to laparotomy. For three patients with benign lesions, only gallbladder bed resection was required. Additional regional lymph node dissection was performed in 16 patients in the LS group. The mean operative time (309 vs. 324 min,
p
= 0.755) and mean number of dissected lymph nodes (12.6 vs. 10.2,
p
= 0.361) were not significantly different between the LS and OS groups. The intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower (104 vs. 584 mL,
p
= 0.002) and the postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter (9.1 vs. 21.6 days,
p
= 0.002) for LS patients than for those in the OS group. In the LS group, one patient developed postoperative pneumonia, but all patients survived without recurrence after a mean follow-up of 37 months.
Conclusion
Our strategy for suspected T2 gallbladder GBC is safe and useful, avoids unnecessary procedures, and is associated with similar oncologic outcomes as the open method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4116-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25740638</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Accuracy ; Aged ; Cancer ; Cholecystectomy ; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods ; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - standards ; Dissection ; Female ; Gallbladder ; Gallbladder Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Gallbladder Neoplasms - surgery ; Gastroenterology ; Gynecology ; Hepatology ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Lymphatic system ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Operative Time ; Pathology ; Patients ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Proctology ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2015-12, Vol.29 (12), p.3600-3607</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-94eb10c693637c12d8ee15812ede7158f6db75f68d083a511a2f8be015d507c23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-94eb10c693637c12d8ee15812ede7158f6db75f68d083a511a2f8be015d507c23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-015-4116-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-015-4116-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25740638$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Itano, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oshima, Go</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minagawa, Takuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shinoda, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitago, Minoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abe, Yuta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hibi, Taizo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yagi, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikoma, Naruhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aiko, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawaida, Miho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masugi, Yohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kameyama, Kaori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, Michiie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitagawa, Yuko</creatorcontrib><title>Novel strategy for laparoscopic treatment of pT2 gallbladder carcinoma</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>Background
This study evaluated our new strategy for treating suspected T2 gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) using a laparoscopic approach.
Methods
We examined 19 patients with suspected T2 GBC who were treated laparoscopically (LS group) between December 2007 and December 2013; these patients were compared with 14 patients who underwent open surgery (OS group). Laparoscopic staging was initially performed to exclude factors making the patients ineligible for curative resection. Intraoperative pathological examination of the surgical margin of the cystic duct was performed prior to laparoscopic gallbladder bed resection, and pathological examination was again performed to confirm the presence of carcinoma and the depth of tumor invasion. Surgery was completed when the pathological findings indicated that the patient was cancer free. Lymph node dissection was performed according to the depth of tumor invasion.
Results
None of the patients required conversion to laparotomy. For three patients with benign lesions, only gallbladder bed resection was required. Additional regional lymph node dissection was performed in 16 patients in the LS group. The mean operative time (309 vs. 324 min,
p
= 0.755) and mean number of dissected lymph nodes (12.6 vs. 10.2,
p
= 0.361) were not significantly different between the LS and OS groups. The intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower (104 vs. 584 mL,
p
= 0.002) and the postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter (9.1 vs. 21.6 days,
p
= 0.002) for LS patients than for those in the OS group. In the LS group, one patient developed postoperative pneumonia, but all patients survived without recurrence after a mean follow-up of 37 months.
Conclusion
Our strategy for suspected T2 gallbladder GBC is safe and useful, avoids unnecessary procedures, and is associated with similar oncologic outcomes as the open method.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - standards</subject><subject>Dissection</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gallbladder</subject><subject>Gallbladder Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Gallbladder Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFLxDAQhYMo7rr6A7xIwYuXaiZJ0_Yo4qqw6GU9hzSdLl3apiat0H9vll1FBE8zMN-8efMIuQR6C5Smd55SIUVMIYkFgIynIzIHwVnMGGTHZE5zTmOW5mJGzrzf0oDnkJySGUtSQSXP5mT5aj-xifzg9ICbKaqsixrda2e9sX1tosGhHlrshshWUb9m0UY3TdHoskQXGe1M3dlWn5OTSjceLw51Qd6Xj-uH53j19vTycL-KjRBsiHOBBVAjcy55aoCVGSIkGTAsMQ1NJcsiTSqZlTTjOgHQrMoKDA-WCU0N4wtys9ftnf0Y0Q-qrb3BptEd2tErSHnCuaQSAnr9B93a0XXB3Y7imWAgd4Kwp0z42DusVO_qVrtJAVW7kNU-ZBU8qF3Iago7VwflsWix_Nn4TjUAbA_4MOo26H6d_lf1C5G6hk0</recordid><startdate>20151201</startdate><enddate>20151201</enddate><creator>Itano, Osamu</creator><creator>Oshima, Go</creator><creator>Minagawa, Takuya</creator><creator>Shinoda, Masahiro</creator><creator>Kitago, Minoru</creator><creator>Abe, Yuta</creator><creator>Hibi, Taizo</creator><creator>Yagi, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Ikoma, Naruhiko</creator><creator>Aiko, Satoshi</creator><creator>Kawaida, Miho</creator><creator>Masugi, Yohei</creator><creator>Kameyama, Kaori</creator><creator>Sakamoto, Michiie</creator><creator>Kitagawa, Yuko</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151201</creationdate><title>Novel strategy for laparoscopic treatment of pT2 gallbladder carcinoma</title><author>Itano, Osamu ; Oshima, Go ; Minagawa, Takuya ; Shinoda, Masahiro ; Kitago, Minoru ; Abe, Yuta ; Hibi, Taizo ; Yagi, Hiroshi ; Ikoma, Naruhiko ; Aiko, Satoshi ; Kawaida, Miho ; Masugi, Yohei ; Kameyama, Kaori ; Sakamoto, Michiie ; Kitagawa, Yuko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-94eb10c693637c12d8ee15812ede7158f6db75f68d083a511a2f8be015d507c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - standards</topic><topic>Dissection</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gallbladder</topic><topic>Gallbladder Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Gallbladder Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Itano, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oshima, Go</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minagawa, Takuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shinoda, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitago, Minoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abe, Yuta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hibi, Taizo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yagi, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikoma, Naruhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aiko, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawaida, Miho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masugi, Yohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kameyama, Kaori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, Michiie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitagawa, Yuko</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Itano, Osamu</au><au>Oshima, Go</au><au>Minagawa, Takuya</au><au>Shinoda, Masahiro</au><au>Kitago, Minoru</au><au>Abe, Yuta</au><au>Hibi, Taizo</au><au>Yagi, Hiroshi</au><au>Ikoma, Naruhiko</au><au>Aiko, Satoshi</au><au>Kawaida, Miho</au><au>Masugi, Yohei</au><au>Kameyama, Kaori</au><au>Sakamoto, Michiie</au><au>Kitagawa, Yuko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Novel strategy for laparoscopic treatment of pT2 gallbladder carcinoma</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><stitle>Surg Endosc</stitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2015-12-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3600</spage><epage>3607</epage><pages>3600-3607</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><abstract>Background
This study evaluated our new strategy for treating suspected T2 gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) using a laparoscopic approach.
Methods
We examined 19 patients with suspected T2 GBC who were treated laparoscopically (LS group) between December 2007 and December 2013; these patients were compared with 14 patients who underwent open surgery (OS group). Laparoscopic staging was initially performed to exclude factors making the patients ineligible for curative resection. Intraoperative pathological examination of the surgical margin of the cystic duct was performed prior to laparoscopic gallbladder bed resection, and pathological examination was again performed to confirm the presence of carcinoma and the depth of tumor invasion. Surgery was completed when the pathological findings indicated that the patient was cancer free. Lymph node dissection was performed according to the depth of tumor invasion.
Results
None of the patients required conversion to laparotomy. For three patients with benign lesions, only gallbladder bed resection was required. Additional regional lymph node dissection was performed in 16 patients in the LS group. The mean operative time (309 vs. 324 min,
p
= 0.755) and mean number of dissected lymph nodes (12.6 vs. 10.2,
p
= 0.361) were not significantly different between the LS and OS groups. The intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower (104 vs. 584 mL,
p
= 0.002) and the postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter (9.1 vs. 21.6 days,
p
= 0.002) for LS patients than for those in the OS group. In the LS group, one patient developed postoperative pneumonia, but all patients survived without recurrence after a mean follow-up of 37 months.
Conclusion
Our strategy for suspected T2 gallbladder GBC is safe and useful, avoids unnecessary procedures, and is associated with similar oncologic outcomes as the open method.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>25740638</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-015-4116-y</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0930-2794 |
ispartof | Surgical endoscopy, 2015-12, Vol.29 (12), p.3600-3607 |
issn | 0930-2794 1432-2218 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1735336061 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Abdominal Surgery Accuracy Aged Cancer Cholecystectomy Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - methods Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic - standards Dissection Female Gallbladder Gallbladder Neoplasms - diagnosis Gallbladder Neoplasms - surgery Gastroenterology Gynecology Hepatology Hospitals Humans Laparoscopy Lymphatic system Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Neoplasm Staging Operative Time Pathology Patients Practice Guidelines as Topic Proctology Retrospective Studies Surgery |
title | Novel strategy for laparoscopic treatment of pT2 gallbladder carcinoma |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T18%3A28%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Novel%20strategy%20for%20laparoscopic%20treatment%20of%20pT2%20gallbladder%20carcinoma&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=Itano,%20Osamu&rft.date=2015-12-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3600&rft.epage=3607&rft.pages=3600-3607&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-015-4116-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3868984161%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1733842162&rft_id=info:pmid/25740638&rfr_iscdi=true |