Assessment of artificial neural network and genetic programming as predictive tools
•Two major soft computing techniques, ANN and GP, are evaluated in detail.•A case study in punching shear modeling of RC slabs is modeled.•The models are compared based on model complexity, statistical validation and parametric study.•Overfitting potential of the models is evaluated and suggestions...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Advances in engineering software (1992) 2015-10, Vol.88, p.63-72 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 72 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 63 |
container_title | Advances in engineering software (1992) |
container_volume | 88 |
creator | Gandomi, Amir H. Roke, David A. |
description | •Two major soft computing techniques, ANN and GP, are evaluated in detail.•A case study in punching shear modeling of RC slabs is modeled.•The models are compared based on model complexity, statistical validation and parametric study.•Overfitting potential of the models is evaluated and suggestions are provided.•The results indicate model acceptance criteria should include engineering analysis.
Soft computing techniques have been widely used during the last two decades for nonlinear system modeling, specifically as predictive tools. In this study, the performances of two well-known soft computing predictive techniques, artificial neural network (ANN) and genetic programming (GP), are evaluated based on several criteria, including over-fitting potential. A case study in punching shear prediction of RC slabs is modeled here using a hybrid ANN (which includes simulated annealing and multi-layer perception) and an established GP variant called gene expression programming. The ANN and GP results are compared to values determined from several design codes. For more verification, external validation and parametric studies were also conducted. The results of this study indicate that model acceptance criteria should include engineering analysis from parametric studies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.05.007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1730077243</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0965997815000861</els_id><sourcerecordid>1730077243</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-47943056cf184202c9947d12b90a5a86c1cf85b8c1081598f4e471ca353373db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1LAzEUzEHB-vEfcvSyNdkkm82xFr-g4EE9hzT7sqTubmqSVvz3plbwKDwYBmaGN4MQpmROCW1uNnPT7WHqU3B5XhMq5qQckSdoRlQjKqVke4bOU9oQQjmp6Qy9LFKClEaYMg4Om5i989abAU-wiz-QP0N8x2bqcA-FeYu3MfTRjKOfemxSodB5m_0ecA5hSJfo1JkhwdUvXqC3-7vX5WO1en54Wi5WlWWC5opLxRkRjXW05TWprVJcdrReK2KEaRtLrWvFurWUtFSo1nHgklrDBGOSdWt2ga6PueWfjx2krEefLAyDmSDskqaSlfKy5qxI26PUxpBSBKe30Y8mfmlK9GE7vdF_2-nDdpqUI7JYb49WKFX2HqJO1sNkS-cINusu-P9DvgEnVX-1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1730077243</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of artificial neural network and genetic programming as predictive tools</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Gandomi, Amir H. ; Roke, David A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gandomi, Amir H. ; Roke, David A.</creatorcontrib><description>•Two major soft computing techniques, ANN and GP, are evaluated in detail.•A case study in punching shear modeling of RC slabs is modeled.•The models are compared based on model complexity, statistical validation and parametric study.•Overfitting potential of the models is evaluated and suggestions are provided.•The results indicate model acceptance criteria should include engineering analysis.
Soft computing techniques have been widely used during the last two decades for nonlinear system modeling, specifically as predictive tools. In this study, the performances of two well-known soft computing predictive techniques, artificial neural network (ANN) and genetic programming (GP), are evaluated based on several criteria, including over-fitting potential. A case study in punching shear prediction of RC slabs is modeled here using a hybrid ANN (which includes simulated annealing and multi-layer perception) and an established GP variant called gene expression programming. The ANN and GP results are compared to values determined from several design codes. For more verification, external validation and parametric studies were also conducted. The results of this study indicate that model acceptance criteria should include engineering analysis from parametric studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0965-9978</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.05.007</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Artificial neural networks ; Assessments ; Computer programs ; Explicit formulation ; Genetic algorithms ; Genetic programming ; Learning theory ; Mathematical models ; Neural networks ; Over-fitting ; Parametric study ; Punching shear ; RC slabs ; Soft computing</subject><ispartof>Advances in engineering software (1992), 2015-10, Vol.88, p.63-72</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-47943056cf184202c9947d12b90a5a86c1cf85b8c1081598f4e471ca353373db3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-47943056cf184202c9947d12b90a5a86c1cf85b8c1081598f4e471ca353373db3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.05.007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27926,27927,45997</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gandomi, Amir H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roke, David A.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of artificial neural network and genetic programming as predictive tools</title><title>Advances in engineering software (1992)</title><description>•Two major soft computing techniques, ANN and GP, are evaluated in detail.•A case study in punching shear modeling of RC slabs is modeled.•The models are compared based on model complexity, statistical validation and parametric study.•Overfitting potential of the models is evaluated and suggestions are provided.•The results indicate model acceptance criteria should include engineering analysis.
Soft computing techniques have been widely used during the last two decades for nonlinear system modeling, specifically as predictive tools. In this study, the performances of two well-known soft computing predictive techniques, artificial neural network (ANN) and genetic programming (GP), are evaluated based on several criteria, including over-fitting potential. A case study in punching shear prediction of RC slabs is modeled here using a hybrid ANN (which includes simulated annealing and multi-layer perception) and an established GP variant called gene expression programming. The ANN and GP results are compared to values determined from several design codes. For more verification, external validation and parametric studies were also conducted. The results of this study indicate that model acceptance criteria should include engineering analysis from parametric studies.</description><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Computer programs</subject><subject>Explicit formulation</subject><subject>Genetic algorithms</subject><subject>Genetic programming</subject><subject>Learning theory</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Over-fitting</subject><subject>Parametric study</subject><subject>Punching shear</subject><subject>RC slabs</subject><subject>Soft computing</subject><issn>0965-9978</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUE1LAzEUzEHB-vEfcvSyNdkkm82xFr-g4EE9hzT7sqTubmqSVvz3plbwKDwYBmaGN4MQpmROCW1uNnPT7WHqU3B5XhMq5qQckSdoRlQjKqVke4bOU9oQQjmp6Qy9LFKClEaYMg4Om5i989abAU-wiz-QP0N8x2bqcA-FeYu3MfTRjKOfemxSodB5m_0ecA5hSJfo1JkhwdUvXqC3-7vX5WO1en54Wi5WlWWC5opLxRkRjXW05TWprVJcdrReK2KEaRtLrWvFurWUtFSo1nHgklrDBGOSdWt2ga6PueWfjx2krEefLAyDmSDskqaSlfKy5qxI26PUxpBSBKe30Y8mfmlK9GE7vdF_2-nDdpqUI7JYb49WKFX2HqJO1sNkS-cINusu-P9DvgEnVX-1</recordid><startdate>20151001</startdate><enddate>20151001</enddate><creator>Gandomi, Amir H.</creator><creator>Roke, David A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151001</creationdate><title>Assessment of artificial neural network and genetic programming as predictive tools</title><author>Gandomi, Amir H. ; Roke, David A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-47943056cf184202c9947d12b90a5a86c1cf85b8c1081598f4e471ca353373db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Computer programs</topic><topic>Explicit formulation</topic><topic>Genetic algorithms</topic><topic>Genetic programming</topic><topic>Learning theory</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Over-fitting</topic><topic>Parametric study</topic><topic>Punching shear</topic><topic>RC slabs</topic><topic>Soft computing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gandomi, Amir H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roke, David A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Advances in engineering software (1992)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gandomi, Amir H.</au><au>Roke, David A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of artificial neural network and genetic programming as predictive tools</atitle><jtitle>Advances in engineering software (1992)</jtitle><date>2015-10-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>88</volume><spage>63</spage><epage>72</epage><pages>63-72</pages><issn>0965-9978</issn><abstract>•Two major soft computing techniques, ANN and GP, are evaluated in detail.•A case study in punching shear modeling of RC slabs is modeled.•The models are compared based on model complexity, statistical validation and parametric study.•Overfitting potential of the models is evaluated and suggestions are provided.•The results indicate model acceptance criteria should include engineering analysis.
Soft computing techniques have been widely used during the last two decades for nonlinear system modeling, specifically as predictive tools. In this study, the performances of two well-known soft computing predictive techniques, artificial neural network (ANN) and genetic programming (GP), are evaluated based on several criteria, including over-fitting potential. A case study in punching shear prediction of RC slabs is modeled here using a hybrid ANN (which includes simulated annealing and multi-layer perception) and an established GP variant called gene expression programming. The ANN and GP results are compared to values determined from several design codes. For more verification, external validation and parametric studies were also conducted. The results of this study indicate that model acceptance criteria should include engineering analysis from parametric studies.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.05.007</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0965-9978 |
ispartof | Advances in engineering software (1992), 2015-10, Vol.88, p.63-72 |
issn | 0965-9978 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1730077243 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Artificial neural networks Assessments Computer programs Explicit formulation Genetic algorithms Genetic programming Learning theory Mathematical models Neural networks Over-fitting Parametric study Punching shear RC slabs Soft computing |
title | Assessment of artificial neural network and genetic programming as predictive tools |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T19%3A37%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20artificial%20neural%20network%20and%20genetic%20programming%20as%20predictive%20tools&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20engineering%20software%20(1992)&rft.au=Gandomi,%20Amir%20H.&rft.date=2015-10-01&rft.volume=88&rft.spage=63&rft.epage=72&rft.pages=63-72&rft.issn=0965-9978&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.05.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1730077243%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1730077243&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0965997815000861&rfr_iscdi=true |