Experimental study of the interaction between building clusters and flash floods

In recent years, flash flood disasters have occurred frequently in southwest China due to the increased frequency of extreme climate events. To solve this problem, great efforts have been made in studying the process of flash flood. However, little attention was paid on bearing body of hazard, the c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of mountain science 2015-09, Vol.12 (5), p.1334-1344
Hauptverfasser: Du, Jun, He, Xiao-yan, Wang, Zhao-yin, Zhang, Chen-di, Li, Wen-xin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1344
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1334
container_title Journal of mountain science
container_volume 12
creator Du, Jun
He, Xiao-yan
Wang, Zhao-yin
Zhang, Chen-di
Li, Wen-xin
description In recent years, flash flood disasters have occurred frequently in southwest China due to the increased frequency of extreme climate events. To solve this problem, great efforts have been made in studying the process of flash flood. However, little attention was paid on bearing body of hazard, the clusters of buildings. Thus the real disaster mechanism of flash flood remains unclear. Accordingly, based on the experiments of artificial flash floods in a conceptual solid model, this paper focuses on the flood-impacted inundation characteristics of the building clusters at different locations of the gully model, in order to obtain a better understanding of the disaster process and the interaction between the flash floods and building clusters. The results showed that, in a typical smallscale flash flood gully with hot and dry climate, 1) clusters of buildings on an alluvial fan could reduce about 35% of the flooding area by blocking the diffusion of the flood to the depression areas, and could also promote the deposition in lower reaches of the river channel by blocking the overbank flow from going back into the channel, making the width-depth ratio of the channel larger. 2) The flash flood rates of disaster and hazard on the alluvial fan are generally higher than that of the inner gully. For the inner gully, buildings located on the beaches along the lower river and the transitional areas of the straight channel and channel bends can easily be affected because of their lower elevations. For the alluvial fan, buildings nearby the meanders suffer the greatest impacts because of bank collapsing and flooding. 3) The safe vertical distance from a building to the river channel is 13 m for the buildings in the inner gully under extreme floods. Below this threshold, the smaller the vertical distance is, the greater the risk exposure is. For the buildings on the alluvial fan, especially for the buildings near the concave bank of the top rush point, the horizontal distance is more important, and the safe value is 80 m under extreme floods.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11629-014-3170-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1732832608</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3830943421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-843fffe7ddf174d8f394ca25928b1a502e81937f5c22fb06c381ad6d0ae23e293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wNuCFy-rmWQ3H0cp9QMKetBzSDeTdst2UzdZ1H9vSj2I4GVmYJ53GB5CLoHeAKXyNgIIpksKVclB0lIckQlozUvKGRznWUhWCg7ilJzFuKFUSK1gQl7mnzsc2i32yXZFTKP7KoIv0hqLtk842Ca1oS-WmD4Qcx_bzrX9qmi6MeZ1LGzvCt_ZuM41BBfPyYm3XcSLnz4lb_fz19ljuXh-eJrdLcqGVzqVquLee5TOeZCVU57rqrGs1kwtwdaUoQLNpa8bxvySioYrsE44apFxZJpPyfXh7m4I7yPGZLZtbLDrbI9hjAYkZ4ozQVVGr_6gmzAOff4uU4xyLUW9p-BANUOIcUBvdtmLHb4MULN3bA6OTXZs9o6NyBl2yMTM9iscfl3-N_QNhex-5Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1720397658</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Experimental study of the interaction between building clusters and flash floods</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Du, Jun ; He, Xiao-yan ; Wang, Zhao-yin ; Zhang, Chen-di ; Li, Wen-xin</creator><creatorcontrib>Du, Jun ; He, Xiao-yan ; Wang, Zhao-yin ; Zhang, Chen-di ; Li, Wen-xin</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years, flash flood disasters have occurred frequently in southwest China due to the increased frequency of extreme climate events. To solve this problem, great efforts have been made in studying the process of flash flood. However, little attention was paid on bearing body of hazard, the clusters of buildings. Thus the real disaster mechanism of flash flood remains unclear. Accordingly, based on the experiments of artificial flash floods in a conceptual solid model, this paper focuses on the flood-impacted inundation characteristics of the building clusters at different locations of the gully model, in order to obtain a better understanding of the disaster process and the interaction between the flash floods and building clusters. The results showed that, in a typical smallscale flash flood gully with hot and dry climate, 1) clusters of buildings on an alluvial fan could reduce about 35% of the flooding area by blocking the diffusion of the flood to the depression areas, and could also promote the deposition in lower reaches of the river channel by blocking the overbank flow from going back into the channel, making the width-depth ratio of the channel larger. 2) The flash flood rates of disaster and hazard on the alluvial fan are generally higher than that of the inner gully. For the inner gully, buildings located on the beaches along the lower river and the transitional areas of the straight channel and channel bends can easily be affected because of their lower elevations. For the alluvial fan, buildings nearby the meanders suffer the greatest impacts because of bank collapsing and flooding. 3) The safe vertical distance from a building to the river channel is 13 m for the buildings in the inner gully under extreme floods. Below this threshold, the smaller the vertical distance is, the greater the risk exposure is. For the buildings on the alluvial fan, especially for the buildings near the concave bank of the top rush point, the horizontal distance is more important, and the safe value is 80 m under extreme floods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1672-6316</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1993-0321</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1008-2786</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11629-014-3170-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Science Press</publisher><subject>Alluvial fans ; Disasters ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Ecology ; Environment ; Flash floods ; Flooding ; Floods ; Geography ; Gullies ; Rivers ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of mountain science, 2015-09, Vol.12 (5), p.1334-1344</ispartof><rights>Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-843fffe7ddf174d8f394ca25928b1a502e81937f5c22fb06c381ad6d0ae23e293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-843fffe7ddf174d8f394ca25928b1a502e81937f5c22fb06c381ad6d0ae23e293</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11629-014-3170-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11629-014-3170-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Du, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Xiao-yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhao-yin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Chen-di</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Wen-xin</creatorcontrib><title>Experimental study of the interaction between building clusters and flash floods</title><title>Journal of mountain science</title><addtitle>J. Mt. Sci</addtitle><description>In recent years, flash flood disasters have occurred frequently in southwest China due to the increased frequency of extreme climate events. To solve this problem, great efforts have been made in studying the process of flash flood. However, little attention was paid on bearing body of hazard, the clusters of buildings. Thus the real disaster mechanism of flash flood remains unclear. Accordingly, based on the experiments of artificial flash floods in a conceptual solid model, this paper focuses on the flood-impacted inundation characteristics of the building clusters at different locations of the gully model, in order to obtain a better understanding of the disaster process and the interaction between the flash floods and building clusters. The results showed that, in a typical smallscale flash flood gully with hot and dry climate, 1) clusters of buildings on an alluvial fan could reduce about 35% of the flooding area by blocking the diffusion of the flood to the depression areas, and could also promote the deposition in lower reaches of the river channel by blocking the overbank flow from going back into the channel, making the width-depth ratio of the channel larger. 2) The flash flood rates of disaster and hazard on the alluvial fan are generally higher than that of the inner gully. For the inner gully, buildings located on the beaches along the lower river and the transitional areas of the straight channel and channel bends can easily be affected because of their lower elevations. For the alluvial fan, buildings nearby the meanders suffer the greatest impacts because of bank collapsing and flooding. 3) The safe vertical distance from a building to the river channel is 13 m for the buildings in the inner gully under extreme floods. Below this threshold, the smaller the vertical distance is, the greater the risk exposure is. For the buildings on the alluvial fan, especially for the buildings near the concave bank of the top rush point, the horizontal distance is more important, and the safe value is 80 m under extreme floods.</description><subject>Alluvial fans</subject><subject>Disasters</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Flash floods</subject><subject>Flooding</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Gullies</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1672-6316</issn><issn>1993-0321</issn><issn>1008-2786</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wNuCFy-rmWQ3H0cp9QMKetBzSDeTdst2UzdZ1H9vSj2I4GVmYJ53GB5CLoHeAKXyNgIIpksKVclB0lIckQlozUvKGRznWUhWCg7ilJzFuKFUSK1gQl7mnzsc2i32yXZFTKP7KoIv0hqLtk842Ca1oS-WmD4Qcx_bzrX9qmi6MeZ1LGzvCt_ZuM41BBfPyYm3XcSLnz4lb_fz19ljuXh-eJrdLcqGVzqVquLee5TOeZCVU57rqrGs1kwtwdaUoQLNpa8bxvySioYrsE44apFxZJpPyfXh7m4I7yPGZLZtbLDrbI9hjAYkZ4ozQVVGr_6gmzAOff4uU4xyLUW9p-BANUOIcUBvdtmLHb4MULN3bA6OTXZs9o6NyBl2yMTM9iscfl3-N_QNhex-5Q</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Du, Jun</creator><creator>He, Xiao-yan</creator><creator>Wang, Zhao-yin</creator><creator>Zhang, Chen-di</creator><creator>Li, Wen-xin</creator><general>Science Press</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>Experimental study of the interaction between building clusters and flash floods</title><author>Du, Jun ; He, Xiao-yan ; Wang, Zhao-yin ; Zhang, Chen-di ; Li, Wen-xin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-843fffe7ddf174d8f394ca25928b1a502e81937f5c22fb06c381ad6d0ae23e293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Alluvial fans</topic><topic>Disasters</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Flash floods</topic><topic>Flooding</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Gullies</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Du, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Xiao-yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhao-yin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Chen-di</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Wen-xin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of mountain science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Du, Jun</au><au>He, Xiao-yan</au><au>Wang, Zhao-yin</au><au>Zhang, Chen-di</au><au>Li, Wen-xin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Experimental study of the interaction between building clusters and flash floods</atitle><jtitle>Journal of mountain science</jtitle><stitle>J. Mt. Sci</stitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1334</spage><epage>1344</epage><pages>1334-1344</pages><issn>1672-6316</issn><eissn>1993-0321</eissn><eissn>1008-2786</eissn><abstract>In recent years, flash flood disasters have occurred frequently in southwest China due to the increased frequency of extreme climate events. To solve this problem, great efforts have been made in studying the process of flash flood. However, little attention was paid on bearing body of hazard, the clusters of buildings. Thus the real disaster mechanism of flash flood remains unclear. Accordingly, based on the experiments of artificial flash floods in a conceptual solid model, this paper focuses on the flood-impacted inundation characteristics of the building clusters at different locations of the gully model, in order to obtain a better understanding of the disaster process and the interaction between the flash floods and building clusters. The results showed that, in a typical smallscale flash flood gully with hot and dry climate, 1) clusters of buildings on an alluvial fan could reduce about 35% of the flooding area by blocking the diffusion of the flood to the depression areas, and could also promote the deposition in lower reaches of the river channel by blocking the overbank flow from going back into the channel, making the width-depth ratio of the channel larger. 2) The flash flood rates of disaster and hazard on the alluvial fan are generally higher than that of the inner gully. For the inner gully, buildings located on the beaches along the lower river and the transitional areas of the straight channel and channel bends can easily be affected because of their lower elevations. For the alluvial fan, buildings nearby the meanders suffer the greatest impacts because of bank collapsing and flooding. 3) The safe vertical distance from a building to the river channel is 13 m for the buildings in the inner gully under extreme floods. Below this threshold, the smaller the vertical distance is, the greater the risk exposure is. For the buildings on the alluvial fan, especially for the buildings near the concave bank of the top rush point, the horizontal distance is more important, and the safe value is 80 m under extreme floods.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Science Press</pub><doi>10.1007/s11629-014-3170-6</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1672-6316
ispartof Journal of mountain science, 2015-09, Vol.12 (5), p.1334-1344
issn 1672-6316
1993-0321
1008-2786
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1732832608
source Alma/SFX Local Collection; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Alluvial fans
Disasters
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Ecology
Environment
Flash floods
Flooding
Floods
Geography
Gullies
Rivers
Studies
title Experimental study of the interaction between building clusters and flash floods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T20%3A27%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Experimental%20study%20of%20the%20interaction%20between%20building%20clusters%20and%20flash%20floods&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20mountain%20science&rft.au=Du,%20Jun&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1334&rft.epage=1344&rft.pages=1334-1344&rft.issn=1672-6316&rft.eissn=1993-0321&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11629-014-3170-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3830943421%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1720397658&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true