Experimental investigation on an ammonia–water–lithium bromide absorption refrigeration system without solution pump

► An absorption refrigeration system with ternary solution of NH 3–H 2O–LiBr was set up. ► Performance of the NH 3–H 2O–LiBr system without solution pump was firstly tested. ► Generator pressure in NH 3–H 2O–LiBr system was lower than the one in NH 3–H 2O system. ► The COP of the NH 3–H 2O–LiBr syst...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy conversion and management 2011-05, Vol.52 (5), p.2314-2319
Hauptverfasser: Wu, Tiehui, Wu, Yuyuan, Yu, Zhiqiang, Zhao, Haichen, Wu, Honglin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2319
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2314
container_title Energy conversion and management
container_volume 52
creator Wu, Tiehui
Wu, Yuyuan
Yu, Zhiqiang
Zhao, Haichen
Wu, Honglin
description ► An absorption refrigeration system with ternary solution of NH 3–H 2O–LiBr was set up. ► Performance of the NH 3–H 2O–LiBr system without solution pump was firstly tested. ► Generator pressure in NH 3–H 2O–LiBr system was lower than the one in NH 3–H 2O system. ► The COP of the NH 3–H 2O–LiBr system was 51.89% larger than the NH 3–H 2O binary system. ► The optimum mass fraction of LiBr of about 23% led to the largest COP of 0.401. Experimental researches were carried out on a novel ammonia–water–lithium bromide ternary solution absorption refrigeration and air-conditioning system without solution pump and distillation equipments. The experiments were conducted by using three kinds of NH 3–H 2O binary solution and 17 kinds of ternary solution with difference in mass fraction of NH 3 and LiBr. The experimental results showed that the vapor pressure of the generator in the system would be lower than that of the generator in an ammonia–water absorption system. In above two situations the same ammonia mass fraction and the same solution temperature were kept. The amplitude of vapor pressure decrease of the system generator would be larger with the increase of the mass fraction of LiBr. The maximum amplitude of decrease would be of 50%. With the increase of the mass fraction of LiBr, the coefficient of performance (COP) of the system would be increased initially, and then decreased later when the mass fraction of LiBr exceeded a certain value. This value was about 23% for the solution with ammonia mass fraction of 50% and 55%, and about 30% for the solution with ammonia mass fraction of 60%. Compared with the ammonia–water system, the COP of the ternary solution system with the same mass fraction of ammonia would increase up to 30%. With the ammonia mass fraction of 60% and LiBr mass fraction of 30% applied, the COP of the ternary solution system was increased up to 0.401. It was 51.89% higher than that when binary ammonia–water solution with ammonia mass fraction of 50% was applied. In above two operating situations, the temperature of hot water, cooling water and chilled water in the system would be kept almost constant, respectively.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.enconman.2010.10.042
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1730083845</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0196890410005169</els_id><sourcerecordid>1730083845</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-d08f256cc366db50cbfbf42bd99309ac8e406a0b00d4c34361ae2c24534e4d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUM1q3DAYFCWFbrZ9heJLoRdvP_1Ya98SQpoUAr3kLmT5c6rFklxJzs8t79A37JNUu5v0GvhgYJiZjxlCPlPYUKDy226D3gTvtN8wOJAbEOwdWdF229WMse0JWQHtZN12ID6Q05R2AMAbkCvyePk4Y7QOfdZTZf09pmzvdLbBV-V0OeeCt_rv858HnTEWnGz-ZRdX9TE4O2Cl-xTifLBEHKO9w3gMSE8po6seij4suUphWg78vLj5I3k_6inhpxdck9vvl7cX1_XNz6sfF-c3teHbJtcDtCNrpDFcyqFvwPRjPwrWD13HodOmRQFSQw8wCMMFl1QjM0w0XKAYBF-Tr8fYOYbfSymnnE0Gp0l7DEtSdMsBWt4Ww5rIo9TEkFJpouYyjI5PioLaL6126nVptV96z5eli_HLyw-djJ7GqL2x6b-b8U5wIWjRnR11WPreW4wqGVsScbARTVZDsG-9-gfEjp3D</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1730083845</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Experimental investigation on an ammonia–water–lithium bromide absorption refrigeration system without solution pump</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Wu, Tiehui ; Wu, Yuyuan ; Yu, Zhiqiang ; Zhao, Haichen ; Wu, Honglin</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, Tiehui ; Wu, Yuyuan ; Yu, Zhiqiang ; Zhao, Haichen ; Wu, Honglin</creatorcontrib><description>► An absorption refrigeration system with ternary solution of NH 3–H 2O–LiBr was set up. ► Performance of the NH 3–H 2O–LiBr system without solution pump was firstly tested. ► Generator pressure in NH 3–H 2O–LiBr system was lower than the one in NH 3–H 2O system. ► The COP of the NH 3–H 2O–LiBr system was 51.89% larger than the NH 3–H 2O binary system. ► The optimum mass fraction of LiBr of about 23% led to the largest COP of 0.401. Experimental researches were carried out on a novel ammonia–water–lithium bromide ternary solution absorption refrigeration and air-conditioning system without solution pump and distillation equipments. The experiments were conducted by using three kinds of NH 3–H 2O binary solution and 17 kinds of ternary solution with difference in mass fraction of NH 3 and LiBr. The experimental results showed that the vapor pressure of the generator in the system would be lower than that of the generator in an ammonia–water absorption system. In above two situations the same ammonia mass fraction and the same solution temperature were kept. The amplitude of vapor pressure decrease of the system generator would be larger with the increase of the mass fraction of LiBr. The maximum amplitude of decrease would be of 50%. With the increase of the mass fraction of LiBr, the coefficient of performance (COP) of the system would be increased initially, and then decreased later when the mass fraction of LiBr exceeded a certain value. This value was about 23% for the solution with ammonia mass fraction of 50% and 55%, and about 30% for the solution with ammonia mass fraction of 60%. Compared with the ammonia–water system, the COP of the ternary solution system with the same mass fraction of ammonia would increase up to 30%. With the ammonia mass fraction of 60% and LiBr mass fraction of 30% applied, the COP of the ternary solution system was increased up to 0.401. It was 51.89% higher than that when binary ammonia–water solution with ammonia mass fraction of 50% was applied. In above two operating situations, the temperature of hot water, cooling water and chilled water in the system would be kept almost constant, respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-8904</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2227</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2010.10.042</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECMADL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Absorption refrigeration ; Air conditioning. Ventilation ; Ammonia ; Ammonia–water–lithium bromide ; Amplitudes ; Applied sciences ; Bromides ; Chilled ; Coefficient of performance ; Energy ; Energy. Thermal use of fuels ; Exact sciences and technology ; Generation characteristics ; Generators ; Heating, air conditioning and ventilation ; Hot water ; Pumps ; Refrigerants ; Refrigerating engineering ; Refrigerating engineering. Cryogenics. Food conservation ; Refrigeration ; Techniques, equipment. Control. Metering ; Techniques. Materials ; Ternary solution ; Vapor pressure</subject><ispartof>Energy conversion and management, 2011-05, Vol.52 (5), p.2314-2319</ispartof><rights>2011</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-d08f256cc366db50cbfbf42bd99309ac8e406a0b00d4c34361ae2c24534e4d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-d08f256cc366db50cbfbf42bd99309ac8e406a0b00d4c34361ae2c24534e4d43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890410005169$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23943441$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, Tiehui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yuyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Zhiqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Haichen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Honglin</creatorcontrib><title>Experimental investigation on an ammonia–water–lithium bromide absorption refrigeration system without solution pump</title><title>Energy conversion and management</title><description>► An absorption refrigeration system with ternary solution of NH 3–H 2O–LiBr was set up. ► Performance of the NH 3–H 2O–LiBr system without solution pump was firstly tested. ► Generator pressure in NH 3–H 2O–LiBr system was lower than the one in NH 3–H 2O system. ► The COP of the NH 3–H 2O–LiBr system was 51.89% larger than the NH 3–H 2O binary system. ► The optimum mass fraction of LiBr of about 23% led to the largest COP of 0.401. Experimental researches were carried out on a novel ammonia–water–lithium bromide ternary solution absorption refrigeration and air-conditioning system without solution pump and distillation equipments. The experiments were conducted by using three kinds of NH 3–H 2O binary solution and 17 kinds of ternary solution with difference in mass fraction of NH 3 and LiBr. The experimental results showed that the vapor pressure of the generator in the system would be lower than that of the generator in an ammonia–water absorption system. In above two situations the same ammonia mass fraction and the same solution temperature were kept. The amplitude of vapor pressure decrease of the system generator would be larger with the increase of the mass fraction of LiBr. The maximum amplitude of decrease would be of 50%. With the increase of the mass fraction of LiBr, the coefficient of performance (COP) of the system would be increased initially, and then decreased later when the mass fraction of LiBr exceeded a certain value. This value was about 23% for the solution with ammonia mass fraction of 50% and 55%, and about 30% for the solution with ammonia mass fraction of 60%. Compared with the ammonia–water system, the COP of the ternary solution system with the same mass fraction of ammonia would increase up to 30%. With the ammonia mass fraction of 60% and LiBr mass fraction of 30% applied, the COP of the ternary solution system was increased up to 0.401. It was 51.89% higher than that when binary ammonia–water solution with ammonia mass fraction of 50% was applied. In above two operating situations, the temperature of hot water, cooling water and chilled water in the system would be kept almost constant, respectively.</description><subject>Absorption refrigeration</subject><subject>Air conditioning. Ventilation</subject><subject>Ammonia</subject><subject>Ammonia–water–lithium bromide</subject><subject>Amplitudes</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Bromides</subject><subject>Chilled</subject><subject>Coefficient of performance</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Generation characteristics</subject><subject>Generators</subject><subject>Heating, air conditioning and ventilation</subject><subject>Hot water</subject><subject>Pumps</subject><subject>Refrigerants</subject><subject>Refrigerating engineering</subject><subject>Refrigerating engineering. Cryogenics. Food conservation</subject><subject>Refrigeration</subject><subject>Techniques, equipment. Control. Metering</subject><subject>Techniques. Materials</subject><subject>Ternary solution</subject><subject>Vapor pressure</subject><issn>0196-8904</issn><issn>1879-2227</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUM1q3DAYFCWFbrZ9heJLoRdvP_1Ya98SQpoUAr3kLmT5c6rFklxJzs8t79A37JNUu5v0GvhgYJiZjxlCPlPYUKDy226D3gTvtN8wOJAbEOwdWdF229WMse0JWQHtZN12ID6Q05R2AMAbkCvyePk4Y7QOfdZTZf09pmzvdLbBV-V0OeeCt_rv858HnTEWnGz-ZRdX9TE4O2Cl-xTifLBEHKO9w3gMSE8po6seij4suUphWg78vLj5I3k_6inhpxdck9vvl7cX1_XNz6sfF-c3teHbJtcDtCNrpDFcyqFvwPRjPwrWD13HodOmRQFSQw8wCMMFl1QjM0w0XKAYBF-Tr8fYOYbfSymnnE0Gp0l7DEtSdMsBWt4Ww5rIo9TEkFJpouYyjI5PioLaL6126nVptV96z5eli_HLyw-djJ7GqL2x6b-b8U5wIWjRnR11WPreW4wqGVsScbARTVZDsG-9-gfEjp3D</recordid><startdate>20110501</startdate><enddate>20110501</enddate><creator>Wu, Tiehui</creator><creator>Wu, Yuyuan</creator><creator>Yu, Zhiqiang</creator><creator>Zhao, Haichen</creator><creator>Wu, Honglin</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110501</creationdate><title>Experimental investigation on an ammonia–water–lithium bromide absorption refrigeration system without solution pump</title><author>Wu, Tiehui ; Wu, Yuyuan ; Yu, Zhiqiang ; Zhao, Haichen ; Wu, Honglin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-d08f256cc366db50cbfbf42bd99309ac8e406a0b00d4c34361ae2c24534e4d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Absorption refrigeration</topic><topic>Air conditioning. Ventilation</topic><topic>Ammonia</topic><topic>Ammonia–water–lithium bromide</topic><topic>Amplitudes</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Bromides</topic><topic>Chilled</topic><topic>Coefficient of performance</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Generation characteristics</topic><topic>Generators</topic><topic>Heating, air conditioning and ventilation</topic><topic>Hot water</topic><topic>Pumps</topic><topic>Refrigerants</topic><topic>Refrigerating engineering</topic><topic>Refrigerating engineering. Cryogenics. Food conservation</topic><topic>Refrigeration</topic><topic>Techniques, equipment. Control. Metering</topic><topic>Techniques. Materials</topic><topic>Ternary solution</topic><topic>Vapor pressure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, Tiehui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yuyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Zhiqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Haichen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Honglin</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>Energy conversion and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, Tiehui</au><au>Wu, Yuyuan</au><au>Yu, Zhiqiang</au><au>Zhao, Haichen</au><au>Wu, Honglin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Experimental investigation on an ammonia–water–lithium bromide absorption refrigeration system without solution pump</atitle><jtitle>Energy conversion and management</jtitle><date>2011-05-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2314</spage><epage>2319</epage><pages>2314-2319</pages><issn>0196-8904</issn><eissn>1879-2227</eissn><coden>ECMADL</coden><abstract>► An absorption refrigeration system with ternary solution of NH 3–H 2O–LiBr was set up. ► Performance of the NH 3–H 2O–LiBr system without solution pump was firstly tested. ► Generator pressure in NH 3–H 2O–LiBr system was lower than the one in NH 3–H 2O system. ► The COP of the NH 3–H 2O–LiBr system was 51.89% larger than the NH 3–H 2O binary system. ► The optimum mass fraction of LiBr of about 23% led to the largest COP of 0.401. Experimental researches were carried out on a novel ammonia–water–lithium bromide ternary solution absorption refrigeration and air-conditioning system without solution pump and distillation equipments. The experiments were conducted by using three kinds of NH 3–H 2O binary solution and 17 kinds of ternary solution with difference in mass fraction of NH 3 and LiBr. The experimental results showed that the vapor pressure of the generator in the system would be lower than that of the generator in an ammonia–water absorption system. In above two situations the same ammonia mass fraction and the same solution temperature were kept. The amplitude of vapor pressure decrease of the system generator would be larger with the increase of the mass fraction of LiBr. The maximum amplitude of decrease would be of 50%. With the increase of the mass fraction of LiBr, the coefficient of performance (COP) of the system would be increased initially, and then decreased later when the mass fraction of LiBr exceeded a certain value. This value was about 23% for the solution with ammonia mass fraction of 50% and 55%, and about 30% for the solution with ammonia mass fraction of 60%. Compared with the ammonia–water system, the COP of the ternary solution system with the same mass fraction of ammonia would increase up to 30%. With the ammonia mass fraction of 60% and LiBr mass fraction of 30% applied, the COP of the ternary solution system was increased up to 0.401. It was 51.89% higher than that when binary ammonia–water solution with ammonia mass fraction of 50% was applied. In above two operating situations, the temperature of hot water, cooling water and chilled water in the system would be kept almost constant, respectively.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enconman.2010.10.042</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-8904
ispartof Energy conversion and management, 2011-05, Vol.52 (5), p.2314-2319
issn 0196-8904
1879-2227
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1730083845
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Absorption refrigeration
Air conditioning. Ventilation
Ammonia
Ammonia–water–lithium bromide
Amplitudes
Applied sciences
Bromides
Chilled
Coefficient of performance
Energy
Energy. Thermal use of fuels
Exact sciences and technology
Generation characteristics
Generators
Heating, air conditioning and ventilation
Hot water
Pumps
Refrigerants
Refrigerating engineering
Refrigerating engineering. Cryogenics. Food conservation
Refrigeration
Techniques, equipment. Control. Metering
Techniques. Materials
Ternary solution
Vapor pressure
title Experimental investigation on an ammonia–water–lithium bromide absorption refrigeration system without solution pump
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T05%3A48%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Experimental%20investigation%20on%20an%20ammonia%E2%80%93water%E2%80%93lithium%20bromide%20absorption%20refrigeration%20system%20without%20solution%20pump&rft.jtitle=Energy%20conversion%20and%20management&rft.au=Wu,%20Tiehui&rft.date=2011-05-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2314&rft.epage=2319&rft.pages=2314-2319&rft.issn=0196-8904&rft.eissn=1879-2227&rft.coden=ECMADL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enconman.2010.10.042&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1730083845%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1730083845&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0196890410005169&rfr_iscdi=true