Assessing hydrological model predictive uncertainty using stochastically generated geological models
In distributed and coupled surface water–groundwater modelling, the uncertainty from the geological structure is unaccounted for if only one deterministic geological model is used. In the present study, the geological structural uncertainty is represented by multiple, stochastically generated geolog...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Hydrological processes 2015-09, Vol.29 (19), p.4293-4311 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4311 |
---|---|
container_issue | 19 |
container_start_page | 4293 |
container_title | Hydrological processes |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | He, Xin Højberg, Anker Lajer Jørgensen, Flemming Refsgaard, Jens Christian |
description | In distributed and coupled surface water–groundwater modelling, the uncertainty from the geological structure is unaccounted for if only one deterministic geological model is used. In the present study, the geological structural uncertainty is represented by multiple, stochastically generated geological models, which are used to develop hydrological model ensembles for the Norsminde catchment in Denmark. The geological models have been constructed using two types of field data, airborne geophysical data and borehole well log data. The use of airborne geophysical data in constructing stochastic geological models and followed by the application of such models to assess hydrological simulation uncertainty for both surface water and groundwater have not been previously studied. The results show that the hydrological ensemble based on geophysical data has a lower level of simulation uncertainty, but the ensemble based on borehole data is able to encapsulate more observation points for stream discharge simulation. The groundwater simulations are in general more sensitive to the changes in the geological structure than the stream discharge simulations, and in the deeper groundwater layers, there are larger variations between simulations within an ensemble than in the upper layers. The relationship between hydrological prediction uncertainties measured as the spread within the hydrological ensembles and the spatial aggregation scale of simulation results has been analysed using a representative elementary scale concept. The results show a clear increase of prediction uncertainty as the spatial scale decreases. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/hyp.10488 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1730088074</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1712567877</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4608-c94baee2a5eb62a66387d30f396df09c5a2cae45aeca120799749c02aabacc693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUlP40AQhVsIJMJy4B9Y4sLFQ3np7YiiAUZCgQOL4NKqtCtJg2Nnuu0B__vpJAhp5sSp3uF7tT3GTjL4kQHk54thFUWp1A4bZaB1moHiu2wESvFUgJL77CCEVwAoQcGIVRchUAiumSeLofJt3c6dxTpZthXVycpT5Wzn_lDSN5Z8h67phqTf8KFr7QJDt-brIZlTQx47qqL6t004YnszrAMdf9ZD9nD58358nd7cXv0aX9ykWMbVUqvLKRLlyGkqchSiULIqYFZoUc1AW465RSo5ksUsB6m1LLWFHHGK1gpdHLKzbd-Vb3_3FDqzdMFSXWNDbR9MJguIjwBZfgPNci6kkjKip_-hr23vm3hIpIBrKXS5nn2-pd5dTYNZebdEP5gMzDoXE3Mxm1zM9fPdRkRHunW40NHHlwP9mxGykNw8Ta6MfJlwmDyOzX3xF81Wk60</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1705976949</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing hydrological model predictive uncertainty using stochastically generated geological models</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>He, Xin ; Højberg, Anker Lajer ; Jørgensen, Flemming ; Refsgaard, Jens Christian</creator><creatorcontrib>He, Xin ; Højberg, Anker Lajer ; Jørgensen, Flemming ; Refsgaard, Jens Christian</creatorcontrib><description>In distributed and coupled surface water–groundwater modelling, the uncertainty from the geological structure is unaccounted for if only one deterministic geological model is used. In the present study, the geological structural uncertainty is represented by multiple, stochastically generated geological models, which are used to develop hydrological model ensembles for the Norsminde catchment in Denmark. The geological models have been constructed using two types of field data, airborne geophysical data and borehole well log data. The use of airborne geophysical data in constructing stochastic geological models and followed by the application of such models to assess hydrological simulation uncertainty for both surface water and groundwater have not been previously studied. The results show that the hydrological ensemble based on geophysical data has a lower level of simulation uncertainty, but the ensemble based on borehole data is able to encapsulate more observation points for stream discharge simulation. The groundwater simulations are in general more sensitive to the changes in the geological structure than the stream discharge simulations, and in the deeper groundwater layers, there are larger variations between simulations within an ensemble than in the upper layers. The relationship between hydrological prediction uncertainties measured as the spread within the hydrological ensembles and the spatial aggregation scale of simulation results has been analysed using a representative elementary scale concept. The results show a clear increase of prediction uncertainty as the spatial scale decreases. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-6087</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1085</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hyp.10488</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>AEM data ; Boreholes ; Geology ; Geophysics ; Groundwater ; hydrological model ; Hydrology ; Mathematical models ; MIKE SHE ; representative elementary scale (RES) ; Simulation ; SkyTEM data ; stochastic geological models ; TProGS ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Hydrological processes, 2015-09, Vol.29 (19), p.4293-4311</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4608-c94baee2a5eb62a66387d30f396df09c5a2cae45aeca120799749c02aabacc693</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhyp.10488$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhyp.10488$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>He, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Højberg, Anker Lajer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jørgensen, Flemming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Refsgaard, Jens Christian</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing hydrological model predictive uncertainty using stochastically generated geological models</title><title>Hydrological processes</title><addtitle>Hydrol. Process</addtitle><description>In distributed and coupled surface water–groundwater modelling, the uncertainty from the geological structure is unaccounted for if only one deterministic geological model is used. In the present study, the geological structural uncertainty is represented by multiple, stochastically generated geological models, which are used to develop hydrological model ensembles for the Norsminde catchment in Denmark. The geological models have been constructed using two types of field data, airborne geophysical data and borehole well log data. The use of airborne geophysical data in constructing stochastic geological models and followed by the application of such models to assess hydrological simulation uncertainty for both surface water and groundwater have not been previously studied. The results show that the hydrological ensemble based on geophysical data has a lower level of simulation uncertainty, but the ensemble based on borehole data is able to encapsulate more observation points for stream discharge simulation. The groundwater simulations are in general more sensitive to the changes in the geological structure than the stream discharge simulations, and in the deeper groundwater layers, there are larger variations between simulations within an ensemble than in the upper layers. The relationship between hydrological prediction uncertainties measured as the spread within the hydrological ensembles and the spatial aggregation scale of simulation results has been analysed using a representative elementary scale concept. The results show a clear increase of prediction uncertainty as the spatial scale decreases. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>AEM data</subject><subject>Boreholes</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>hydrological model</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>MIKE SHE</subject><subject>representative elementary scale (RES)</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>SkyTEM data</subject><subject>stochastic geological models</subject><subject>TProGS</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0885-6087</issn><issn>1099-1085</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkUlP40AQhVsIJMJy4B9Y4sLFQ3np7YiiAUZCgQOL4NKqtCtJg2Nnuu0B__vpJAhp5sSp3uF7tT3GTjL4kQHk54thFUWp1A4bZaB1moHiu2wESvFUgJL77CCEVwAoQcGIVRchUAiumSeLofJt3c6dxTpZthXVycpT5Wzn_lDSN5Z8h67phqTf8KFr7QJDt-brIZlTQx47qqL6t004YnszrAMdf9ZD9nD58358nd7cXv0aX9ykWMbVUqvLKRLlyGkqchSiULIqYFZoUc1AW465RSo5ksUsB6m1LLWFHHGK1gpdHLKzbd-Vb3_3FDqzdMFSXWNDbR9MJguIjwBZfgPNci6kkjKip_-hr23vm3hIpIBrKXS5nn2-pd5dTYNZebdEP5gMzDoXE3Mxm1zM9fPdRkRHunW40NHHlwP9mxGykNw8Ta6MfJlwmDyOzX3xF81Wk60</recordid><startdate>20150915</startdate><enddate>20150915</enddate><creator>He, Xin</creator><creator>Højberg, Anker Lajer</creator><creator>Jørgensen, Flemming</creator><creator>Refsgaard, Jens Christian</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150915</creationdate><title>Assessing hydrological model predictive uncertainty using stochastically generated geological models</title><author>He, Xin ; Højberg, Anker Lajer ; Jørgensen, Flemming ; Refsgaard, Jens Christian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4608-c94baee2a5eb62a66387d30f396df09c5a2cae45aeca120799749c02aabacc693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>AEM data</topic><topic>Boreholes</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>hydrological model</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>MIKE SHE</topic><topic>representative elementary scale (RES)</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>SkyTEM data</topic><topic>stochastic geological models</topic><topic>TProGS</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>He, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Højberg, Anker Lajer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jørgensen, Flemming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Refsgaard, Jens Christian</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>He, Xin</au><au>Højberg, Anker Lajer</au><au>Jørgensen, Flemming</au><au>Refsgaard, Jens Christian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing hydrological model predictive uncertainty using stochastically generated geological models</atitle><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle><addtitle>Hydrol. Process</addtitle><date>2015-09-15</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>4293</spage><epage>4311</epage><pages>4293-4311</pages><issn>0885-6087</issn><eissn>1099-1085</eissn><abstract>In distributed and coupled surface water–groundwater modelling, the uncertainty from the geological structure is unaccounted for if only one deterministic geological model is used. In the present study, the geological structural uncertainty is represented by multiple, stochastically generated geological models, which are used to develop hydrological model ensembles for the Norsminde catchment in Denmark. The geological models have been constructed using two types of field data, airborne geophysical data and borehole well log data. The use of airborne geophysical data in constructing stochastic geological models and followed by the application of such models to assess hydrological simulation uncertainty for both surface water and groundwater have not been previously studied. The results show that the hydrological ensemble based on geophysical data has a lower level of simulation uncertainty, but the ensemble based on borehole data is able to encapsulate more observation points for stream discharge simulation. The groundwater simulations are in general more sensitive to the changes in the geological structure than the stream discharge simulations, and in the deeper groundwater layers, there are larger variations between simulations within an ensemble than in the upper layers. The relationship between hydrological prediction uncertainties measured as the spread within the hydrological ensembles and the spatial aggregation scale of simulation results has been analysed using a representative elementary scale concept. The results show a clear increase of prediction uncertainty as the spatial scale decreases. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/hyp.10488</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0885-6087 |
ispartof | Hydrological processes, 2015-09, Vol.29 (19), p.4293-4311 |
issn | 0885-6087 1099-1085 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1730088074 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | AEM data Boreholes Geology Geophysics Groundwater hydrological model Hydrology Mathematical models MIKE SHE representative elementary scale (RES) Simulation SkyTEM data stochastic geological models TProGS Uncertainty |
title | Assessing hydrological model predictive uncertainty using stochastically generated geological models |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T21%3A34%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20hydrological%20model%20predictive%20uncertainty%20using%20stochastically%20generated%20geological%20models&rft.jtitle=Hydrological%20processes&rft.au=He,%20Xin&rft.date=2015-09-15&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=4293&rft.epage=4311&rft.pages=4293-4311&rft.issn=0885-6087&rft.eissn=1099-1085&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hyp.10488&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E1712567877%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1705976949&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |