Evaluation of the quality of CT images acquired with the single energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) algorithm in patients with hip and dental prostheses and aneurysm embolization coils
Purpose We compared the quality of the images acquired with single energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) on CT scans of three different human body areas. Materials and methods Our institutional review board approved the study protocol. CT studies of 58 patients (hip prosthesis, n = 20; iliac arte...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Japanese journal of radiology 2015-11, Vol.33 (11), p.710-716 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 716 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 710 |
container_title | Japanese journal of radiology |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Sonoda, Akinaga Nitta, Norihisa Ushio, Noritoshi Nagatani, Yukihiro Okumura, Noriaki Otani, Hideji Murata, Kiyoshi |
description | Purpose
We compared the quality of the images acquired with single energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) on CT scans of three different human body areas.
Materials and methods
Our institutional review board approved the study protocol. CT studies of 58 patients (hip prosthesis,
n
= 20; iliac artery aneurysm embolization,
n
= 20; dental prosthesis,
n
= 18) were retrospectively reconstructed using interactive reconstruction (IR) and IR plus SEMAR. Two radiologists independently evaluated the images for the reduction of metal artifacts at three sites, i.e., 0–1, 1–5, and 5–10 cm from their edges, and recorded their findings on a 100-mm-long line that corresponded to the Likert scale and ranged from 0 (invisible) to 100 mm (clearly visible). The standard deviation in Hounsfield units was used as the noise assessment tool. Statistical analysis was performed with the
t
test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Results
The image quality of scans of hip prostheses and metal embolization coils was significantly improved when SEMAR was used (
p
|
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11604-015-0478-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1734279935</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1734279935</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-1273825e69f1d1db438d7ad9f8663ad7a893eae80172f0e7fa7e66a1cd7ae3b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxiMEoqXwAFyQJS7lkOJ_sZNjtdoWpFZIUCRuljeZZF05ya7tgLbP1odj0pQKIXHyeOY334z9ZdlbRs8YpfpjZExRmVNW5FTqMufPsmNWKp0zWv54_hRrdpS9ivGWUiWFlC-zI64kFYoVx9n9-qf1k01uHMjYkrQFsp-sd-kwX1c3xPW2g0hsvZ9cgIb8cmn7gEU3dB4IDBC6A-khWU9sSK61dSJITvWD6Om39fX51w_E-m4M2NsTN5AdDoQhxUVt63bEDg1pMIUiuzBGHBDnqZi1A0zhEHsC_Wb07m7ZtR6dj6-zF631Ed48nifZ94v1zepTfvXl8vPq_CqvpVIpZ1yLkhegqpY1rNlIUTbaNlVbKiUshmUlwEJJmeYtBd1aDUpZVmMJxEaJk-x00cXV9hPEZHoXa_AedxunaJgWkuuqEgWi7_9Bb8cpDLjdTAlZUF5IpNhC1fjWGKA1u4AfHQ6GUTNbaxZrDVprZmsNx553j8rTpofmqeOPlwjwBYhYGjoIf43-r-pveAayGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1733450254</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the quality of CT images acquired with the single energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) algorithm in patients with hip and dental prostheses and aneurysm embolization coils</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Sonoda, Akinaga ; Nitta, Norihisa ; Ushio, Noritoshi ; Nagatani, Yukihiro ; Okumura, Noriaki ; Otani, Hideji ; Murata, Kiyoshi</creator><creatorcontrib>Sonoda, Akinaga ; Nitta, Norihisa ; Ushio, Noritoshi ; Nagatani, Yukihiro ; Okumura, Noriaki ; Otani, Hideji ; Murata, Kiyoshi</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
We compared the quality of the images acquired with single energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) on CT scans of three different human body areas.
Materials and methods
Our institutional review board approved the study protocol. CT studies of 58 patients (hip prosthesis,
n
= 20; iliac artery aneurysm embolization,
n
= 20; dental prosthesis,
n
= 18) were retrospectively reconstructed using interactive reconstruction (IR) and IR plus SEMAR. Two radiologists independently evaluated the images for the reduction of metal artifacts at three sites, i.e., 0–1, 1–5, and 5–10 cm from their edges, and recorded their findings on a 100-mm-long line that corresponded to the Likert scale and ranged from 0 (invisible) to 100 mm (clearly visible). The standard deviation in Hounsfield units was used as the noise assessment tool. Statistical analysis was performed with the
t
test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Results
The image quality of scans of hip prostheses and metal embolization coils was significantly improved when SEMAR was used (
p
< 0.05). On scans of dental prostheses, SEMAR did not contribute significantly, especially in the area 1 cm from the edge of the implant.
Conclusion
Visual subjective evaluation showed that SEMAR improved the image quality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1867-1071</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1867-108X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11604-015-0478-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26403615</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Tokyo: Springer Japan</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Aneurysm - therapy ; Dental Prosthesis ; Embolization, Therapeutic - instrumentation ; Hip Prosthesis ; Humans ; Imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Metals ; Nuclear Medicine ; Prostheses and Implants ; Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods ; Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Radiology ; Radiotherapy ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Technical Note ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>Japanese journal of radiology, 2015-11, Vol.33 (11), p.710-716</ispartof><rights>Japan Radiological Society 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-1273825e69f1d1db438d7ad9f8663ad7a893eae80172f0e7fa7e66a1cd7ae3b63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-1273825e69f1d1db438d7ad9f8663ad7a893eae80172f0e7fa7e66a1cd7ae3b63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11604-015-0478-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11604-015-0478-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26403615$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sonoda, Akinaga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nitta, Norihisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ushio, Noritoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagatani, Yukihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okumura, Noriaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otani, Hideji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murata, Kiyoshi</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the quality of CT images acquired with the single energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) algorithm in patients with hip and dental prostheses and aneurysm embolization coils</title><title>Japanese journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Jpn J Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Jpn J Radiol</addtitle><description>Purpose
We compared the quality of the images acquired with single energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) on CT scans of three different human body areas.
Materials and methods
Our institutional review board approved the study protocol. CT studies of 58 patients (hip prosthesis,
n
= 20; iliac artery aneurysm embolization,
n
= 20; dental prosthesis,
n
= 18) were retrospectively reconstructed using interactive reconstruction (IR) and IR plus SEMAR. Two radiologists independently evaluated the images for the reduction of metal artifacts at three sites, i.e., 0–1, 1–5, and 5–10 cm from their edges, and recorded their findings on a 100-mm-long line that corresponded to the Likert scale and ranged from 0 (invisible) to 100 mm (clearly visible). The standard deviation in Hounsfield units was used as the noise assessment tool. Statistical analysis was performed with the
t
test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Results
The image quality of scans of hip prostheses and metal embolization coils was significantly improved when SEMAR was used (
p
< 0.05). On scans of dental prostheses, SEMAR did not contribute significantly, especially in the area 1 cm from the edge of the implant.
Conclusion
Visual subjective evaluation showed that SEMAR improved the image quality.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Aneurysm - therapy</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis</subject><subject>Embolization, Therapeutic - instrumentation</subject><subject>Hip Prosthesis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Metals</subject><subject>Nuclear Medicine</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Technical Note</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>1867-1071</issn><issn>1867-108X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxiMEoqXwAFyQJS7lkOJ_sZNjtdoWpFZIUCRuljeZZF05ya7tgLbP1odj0pQKIXHyeOY334z9ZdlbRs8YpfpjZExRmVNW5FTqMufPsmNWKp0zWv54_hRrdpS9ivGWUiWFlC-zI64kFYoVx9n9-qf1k01uHMjYkrQFsp-sd-kwX1c3xPW2g0hsvZ9cgIb8cmn7gEU3dB4IDBC6A-khWU9sSK61dSJITvWD6Om39fX51w_E-m4M2NsTN5AdDoQhxUVt63bEDg1pMIUiuzBGHBDnqZi1A0zhEHsC_Wb07m7ZtR6dj6-zF631Ed48nifZ94v1zepTfvXl8vPq_CqvpVIpZ1yLkhegqpY1rNlIUTbaNlVbKiUshmUlwEJJmeYtBd1aDUpZVmMJxEaJk-x00cXV9hPEZHoXa_AedxunaJgWkuuqEgWi7_9Bb8cpDLjdTAlZUF5IpNhC1fjWGKA1u4AfHQ6GUTNbaxZrDVprZmsNx553j8rTpofmqeOPlwjwBYhYGjoIf43-r-pveAayGg</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Sonoda, Akinaga</creator><creator>Nitta, Norihisa</creator><creator>Ushio, Noritoshi</creator><creator>Nagatani, Yukihiro</creator><creator>Okumura, Noriaki</creator><creator>Otani, Hideji</creator><creator>Murata, Kiyoshi</creator><general>Springer Japan</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the quality of CT images acquired with the single energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) algorithm in patients with hip and dental prostheses and aneurysm embolization coils</title><author>Sonoda, Akinaga ; Nitta, Norihisa ; Ushio, Noritoshi ; Nagatani, Yukihiro ; Okumura, Noriaki ; Otani, Hideji ; Murata, Kiyoshi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-1273825e69f1d1db438d7ad9f8663ad7a893eae80172f0e7fa7e66a1cd7ae3b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Aneurysm - therapy</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis</topic><topic>Embolization, Therapeutic - instrumentation</topic><topic>Hip Prosthesis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Metals</topic><topic>Nuclear Medicine</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Technical Note</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sonoda, Akinaga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nitta, Norihisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ushio, Noritoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagatani, Yukihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okumura, Noriaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otani, Hideji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murata, Kiyoshi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Japanese journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sonoda, Akinaga</au><au>Nitta, Norihisa</au><au>Ushio, Noritoshi</au><au>Nagatani, Yukihiro</au><au>Okumura, Noriaki</au><au>Otani, Hideji</au><au>Murata, Kiyoshi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the quality of CT images acquired with the single energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) algorithm in patients with hip and dental prostheses and aneurysm embolization coils</atitle><jtitle>Japanese journal of radiology</jtitle><stitle>Jpn J Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Jpn J Radiol</addtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>710</spage><epage>716</epage><pages>710-716</pages><issn>1867-1071</issn><eissn>1867-108X</eissn><abstract>Purpose
We compared the quality of the images acquired with single energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) on CT scans of three different human body areas.
Materials and methods
Our institutional review board approved the study protocol. CT studies of 58 patients (hip prosthesis,
n
= 20; iliac artery aneurysm embolization,
n
= 20; dental prosthesis,
n
= 18) were retrospectively reconstructed using interactive reconstruction (IR) and IR plus SEMAR. Two radiologists independently evaluated the images for the reduction of metal artifacts at three sites, i.e., 0–1, 1–5, and 5–10 cm from their edges, and recorded their findings on a 100-mm-long line that corresponded to the Likert scale and ranged from 0 (invisible) to 100 mm (clearly visible). The standard deviation in Hounsfield units was used as the noise assessment tool. Statistical analysis was performed with the
t
test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Results
The image quality of scans of hip prostheses and metal embolization coils was significantly improved when SEMAR was used (
p
< 0.05). On scans of dental prostheses, SEMAR did not contribute significantly, especially in the area 1 cm from the edge of the implant.
Conclusion
Visual subjective evaluation showed that SEMAR improved the image quality.</abstract><cop>Tokyo</cop><pub>Springer Japan</pub><pmid>26403615</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11604-015-0478-2</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1867-1071 |
ispartof | Japanese journal of radiology, 2015-11, Vol.33 (11), p.710-716 |
issn | 1867-1071 1867-108X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1734279935 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Algorithms Aneurysm - therapy Dental Prosthesis Embolization, Therapeutic - instrumentation Hip Prosthesis Humans Imaging Medicine Medicine & Public Health Metals Nuclear Medicine Prostheses and Implants Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods Radiology Radiotherapy Reproducibility of Results Retrospective Studies Sensitivity and Specificity Technical Note Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods |
title | Evaluation of the quality of CT images acquired with the single energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) algorithm in patients with hip and dental prostheses and aneurysm embolization coils |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T00%3A02%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20quality%20of%20CT%20images%20acquired%20with%20the%20single%20energy%20metal%20artifact%20reduction%20(SEMAR)%20algorithm%20in%20patients%20with%20hip%20and%20dental%20prostheses%20and%20aneurysm%20embolization%20coils&rft.jtitle=Japanese%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Sonoda,%20Akinaga&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=710&rft.epage=716&rft.pages=710-716&rft.issn=1867-1071&rft.eissn=1867-108X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11604-015-0478-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1734279935%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1733450254&rft_id=info:pmid/26403615&rfr_iscdi=true |