Docking small peptides remains a great challenge: an assessment using AutoDock Vina
There is a growing interest in the mechanisms and the prediction of how flexible peptides bind proteins, often in a highly selective and conserved manner. While both existing small-molecule docking methods and custom protocols can be used, even short peptides make difficult targets owing to their hi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Briefings in bioinformatics 2015-11, Vol.16 (6), p.1045-1056 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1056 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1045 |
container_title | Briefings in bioinformatics |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Rentzsch, Robert Renard, Bernhard Y |
description | There is a growing interest in the mechanisms and the prediction of how flexible peptides bind proteins, often in a highly selective and conserved manner. While both existing small-molecule docking methods and custom protocols can be used, even short peptides make difficult targets owing to their high torsional flexibility. Any benchmarking should therefore start with those. We compiled a meta-data set of 47 complexes with peptides up to five residues, based on 11 related studies from the past decade. Although their highly varying strategies and constraints preclude direct, quantitative comparisons, we still provide a comprehensive overview of the reported results, using a simple yet stringent measure: the quality of the top-scoring peptide pose. Using the entire data set, this is augmented by our own benchmark of AutoDock Vina, a freely available, fast and widely used docking tool. It particularly addresses non-expert users and was therefore implemented in a highly integrated manner. Guidelines addressing important issues such as the amount of sampling required for result reproducibility are so far lacking. Using peptide docking as an example, this is the first study to address these issues in detail. Finally, to encourage further, standardized benchmarking efforts, the compiled data set is made available in an accessible, transparent and extendable manner. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/bib/bbv008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1735332047</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3911499031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-495520667cd08857634017b54d8017d266949fc58b765102739670f35e95196c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0MtKxDAUBuAgijOObnwACbgRoU7S3Bp3w3iFARdetiVN07Fjb-a0gm9vyowuXJ3A-fJz-BE6peSKEs3mWZnNs-yLkGQPTSlXKuJE8P3xLVUkuGQTdASwISQmKqGHaBILHTTXU_R809qPslljqE1V4c51fZk7wN7VpmwAG7z2zvTYvoe1a9buGpsGGwAHULumxwOMvxdD345J-K1szDE6KEwF7mQ3Z-j17vZl-RCtnu4fl4tVZJmgfcS1EDGRUtmcJIlQknFCVSZ4noSZx1JqrgsrkkxJQUmsmJaKFEw4LaiWls3QxTa38-3n4KBP6xKsqyrTuHaAlComGIsJV4Ge_6ObdvBNuC4oweKAqAzqcqusbwG8K9LOl7Xx3ykl6Vh1GqpOt1UHfLaLHLLa5X_0t1v2A0Jmdxc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1753220416</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Docking small peptides remains a great challenge: an assessment using AutoDock Vina</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Oxford University Press (Open Access Collection)</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Rentzsch, Robert ; Renard, Bernhard Y</creator><creatorcontrib>Rentzsch, Robert ; Renard, Bernhard Y</creatorcontrib><description>There is a growing interest in the mechanisms and the prediction of how flexible peptides bind proteins, often in a highly selective and conserved manner. While both existing small-molecule docking methods and custom protocols can be used, even short peptides make difficult targets owing to their high torsional flexibility. Any benchmarking should therefore start with those. We compiled a meta-data set of 47 complexes with peptides up to five residues, based on 11 related studies from the past decade. Although their highly varying strategies and constraints preclude direct, quantitative comparisons, we still provide a comprehensive overview of the reported results, using a simple yet stringent measure: the quality of the top-scoring peptide pose. Using the entire data set, this is augmented by our own benchmark of AutoDock Vina, a freely available, fast and widely used docking tool. It particularly addresses non-expert users and was therefore implemented in a highly integrated manner. Guidelines addressing important issues such as the amount of sampling required for result reproducibility are so far lacking. Using peptide docking as an example, this is the first study to address these issues in detail. Finally, to encourage further, standardized benchmarking efforts, the compiled data set is made available in an accessible, transparent and extendable manner.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1467-5463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-4054</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbv008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25900849</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</publisher><subject>Bioinformatics ; Molecular Docking Simulation ; Molecules ; Peptides ; Peptides - chemistry ; Proteins ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>Briefings in bioinformatics, 2015-11, Vol.16 (6), p.1045-1056</ispartof><rights>The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Nov 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-495520667cd08857634017b54d8017d266949fc58b765102739670f35e95196c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-495520667cd08857634017b54d8017d266949fc58b765102739670f35e95196c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25900849$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rentzsch, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renard, Bernhard Y</creatorcontrib><title>Docking small peptides remains a great challenge: an assessment using AutoDock Vina</title><title>Briefings in bioinformatics</title><addtitle>Brief Bioinform</addtitle><description>There is a growing interest in the mechanisms and the prediction of how flexible peptides bind proteins, often in a highly selective and conserved manner. While both existing small-molecule docking methods and custom protocols can be used, even short peptides make difficult targets owing to their high torsional flexibility. Any benchmarking should therefore start with those. We compiled a meta-data set of 47 complexes with peptides up to five residues, based on 11 related studies from the past decade. Although their highly varying strategies and constraints preclude direct, quantitative comparisons, we still provide a comprehensive overview of the reported results, using a simple yet stringent measure: the quality of the top-scoring peptide pose. Using the entire data set, this is augmented by our own benchmark of AutoDock Vina, a freely available, fast and widely used docking tool. It particularly addresses non-expert users and was therefore implemented in a highly integrated manner. Guidelines addressing important issues such as the amount of sampling required for result reproducibility are so far lacking. Using peptide docking as an example, this is the first study to address these issues in detail. Finally, to encourage further, standardized benchmarking efforts, the compiled data set is made available in an accessible, transparent and extendable manner.</description><subject>Bioinformatics</subject><subject>Molecular Docking Simulation</subject><subject>Molecules</subject><subject>Peptides</subject><subject>Peptides - chemistry</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>1467-5463</issn><issn>1477-4054</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0MtKxDAUBuAgijOObnwACbgRoU7S3Bp3w3iFARdetiVN07Fjb-a0gm9vyowuXJ3A-fJz-BE6peSKEs3mWZnNs-yLkGQPTSlXKuJE8P3xLVUkuGQTdASwISQmKqGHaBILHTTXU_R809qPslljqE1V4c51fZk7wN7VpmwAG7z2zvTYvoe1a9buGpsGGwAHULumxwOMvxdD345J-K1szDE6KEwF7mQ3Z-j17vZl-RCtnu4fl4tVZJmgfcS1EDGRUtmcJIlQknFCVSZ4noSZx1JqrgsrkkxJQUmsmJaKFEw4LaiWls3QxTa38-3n4KBP6xKsqyrTuHaAlComGIsJV4Ge_6ObdvBNuC4oweKAqAzqcqusbwG8K9LOl7Xx3ykl6Vh1GqpOt1UHfLaLHLLa5X_0t1v2A0Jmdxc</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Rentzsch, Robert</creator><creator>Renard, Bernhard Y</creator><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Docking small peptides remains a great challenge: an assessment using AutoDock Vina</title><author>Rentzsch, Robert ; Renard, Bernhard Y</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-495520667cd08857634017b54d8017d266949fc58b765102739670f35e95196c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Bioinformatics</topic><topic>Molecular Docking Simulation</topic><topic>Molecules</topic><topic>Peptides</topic><topic>Peptides - chemistry</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rentzsch, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renard, Bernhard Y</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Briefings in bioinformatics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rentzsch, Robert</au><au>Renard, Bernhard Y</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Docking small peptides remains a great challenge: an assessment using AutoDock Vina</atitle><jtitle>Briefings in bioinformatics</jtitle><addtitle>Brief Bioinform</addtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1045</spage><epage>1056</epage><pages>1045-1056</pages><issn>1467-5463</issn><eissn>1477-4054</eissn><abstract>There is a growing interest in the mechanisms and the prediction of how flexible peptides bind proteins, often in a highly selective and conserved manner. While both existing small-molecule docking methods and custom protocols can be used, even short peptides make difficult targets owing to their high torsional flexibility. Any benchmarking should therefore start with those. We compiled a meta-data set of 47 complexes with peptides up to five residues, based on 11 related studies from the past decade. Although their highly varying strategies and constraints preclude direct, quantitative comparisons, we still provide a comprehensive overview of the reported results, using a simple yet stringent measure: the quality of the top-scoring peptide pose. Using the entire data set, this is augmented by our own benchmark of AutoDock Vina, a freely available, fast and widely used docking tool. It particularly addresses non-expert users and was therefore implemented in a highly integrated manner. Guidelines addressing important issues such as the amount of sampling required for result reproducibility are so far lacking. Using peptide docking as an example, this is the first study to address these issues in detail. Finally, to encourage further, standardized benchmarking efforts, the compiled data set is made available in an accessible, transparent and extendable manner.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</pub><pmid>25900849</pmid><doi>10.1093/bib/bbv008</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1467-5463 |
ispartof | Briefings in bioinformatics, 2015-11, Vol.16 (6), p.1045-1056 |
issn | 1467-5463 1477-4054 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1735332047 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Oxford University Press (Open Access Collection); EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Bioinformatics Molecular Docking Simulation Molecules Peptides Peptides - chemistry Proteins Reproducibility of Results |
title | Docking small peptides remains a great challenge: an assessment using AutoDock Vina |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T22%3A24%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Docking%20small%20peptides%20remains%20a%20great%20challenge:%20an%20assessment%20using%20AutoDock%20Vina&rft.jtitle=Briefings%20in%20bioinformatics&rft.au=Rentzsch,%20Robert&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1045&rft.epage=1056&rft.pages=1045-1056&rft.issn=1467-5463&rft.eissn=1477-4054&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/bib/bbv008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3911499031%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1753220416&rft_id=info:pmid/25900849&rfr_iscdi=true |