Variation in Cardiac Screening and Management of Carcinoid Heart Disease in the UK and Republic of Ireland

Abstract Aims Screening for carcinoid heart disease is an important, yet frequently neglected aspect of the management of patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). Screening is advocated in international guidelines, although recommendations on the modality and frequency are poorly defined. We map...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)) 2015-12, Vol.27 (12), p.741-746
Hauptverfasser: Dobson, R, Valle, J.W, Burgess, M.I, Poston, G.J, Cuthbertson, D.J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 746
container_issue 12
container_start_page 741
container_title Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))
container_volume 27
creator Dobson, R
Valle, J.W
Burgess, M.I
Poston, G.J
Cuthbertson, D.J
description Abstract Aims Screening for carcinoid heart disease is an important, yet frequently neglected aspect of the management of patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). Screening is advocated in international guidelines, although recommendations on the modality and frequency are poorly defined. We mapped current practice for the screening and management of carcinoid heart disease in specialist NET centres throughout the UK and Republic of Ireland. Materials and methods Thirty-five NET centres were invited to complete an online questionnaire outlining the size of NET service, patient selection criteria for carcinoid heart disease screening and the modality and frequency of screening. Results Twenty-eight centres responded (80%), representing over 5500 patients. Eleven per cent of centres screen all patients with any NET, 14% screen only patients with midgut NETs, 32% screen all patients with liver metastases and/or carcinoid syndrome and 43% screen all patients with evidence of syndrome or raised urinary/serum/plasma 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5HIAA). The mode of screening included clinical examination, echocardiography and biomarker measurement: 89% of centres carry out echocardiography, ranging from at initial presentation only (24%), periodically without clearly defined intervals (28%), annually (36%) or less than annually (12%); three centres use a scoring system to report their echocardiograms. Fifty per cent of centres utilise biomarkers for screening (chromogranins, plasma/urinary 5HIAA or most commonly N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide) at varying time intervals. Conclusion There is considerable heterogeneity across the UK and Ireland in multiple aspects of screening and management of carcinoid heart disease.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.clon.2015.06.016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1734281417</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0936655515002502</els_id><sourcerecordid>1734281417</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-d327e52f863bdd139206f1cbd245e7ab268f835a3bfc6b7e8c14174754d062ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAYhC0EotvCH-CAfOSS4I_Y8UoICS2UVhQhUcrVcuw3xSFrL3aC1H-PzRYOHDhZGs0zej2D0DNKWkqofDm1do6hZYSKlsi2SA_QhnacN2yr6EO0IVsuGymEOEGnOU-EEKbU9jE6YZL2hDK-QdNXk7xZfAzYB7wzyXlj8bVNAMGHW2yCwx9NMLewh7DgOFaP9SF6hy_ApAW_9RlMhoov3wDffPjNfIbDOszeVuIywVy0J-jRaOYMT-_fM3Rz_u7L7qK5-vT-cvfmqrGdokvjOOtBsFFJPjhH-ZYROVI7ONYJ6M3ApBoVF4YPo5VDD8rSjvZdLzpHJAPgZ-jFMfeQ4o8V8qL3PluYyw0Q16xpzzumKlSs7Gi1KeacYNSH5Pcm3WlKdO1YT7p2rGvHmkhdpAI9v89fhz24v8ifUovh1dEA5Zc_PSSdrYdgwfkEdtEu-v_nv_4Ht7MP3pr5O9xBnuKaQulPU52ZJvq6rlxHpqLsKwjjvwD7oKE5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1734281417</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variation in Cardiac Screening and Management of Carcinoid Heart Disease in the UK and Republic of Ireland</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Dobson, R ; Valle, J.W ; Burgess, M.I ; Poston, G.J ; Cuthbertson, D.J</creator><creatorcontrib>Dobson, R ; Valle, J.W ; Burgess, M.I ; Poston, G.J ; Cuthbertson, D.J</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Aims Screening for carcinoid heart disease is an important, yet frequently neglected aspect of the management of patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). Screening is advocated in international guidelines, although recommendations on the modality and frequency are poorly defined. We mapped current practice for the screening and management of carcinoid heart disease in specialist NET centres throughout the UK and Republic of Ireland. Materials and methods Thirty-five NET centres were invited to complete an online questionnaire outlining the size of NET service, patient selection criteria for carcinoid heart disease screening and the modality and frequency of screening. Results Twenty-eight centres responded (80%), representing over 5500 patients. Eleven per cent of centres screen all patients with any NET, 14% screen only patients with midgut NETs, 32% screen all patients with liver metastases and/or carcinoid syndrome and 43% screen all patients with evidence of syndrome or raised urinary/serum/plasma 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5HIAA). The mode of screening included clinical examination, echocardiography and biomarker measurement: 89% of centres carry out echocardiography, ranging from at initial presentation only (24%), periodically without clearly defined intervals (28%), annually (36%) or less than annually (12%); three centres use a scoring system to report their echocardiograms. Fifty per cent of centres utilise biomarkers for screening (chromogranins, plasma/urinary 5HIAA or most commonly N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide) at varying time intervals. Conclusion There is considerable heterogeneity across the UK and Ireland in multiple aspects of screening and management of carcinoid heart disease.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0936-6555</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-2981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2015.06.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26170123</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biomarkers - analysis ; Carcinoid heart disease ; Carcinoid Heart Disease - diagnosis ; Carcinoid Heart Disease - etiology ; Carcinoid Heart Disease - therapy ; Disease Management ; Echocardiography - methods ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Ireland ; Liver Neoplasms - complications ; Liver Neoplasms - secondary ; Liver Neoplasms - therapy ; management ; Mass Screening - methods ; Mass Screening - trends ; neuroendocrine ; Neuroendocrine Tumors - complications ; Neuroendocrine Tumors - pathology ; Neuroendocrine Tumors - therapy ; Population Surveillance ; Radiology ; screening ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)), 2015-12, Vol.27 (12), p.741-746</ispartof><rights>The Royal College of Radiologists</rights><rights>2015 The Royal College of Radiologists</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-d327e52f863bdd139206f1cbd245e7ab268f835a3bfc6b7e8c14174754d062ee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-d327e52f863bdd139206f1cbd245e7ab268f835a3bfc6b7e8c14174754d062ee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0936655515002502$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26170123$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dobson, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valle, J.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgess, M.I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poston, G.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuthbertson, D.J</creatorcontrib><title>Variation in Cardiac Screening and Management of Carcinoid Heart Disease in the UK and Republic of Ireland</title><title>Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))</title><addtitle>Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)</addtitle><description>Abstract Aims Screening for carcinoid heart disease is an important, yet frequently neglected aspect of the management of patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). Screening is advocated in international guidelines, although recommendations on the modality and frequency are poorly defined. We mapped current practice for the screening and management of carcinoid heart disease in specialist NET centres throughout the UK and Republic of Ireland. Materials and methods Thirty-five NET centres were invited to complete an online questionnaire outlining the size of NET service, patient selection criteria for carcinoid heart disease screening and the modality and frequency of screening. Results Twenty-eight centres responded (80%), representing over 5500 patients. Eleven per cent of centres screen all patients with any NET, 14% screen only patients with midgut NETs, 32% screen all patients with liver metastases and/or carcinoid syndrome and 43% screen all patients with evidence of syndrome or raised urinary/serum/plasma 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5HIAA). The mode of screening included clinical examination, echocardiography and biomarker measurement: 89% of centres carry out echocardiography, ranging from at initial presentation only (24%), periodically without clearly defined intervals (28%), annually (36%) or less than annually (12%); three centres use a scoring system to report their echocardiograms. Fifty per cent of centres utilise biomarkers for screening (chromogranins, plasma/urinary 5HIAA or most commonly N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide) at varying time intervals. Conclusion There is considerable heterogeneity across the UK and Ireland in multiple aspects of screening and management of carcinoid heart disease.</description><subject>Biomarkers - analysis</subject><subject>Carcinoid heart disease</subject><subject>Carcinoid Heart Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Carcinoid Heart Disease - etiology</subject><subject>Carcinoid Heart Disease - therapy</subject><subject>Disease Management</subject><subject>Echocardiography - methods</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ireland</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - complications</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>management</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Mass Screening - trends</subject><subject>neuroendocrine</subject><subject>Neuroendocrine Tumors - complications</subject><subject>Neuroendocrine Tumors - pathology</subject><subject>Neuroendocrine Tumors - therapy</subject><subject>Population Surveillance</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>screening</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0936-6555</issn><issn>1433-2981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAYhC0EotvCH-CAfOSS4I_Y8UoICS2UVhQhUcrVcuw3xSFrL3aC1H-PzRYOHDhZGs0zej2D0DNKWkqofDm1do6hZYSKlsi2SA_QhnacN2yr6EO0IVsuGymEOEGnOU-EEKbU9jE6YZL2hDK-QdNXk7xZfAzYB7wzyXlj8bVNAMGHW2yCwx9NMLewh7DgOFaP9SF6hy_ApAW_9RlMhoov3wDffPjNfIbDOszeVuIywVy0J-jRaOYMT-_fM3Rz_u7L7qK5-vT-cvfmqrGdokvjOOtBsFFJPjhH-ZYROVI7ONYJ6M3ApBoVF4YPo5VDD8rSjvZdLzpHJAPgZ-jFMfeQ4o8V8qL3PluYyw0Q16xpzzumKlSs7Gi1KeacYNSH5Pcm3WlKdO1YT7p2rGvHmkhdpAI9v89fhz24v8ifUovh1dEA5Zc_PSSdrYdgwfkEdtEu-v_nv_4Ht7MP3pr5O9xBnuKaQulPU52ZJvq6rlxHpqLsKwjjvwD7oKE5</recordid><startdate>20151201</startdate><enddate>20151201</enddate><creator>Dobson, R</creator><creator>Valle, J.W</creator><creator>Burgess, M.I</creator><creator>Poston, G.J</creator><creator>Cuthbertson, D.J</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151201</creationdate><title>Variation in Cardiac Screening and Management of Carcinoid Heart Disease in the UK and Republic of Ireland</title><author>Dobson, R ; Valle, J.W ; Burgess, M.I ; Poston, G.J ; Cuthbertson, D.J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-d327e52f863bdd139206f1cbd245e7ab268f835a3bfc6b7e8c14174754d062ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Biomarkers - analysis</topic><topic>Carcinoid heart disease</topic><topic>Carcinoid Heart Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Carcinoid Heart Disease - etiology</topic><topic>Carcinoid Heart Disease - therapy</topic><topic>Disease Management</topic><topic>Echocardiography - methods</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ireland</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - complications</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>management</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Mass Screening - trends</topic><topic>neuroendocrine</topic><topic>Neuroendocrine Tumors - complications</topic><topic>Neuroendocrine Tumors - pathology</topic><topic>Neuroendocrine Tumors - therapy</topic><topic>Population Surveillance</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>screening</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dobson, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valle, J.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgess, M.I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poston, G.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuthbertson, D.J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dobson, R</au><au>Valle, J.W</au><au>Burgess, M.I</au><au>Poston, G.J</au><au>Cuthbertson, D.J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variation in Cardiac Screening and Management of Carcinoid Heart Disease in the UK and Republic of Ireland</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)</addtitle><date>2015-12-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>741</spage><epage>746</epage><pages>741-746</pages><issn>0936-6555</issn><eissn>1433-2981</eissn><abstract>Abstract Aims Screening for carcinoid heart disease is an important, yet frequently neglected aspect of the management of patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). Screening is advocated in international guidelines, although recommendations on the modality and frequency are poorly defined. We mapped current practice for the screening and management of carcinoid heart disease in specialist NET centres throughout the UK and Republic of Ireland. Materials and methods Thirty-five NET centres were invited to complete an online questionnaire outlining the size of NET service, patient selection criteria for carcinoid heart disease screening and the modality and frequency of screening. Results Twenty-eight centres responded (80%), representing over 5500 patients. Eleven per cent of centres screen all patients with any NET, 14% screen only patients with midgut NETs, 32% screen all patients with liver metastases and/or carcinoid syndrome and 43% screen all patients with evidence of syndrome or raised urinary/serum/plasma 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5HIAA). The mode of screening included clinical examination, echocardiography and biomarker measurement: 89% of centres carry out echocardiography, ranging from at initial presentation only (24%), periodically without clearly defined intervals (28%), annually (36%) or less than annually (12%); three centres use a scoring system to report their echocardiograms. Fifty per cent of centres utilise biomarkers for screening (chromogranins, plasma/urinary 5HIAA or most commonly N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide) at varying time intervals. Conclusion There is considerable heterogeneity across the UK and Ireland in multiple aspects of screening and management of carcinoid heart disease.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26170123</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clon.2015.06.016</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0936-6555
ispartof Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)), 2015-12, Vol.27 (12), p.741-746
issn 0936-6555
1433-2981
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1734281417
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Biomarkers - analysis
Carcinoid heart disease
Carcinoid Heart Disease - diagnosis
Carcinoid Heart Disease - etiology
Carcinoid Heart Disease - therapy
Disease Management
Echocardiography - methods
Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
Humans
Ireland
Liver Neoplasms - complications
Liver Neoplasms - secondary
Liver Neoplasms - therapy
management
Mass Screening - methods
Mass Screening - trends
neuroendocrine
Neuroendocrine Tumors - complications
Neuroendocrine Tumors - pathology
Neuroendocrine Tumors - therapy
Population Surveillance
Radiology
screening
United Kingdom
title Variation in Cardiac Screening and Management of Carcinoid Heart Disease in the UK and Republic of Ireland
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T02%3A14%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variation%20in%20Cardiac%20Screening%20and%20Management%20of%20Carcinoid%20Heart%20Disease%20in%20the%20UK%20and%20Republic%20of%20Ireland&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oncology%20(Royal%20College%20of%20Radiologists%20(Great%20Britain))&rft.au=Dobson,%20R&rft.date=2015-12-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=741&rft.epage=746&rft.pages=741-746&rft.issn=0936-6555&rft.eissn=1433-2981&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clon.2015.06.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1734281417%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1734281417&rft_id=info:pmid/26170123&rft_els_id=S0936655515002502&rfr_iscdi=true