Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE: Laparoscopic procedures are generally thought to have better outcomes than open procedures. Because of anatomical constraints, laparoscopic rectal resection may not be better because of limitations in performing an adequate cancer resection. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether laparoscopic r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2015-10, Vol.314 (13), p.1356-1363
Hauptverfasser:	Stevenson, Andrew R. L, Solomon, Michael J, Lumley, John W, Hewett, Peter, Clouston, Andrew D, Gebski, Val J, Davies, Lucy, Wilson, Kate, Hague, Wendy, Simes, John
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Adenoma - pathology Adenoma - surgery Adult Colorectal cancer Colorectal surgery Digestive System Surgical Procedures - methods Disease-Free Survival Female Humans Laparoscopy Laparoscopy - methods Laparotomy Male Middle Aged Neoplasm Recurrence, Local Neoplasm, Residual Oncology Quality of Life Rectal Neoplasms - pathology Rectal Neoplasms - surgery Single-Blind Method Surgical outcomes Treatment Outcome
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Schreiben Sie den ersten Kommentar!