Early surgical intervention versus watchful waiting and outcomes for asymptomatic severe aortic regurgitation

Abstract Objectives The management of asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation remains controversial. Accordingly, the aim of the present study was to assess the long-term outcomes and incidence of cardiac complications among asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation who u...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2015-11, Vol.150 (5), p.1100-1108
Hauptverfasser: de Meester, Christophe, MS, Gerber, Bernhard L., MD, PhD, Vancraeynest, David, MD, PhD, Pouleur, Anne-Catherine, MD, PhD, Noirhomme, Philippe, MD, Pasquet, Agnès, MD, PhD, El Khoury, Gébrine, MD, Vanoverschelde, Jean-Louis, MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1108
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1100
container_title The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
container_volume 150
creator de Meester, Christophe, MS
Gerber, Bernhard L., MD, PhD
Vancraeynest, David, MD, PhD
Pouleur, Anne-Catherine, MD, PhD
Noirhomme, Philippe, MD
Pasquet, Agnès, MD, PhD
El Khoury, Gébrine, MD
Vanoverschelde, Jean-Louis, MD, PhD
description Abstract Objectives The management of asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation remains controversial. Accordingly, the aim of the present study was to assess the long-term outcomes and incidence of cardiac complications among asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation who underwent operation early, in the absence of any class I or class IIa guideline triggers, or were managed conservatively and eventually underwent operation whenever these triggers appeared. Methods A total of 160 consecutive asymptomatic patients (50 ± 17 years) with severe aortic regurgitation were prospectively followed up for a median of 7.2 years. Overall and cardiovascular survivals and the need for repeat aortic regurgitation surgery were evaluated in an “early surgery” group (n = 91) and a “conservatively managed” group (n = 69). Results Ten-year overall (91% ± 4% vs 89% ± 5%, P  = .87) and cardiovascular (96% ± 2% vs 96% ± 3%, P  = .79) survivals were similar among the early surgery and conservatively managed groups. Conservatively managed patients were further sub-stratified according to the regularity and quality of their follow-up. Patients who were regularly followed up by a certified cardiologist had a better 10-year overall survival than patients undergoing no or a looser follow-up (95% ± 5% vs 79% ± 10%, P  = .045). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis identified age ( P  = .003) and male gender ( P  = .024) as independent predictors of survival. Early surgical management was not a predictor of outcome ( P  = .45). Conclusions Our results show that the outcome of asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation is not different between an early surgical and a more conservative strategy, provided that the conservatively managed patients are regularly followed up and timely referred to surgery as soon as operative triggers develop. This suggests that surgery should not be recommended in patients with aortic regurgitation who do not meet current guidelines for intervention.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.07.053
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1731786969</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0022522315012714</els_id><sourcerecordid>1731786969</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c595t-355be9ae21d9be6083c0a0b634b7d3b835fdafff87f1f15d59b69044a4fb7c3c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUGL1TAUhYMozpvRXyBIlm5ab5KmaRcKMoyOMOBCBXchTW-eqW3zTNI3vH9v6xtduHF1c-Gcc8l3CHnBoGTA6tdDOWR7TCUHJktQJUjxiOwYtKqoG_ntMdkBcF5IzsUFuUxpAAAFrH1KLnjN26ZRfEemGxPHE01L3HtrRurnjPGIc_ZhpkeMaUn03mT73S3j-vDZz3tq5p6GJdswYaIuRGrSaTrkMJnsLU24-pCaELct4n7LzmZLfEaeODMmfP4wr8jX9zdfrm-Lu08fPl6_uyusbGUuhJQdtgY569sOa2iEBQNdLapO9aJrhHS9cc41yjHHZC_brm6hqkzlOmWFFVfk1Tn3EMPPBVPWk08Wx9HMGJakmRJMNXVbt6tUnKU2hpQiOn2IfjLxpBnojbMe9G_OeuOsQemV8-p6-XBg6Sbs_3r-gF0Fb84CXL959Bh1sh5ni72PaLPug__Pgbf_-O3o562iH3jCNIQlzitBzXTiGvTnreqtaSaBccUq8QvauqiH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1731786969</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Early surgical intervention versus watchful waiting and outcomes for asymptomatic severe aortic regurgitation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>de Meester, Christophe, MS ; Gerber, Bernhard L., MD, PhD ; Vancraeynest, David, MD, PhD ; Pouleur, Anne-Catherine, MD, PhD ; Noirhomme, Philippe, MD ; Pasquet, Agnès, MD, PhD ; El Khoury, Gébrine, MD ; Vanoverschelde, Jean-Louis, MD, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>de Meester, Christophe, MS ; Gerber, Bernhard L., MD, PhD ; Vancraeynest, David, MD, PhD ; Pouleur, Anne-Catherine, MD, PhD ; Noirhomme, Philippe, MD ; Pasquet, Agnès, MD, PhD ; El Khoury, Gébrine, MD ; Vanoverschelde, Jean-Louis, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives The management of asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation remains controversial. Accordingly, the aim of the present study was to assess the long-term outcomes and incidence of cardiac complications among asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation who underwent operation early, in the absence of any class I or class IIa guideline triggers, or were managed conservatively and eventually underwent operation whenever these triggers appeared. Methods A total of 160 consecutive asymptomatic patients (50 ± 17 years) with severe aortic regurgitation were prospectively followed up for a median of 7.2 years. Overall and cardiovascular survivals and the need for repeat aortic regurgitation surgery were evaluated in an “early surgery” group (n = 91) and a “conservatively managed” group (n = 69). Results Ten-year overall (91% ± 4% vs 89% ± 5%, P  = .87) and cardiovascular (96% ± 2% vs 96% ± 3%, P  = .79) survivals were similar among the early surgery and conservatively managed groups. Conservatively managed patients were further sub-stratified according to the regularity and quality of their follow-up. Patients who were regularly followed up by a certified cardiologist had a better 10-year overall survival than patients undergoing no or a looser follow-up (95% ± 5% vs 79% ± 10%, P  = .045). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis identified age ( P  = .003) and male gender ( P  = .024) as independent predictors of survival. Early surgical management was not a predictor of outcome ( P  = .45). Conclusions Our results show that the outcome of asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation is not different between an early surgical and a more conservative strategy, provided that the conservatively managed patients are regularly followed up and timely referred to surgery as soon as operative triggers develop. This suggests that surgery should not be recommended in patients with aortic regurgitation who do not meet current guidelines for intervention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-685X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.07.053</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26298872</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; aortic regurgitation ; Aortic Valve Insufficiency - diagnosis ; Aortic Valve Insufficiency - mortality ; Aortic Valve Insufficiency - surgery ; Aortic Valve Insufficiency - therapy ; aortic valve repair ; Asymptomatic Diseases ; Cardiothoracic Surgery ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Early Medical Intervention - methods ; early surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Patient Selection ; Propensity Score ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Registries ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; Severity of Illness Index ; Sex Factors ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Vascular Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Vascular Surgical Procedures - mortality ; Watchful Waiting</subject><ispartof>The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2015-11, Vol.150 (5), p.1100-1108</ispartof><rights>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery</rights><rights>2015 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c595t-355be9ae21d9be6083c0a0b634b7d3b835fdafff87f1f15d59b69044a4fb7c3c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c595t-355be9ae21d9be6083c0a0b634b7d3b835fdafff87f1f15d59b69044a4fb7c3c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022522315012714$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26298872$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Meester, Christophe, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerber, Bernhard L., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vancraeynest, David, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pouleur, Anne-Catherine, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noirhomme, Philippe, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasquet, Agnès, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Khoury, Gébrine, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanoverschelde, Jean-Louis, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Early surgical intervention versus watchful waiting and outcomes for asymptomatic severe aortic regurgitation</title><title>The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery</title><addtitle>J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives The management of asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation remains controversial. Accordingly, the aim of the present study was to assess the long-term outcomes and incidence of cardiac complications among asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation who underwent operation early, in the absence of any class I or class IIa guideline triggers, or were managed conservatively and eventually underwent operation whenever these triggers appeared. Methods A total of 160 consecutive asymptomatic patients (50 ± 17 years) with severe aortic regurgitation were prospectively followed up for a median of 7.2 years. Overall and cardiovascular survivals and the need for repeat aortic regurgitation surgery were evaluated in an “early surgery” group (n = 91) and a “conservatively managed” group (n = 69). Results Ten-year overall (91% ± 4% vs 89% ± 5%, P  = .87) and cardiovascular (96% ± 2% vs 96% ± 3%, P  = .79) survivals were similar among the early surgery and conservatively managed groups. Conservatively managed patients were further sub-stratified according to the regularity and quality of their follow-up. Patients who were regularly followed up by a certified cardiologist had a better 10-year overall survival than patients undergoing no or a looser follow-up (95% ± 5% vs 79% ± 10%, P  = .045). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis identified age ( P  = .003) and male gender ( P  = .024) as independent predictors of survival. Early surgical management was not a predictor of outcome ( P  = .45). Conclusions Our results show that the outcome of asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation is not different between an early surgical and a more conservative strategy, provided that the conservatively managed patients are regularly followed up and timely referred to surgery as soon as operative triggers develop. This suggests that surgery should not be recommended in patients with aortic regurgitation who do not meet current guidelines for intervention.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>aortic regurgitation</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Insufficiency - diagnosis</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Insufficiency - mortality</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Insufficiency - surgery</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Insufficiency - therapy</subject><subject>aortic valve repair</subject><subject>Asymptomatic Diseases</subject><subject>Cardiothoracic Surgery</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Early Medical Intervention - methods</subject><subject>early surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Propensity Score</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vascular Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Vascular Surgical Procedures - mortality</subject><subject>Watchful Waiting</subject><issn>0022-5223</issn><issn>1097-685X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUGL1TAUhYMozpvRXyBIlm5ab5KmaRcKMoyOMOBCBXchTW-eqW3zTNI3vH9v6xtduHF1c-Gcc8l3CHnBoGTA6tdDOWR7TCUHJktQJUjxiOwYtKqoG_ntMdkBcF5IzsUFuUxpAAAFrH1KLnjN26ZRfEemGxPHE01L3HtrRurnjPGIc_ZhpkeMaUn03mT73S3j-vDZz3tq5p6GJdswYaIuRGrSaTrkMJnsLU24-pCaELct4n7LzmZLfEaeODMmfP4wr8jX9zdfrm-Lu08fPl6_uyusbGUuhJQdtgY569sOa2iEBQNdLapO9aJrhHS9cc41yjHHZC_brm6hqkzlOmWFFVfk1Tn3EMPPBVPWk08Wx9HMGJakmRJMNXVbt6tUnKU2hpQiOn2IfjLxpBnojbMe9G_OeuOsQemV8-p6-XBg6Sbs_3r-gF0Fb84CXL959Bh1sh5ni72PaLPug__Pgbf_-O3o562iH3jCNIQlzitBzXTiGvTnreqtaSaBccUq8QvauqiH</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>de Meester, Christophe, MS</creator><creator>Gerber, Bernhard L., MD, PhD</creator><creator>Vancraeynest, David, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Pouleur, Anne-Catherine, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Noirhomme, Philippe, MD</creator><creator>Pasquet, Agnès, MD, PhD</creator><creator>El Khoury, Gébrine, MD</creator><creator>Vanoverschelde, Jean-Louis, MD, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Early surgical intervention versus watchful waiting and outcomes for asymptomatic severe aortic regurgitation</title><author>de Meester, Christophe, MS ; Gerber, Bernhard L., MD, PhD ; Vancraeynest, David, MD, PhD ; Pouleur, Anne-Catherine, MD, PhD ; Noirhomme, Philippe, MD ; Pasquet, Agnès, MD, PhD ; El Khoury, Gébrine, MD ; Vanoverschelde, Jean-Louis, MD, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c595t-355be9ae21d9be6083c0a0b634b7d3b835fdafff87f1f15d59b69044a4fb7c3c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>aortic regurgitation</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Insufficiency - diagnosis</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Insufficiency - mortality</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Insufficiency - surgery</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Insufficiency - therapy</topic><topic>aortic valve repair</topic><topic>Asymptomatic Diseases</topic><topic>Cardiothoracic Surgery</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Early Medical Intervention - methods</topic><topic>early surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Propensity Score</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vascular Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Vascular Surgical Procedures - mortality</topic><topic>Watchful Waiting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Meester, Christophe, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerber, Bernhard L., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vancraeynest, David, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pouleur, Anne-Catherine, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noirhomme, Philippe, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasquet, Agnès, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Khoury, Gébrine, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanoverschelde, Jean-Louis, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Meester, Christophe, MS</au><au>Gerber, Bernhard L., MD, PhD</au><au>Vancraeynest, David, MD, PhD</au><au>Pouleur, Anne-Catherine, MD, PhD</au><au>Noirhomme, Philippe, MD</au><au>Pasquet, Agnès, MD, PhD</au><au>El Khoury, Gébrine, MD</au><au>Vanoverschelde, Jean-Louis, MD, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Early surgical intervention versus watchful waiting and outcomes for asymptomatic severe aortic regurgitation</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg</addtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>150</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1100</spage><epage>1108</epage><pages>1100-1108</pages><issn>0022-5223</issn><eissn>1097-685X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives The management of asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation remains controversial. Accordingly, the aim of the present study was to assess the long-term outcomes and incidence of cardiac complications among asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation who underwent operation early, in the absence of any class I or class IIa guideline triggers, or were managed conservatively and eventually underwent operation whenever these triggers appeared. Methods A total of 160 consecutive asymptomatic patients (50 ± 17 years) with severe aortic regurgitation were prospectively followed up for a median of 7.2 years. Overall and cardiovascular survivals and the need for repeat aortic regurgitation surgery were evaluated in an “early surgery” group (n = 91) and a “conservatively managed” group (n = 69). Results Ten-year overall (91% ± 4% vs 89% ± 5%, P  = .87) and cardiovascular (96% ± 2% vs 96% ± 3%, P  = .79) survivals were similar among the early surgery and conservatively managed groups. Conservatively managed patients were further sub-stratified according to the regularity and quality of their follow-up. Patients who were regularly followed up by a certified cardiologist had a better 10-year overall survival than patients undergoing no or a looser follow-up (95% ± 5% vs 79% ± 10%, P  = .045). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis identified age ( P  = .003) and male gender ( P  = .024) as independent predictors of survival. Early surgical management was not a predictor of outcome ( P  = .45). Conclusions Our results show that the outcome of asymptomatic patients with severe aortic regurgitation is not different between an early surgical and a more conservative strategy, provided that the conservatively managed patients are regularly followed up and timely referred to surgery as soon as operative triggers develop. This suggests that surgery should not be recommended in patients with aortic regurgitation who do not meet current guidelines for intervention.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26298872</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.07.053</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-5223
ispartof The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2015-11, Vol.150 (5), p.1100-1108
issn 0022-5223
1097-685X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1731786969
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Age Factors
Aged
aortic regurgitation
Aortic Valve Insufficiency - diagnosis
Aortic Valve Insufficiency - mortality
Aortic Valve Insufficiency - surgery
Aortic Valve Insufficiency - therapy
aortic valve repair
Asymptomatic Diseases
Cardiothoracic Surgery
Chi-Square Distribution
Early Medical Intervention - methods
early surgery
Female
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Patient Selection
Propensity Score
Proportional Hazards Models
Registries
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Severity of Illness Index
Sex Factors
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Vascular Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Vascular Surgical Procedures - mortality
Watchful Waiting
title Early surgical intervention versus watchful waiting and outcomes for asymptomatic severe aortic regurgitation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T06%3A03%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Early%20surgical%20intervention%20versus%20watchful%20waiting%20and%20outcomes%20for%20asymptomatic%20severe%20aortic%20regurgitation&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20thoracic%20and%20cardiovascular%20surgery&rft.au=de%20Meester,%20Christophe,%20MS&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=150&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1100&rft.epage=1108&rft.pages=1100-1108&rft.issn=0022-5223&rft.eissn=1097-685X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.07.053&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1731786969%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1731786969&rft_id=info:pmid/26298872&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0022522315012714&rfr_iscdi=true