Toward an Improved Analytical Description of Lagrangian Bias
We carry out a detailed numerical investigation of the spatial correlation function of the initial positions of cosmological dark matter halos. In this Lagrangian coordinate system, which is especially useful for analytic studies of cosmological feedback, we are able to construct cross-correlation f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Astrophysical journal 2005-01, Vol.619 (1), p.1-11 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 11 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | The Astrophysical journal |
container_volume | 619 |
creator | Scannapieco, Evan Thacker, Robert J |
description | We carry out a detailed numerical investigation of the spatial correlation function of the initial positions of cosmological dark matter halos. In this Lagrangian coordinate system, which is especially useful for analytic studies of cosmological feedback, we are able to construct cross-correlation functions of objects with varying masses and formation redshifts and compare them with a variety of analytical approaches. For the case in which both formation redshifts are equal, we find good agreement between our numerical results and the bivariate model of Scannapieco & Barkana at all masses, redshifts, and separations, while the model of Porciani and coworkers does well for all parameters except for objects with different masses at small separations. We find that the standard mapping between Lagrangian and Eulerian bias performs well for rare objects at all separations, but fails if the objects are highly nonlinear (low-sigma) peaks. In the Lagrangian case, in which the formation redshifts differ, the model of Scannapieco & Barkana does well for all separations and combinations of masses, apart from a discrepancy at small separations in situations in which the smaller object is formed earlier, and the difference between redshifts or masses is large. As this same limitation arises in the standard approach to the single-point progenitor distribution developed by Lacey & Cole, we conclude that a more complete understanding of the progenitor distribution is the most important outstanding issue in the analytic modeling of Lagrangian bias. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/426474 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_O3W</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17318315</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17318315</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-fce5388acca7bcfc77886d8540c59bd5b4e64dc21a5f3412c7b5ddf8e8c91e9a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKf-hnqheFNtmqRJwZttfg0G3kzwLqQnyYh0bU06Zf_elA29EDkXhwMPL-d9EDrH2Q3ORHFL84JyeoBGmBGRUsL4IRplWUbTgvC3Y3QSwvtw5mU5QnfL9kt5nagmma87334anUwaVW97B6pO7k0A77retU3S2mShVl41KxfpqVPhFB1ZVQdztt9j9Pr4sJw9p4uXp_lsskiBcNanFkz8RCgAxSuwwLkQhRaMZsDKSrOKmoJqyLFillCcA6-Y1lYYASU2pSJjdLXLjQ9-bEzo5doFMHWtGtNugsScYEFi3R8QfBuCN1Z23q2V30qcyUGO3MmJ4OU-UYXY08ZW4MIvXbCc5ZRH7mLHubb7P-v6LzMIloNvWeBS4jidtuQbFJt6Kg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17318315</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Toward an Improved Analytical Description of Lagrangian Bias</title><source>IOP Publishing Free Content</source><creator>Scannapieco, Evan ; Thacker, Robert J</creator><creatorcontrib>Scannapieco, Evan ; Thacker, Robert J</creatorcontrib><description>We carry out a detailed numerical investigation of the spatial correlation function of the initial positions of cosmological dark matter halos. In this Lagrangian coordinate system, which is especially useful for analytic studies of cosmological feedback, we are able to construct cross-correlation functions of objects with varying masses and formation redshifts and compare them with a variety of analytical approaches. For the case in which both formation redshifts are equal, we find good agreement between our numerical results and the bivariate model of Scannapieco & Barkana at all masses, redshifts, and separations, while the model of Porciani and coworkers does well for all parameters except for objects with different masses at small separations. We find that the standard mapping between Lagrangian and Eulerian bias performs well for rare objects at all separations, but fails if the objects are highly nonlinear (low-sigma) peaks. In the Lagrangian case, in which the formation redshifts differ, the model of Scannapieco & Barkana does well for all separations and combinations of masses, apart from a discrepancy at small separations in situations in which the smaller object is formed earlier, and the difference between redshifts or masses is large. As this same limitation arises in the standard approach to the single-point progenitor distribution developed by Lacey & Cole, we conclude that a more complete understanding of the progenitor distribution is the most important outstanding issue in the analytic modeling of Lagrangian bias.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-637X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4357</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/426474</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ASJOAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, IL: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Astronomy ; Cosmology ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; Mathematical and relativistic aspects of cosmology. Quantum cosmology ; Stellar systems. Galactic and extragalactic objects and systems. The universe</subject><ispartof>The Astrophysical journal, 2005-01, Vol.619 (1), p.1-11</ispartof><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-fce5388acca7bcfc77886d8540c59bd5b4e64dc21a5f3412c7b5ddf8e8c91e9a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-fce5388acca7bcfc77886d8540c59bd5b4e64dc21a5f3412c7b5ddf8e8c91e9a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/426474/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27628,27924,27925,53931</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/619/1/1$$EView_record_in_IOP_Publishing$$FView_record_in_$$GIOP_Publishing</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16525247$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scannapieco, Evan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thacker, Robert J</creatorcontrib><title>Toward an Improved Analytical Description of Lagrangian Bias</title><title>The Astrophysical journal</title><description>We carry out a detailed numerical investigation of the spatial correlation function of the initial positions of cosmological dark matter halos. In this Lagrangian coordinate system, which is especially useful for analytic studies of cosmological feedback, we are able to construct cross-correlation functions of objects with varying masses and formation redshifts and compare them with a variety of analytical approaches. For the case in which both formation redshifts are equal, we find good agreement between our numerical results and the bivariate model of Scannapieco & Barkana at all masses, redshifts, and separations, while the model of Porciani and coworkers does well for all parameters except for objects with different masses at small separations. We find that the standard mapping between Lagrangian and Eulerian bias performs well for rare objects at all separations, but fails if the objects are highly nonlinear (low-sigma) peaks. In the Lagrangian case, in which the formation redshifts differ, the model of Scannapieco & Barkana does well for all separations and combinations of masses, apart from a discrepancy at small separations in situations in which the smaller object is formed earlier, and the difference between redshifts or masses is large. As this same limitation arises in the standard approach to the single-point progenitor distribution developed by Lacey & Cole, we conclude that a more complete understanding of the progenitor distribution is the most important outstanding issue in the analytic modeling of Lagrangian bias.</description><subject>Astronomy</subject><subject>Cosmology</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Mathematical and relativistic aspects of cosmology. Quantum cosmology</subject><subject>Stellar systems. Galactic and extragalactic objects and systems. The universe</subject><issn>0004-637X</issn><issn>1538-4357</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMoOKf-hnqheFNtmqRJwZttfg0G3kzwLqQnyYh0bU06Zf_elA29EDkXhwMPL-d9EDrH2Q3ORHFL84JyeoBGmBGRUsL4IRplWUbTgvC3Y3QSwvtw5mU5QnfL9kt5nagmma87334anUwaVW97B6pO7k0A77retU3S2mShVl41KxfpqVPhFB1ZVQdztt9j9Pr4sJw9p4uXp_lsskiBcNanFkz8RCgAxSuwwLkQhRaMZsDKSrOKmoJqyLFillCcA6-Y1lYYASU2pSJjdLXLjQ9-bEzo5doFMHWtGtNugsScYEFi3R8QfBuCN1Z23q2V30qcyUGO3MmJ4OU-UYXY08ZW4MIvXbCc5ZRH7mLHubb7P-v6LzMIloNvWeBS4jidtuQbFJt6Kg</recordid><startdate>20050120</startdate><enddate>20050120</enddate><creator>Scannapieco, Evan</creator><creator>Thacker, Robert J</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050120</creationdate><title>Toward an Improved Analytical Description of Lagrangian Bias</title><author>Scannapieco, Evan ; Thacker, Robert J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-fce5388acca7bcfc77886d8540c59bd5b4e64dc21a5f3412c7b5ddf8e8c91e9a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Astronomy</topic><topic>Cosmology</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Mathematical and relativistic aspects of cosmology. Quantum cosmology</topic><topic>Stellar systems. Galactic and extragalactic objects and systems. The universe</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scannapieco, Evan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thacker, Robert J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Astrophysical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scannapieco, Evan</au><au>Thacker, Robert J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Toward an Improved Analytical Description of Lagrangian Bias</atitle><jtitle>The Astrophysical journal</jtitle><date>2005-01-20</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>619</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>1-11</pages><issn>0004-637X</issn><eissn>1538-4357</eissn><coden>ASJOAB</coden><abstract>We carry out a detailed numerical investigation of the spatial correlation function of the initial positions of cosmological dark matter halos. In this Lagrangian coordinate system, which is especially useful for analytic studies of cosmological feedback, we are able to construct cross-correlation functions of objects with varying masses and formation redshifts and compare them with a variety of analytical approaches. For the case in which both formation redshifts are equal, we find good agreement between our numerical results and the bivariate model of Scannapieco & Barkana at all masses, redshifts, and separations, while the model of Porciani and coworkers does well for all parameters except for objects with different masses at small separations. We find that the standard mapping between Lagrangian and Eulerian bias performs well for rare objects at all separations, but fails if the objects are highly nonlinear (low-sigma) peaks. In the Lagrangian case, in which the formation redshifts differ, the model of Scannapieco & Barkana does well for all separations and combinations of masses, apart from a discrepancy at small separations in situations in which the smaller object is formed earlier, and the difference between redshifts or masses is large. As this same limitation arises in the standard approach to the single-point progenitor distribution developed by Lacey & Cole, we conclude that a more complete understanding of the progenitor distribution is the most important outstanding issue in the analytic modeling of Lagrangian bias.</abstract><cop>Chicago, IL</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1086/426474</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0004-637X |
ispartof | The Astrophysical journal, 2005-01, Vol.619 (1), p.1-11 |
issn | 0004-637X 1538-4357 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17318315 |
source | IOP Publishing Free Content |
subjects | Astronomy Cosmology Earth, ocean, space Exact sciences and technology Mathematical and relativistic aspects of cosmology. Quantum cosmology Stellar systems. Galactic and extragalactic objects and systems. The universe |
title | Toward an Improved Analytical Description of Lagrangian Bias |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T08%3A17%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_O3W&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Toward%20an%20Improved%20Analytical%20Description%20of%20Lagrangian%20Bias&rft.jtitle=The%20Astrophysical%20journal&rft.au=Scannapieco,%20Evan&rft.date=2005-01-20&rft.volume=619&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=1-11&rft.issn=0004-637X&rft.eissn=1538-4357&rft.coden=ASJOAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/426474&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_O3W%3E17318315%3C/proquest_O3W%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17318315&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |