Large-scale dam removal on the Elwha River, Washington, USA: Fluvial sediment load

The Elwha River restoration project, in Washington State, includes the largest dam-removal project in United States history to date. Starting September 2011, two nearly century-old dams that collectively contained 21±3millionm3 of sediment were removed over the course of three years with a top-down...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Netherlands), 2015-10, Vol.246, p.669-686
Hauptverfasser: Magirl, Christopher S., Hilldale, Robert C., Curran, Christopher A., Duda, Jeffrey J., Straub, Timothy D., Domanski, Marian, Foreman, James R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 686
container_issue
container_start_page 669
container_title Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
container_volume 246
creator Magirl, Christopher S.
Hilldale, Robert C.
Curran, Christopher A.
Duda, Jeffrey J.
Straub, Timothy D.
Domanski, Marian
Foreman, James R.
description The Elwha River restoration project, in Washington State, includes the largest dam-removal project in United States history to date. Starting September 2011, two nearly century-old dams that collectively contained 21±3millionm3 of sediment were removed over the course of three years with a top-down deconstruction strategy designed to meter the release of a portion of the dam-trapped sediment. Gauging with sediment-surrogate technologies during the first two years downstream from the project measured 8,200,000±3,400,000tonnes of transported sediment, with 1,100,000 and 7,100,000t moving in years 1 and 2, respectively, representing 3 and 20 times the Elwha River annual sediment load of 340,000±80,000t/y. During the study period, the discharge in the Elwha River was greater than normal (107% in year 1 and 108% in year 2); however, the magnitudes of the peak-flow events during the study period were relatively benign with the largest discharge of 292m3/s (73% of the 2-year annual peak-flow event) early in the project when both extant reservoirs still retained sediment. Despite the muted peak flows, sediment transport was large, with measured suspended-sediment concentrations during the study period ranging from 44 to 16,300mg/L and gauged bedload transport as large as 24,700t/d. Five distinct sediment-release periods were identified when sediment loads were notably increased (when lateral erosion in the former reservoirs was active) or reduced (when reservoir retention or seasonal low flows and cessation of lateral erosion reduced sediment transport). Total suspended-sediment load was 930,000t in year 1 and 5,400,000t in year 2. Of the total 6,300,000±3,200,000t of suspended-sediment load, 3,400,000t consisted of silt and clay and 2,900,000t was sand. Gauged bedload on the lower Elwha River in year 2 of the project was 450,000±360,000t. Bedload was not quantified in year 1, but qualitative observations using bedload-surrogate instruments indicated detectable bedload starting just after full removal of the downstream dam. Using comparative studies from other sediment-laden rivers, the total ungauged fraction of
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.12.032
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1730070083</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0169555X14006369</els_id><sourcerecordid>1730070083</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a642t-6549fd02d8d7a9348f34868fd92dcfb9c06b6b46ee61920a8b7f2b12a21311373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtLxDAUhYMoOD7-gmTpwtabtE0bV4qMDxgQfKC7kDa3MxnaZkw6I_57I6NrXVzO5jsH7kfICYOUARPny3SOrnd-tUg5sDxlPIWM75AJq0qeCFm87ZJJBGVSFMXbPjkIYQkAeSlhQh5n2s8xCY3ukBrdU4-92-iOuoGOC6TT7mOh6aPdoD-jrzos7DAf3XBGX56uLuhNt97YCAc0tsdhpJ3T5ojstboLePyTh-TlZvp8fZfMHm7vr69miRY5HxNR5LI1wE1lSi2zvGrjiao1kpumrWUDohZ1LhAFkxx0VZctrxnXnGWMZWV2SE63uyvv3tcYRtXb0GDX6QHdOihWZgAlQJX9A2W8iLiEiIot2ngXgsdWrbzttf9UDNS3b7VUv77Vt2_FuIq-Y_FyW8T488aiV6GxODRRjcdmVMbZvya-ANX4iyM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1712573090</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Large-scale dam removal on the Elwha River, Washington, USA: Fluvial sediment load</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Magirl, Christopher S. ; Hilldale, Robert C. ; Curran, Christopher A. ; Duda, Jeffrey J. ; Straub, Timothy D. ; Domanski, Marian ; Foreman, James R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Magirl, Christopher S. ; Hilldale, Robert C. ; Curran, Christopher A. ; Duda, Jeffrey J. ; Straub, Timothy D. ; Domanski, Marian ; Foreman, James R.</creatorcontrib><description>The Elwha River restoration project, in Washington State, includes the largest dam-removal project in United States history to date. Starting September 2011, two nearly century-old dams that collectively contained 21±3millionm3 of sediment were removed over the course of three years with a top-down deconstruction strategy designed to meter the release of a portion of the dam-trapped sediment. Gauging with sediment-surrogate technologies during the first two years downstream from the project measured 8,200,000±3,400,000tonnes of transported sediment, with 1,100,000 and 7,100,000t moving in years 1 and 2, respectively, representing 3 and 20 times the Elwha River annual sediment load of 340,000±80,000t/y. During the study period, the discharge in the Elwha River was greater than normal (107% in year 1 and 108% in year 2); however, the magnitudes of the peak-flow events during the study period were relatively benign with the largest discharge of 292m3/s (73% of the 2-year annual peak-flow event) early in the project when both extant reservoirs still retained sediment. Despite the muted peak flows, sediment transport was large, with measured suspended-sediment concentrations during the study period ranging from 44 to 16,300mg/L and gauged bedload transport as large as 24,700t/d. Five distinct sediment-release periods were identified when sediment loads were notably increased (when lateral erosion in the former reservoirs was active) or reduced (when reservoir retention or seasonal low flows and cessation of lateral erosion reduced sediment transport). Total suspended-sediment load was 930,000t in year 1 and 5,400,000t in year 2. Of the total 6,300,000±3,200,000t of suspended-sediment load, 3,400,000t consisted of silt and clay and 2,900,000t was sand. Gauged bedload on the lower Elwha River in year 2 of the project was 450,000±360,000t. Bedload was not quantified in year 1, but qualitative observations using bedload-surrogate instruments indicated detectable bedload starting just after full removal of the downstream dam. Using comparative studies from other sediment-laden rivers, the total ungauged fraction of &lt;2-mm bedload was estimated to be on the order of 1.5Mt. •In the first two years of dam removal, 8.2±3.4Mt of total sediment load•Annual sediment discharge as much as 20 times the long-term average•About 33% of the total sediment trapped behind both dams transported•River sediment transport was large despite the dearth of large flow events.•Sediment transport enhanced with active lateral erosion in former reservoirs</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-555X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-695X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.12.032</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Bedload ; Dam removal ; Discharge ; Erosion ; Fluvial geomorphology ; Mountain river ; Reservoirs ; Restoration ; Rivers ; Sand ; Sediment loads ; Sediment transport ; Sediments</subject><ispartof>Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2015-10, Vol.246, p.669-686</ispartof><rights>2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a642t-6549fd02d8d7a9348f34868fd92dcfb9c06b6b46ee61920a8b7f2b12a21311373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a642t-6549fd02d8d7a9348f34868fd92dcfb9c06b6b46ee61920a8b7f2b12a21311373</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9922-6549</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.12.032$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3541,27915,27916,45986</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Magirl, Christopher S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilldale, Robert C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curran, Christopher A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duda, Jeffrey J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Straub, Timothy D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domanski, Marian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foreman, James R.</creatorcontrib><title>Large-scale dam removal on the Elwha River, Washington, USA: Fluvial sediment load</title><title>Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)</title><description>The Elwha River restoration project, in Washington State, includes the largest dam-removal project in United States history to date. Starting September 2011, two nearly century-old dams that collectively contained 21±3millionm3 of sediment were removed over the course of three years with a top-down deconstruction strategy designed to meter the release of a portion of the dam-trapped sediment. Gauging with sediment-surrogate technologies during the first two years downstream from the project measured 8,200,000±3,400,000tonnes of transported sediment, with 1,100,000 and 7,100,000t moving in years 1 and 2, respectively, representing 3 and 20 times the Elwha River annual sediment load of 340,000±80,000t/y. During the study period, the discharge in the Elwha River was greater than normal (107% in year 1 and 108% in year 2); however, the magnitudes of the peak-flow events during the study period were relatively benign with the largest discharge of 292m3/s (73% of the 2-year annual peak-flow event) early in the project when both extant reservoirs still retained sediment. Despite the muted peak flows, sediment transport was large, with measured suspended-sediment concentrations during the study period ranging from 44 to 16,300mg/L and gauged bedload transport as large as 24,700t/d. Five distinct sediment-release periods were identified when sediment loads were notably increased (when lateral erosion in the former reservoirs was active) or reduced (when reservoir retention or seasonal low flows and cessation of lateral erosion reduced sediment transport). Total suspended-sediment load was 930,000t in year 1 and 5,400,000t in year 2. Of the total 6,300,000±3,200,000t of suspended-sediment load, 3,400,000t consisted of silt and clay and 2,900,000t was sand. Gauged bedload on the lower Elwha River in year 2 of the project was 450,000±360,000t. Bedload was not quantified in year 1, but qualitative observations using bedload-surrogate instruments indicated detectable bedload starting just after full removal of the downstream dam. Using comparative studies from other sediment-laden rivers, the total ungauged fraction of &lt;2-mm bedload was estimated to be on the order of 1.5Mt. •In the first two years of dam removal, 8.2±3.4Mt of total sediment load•Annual sediment discharge as much as 20 times the long-term average•About 33% of the total sediment trapped behind both dams transported•River sediment transport was large despite the dearth of large flow events.•Sediment transport enhanced with active lateral erosion in former reservoirs</description><subject>Bedload</subject><subject>Dam removal</subject><subject>Discharge</subject><subject>Erosion</subject><subject>Fluvial geomorphology</subject><subject>Mountain river</subject><subject>Reservoirs</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Sand</subject><subject>Sediment loads</subject><subject>Sediment transport</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><issn>0169-555X</issn><issn>1872-695X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkEtLxDAUhYMoOD7-gmTpwtabtE0bV4qMDxgQfKC7kDa3MxnaZkw6I_57I6NrXVzO5jsH7kfICYOUARPny3SOrnd-tUg5sDxlPIWM75AJq0qeCFm87ZJJBGVSFMXbPjkIYQkAeSlhQh5n2s8xCY3ukBrdU4-92-iOuoGOC6TT7mOh6aPdoD-jrzos7DAf3XBGX56uLuhNt97YCAc0tsdhpJ3T5ojstboLePyTh-TlZvp8fZfMHm7vr69miRY5HxNR5LI1wE1lSi2zvGrjiao1kpumrWUDohZ1LhAFkxx0VZctrxnXnGWMZWV2SE63uyvv3tcYRtXb0GDX6QHdOihWZgAlQJX9A2W8iLiEiIot2ngXgsdWrbzttf9UDNS3b7VUv77Vt2_FuIq-Y_FyW8T488aiV6GxODRRjcdmVMbZvya-ANX4iyM</recordid><startdate>20151001</startdate><enddate>20151001</enddate><creator>Magirl, Christopher S.</creator><creator>Hilldale, Robert C.</creator><creator>Curran, Christopher A.</creator><creator>Duda, Jeffrey J.</creator><creator>Straub, Timothy D.</creator><creator>Domanski, Marian</creator><creator>Foreman, James R.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9922-6549</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20151001</creationdate><title>Large-scale dam removal on the Elwha River, Washington, USA: Fluvial sediment load</title><author>Magirl, Christopher S. ; Hilldale, Robert C. ; Curran, Christopher A. ; Duda, Jeffrey J. ; Straub, Timothy D. ; Domanski, Marian ; Foreman, James R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a642t-6549fd02d8d7a9348f34868fd92dcfb9c06b6b46ee61920a8b7f2b12a21311373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Bedload</topic><topic>Dam removal</topic><topic>Discharge</topic><topic>Erosion</topic><topic>Fluvial geomorphology</topic><topic>Mountain river</topic><topic>Reservoirs</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Sand</topic><topic>Sediment loads</topic><topic>Sediment transport</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Magirl, Christopher S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilldale, Robert C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curran, Christopher A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duda, Jeffrey J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Straub, Timothy D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domanski, Marian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foreman, James R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Magirl, Christopher S.</au><au>Hilldale, Robert C.</au><au>Curran, Christopher A.</au><au>Duda, Jeffrey J.</au><au>Straub, Timothy D.</au><au>Domanski, Marian</au><au>Foreman, James R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Large-scale dam removal on the Elwha River, Washington, USA: Fluvial sediment load</atitle><jtitle>Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)</jtitle><date>2015-10-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>246</volume><spage>669</spage><epage>686</epage><pages>669-686</pages><issn>0169-555X</issn><eissn>1872-695X</eissn><abstract>The Elwha River restoration project, in Washington State, includes the largest dam-removal project in United States history to date. Starting September 2011, two nearly century-old dams that collectively contained 21±3millionm3 of sediment were removed over the course of three years with a top-down deconstruction strategy designed to meter the release of a portion of the dam-trapped sediment. Gauging with sediment-surrogate technologies during the first two years downstream from the project measured 8,200,000±3,400,000tonnes of transported sediment, with 1,100,000 and 7,100,000t moving in years 1 and 2, respectively, representing 3 and 20 times the Elwha River annual sediment load of 340,000±80,000t/y. During the study period, the discharge in the Elwha River was greater than normal (107% in year 1 and 108% in year 2); however, the magnitudes of the peak-flow events during the study period were relatively benign with the largest discharge of 292m3/s (73% of the 2-year annual peak-flow event) early in the project when both extant reservoirs still retained sediment. Despite the muted peak flows, sediment transport was large, with measured suspended-sediment concentrations during the study period ranging from 44 to 16,300mg/L and gauged bedload transport as large as 24,700t/d. Five distinct sediment-release periods were identified when sediment loads were notably increased (when lateral erosion in the former reservoirs was active) or reduced (when reservoir retention or seasonal low flows and cessation of lateral erosion reduced sediment transport). Total suspended-sediment load was 930,000t in year 1 and 5,400,000t in year 2. Of the total 6,300,000±3,200,000t of suspended-sediment load, 3,400,000t consisted of silt and clay and 2,900,000t was sand. Gauged bedload on the lower Elwha River in year 2 of the project was 450,000±360,000t. Bedload was not quantified in year 1, but qualitative observations using bedload-surrogate instruments indicated detectable bedload starting just after full removal of the downstream dam. Using comparative studies from other sediment-laden rivers, the total ungauged fraction of &lt;2-mm bedload was estimated to be on the order of 1.5Mt. •In the first two years of dam removal, 8.2±3.4Mt of total sediment load•Annual sediment discharge as much as 20 times the long-term average•About 33% of the total sediment trapped behind both dams transported•River sediment transport was large despite the dearth of large flow events.•Sediment transport enhanced with active lateral erosion in former reservoirs</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.12.032</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9922-6549</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0169-555X
ispartof Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2015-10, Vol.246, p.669-686
issn 0169-555X
1872-695X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1730070083
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Bedload
Dam removal
Discharge
Erosion
Fluvial geomorphology
Mountain river
Reservoirs
Restoration
Rivers
Sand
Sediment loads
Sediment transport
Sediments
title Large-scale dam removal on the Elwha River, Washington, USA: Fluvial sediment load
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T23%3A02%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Large-scale%20dam%20removal%20on%20the%20Elwha%20River,%20Washington,%20USA:%20Fluvial%20sediment%20load&rft.jtitle=Geomorphology%20(Amsterdam,%20Netherlands)&rft.au=Magirl,%20Christopher%20S.&rft.date=2015-10-01&rft.volume=246&rft.spage=669&rft.epage=686&rft.pages=669-686&rft.issn=0169-555X&rft.eissn=1872-695X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.12.032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1730070083%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1712573090&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0169555X14006369&rfr_iscdi=true