Secondary Enucleations for Uveal Melanoma: A 7-Year Retrospective Analysis
Purpose To describe the indications for secondary enucleations in uveal melanoma and analyze associations and outcomes. Design Retrospective interventional case series. Methods Data of patients who underwent secondary enucleation for uveal melanoma in the London Ocular Oncology Service, between 2008...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of ophthalmology 2015-12, Vol.160 (6), p.1104-1110.e1 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose To describe the indications for secondary enucleations in uveal melanoma and analyze associations and outcomes. Design Retrospective interventional case series. Methods Data of patients who underwent secondary enucleation for uveal melanoma in the London Ocular Oncology Service, between 2008 and 2014, were retrieved from medical records analyzed. Cox regression model was performed to analyze associations with secondary enucleation and metastases and Kaplan-Meier estimates to assess the probability of metastatic spread and death. Results During the study period 515 enucleations were performed for uveal melanoma, 99 (19%) of which were secondary enucleations. Tumors were located at the ciliary body in 21 eyes (21%), juxtapapillary in 31 (31%), and choroid elsewhere in 47 (48%). Primary treatment included Ru106 plaque radiotherapy, proton beam radiotherapy, and transpupillary thermotherapy in 85, 11, and 3 eyes, respectively. Indications for secondary enucleation were tumor recurrence in 60 (61%), neovascular glaucoma in 21 (21%), and tumor nonresponse in 18 eyes (18%). Twenty patients (20%) were diagnosed with metastasis and 12 out of 20 died of metastatic spread. On multivariate analysis, juxtapapillary tumor location was found to associate with tumor nonresponse ( P = .004) and nonresponding patients with metastatic spread ( P = .04). Conclusions Indications for secondary enucleations for uveal melanoma were tumor recurrence, neovascular glaucoma, and tumor nonresponse. This review identified a possible high-risk group (nonresponse), which proved radioresistant to treatment. These tumors were more frequently found in the juxtapapillary location and were associated with metastatic spread. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9394 1879-1891 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.08.034 |