Variations in level of oil, protein, and some antioxidants in chickpea and peanut seeds
Background Chickpea and peanut are two legume species not frequently used in human diets. Chickpea is rich in starch and proteins, while peanut is mainly a source of oils and proteins and they could be successfully used as protein sources in vegetarian diets. Seeds of 19 chickpea and 13 peanut landr...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Chemical and biological technologies in agriculture 2015-02, Vol.2 (1), p.1-6, Article 2 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 6 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | Chemical and biological technologies in agriculture |
| container_volume | 2 |
| creator | Dragičević, Vesna Kratovalieva, Suzana Dumanović, Zoran Dimov, Zoran Kravić, Natalija |
| description | Background
Chickpea and peanut are two legume species not frequently used in human diets. Chickpea is rich in starch and proteins, while peanut is mainly a source of oils and proteins and they could be successfully used as protein sources in vegetarian diets.
Seeds of 19 chickpea and 13 peanut landraces were colorimetrically analyzed in respect to antioxidant content (i.e., free soluble phenolics, total glutathione, and phytate). Oil and protein contents in grain were also determined.
Results
Free soluble phenolics content varied in range from 520 to1,050 mg kg
−1
in peanut and from 720 to 1,370 mg kg
−1
in chickpea. Total glutathione content ranged from 1,495 to 2,365 mmol kg
−1
in peanut and from 955 to 1,232 mmol kg
−1
in chickpea. Relatively low content of phytic phosphorus was found in grain of both species, ranging from 2.5 to 4.5 g kg
−1
in peanut and from 1.4 to 3.0 g kg
−1
in chickpea, respectively. Considering the lack of data for phytate variability in Macedonian chickpea and peanut local landraces up to date, the observed high variation in phytic phosphorus content could represent the great basis for further breeding programs for phytate decrease in seeds of those genotypes. This is significant, since phytate is an important antinutrient which affects availability of mineral elements. Regression analysis revealed positive and highly significant interdependence between oil content and total glutathione in chickpea seeds, as well as between oil content and phytic phosphorus in peanut seeds. In chickpea, significant and negative correlation between oil and phytic phosphorus content was also observed.
Conclusions
Results obtained indicated that chickpea genotypes with higher oil content could have increased nutritional value due to higher glutathione and lower phytate content observed. However, lower level of phytate content, along with higher level of soluble phenolics and total glutathione found in peanut seeds with lower oil content, indicated higher digestibility and increased antioxidant activity of those genotypes. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s40538-015-0031-7 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1732836091</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3780700371</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-cc49cfbc6251b42e19571baf467076ebcae3d7e6b0c3ead31b3d6e555cd809a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAYhC0EElXpD2CzxMLQgN84tpMRVXxJlVj4GC3HeQMuqVPiBMG_x20YKiSmu-G50-kIOQV2AZDLy5AxwfOEgUgY45CoAzJJoZCJkBkc7vljMgthxRiDFPJC8Ql5eTadM71rfaDO0wY_saFtTVvXzOmma3t0fk6Nr2ho1xhNRL9cFXXH2zdn3zdodkRUP_Q0IFbhhBzVpgk4-9Upebq5flzcJcuH2_vF1TKxmUz7xNqssHVpZSqgzFKEQigoTZ1JxZTE0hrklUJZMsvRVBxKXkkUQtgqZ4WRfErOx9649WPA0Ou1Cxabxnhsh6BB8TTnkhUQ0bM_6KodOh_XRYplqkglF5GCkbJdG0KHtd50bm26bw1Mb9_W49s6vq23b2sVM-mYCZH1r9jtNf8b-gHCMoGp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1704792635</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variations in level of oil, protein, and some antioxidants in chickpea and peanut seeds</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Dragičević, Vesna ; Kratovalieva, Suzana ; Dumanović, Zoran ; Dimov, Zoran ; Kravić, Natalija</creator><creatorcontrib>Dragičević, Vesna ; Kratovalieva, Suzana ; Dumanović, Zoran ; Dimov, Zoran ; Kravić, Natalija</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Chickpea and peanut are two legume species not frequently used in human diets. Chickpea is rich in starch and proteins, while peanut is mainly a source of oils and proteins and they could be successfully used as protein sources in vegetarian diets.
Seeds of 19 chickpea and 13 peanut landraces were colorimetrically analyzed in respect to antioxidant content (i.e., free soluble phenolics, total glutathione, and phytate). Oil and protein contents in grain were also determined.
Results
Free soluble phenolics content varied in range from 520 to1,050 mg kg
−1
in peanut and from 720 to 1,370 mg kg
−1
in chickpea. Total glutathione content ranged from 1,495 to 2,365 mmol kg
−1
in peanut and from 955 to 1,232 mmol kg
−1
in chickpea. Relatively low content of phytic phosphorus was found in grain of both species, ranging from 2.5 to 4.5 g kg
−1
in peanut and from 1.4 to 3.0 g kg
−1
in chickpea, respectively. Considering the lack of data for phytate variability in Macedonian chickpea and peanut local landraces up to date, the observed high variation in phytic phosphorus content could represent the great basis for further breeding programs for phytate decrease in seeds of those genotypes. This is significant, since phytate is an important antinutrient which affects availability of mineral elements. Regression analysis revealed positive and highly significant interdependence between oil content and total glutathione in chickpea seeds, as well as between oil content and phytic phosphorus in peanut seeds. In chickpea, significant and negative correlation between oil and phytic phosphorus content was also observed.
Conclusions
Results obtained indicated that chickpea genotypes with higher oil content could have increased nutritional value due to higher glutathione and lower phytate content observed. However, lower level of phytate content, along with higher level of soluble phenolics and total glutathione found in peanut seeds with lower oil content, indicated higher digestibility and increased antioxidant activity of those genotypes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2196-5641</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2196-5641</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s40538-015-0031-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Arachis hypogaea ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; CEFood 2014 – Food Chain Integration ; Cicer arietinum ; Life Sciences ; Organic Chemistry ; Plant Biochemistry ; Plant Physiology ; Soil Science & Conservation</subject><ispartof>Chemical and biological technologies in agriculture, 2015-02, Vol.2 (1), p.1-6, Article 2</ispartof><rights>Dragicevic et al.; licensee Springer. 2015. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-cc49cfbc6251b42e19571baf467076ebcae3d7e6b0c3ead31b3d6e555cd809a63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-cc49cfbc6251b42e19571baf467076ebcae3d7e6b0c3ead31b3d6e555cd809a63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s40538-015-0031-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1186/s40538-015-0031-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,861,27905,27906,41101,41469,42170,42538,51300,51557</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dragičević, Vesna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kratovalieva, Suzana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumanović, Zoran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dimov, Zoran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kravić, Natalija</creatorcontrib><title>Variations in level of oil, protein, and some antioxidants in chickpea and peanut seeds</title><title>Chemical and biological technologies in agriculture</title><addtitle>Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric</addtitle><description>Background
Chickpea and peanut are two legume species not frequently used in human diets. Chickpea is rich in starch and proteins, while peanut is mainly a source of oils and proteins and they could be successfully used as protein sources in vegetarian diets.
Seeds of 19 chickpea and 13 peanut landraces were colorimetrically analyzed in respect to antioxidant content (i.e., free soluble phenolics, total glutathione, and phytate). Oil and protein contents in grain were also determined.
Results
Free soluble phenolics content varied in range from 520 to1,050 mg kg
−1
in peanut and from 720 to 1,370 mg kg
−1
in chickpea. Total glutathione content ranged from 1,495 to 2,365 mmol kg
−1
in peanut and from 955 to 1,232 mmol kg
−1
in chickpea. Relatively low content of phytic phosphorus was found in grain of both species, ranging from 2.5 to 4.5 g kg
−1
in peanut and from 1.4 to 3.0 g kg
−1
in chickpea, respectively. Considering the lack of data for phytate variability in Macedonian chickpea and peanut local landraces up to date, the observed high variation in phytic phosphorus content could represent the great basis for further breeding programs for phytate decrease in seeds of those genotypes. This is significant, since phytate is an important antinutrient which affects availability of mineral elements. Regression analysis revealed positive and highly significant interdependence between oil content and total glutathione in chickpea seeds, as well as between oil content and phytic phosphorus in peanut seeds. In chickpea, significant and negative correlation between oil and phytic phosphorus content was also observed.
Conclusions
Results obtained indicated that chickpea genotypes with higher oil content could have increased nutritional value due to higher glutathione and lower phytate content observed. However, lower level of phytate content, along with higher level of soluble phenolics and total glutathione found in peanut seeds with lower oil content, indicated higher digestibility and increased antioxidant activity of those genotypes.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Arachis hypogaea</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>CEFood 2014 – Food Chain Integration</subject><subject>Cicer arietinum</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Organic Chemistry</subject><subject>Plant Biochemistry</subject><subject>Plant Physiology</subject><subject>Soil Science & Conservation</subject><issn>2196-5641</issn><issn>2196-5641</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAYhC0EElXpD2CzxMLQgN84tpMRVXxJlVj4GC3HeQMuqVPiBMG_x20YKiSmu-G50-kIOQV2AZDLy5AxwfOEgUgY45CoAzJJoZCJkBkc7vljMgthxRiDFPJC8Ql5eTadM71rfaDO0wY_saFtTVvXzOmma3t0fk6Nr2ho1xhNRL9cFXXH2zdn3zdodkRUP_Q0IFbhhBzVpgk4-9Upebq5flzcJcuH2_vF1TKxmUz7xNqssHVpZSqgzFKEQigoTZ1JxZTE0hrklUJZMsvRVBxKXkkUQtgqZ4WRfErOx9649WPA0Ou1Cxabxnhsh6BB8TTnkhUQ0bM_6KodOh_XRYplqkglF5GCkbJdG0KHtd50bm26bw1Mb9_W49s6vq23b2sVM-mYCZH1r9jtNf8b-gHCMoGp</recordid><startdate>20150201</startdate><enddate>20150201</enddate><creator>Dragičević, Vesna</creator><creator>Kratovalieva, Suzana</creator><creator>Dumanović, Zoran</creator><creator>Dimov, Zoran</creator><creator>Kravić, Natalija</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150201</creationdate><title>Variations in level of oil, protein, and some antioxidants in chickpea and peanut seeds</title><author>Dragičević, Vesna ; Kratovalieva, Suzana ; Dumanović, Zoran ; Dimov, Zoran ; Kravić, Natalija</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-cc49cfbc6251b42e19571baf467076ebcae3d7e6b0c3ead31b3d6e555cd809a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Arachis hypogaea</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>CEFood 2014 – Food Chain Integration</topic><topic>Cicer arietinum</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Organic Chemistry</topic><topic>Plant Biochemistry</topic><topic>Plant Physiology</topic><topic>Soil Science & Conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dragičević, Vesna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kratovalieva, Suzana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumanović, Zoran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dimov, Zoran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kravić, Natalija</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Chemical and biological technologies in agriculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dragičević, Vesna</au><au>Kratovalieva, Suzana</au><au>Dumanović, Zoran</au><au>Dimov, Zoran</au><au>Kravić, Natalija</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variations in level of oil, protein, and some antioxidants in chickpea and peanut seeds</atitle><jtitle>Chemical and biological technologies in agriculture</jtitle><stitle>Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric</stitle><date>2015-02-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>6</epage><pages>1-6</pages><artnum>2</artnum><issn>2196-5641</issn><eissn>2196-5641</eissn><abstract>Background
Chickpea and peanut are two legume species not frequently used in human diets. Chickpea is rich in starch and proteins, while peanut is mainly a source of oils and proteins and they could be successfully used as protein sources in vegetarian diets.
Seeds of 19 chickpea and 13 peanut landraces were colorimetrically analyzed in respect to antioxidant content (i.e., free soluble phenolics, total glutathione, and phytate). Oil and protein contents in grain were also determined.
Results
Free soluble phenolics content varied in range from 520 to1,050 mg kg
−1
in peanut and from 720 to 1,370 mg kg
−1
in chickpea. Total glutathione content ranged from 1,495 to 2,365 mmol kg
−1
in peanut and from 955 to 1,232 mmol kg
−1
in chickpea. Relatively low content of phytic phosphorus was found in grain of both species, ranging from 2.5 to 4.5 g kg
−1
in peanut and from 1.4 to 3.0 g kg
−1
in chickpea, respectively. Considering the lack of data for phytate variability in Macedonian chickpea and peanut local landraces up to date, the observed high variation in phytic phosphorus content could represent the great basis for further breeding programs for phytate decrease in seeds of those genotypes. This is significant, since phytate is an important antinutrient which affects availability of mineral elements. Regression analysis revealed positive and highly significant interdependence between oil content and total glutathione in chickpea seeds, as well as between oil content and phytic phosphorus in peanut seeds. In chickpea, significant and negative correlation between oil and phytic phosphorus content was also observed.
Conclusions
Results obtained indicated that chickpea genotypes with higher oil content could have increased nutritional value due to higher glutathione and lower phytate content observed. However, lower level of phytate content, along with higher level of soluble phenolics and total glutathione found in peanut seeds with lower oil content, indicated higher digestibility and increased antioxidant activity of those genotypes.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1186/s40538-015-0031-7</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2196-5641 |
| ispartof | Chemical and biological technologies in agriculture, 2015-02, Vol.2 (1), p.1-6, Article 2 |
| issn | 2196-5641 2196-5641 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1732836091 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Agriculture Arachis hypogaea Biomedical and Life Sciences CEFood 2014 – Food Chain Integration Cicer arietinum Life Sciences Organic Chemistry Plant Biochemistry Plant Physiology Soil Science & Conservation |
| title | Variations in level of oil, protein, and some antioxidants in chickpea and peanut seeds |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T00%3A45%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variations%20in%20level%20of%20oil,%20protein,%20and%20some%20antioxidants%20in%20chickpea%20and%20peanut%20seeds&rft.jtitle=Chemical%20and%20biological%20technologies%20in%20agriculture&rft.au=Dragi%C4%8Devi%C4%87,%20Vesna&rft.date=2015-02-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=6&rft.pages=1-6&rft.artnum=2&rft.issn=2196-5641&rft.eissn=2196-5641&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s40538-015-0031-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3780700371%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1704792635&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |