Assessment of artificial neural network and genetic programming as predictive tools

•Two major soft computing techniques, ANN and GP, are evaluated in detail.•A case study in punching shear modeling of RC slabs is modeled.•The models are compared based on model complexity, statistical validation and parametric study.•Overfitting potential of the models is evaluated and suggestions...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Advances in engineering software (1992) 2015-10, Vol.88, p.63-72
Hauptverfasser: Gandomi, Amir H., Roke, David A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 72
container_issue
container_start_page 63
container_title Advances in engineering software (1992)
container_volume 88
creator Gandomi, Amir H.
Roke, David A.
description •Two major soft computing techniques, ANN and GP, are evaluated in detail.•A case study in punching shear modeling of RC slabs is modeled.•The models are compared based on model complexity, statistical validation and parametric study.•Overfitting potential of the models is evaluated and suggestions are provided.•The results indicate model acceptance criteria should include engineering analysis. Soft computing techniques have been widely used during the last two decades for nonlinear system modeling, specifically as predictive tools. In this study, the performances of two well-known soft computing predictive techniques, artificial neural network (ANN) and genetic programming (GP), are evaluated based on several criteria, including over-fitting potential. A case study in punching shear prediction of RC slabs is modeled here using a hybrid ANN (which includes simulated annealing and multi-layer perception) and an established GP variant called gene expression programming. The ANN and GP results are compared to values determined from several design codes. For more verification, external validation and parametric studies were also conducted. The results of this study indicate that model acceptance criteria should include engineering analysis from parametric studies.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.05.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1730077243</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0965997815000861</els_id><sourcerecordid>1730077243</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-47943056cf184202c9947d12b90a5a86c1cf85b8c1081598f4e471ca353373db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1LAzEUzEHB-vEfcvSyNdkkm82xFr-g4EE9hzT7sqTubmqSVvz3plbwKDwYBmaGN4MQpmROCW1uNnPT7WHqU3B5XhMq5qQckSdoRlQjKqVke4bOU9oQQjmp6Qy9LFKClEaYMg4Om5i989abAU-wiz-QP0N8x2bqcA-FeYu3MfTRjKOfemxSodB5m_0ecA5hSJfo1JkhwdUvXqC3-7vX5WO1en54Wi5WlWWC5opLxRkRjXW05TWprVJcdrReK2KEaRtLrWvFurWUtFSo1nHgklrDBGOSdWt2ga6PueWfjx2krEefLAyDmSDskqaSlfKy5qxI26PUxpBSBKe30Y8mfmlK9GE7vdF_2-nDdpqUI7JYb49WKFX2HqJO1sNkS-cINusu-P9DvgEnVX-1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1730077243</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of artificial neural network and genetic programming as predictive tools</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Gandomi, Amir H. ; Roke, David A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gandomi, Amir H. ; Roke, David A.</creatorcontrib><description>•Two major soft computing techniques, ANN and GP, are evaluated in detail.•A case study in punching shear modeling of RC slabs is modeled.•The models are compared based on model complexity, statistical validation and parametric study.•Overfitting potential of the models is evaluated and suggestions are provided.•The results indicate model acceptance criteria should include engineering analysis. Soft computing techniques have been widely used during the last two decades for nonlinear system modeling, specifically as predictive tools. In this study, the performances of two well-known soft computing predictive techniques, artificial neural network (ANN) and genetic programming (GP), are evaluated based on several criteria, including over-fitting potential. A case study in punching shear prediction of RC slabs is modeled here using a hybrid ANN (which includes simulated annealing and multi-layer perception) and an established GP variant called gene expression programming. The ANN and GP results are compared to values determined from several design codes. For more verification, external validation and parametric studies were also conducted. The results of this study indicate that model acceptance criteria should include engineering analysis from parametric studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0965-9978</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.05.007</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Artificial neural networks ; Assessments ; Computer programs ; Explicit formulation ; Genetic algorithms ; Genetic programming ; Learning theory ; Mathematical models ; Neural networks ; Over-fitting ; Parametric study ; Punching shear ; RC slabs ; Soft computing</subject><ispartof>Advances in engineering software (1992), 2015-10, Vol.88, p.63-72</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-47943056cf184202c9947d12b90a5a86c1cf85b8c1081598f4e471ca353373db3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-47943056cf184202c9947d12b90a5a86c1cf85b8c1081598f4e471ca353373db3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.05.007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27926,27927,45997</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gandomi, Amir H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roke, David A.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of artificial neural network and genetic programming as predictive tools</title><title>Advances in engineering software (1992)</title><description>•Two major soft computing techniques, ANN and GP, are evaluated in detail.•A case study in punching shear modeling of RC slabs is modeled.•The models are compared based on model complexity, statistical validation and parametric study.•Overfitting potential of the models is evaluated and suggestions are provided.•The results indicate model acceptance criteria should include engineering analysis. Soft computing techniques have been widely used during the last two decades for nonlinear system modeling, specifically as predictive tools. In this study, the performances of two well-known soft computing predictive techniques, artificial neural network (ANN) and genetic programming (GP), are evaluated based on several criteria, including over-fitting potential. A case study in punching shear prediction of RC slabs is modeled here using a hybrid ANN (which includes simulated annealing and multi-layer perception) and an established GP variant called gene expression programming. The ANN and GP results are compared to values determined from several design codes. For more verification, external validation and parametric studies were also conducted. The results of this study indicate that model acceptance criteria should include engineering analysis from parametric studies.</description><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Computer programs</subject><subject>Explicit formulation</subject><subject>Genetic algorithms</subject><subject>Genetic programming</subject><subject>Learning theory</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Over-fitting</subject><subject>Parametric study</subject><subject>Punching shear</subject><subject>RC slabs</subject><subject>Soft computing</subject><issn>0965-9978</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUE1LAzEUzEHB-vEfcvSyNdkkm82xFr-g4EE9hzT7sqTubmqSVvz3plbwKDwYBmaGN4MQpmROCW1uNnPT7WHqU3B5XhMq5qQckSdoRlQjKqVke4bOU9oQQjmp6Qy9LFKClEaYMg4Om5i989abAU-wiz-QP0N8x2bqcA-FeYu3MfTRjKOfemxSodB5m_0ecA5hSJfo1JkhwdUvXqC3-7vX5WO1en54Wi5WlWWC5opLxRkRjXW05TWprVJcdrReK2KEaRtLrWvFurWUtFSo1nHgklrDBGOSdWt2ga6PueWfjx2krEefLAyDmSDskqaSlfKy5qxI26PUxpBSBKe30Y8mfmlK9GE7vdF_2-nDdpqUI7JYb49WKFX2HqJO1sNkS-cINusu-P9DvgEnVX-1</recordid><startdate>20151001</startdate><enddate>20151001</enddate><creator>Gandomi, Amir H.</creator><creator>Roke, David A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151001</creationdate><title>Assessment of artificial neural network and genetic programming as predictive tools</title><author>Gandomi, Amir H. ; Roke, David A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-47943056cf184202c9947d12b90a5a86c1cf85b8c1081598f4e471ca353373db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Computer programs</topic><topic>Explicit formulation</topic><topic>Genetic algorithms</topic><topic>Genetic programming</topic><topic>Learning theory</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Over-fitting</topic><topic>Parametric study</topic><topic>Punching shear</topic><topic>RC slabs</topic><topic>Soft computing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gandomi, Amir H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roke, David A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Advances in engineering software (1992)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gandomi, Amir H.</au><au>Roke, David A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of artificial neural network and genetic programming as predictive tools</atitle><jtitle>Advances in engineering software (1992)</jtitle><date>2015-10-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>88</volume><spage>63</spage><epage>72</epage><pages>63-72</pages><issn>0965-9978</issn><abstract>•Two major soft computing techniques, ANN and GP, are evaluated in detail.•A case study in punching shear modeling of RC slabs is modeled.•The models are compared based on model complexity, statistical validation and parametric study.•Overfitting potential of the models is evaluated and suggestions are provided.•The results indicate model acceptance criteria should include engineering analysis. Soft computing techniques have been widely used during the last two decades for nonlinear system modeling, specifically as predictive tools. In this study, the performances of two well-known soft computing predictive techniques, artificial neural network (ANN) and genetic programming (GP), are evaluated based on several criteria, including over-fitting potential. A case study in punching shear prediction of RC slabs is modeled here using a hybrid ANN (which includes simulated annealing and multi-layer perception) and an established GP variant called gene expression programming. The ANN and GP results are compared to values determined from several design codes. For more verification, external validation and parametric studies were also conducted. The results of this study indicate that model acceptance criteria should include engineering analysis from parametric studies.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.05.007</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0965-9978
ispartof Advances in engineering software (1992), 2015-10, Vol.88, p.63-72
issn 0965-9978
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1730077243
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Artificial neural networks
Assessments
Computer programs
Explicit formulation
Genetic algorithms
Genetic programming
Learning theory
Mathematical models
Neural networks
Over-fitting
Parametric study
Punching shear
RC slabs
Soft computing
title Assessment of artificial neural network and genetic programming as predictive tools
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T19%3A37%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20artificial%20neural%20network%20and%20genetic%20programming%20as%20predictive%20tools&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20engineering%20software%20(1992)&rft.au=Gandomi,%20Amir%20H.&rft.date=2015-10-01&rft.volume=88&rft.spage=63&rft.epage=72&rft.pages=63-72&rft.issn=0965-9978&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.05.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1730077243%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1730077243&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0965997815000861&rfr_iscdi=true