Estimating survival of rock lobsters from long-term tagging programmes: how survey number and interval influence estimates

A long-term tagging dataset on southern rock lobster (Jasus edwardsii) conducted at the Crayfish Point Scientific Reserve near Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, was used to determine how survey number and survey duration affected the precision of survival estimates of male and female lobsters to ensure s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ICES journal of marine science 2015-07, Vol.72 (suppl_1), p.i244-i251
Hauptverfasser: Kordjazi, Ziya, Frusher, Stewart, Buxton, Colin D, Gardner, Caleb
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page i251
container_issue suppl_1
container_start_page i244
container_title ICES journal of marine science
container_volume 72
creator Kordjazi, Ziya
Frusher, Stewart
Buxton, Colin D
Gardner, Caleb
description A long-term tagging dataset on southern rock lobster (Jasus edwardsii) conducted at the Crayfish Point Scientific Reserve near Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, was used to determine how survey number and survey duration affected the precision of survival estimates of male and female lobsters to ensure sustainable exploitation of the population. Tagging surveys were undertaken twice yearly during 2000-2003 with unequal time-intervals between surveys and then once a year with equal time-intervals during 2004-2012 during the January-February period. The most parsimonious Cormack-Jolly-Seber model for estimating survival of lobsters was dependent on (i) timing of the tagging and recapture surveys, (ii) time between consecutive recapture surveys, and (iii) gender. The number of surveys required to provide a precise survival probability varied with gender and time between recapture surveys. For surveys where there was unequal time between recapture surveys, seven and five surveys were required for female and male lobsters, respectively, whereas only five surveys were required when annual surveys were undertaken. Thus, lobster tagging projects using annual surveys should ideally extend to at least 5 years, which is beyond the 3-year project duration common in marine science.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/icesjms/fsv005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1730069057</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1709191679</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-75ce345d639c01efa09e3efc4d1054ad3168e246b5399d54f370b357ff0a29a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUctOwzAQtBBIlMKVs49c0q7rOKm5oao8pEpc4Bw5zjqkxHaxk6Ly9SS0H8BpH5qd2dEQcstgxkDyeaMxbm2cm7gHEGdkMmxFIhdLeT72Ik044_KSXMW4BYA8zWBCftaxa6zqGlfT2Id9s1ct9YYGrz9p68vYYYjUBG-HydXJMFraqboeD3bB10FZi_GefvjvPwI8UNfbEgNVrqKNGw5GysaZtkenkeJREOM1uTCqjXhzqlPy_rh-Wz0nm9enl9XDJtEcRJfkQiNPRZVxqYGhUSCRo9FpNXpSFWfZEhdpVgouZSVSw3MouciNAbWQSvIpuTvyDu9-9YN8YZuosW2VQ9_HguUcIJMg8n9AQTLJsnxknR2hOvgYA5piFwZf4VAwKMY8ilMexTEP_gtdc4OQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1709191679</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimating survival of rock lobsters from long-term tagging programmes: how survey number and interval influence estimates</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kordjazi, Ziya ; Frusher, Stewart ; Buxton, Colin D ; Gardner, Caleb</creator><creatorcontrib>Kordjazi, Ziya ; Frusher, Stewart ; Buxton, Colin D ; Gardner, Caleb</creatorcontrib><description>A long-term tagging dataset on southern rock lobster (Jasus edwardsii) conducted at the Crayfish Point Scientific Reserve near Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, was used to determine how survey number and survey duration affected the precision of survival estimates of male and female lobsters to ensure sustainable exploitation of the population. Tagging surveys were undertaken twice yearly during 2000-2003 with unequal time-intervals between surveys and then once a year with equal time-intervals during 2004-2012 during the January-February period. The most parsimonious Cormack-Jolly-Seber model for estimating survival of lobsters was dependent on (i) timing of the tagging and recapture surveys, (ii) time between consecutive recapture surveys, and (iii) gender. The number of surveys required to provide a precise survival probability varied with gender and time between recapture surveys. For surveys where there was unequal time between recapture surveys, seven and five surveys were required for female and male lobsters, respectively, whereas only five surveys were required when annual surveys were undertaken. Thus, lobster tagging projects using annual surveys should ideally extend to at least 5 years, which is beyond the 3-year project duration common in marine science.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1054-3139</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9289</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsv005</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Cambaridae ; Estimates ; Females ; Homarus americanus ; Jasus edwardsii ; Lobsters ; Males ; Marine ; Marking ; Rock ; Survival</subject><ispartof>ICES journal of marine science, 2015-07, Vol.72 (suppl_1), p.i244-i251</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-75ce345d639c01efa09e3efc4d1054ad3168e246b5399d54f370b357ff0a29a93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-75ce345d639c01efa09e3efc4d1054ad3168e246b5399d54f370b357ff0a29a93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kordjazi, Ziya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frusher, Stewart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buxton, Colin D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardner, Caleb</creatorcontrib><title>Estimating survival of rock lobsters from long-term tagging programmes: how survey number and interval influence estimates</title><title>ICES journal of marine science</title><description>A long-term tagging dataset on southern rock lobster (Jasus edwardsii) conducted at the Crayfish Point Scientific Reserve near Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, was used to determine how survey number and survey duration affected the precision of survival estimates of male and female lobsters to ensure sustainable exploitation of the population. Tagging surveys were undertaken twice yearly during 2000-2003 with unequal time-intervals between surveys and then once a year with equal time-intervals during 2004-2012 during the January-February period. The most parsimonious Cormack-Jolly-Seber model for estimating survival of lobsters was dependent on (i) timing of the tagging and recapture surveys, (ii) time between consecutive recapture surveys, and (iii) gender. The number of surveys required to provide a precise survival probability varied with gender and time between recapture surveys. For surveys where there was unequal time between recapture surveys, seven and five surveys were required for female and male lobsters, respectively, whereas only five surveys were required when annual surveys were undertaken. Thus, lobster tagging projects using annual surveys should ideally extend to at least 5 years, which is beyond the 3-year project duration common in marine science.</description><subject>Cambaridae</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Homarus americanus</subject><subject>Jasus edwardsii</subject><subject>Lobsters</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marking</subject><subject>Rock</subject><subject>Survival</subject><issn>1054-3139</issn><issn>1095-9289</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUctOwzAQtBBIlMKVs49c0q7rOKm5oao8pEpc4Bw5zjqkxHaxk6Ly9SS0H8BpH5qd2dEQcstgxkDyeaMxbm2cm7gHEGdkMmxFIhdLeT72Ik044_KSXMW4BYA8zWBCftaxa6zqGlfT2Id9s1ct9YYGrz9p68vYYYjUBG-HydXJMFraqboeD3bB10FZi_GefvjvPwI8UNfbEgNVrqKNGw5GysaZtkenkeJREOM1uTCqjXhzqlPy_rh-Wz0nm9enl9XDJtEcRJfkQiNPRZVxqYGhUSCRo9FpNXpSFWfZEhdpVgouZSVSw3MouciNAbWQSvIpuTvyDu9-9YN8YZuosW2VQ9_HguUcIJMg8n9AQTLJsnxknR2hOvgYA5piFwZf4VAwKMY8ilMexTEP_gtdc4OQ</recordid><startdate>20150701</startdate><enddate>20150701</enddate><creator>Kordjazi, Ziya</creator><creator>Frusher, Stewart</creator><creator>Buxton, Colin D</creator><creator>Gardner, Caleb</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150701</creationdate><title>Estimating survival of rock lobsters from long-term tagging programmes: how survey number and interval influence estimates</title><author>Kordjazi, Ziya ; Frusher, Stewart ; Buxton, Colin D ; Gardner, Caleb</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-75ce345d639c01efa09e3efc4d1054ad3168e246b5399d54f370b357ff0a29a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Cambaridae</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Homarus americanus</topic><topic>Jasus edwardsii</topic><topic>Lobsters</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marking</topic><topic>Rock</topic><topic>Survival</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kordjazi, Ziya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frusher, Stewart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buxton, Colin D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardner, Caleb</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>ICES journal of marine science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kordjazi, Ziya</au><au>Frusher, Stewart</au><au>Buxton, Colin D</au><au>Gardner, Caleb</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimating survival of rock lobsters from long-term tagging programmes: how survey number and interval influence estimates</atitle><jtitle>ICES journal of marine science</jtitle><date>2015-07-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>suppl_1</issue><spage>i244</spage><epage>i251</epage><pages>i244-i251</pages><issn>1054-3139</issn><eissn>1095-9289</eissn><abstract>A long-term tagging dataset on southern rock lobster (Jasus edwardsii) conducted at the Crayfish Point Scientific Reserve near Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, was used to determine how survey number and survey duration affected the precision of survival estimates of male and female lobsters to ensure sustainable exploitation of the population. Tagging surveys were undertaken twice yearly during 2000-2003 with unequal time-intervals between surveys and then once a year with equal time-intervals during 2004-2012 during the January-February period. The most parsimonious Cormack-Jolly-Seber model for estimating survival of lobsters was dependent on (i) timing of the tagging and recapture surveys, (ii) time between consecutive recapture surveys, and (iii) gender. The number of surveys required to provide a precise survival probability varied with gender and time between recapture surveys. For surveys where there was unequal time between recapture surveys, seven and five surveys were required for female and male lobsters, respectively, whereas only five surveys were required when annual surveys were undertaken. Thus, lobster tagging projects using annual surveys should ideally extend to at least 5 years, which is beyond the 3-year project duration common in marine science.</abstract><doi>10.1093/icesjms/fsv005</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1054-3139
ispartof ICES journal of marine science, 2015-07, Vol.72 (suppl_1), p.i244-i251
issn 1054-3139
1095-9289
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1730069057
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Cambaridae
Estimates
Females
Homarus americanus
Jasus edwardsii
Lobsters
Males
Marine
Marking
Rock
Survival
title Estimating survival of rock lobsters from long-term tagging programmes: how survey number and interval influence estimates
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T05%3A19%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimating%20survival%20of%20rock%20lobsters%20from%20long-term%20tagging%20programmes:%20how%20survey%20number%20and%20interval%20influence%20estimates&rft.jtitle=ICES%20journal%20of%20marine%20science&rft.au=Kordjazi,%20Ziya&rft.date=2015-07-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=suppl_1&rft.spage=i244&rft.epage=i251&rft.pages=i244-i251&rft.issn=1054-3139&rft.eissn=1095-9289&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/icesjms/fsv005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1709191679%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1709191679&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true