Maladaptive behavioural phenotypes in captive‐reared darters (Etheostoma caeruleum, Storer 1845)
The foraging and anti‐predator behaviour of captive‐reared rainbow darters (Etheostoma caeruleum) was compared to their wild‐caught counterparts. Wild‐caught darters responded with appropriate anti‐predator behaviour (reduced foraging activity) when exposed to alarm cues (e.g. stimuli from damaged s...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied ichthyology 2015-08, Vol.31 (4), p.787-792 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 792 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 787 |
| container_title | Journal of applied ichthyology |
| container_volume | 31 |
| creator | Crane, A. L Lampe, M. J Mathis, A |
| description | The foraging and anti‐predator behaviour of captive‐reared rainbow darters (Etheostoma caeruleum) was compared to their wild‐caught counterparts. Wild‐caught darters responded with appropriate anti‐predator behaviour (reduced foraging activity) when exposed to alarm cues (e.g. stimuli from damaged skin) from both wild‐caught and captive‐reared darters, indicating that the diet in captivity did not inhibit the production of alarm cues. Captive‐reared individuals did not change their level of activity when exposed to alarm cues; however, their significantly lower baseline activity (movement and prey consumption) makes it unclear as to whether they actually failed to recognize risk. Regardless, captive‐reared darters showed little motivation to feed when food became available (i.e. they made few movements to obtain food) and appeared impervious to chemical cues indicating risk. Exposing captive‐reared individuals to both semi‐natural foraging opportunities and predator‐recognition training before their release is recommended. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jai.12769 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1732829760</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1732829760</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4279-76aae8cf77d79aacd9907895ffd2d386d57ef77cb0f9db069079be8ebe05f7523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10U9u1DAUBnALgcRQWHACIrFpJdLaTuI_y6oqpWgoi1JAbKwX-4XxkBmndlKYHUfgCJyFo3ASDAEWSHjjxft9lv2ZkIeMHrK8jtbgDxmXQt8iC1ZXuqQ1F7fJgjLZlEo0-i65l9KaUqqkFgtiX0APDobR32DR4gpufJgi9MWwwm0YdwOmwm8LO4vvn79EhIiucBBHjKnYPx1XGNIYNvDtqwWMU4_T5klxOYaIsWCqbg7ukzsd9Akf_N73yNXT01cnz8rly7Pzk-NlaWsudSkFACrbSemkBrBOayqVbrrOcVcp4RqJeWhb2mnXUpGnukWFLdKmkw2v9sj-fO4Qw_WEaTQbnyz2PWwxTMkwWXHFtRQ008f_0HV-9jbfzjChBZVScZHVwaxsDClF7MwQ_QbizjBqftZtct3mV93ZHs32o-9x939onh-f_0mUc8KnET_9TUD8YISsZGPeXJwZ9e4tu6heK7PM_tHsOwgG3kefzNUlp0zkz9S8lqz6AUbam7w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1696077826</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Maladaptive behavioural phenotypes in captive‐reared darters (Etheostoma caeruleum, Storer 1845)</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Crane, A. L ; Lampe, M. J ; Mathis, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Crane, A. L ; Lampe, M. J ; Mathis, A</creatorcontrib><description>The foraging and anti‐predator behaviour of captive‐reared rainbow darters (Etheostoma caeruleum) was compared to their wild‐caught counterparts. Wild‐caught darters responded with appropriate anti‐predator behaviour (reduced foraging activity) when exposed to alarm cues (e.g. stimuli from damaged skin) from both wild‐caught and captive‐reared darters, indicating that the diet in captivity did not inhibit the production of alarm cues. Captive‐reared individuals did not change their level of activity when exposed to alarm cues; however, their significantly lower baseline activity (movement and prey consumption) makes it unclear as to whether they actually failed to recognize risk. Regardless, captive‐reared darters showed little motivation to feed when food became available (i.e. they made few movements to obtain food) and appeared impervious to chemical cues indicating risk. Exposing captive‐reared individuals to both semi‐natural foraging opportunities and predator‐recognition training before their release is recommended.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0175-8659</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0426</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jai.12769</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Blackwell Wissenschafts-Verlag</publisher><subject>antipredatory behavior ; captive animals ; diet ; Etheostoma ; Etheostoma caeruleum ; foraging ; Freshwater ; motivation ; phenotype ; risk</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied ichthyology, 2015-08, Vol.31 (4), p.787-792</ispartof><rights>2015 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4279-76aae8cf77d79aacd9907895ffd2d386d57ef77cb0f9db069079be8ebe05f7523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4279-76aae8cf77d79aacd9907895ffd2d386d57ef77cb0f9db069079be8ebe05f7523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjai.12769$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjai.12769$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crane, A. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lampe, M. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathis, A</creatorcontrib><title>Maladaptive behavioural phenotypes in captive‐reared darters (Etheostoma caeruleum, Storer 1845)</title><title>Journal of applied ichthyology</title><addtitle>J. Appl. Ichthyol</addtitle><description>The foraging and anti‐predator behaviour of captive‐reared rainbow darters (Etheostoma caeruleum) was compared to their wild‐caught counterparts. Wild‐caught darters responded with appropriate anti‐predator behaviour (reduced foraging activity) when exposed to alarm cues (e.g. stimuli from damaged skin) from both wild‐caught and captive‐reared darters, indicating that the diet in captivity did not inhibit the production of alarm cues. Captive‐reared individuals did not change their level of activity when exposed to alarm cues; however, their significantly lower baseline activity (movement and prey consumption) makes it unclear as to whether they actually failed to recognize risk. Regardless, captive‐reared darters showed little motivation to feed when food became available (i.e. they made few movements to obtain food) and appeared impervious to chemical cues indicating risk. Exposing captive‐reared individuals to both semi‐natural foraging opportunities and predator‐recognition training before their release is recommended.</description><subject>antipredatory behavior</subject><subject>captive animals</subject><subject>diet</subject><subject>Etheostoma</subject><subject>Etheostoma caeruleum</subject><subject>foraging</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>motivation</subject><subject>phenotype</subject><subject>risk</subject><issn>0175-8659</issn><issn>1439-0426</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10U9u1DAUBnALgcRQWHACIrFpJdLaTuI_y6oqpWgoi1JAbKwX-4XxkBmndlKYHUfgCJyFo3ASDAEWSHjjxft9lv2ZkIeMHrK8jtbgDxmXQt8iC1ZXuqQ1F7fJgjLZlEo0-i65l9KaUqqkFgtiX0APDobR32DR4gpufJgi9MWwwm0YdwOmwm8LO4vvn79EhIiucBBHjKnYPx1XGNIYNvDtqwWMU4_T5klxOYaIsWCqbg7ukzsd9Akf_N73yNXT01cnz8rly7Pzk-NlaWsudSkFACrbSemkBrBOayqVbrrOcVcp4RqJeWhb2mnXUpGnukWFLdKmkw2v9sj-fO4Qw_WEaTQbnyz2PWwxTMkwWXHFtRQ008f_0HV-9jbfzjChBZVScZHVwaxsDClF7MwQ_QbizjBqftZtct3mV93ZHs32o-9x939onh-f_0mUc8KnET_9TUD8YISsZGPeXJwZ9e4tu6heK7PM_tHsOwgG3kefzNUlp0zkz9S8lqz6AUbam7w</recordid><startdate>201508</startdate><enddate>201508</enddate><creator>Crane, A. L</creator><creator>Lampe, M. J</creator><creator>Mathis, A</creator><general>Blackwell Wissenschafts-Verlag</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201508</creationdate><title>Maladaptive behavioural phenotypes in captive‐reared darters (Etheostoma caeruleum, Storer 1845)</title><author>Crane, A. L ; Lampe, M. J ; Mathis, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4279-76aae8cf77d79aacd9907895ffd2d386d57ef77cb0f9db069079be8ebe05f7523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>antipredatory behavior</topic><topic>captive animals</topic><topic>diet</topic><topic>Etheostoma</topic><topic>Etheostoma caeruleum</topic><topic>foraging</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>motivation</topic><topic>phenotype</topic><topic>risk</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crane, A. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lampe, M. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathis, A</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied ichthyology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crane, A. L</au><au>Lampe, M. J</au><au>Mathis, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Maladaptive behavioural phenotypes in captive‐reared darters (Etheostoma caeruleum, Storer 1845)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied ichthyology</jtitle><addtitle>J. Appl. Ichthyol</addtitle><date>2015-08</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>787</spage><epage>792</epage><pages>787-792</pages><issn>0175-8659</issn><eissn>1439-0426</eissn><abstract>The foraging and anti‐predator behaviour of captive‐reared rainbow darters (Etheostoma caeruleum) was compared to their wild‐caught counterparts. Wild‐caught darters responded with appropriate anti‐predator behaviour (reduced foraging activity) when exposed to alarm cues (e.g. stimuli from damaged skin) from both wild‐caught and captive‐reared darters, indicating that the diet in captivity did not inhibit the production of alarm cues. Captive‐reared individuals did not change their level of activity when exposed to alarm cues; however, their significantly lower baseline activity (movement and prey consumption) makes it unclear as to whether they actually failed to recognize risk. Regardless, captive‐reared darters showed little motivation to feed when food became available (i.e. they made few movements to obtain food) and appeared impervious to chemical cues indicating risk. Exposing captive‐reared individuals to both semi‐natural foraging opportunities and predator‐recognition training before their release is recommended.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Blackwell Wissenschafts-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1111/jai.12769</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0175-8659 |
| ispartof | Journal of applied ichthyology, 2015-08, Vol.31 (4), p.787-792 |
| issn | 0175-8659 1439-0426 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1732829760 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | antipredatory behavior captive animals diet Etheostoma Etheostoma caeruleum foraging Freshwater motivation phenotype risk |
| title | Maladaptive behavioural phenotypes in captive‐reared darters (Etheostoma caeruleum, Storer 1845) |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T23%3A30%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Maladaptive%20behavioural%20phenotypes%20in%20captive%E2%80%90reared%20darters%20(Etheostoma%C2%A0caeruleum,%20Storer%201845)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20ichthyology&rft.au=Crane,%20A.%20L&rft.date=2015-08&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=787&rft.epage=792&rft.pages=787-792&rft.issn=0175-8659&rft.eissn=1439-0426&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jai.12769&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1732829760%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1696077826&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |