The (dis)unity of nursing science
This paper looks at the implications of contemporary work in philosophy of science for nursing science. Early work on the nature of theories in nursing was strongly influenced by logical empiricism, and this influence remains even long after nurse scholars have come to reject logical empiricism as a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nursing philosophy 2014-10, Vol.15 (4), p.250-260 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 260 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 250 |
container_title | Nursing philosophy |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Bluhm, Robyn L. |
description | This paper looks at the implications of contemporary work in philosophy of science for nursing science. Early work on the nature of theories in nursing was strongly influenced by logical empiricism, and this influence remains even long after nurse scholars have come to reject logical empiricism as an adequate philosophy of science. Combined with the need to establish nursing as an autonomous profession, nursing theory's use of logical empiricism has led to serious conceptual problems. Philosophers of science have also rejected many of the central tenets of logical empiricism, including its focus on the logical justification of theories and the idea that science is, or should be, unified. Instead, there has been an increasing focus on the practice of science, which in turn has led to a pluralist understanding of science that emphasizes the construction of scientific models that are appropriate for certain purposes or in certain contexts. I suggest that this approach to philosophy of science may provide better resources for nursing science. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/nup.12062 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1732090483</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1732090483</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4622-90c30fafc3d5e3554d07213001ca5a23fd104bc88e98f4d563e5b901cf2150903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9PwkAQxTdGI4ge_AKm3uBQ2Nl_bY8GFQ0ENYHobVO2u7paWuzSKN_e1Qo341xmkvm9N5mH0CngPvgaFPWqDwQLsofawIQII5E87e_mGFroyLlXjEFATA5Ri7BYAHDeRuezFx10M-t6dWHXm6A0QVFXzhbPgVNWF0ofowOT5k6f_PYOml9fzYY34eRudDu8mISKCULCBCuKTWoUzbimnLMMRwSov6lSnhJqMsBsoeJYJ7FhGRdU80Xit4YAxwmmHdRtfFdV-V5rt5ZL65TO87TQZe0kRJR4jsX0f5QL_x4kmHu016CqKp2rtJGryi7TaiMBy-_wpA9P_oTn2bNf23qx1NmO3KblgUEDfNhcb_52ktP5_dYybBTWrfXnTpFWb1JENOLycTqSYwYP4zjh8pJ-ATVGhEE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1566111905</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The (dis)unity of nursing science</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Bluhm, Robyn L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bluhm, Robyn L.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper looks at the implications of contemporary work in philosophy of science for nursing science. Early work on the nature of theories in nursing was strongly influenced by logical empiricism, and this influence remains even long after nurse scholars have come to reject logical empiricism as an adequate philosophy of science. Combined with the need to establish nursing as an autonomous profession, nursing theory's use of logical empiricism has led to serious conceptual problems. Philosophers of science have also rejected many of the central tenets of logical empiricism, including its focus on the logical justification of theories and the idea that science is, or should be, unified. Instead, there has been an increasing focus on the practice of science, which in turn has led to a pluralist understanding of science that emphasizes the construction of scientific models that are appropriate for certain purposes or in certain contexts. I suggest that this approach to philosophy of science may provide better resources for nursing science.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1466-7681</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-769X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/nup.12062</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24861155</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; epistemology ; Forecasting ; History, 20th Century ; History, 21st Century ; Humans ; Nursing ; Nursing Care - organization & administration ; Nursing Care - psychology ; Nursing Care - trends ; Nursing Staff - psychology ; Nursing Theory ; Organizational Culture ; philosophy of science ; Philosophy, Nursing - history ; positivism</subject><ispartof>Nursing philosophy, 2014-10, Vol.15 (4), p.250-260</ispartof><rights>2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4622-90c30fafc3d5e3554d07213001ca5a23fd104bc88e98f4d563e5b901cf2150903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4622-90c30fafc3d5e3554d07213001ca5a23fd104bc88e98f4d563e5b901cf2150903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fnup.12062$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fnup.12062$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27907,27908,45557,45558</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24861155$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bluhm, Robyn L.</creatorcontrib><title>The (dis)unity of nursing science</title><title>Nursing philosophy</title><addtitle>Nursing Philosophy</addtitle><description>This paper looks at the implications of contemporary work in philosophy of science for nursing science. Early work on the nature of theories in nursing was strongly influenced by logical empiricism, and this influence remains even long after nurse scholars have come to reject logical empiricism as an adequate philosophy of science. Combined with the need to establish nursing as an autonomous profession, nursing theory's use of logical empiricism has led to serious conceptual problems. Philosophers of science have also rejected many of the central tenets of logical empiricism, including its focus on the logical justification of theories and the idea that science is, or should be, unified. Instead, there has been an increasing focus on the practice of science, which in turn has led to a pluralist understanding of science that emphasizes the construction of scientific models that are appropriate for certain purposes or in certain contexts. I suggest that this approach to philosophy of science may provide better resources for nursing science.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>epistemology</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>History, 20th Century</subject><subject>History, 21st Century</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Care - organization & administration</subject><subject>Nursing Care - psychology</subject><subject>Nursing Care - trends</subject><subject>Nursing Staff - psychology</subject><subject>Nursing Theory</subject><subject>Organizational Culture</subject><subject>philosophy of science</subject><subject>Philosophy, Nursing - history</subject><subject>positivism</subject><issn>1466-7681</issn><issn>1466-769X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE9PwkAQxTdGI4ge_AKm3uBQ2Nl_bY8GFQ0ENYHobVO2u7paWuzSKN_e1Qo341xmkvm9N5mH0CngPvgaFPWqDwQLsofawIQII5E87e_mGFroyLlXjEFATA5Ri7BYAHDeRuezFx10M-t6dWHXm6A0QVFXzhbPgVNWF0ofowOT5k6f_PYOml9fzYY34eRudDu8mISKCULCBCuKTWoUzbimnLMMRwSov6lSnhJqMsBsoeJYJ7FhGRdU80Xit4YAxwmmHdRtfFdV-V5rt5ZL65TO87TQZe0kRJR4jsX0f5QL_x4kmHu016CqKp2rtJGryi7TaiMBy-_wpA9P_oTn2bNf23qx1NmO3KblgUEDfNhcb_52ktP5_dYybBTWrfXnTpFWb1JENOLycTqSYwYP4zjh8pJ-ATVGhEE</recordid><startdate>201410</startdate><enddate>201410</enddate><creator>Bluhm, Robyn L.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201410</creationdate><title>The (dis)unity of nursing science</title><author>Bluhm, Robyn L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4622-90c30fafc3d5e3554d07213001ca5a23fd104bc88e98f4d563e5b901cf2150903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>epistemology</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>History, 20th Century</topic><topic>History, 21st Century</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Care - organization & administration</topic><topic>Nursing Care - psychology</topic><topic>Nursing Care - trends</topic><topic>Nursing Staff - psychology</topic><topic>Nursing Theory</topic><topic>Organizational Culture</topic><topic>philosophy of science</topic><topic>Philosophy, Nursing - history</topic><topic>positivism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bluhm, Robyn L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>Nursing philosophy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bluhm, Robyn L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The (dis)unity of nursing science</atitle><jtitle>Nursing philosophy</jtitle><addtitle>Nursing Philosophy</addtitle><date>2014-10</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>250</spage><epage>260</epage><pages>250-260</pages><issn>1466-7681</issn><eissn>1466-769X</eissn><abstract>This paper looks at the implications of contemporary work in philosophy of science for nursing science. Early work on the nature of theories in nursing was strongly influenced by logical empiricism, and this influence remains even long after nurse scholars have come to reject logical empiricism as an adequate philosophy of science. Combined with the need to establish nursing as an autonomous profession, nursing theory's use of logical empiricism has led to serious conceptual problems. Philosophers of science have also rejected many of the central tenets of logical empiricism, including its focus on the logical justification of theories and the idea that science is, or should be, unified. Instead, there has been an increasing focus on the practice of science, which in turn has led to a pluralist understanding of science that emphasizes the construction of scientific models that are appropriate for certain purposes or in certain contexts. I suggest that this approach to philosophy of science may provide better resources for nursing science.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24861155</pmid><doi>10.1111/nup.12062</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1466-7681 |
ispartof | Nursing philosophy, 2014-10, Vol.15 (4), p.250-260 |
issn | 1466-7681 1466-769X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1732090483 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Attitude of Health Personnel epistemology Forecasting History, 20th Century History, 21st Century Humans Nursing Nursing Care - organization & administration Nursing Care - psychology Nursing Care - trends Nursing Staff - psychology Nursing Theory Organizational Culture philosophy of science Philosophy, Nursing - history positivism |
title | The (dis)unity of nursing science |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T13%3A44%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20(dis)unity%20of%20nursing%20science&rft.jtitle=Nursing%20philosophy&rft.au=Bluhm,%20Robyn%20L.&rft.date=2014-10&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=250&rft.epage=260&rft.pages=250-260&rft.issn=1466-7681&rft.eissn=1466-769X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/nup.12062&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1732090483%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1566111905&rft_id=info:pmid/24861155&rfr_iscdi=true |