Toward an Improved Analytical Description of Lagrangian Bias

We carry out a detailed numerical investigation of the spatial correlation function of the initial positions of cosmological dark matter halos. In this Lagrangian coordinate system, which is especially useful for analytic studies of cosmological feedback, we are able to construct cross-correlation f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Astrophysical journal 2005-01, Vol.619 (1), p.1-11
Hauptverfasser: Scannapieco, Evan, Thacker, Robert J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 11
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title The Astrophysical journal
container_volume 619
creator Scannapieco, Evan
Thacker, Robert J
description We carry out a detailed numerical investigation of the spatial correlation function of the initial positions of cosmological dark matter halos. In this Lagrangian coordinate system, which is especially useful for analytic studies of cosmological feedback, we are able to construct cross-correlation functions of objects with varying masses and formation redshifts and compare them with a variety of analytical approaches. For the case in which both formation redshifts are equal, we find good agreement between our numerical results and the bivariate model of Scannapieco & Barkana at all masses, redshifts, and separations, while the model of Porciani and coworkers does well for all parameters except for objects with different masses at small separations. We find that the standard mapping between Lagrangian and Eulerian bias performs well for rare objects at all separations, but fails if the objects are highly nonlinear (low-sigma) peaks. In the Lagrangian case, in which the formation redshifts differ, the model of Scannapieco & Barkana does well for all separations and combinations of masses, apart from a discrepancy at small separations in situations in which the smaller object is formed earlier, and the difference between redshifts or masses is large. As this same limitation arises in the standard approach to the single-point progenitor distribution developed by Lacey & Cole, we conclude that a more complete understanding of the progenitor distribution is the most important outstanding issue in the analytic modeling of Lagrangian bias.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/426474
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_O3W</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17318315</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17318315</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-fce5388acca7bcfc77886d8540c59bd5b4e64dc21a5f3412c7b5ddf8e8c91e9a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKf-hnqheFNtmqRJwZttfg0G3kzwLqQnyYh0bU06Zf_elA29EDkXhwMPL-d9EDrH2Q3ORHFL84JyeoBGmBGRUsL4IRplWUbTgvC3Y3QSwvtw5mU5QnfL9kt5nagmma87334anUwaVW97B6pO7k0A77retU3S2mShVl41KxfpqVPhFB1ZVQdztt9j9Pr4sJw9p4uXp_lsskiBcNanFkz8RCgAxSuwwLkQhRaMZsDKSrOKmoJqyLFillCcA6-Y1lYYASU2pSJjdLXLjQ9-bEzo5doFMHWtGtNugsScYEFi3R8QfBuCN1Z23q2V30qcyUGO3MmJ4OU-UYXY08ZW4MIvXbCc5ZRH7mLHubb7P-v6LzMIloNvWeBS4jidtuQbFJt6Kg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17318315</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Toward an Improved Analytical Description of Lagrangian Bias</title><source>IOP Publishing Free Content</source><creator>Scannapieco, Evan ; Thacker, Robert J</creator><creatorcontrib>Scannapieco, Evan ; Thacker, Robert J</creatorcontrib><description>We carry out a detailed numerical investigation of the spatial correlation function of the initial positions of cosmological dark matter halos. In this Lagrangian coordinate system, which is especially useful for analytic studies of cosmological feedback, we are able to construct cross-correlation functions of objects with varying masses and formation redshifts and compare them with a variety of analytical approaches. For the case in which both formation redshifts are equal, we find good agreement between our numerical results and the bivariate model of Scannapieco &amp; Barkana at all masses, redshifts, and separations, while the model of Porciani and coworkers does well for all parameters except for objects with different masses at small separations. We find that the standard mapping between Lagrangian and Eulerian bias performs well for rare objects at all separations, but fails if the objects are highly nonlinear (low-sigma) peaks. In the Lagrangian case, in which the formation redshifts differ, the model of Scannapieco &amp; Barkana does well for all separations and combinations of masses, apart from a discrepancy at small separations in situations in which the smaller object is formed earlier, and the difference between redshifts or masses is large. As this same limitation arises in the standard approach to the single-point progenitor distribution developed by Lacey &amp; Cole, we conclude that a more complete understanding of the progenitor distribution is the most important outstanding issue in the analytic modeling of Lagrangian bias.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-637X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4357</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/426474</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ASJOAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, IL: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Astronomy ; Cosmology ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; Mathematical and relativistic aspects of cosmology. Quantum cosmology ; Stellar systems. Galactic and extragalactic objects and systems. The universe</subject><ispartof>The Astrophysical journal, 2005-01, Vol.619 (1), p.1-11</ispartof><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-fce5388acca7bcfc77886d8540c59bd5b4e64dc21a5f3412c7b5ddf8e8c91e9a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-fce5388acca7bcfc77886d8540c59bd5b4e64dc21a5f3412c7b5ddf8e8c91e9a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/426474/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27628,27924,27925,53931</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/619/1/1$$EView_record_in_IOP_Publishing$$FView_record_in_$$GIOP_Publishing</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16525247$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scannapieco, Evan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thacker, Robert J</creatorcontrib><title>Toward an Improved Analytical Description of Lagrangian Bias</title><title>The Astrophysical journal</title><description>We carry out a detailed numerical investigation of the spatial correlation function of the initial positions of cosmological dark matter halos. In this Lagrangian coordinate system, which is especially useful for analytic studies of cosmological feedback, we are able to construct cross-correlation functions of objects with varying masses and formation redshifts and compare them with a variety of analytical approaches. For the case in which both formation redshifts are equal, we find good agreement between our numerical results and the bivariate model of Scannapieco &amp; Barkana at all masses, redshifts, and separations, while the model of Porciani and coworkers does well for all parameters except for objects with different masses at small separations. We find that the standard mapping between Lagrangian and Eulerian bias performs well for rare objects at all separations, but fails if the objects are highly nonlinear (low-sigma) peaks. In the Lagrangian case, in which the formation redshifts differ, the model of Scannapieco &amp; Barkana does well for all separations and combinations of masses, apart from a discrepancy at small separations in situations in which the smaller object is formed earlier, and the difference between redshifts or masses is large. As this same limitation arises in the standard approach to the single-point progenitor distribution developed by Lacey &amp; Cole, we conclude that a more complete understanding of the progenitor distribution is the most important outstanding issue in the analytic modeling of Lagrangian bias.</description><subject>Astronomy</subject><subject>Cosmology</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Mathematical and relativistic aspects of cosmology. Quantum cosmology</subject><subject>Stellar systems. Galactic and extragalactic objects and systems. The universe</subject><issn>0004-637X</issn><issn>1538-4357</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKf-hnqheFNtmqRJwZttfg0G3kzwLqQnyYh0bU06Zf_elA29EDkXhwMPL-d9EDrH2Q3ORHFL84JyeoBGmBGRUsL4IRplWUbTgvC3Y3QSwvtw5mU5QnfL9kt5nagmma87334anUwaVW97B6pO7k0A77retU3S2mShVl41KxfpqVPhFB1ZVQdztt9j9Pr4sJw9p4uXp_lsskiBcNanFkz8RCgAxSuwwLkQhRaMZsDKSrOKmoJqyLFillCcA6-Y1lYYASU2pSJjdLXLjQ9-bEzo5doFMHWtGtNugsScYEFi3R8QfBuCN1Z23q2V30qcyUGO3MmJ4OU-UYXY08ZW4MIvXbCc5ZRH7mLHubb7P-v6LzMIloNvWeBS4jidtuQbFJt6Kg</recordid><startdate>20050120</startdate><enddate>20050120</enddate><creator>Scannapieco, Evan</creator><creator>Thacker, Robert J</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050120</creationdate><title>Toward an Improved Analytical Description of Lagrangian Bias</title><author>Scannapieco, Evan ; Thacker, Robert J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-fce5388acca7bcfc77886d8540c59bd5b4e64dc21a5f3412c7b5ddf8e8c91e9a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Astronomy</topic><topic>Cosmology</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Mathematical and relativistic aspects of cosmology. Quantum cosmology</topic><topic>Stellar systems. Galactic and extragalactic objects and systems. The universe</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scannapieco, Evan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thacker, Robert J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Astrophysical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scannapieco, Evan</au><au>Thacker, Robert J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Toward an Improved Analytical Description of Lagrangian Bias</atitle><jtitle>The Astrophysical journal</jtitle><date>2005-01-20</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>619</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>1-11</pages><issn>0004-637X</issn><eissn>1538-4357</eissn><coden>ASJOAB</coden><abstract>We carry out a detailed numerical investigation of the spatial correlation function of the initial positions of cosmological dark matter halos. In this Lagrangian coordinate system, which is especially useful for analytic studies of cosmological feedback, we are able to construct cross-correlation functions of objects with varying masses and formation redshifts and compare them with a variety of analytical approaches. For the case in which both formation redshifts are equal, we find good agreement between our numerical results and the bivariate model of Scannapieco &amp; Barkana at all masses, redshifts, and separations, while the model of Porciani and coworkers does well for all parameters except for objects with different masses at small separations. We find that the standard mapping between Lagrangian and Eulerian bias performs well for rare objects at all separations, but fails if the objects are highly nonlinear (low-sigma) peaks. In the Lagrangian case, in which the formation redshifts differ, the model of Scannapieco &amp; Barkana does well for all separations and combinations of masses, apart from a discrepancy at small separations in situations in which the smaller object is formed earlier, and the difference between redshifts or masses is large. As this same limitation arises in the standard approach to the single-point progenitor distribution developed by Lacey &amp; Cole, we conclude that a more complete understanding of the progenitor distribution is the most important outstanding issue in the analytic modeling of Lagrangian bias.</abstract><cop>Chicago, IL</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1086/426474</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0004-637X
ispartof The Astrophysical journal, 2005-01, Vol.619 (1), p.1-11
issn 0004-637X
1538-4357
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17318315
source IOP Publishing Free Content
subjects Astronomy
Cosmology
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
Mathematical and relativistic aspects of cosmology. Quantum cosmology
Stellar systems. Galactic and extragalactic objects and systems. The universe
title Toward an Improved Analytical Description of Lagrangian Bias
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T08%3A17%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_O3W&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Toward%20an%20Improved%20Analytical%20Description%20of%20Lagrangian%20Bias&rft.jtitle=The%20Astrophysical%20journal&rft.au=Scannapieco,%20Evan&rft.date=2005-01-20&rft.volume=619&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=1-11&rft.issn=0004-637X&rft.eissn=1538-4357&rft.coden=ASJOAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/426474&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_O3W%3E17318315%3C/proquest_O3W%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17318315&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true