Seismic response evaluation of the linked column frame system

SUMMARY The linked column frame (LCF) system is proposed as a seismic load resisting system that uses conventional components to limit seismic damage to relatively easily replaced elements. The LCF features a primary lateral system, denoted the linked column, which is made up of dual columns connect...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics 2013-05, Vol.42 (6), p.795-814
Hauptverfasser: Malakoutian, Mohammad, Berman, Jeffrey W., Dusicka, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 814
container_issue 6
container_start_page 795
container_title Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics
container_volume 42
creator Malakoutian, Mohammad
Berman, Jeffrey W.
Dusicka, Peter
description SUMMARY The linked column frame (LCF) system is proposed as a seismic load resisting system that uses conventional components to limit seismic damage to relatively easily replaced elements. The LCF features a primary lateral system, denoted the linked column, which is made up of dual columns connected with replaceable links, and a secondary flexible moment frame system with beams having fully restrained connections at one end and simple connections at the other. The linked columns are designed to limit seismic forces and provide energy dissipation via link yielding, while preventing damage to the moment frame under certain earthquake hazard levels. A design procedure is proposed that ensures plastic hinges develop in the links of the linked columns at a significantly lower story drift than when plastic hinges develop in the moment frame beams. The large drift difference helps enable design of this system for two distinct performance states: rapid return to occupancy, where only link damage occurs and relatively simple link replacement is possible, and collapse prevention, where both the links and the beams of the moment frame may be damaged. A series of 3‐story, 6‐story, and 9‐story prototype LCF buildings were designed using the proposed design approach. Nonlinear models were developed for the designs with the link models validated using recent experimental results. The seismic response of these systems was investigated for ground motions representing various seismic hazard levels. Results show that the LCF system not only provides collapse prevention, but also has the capability of limiting economic loss by reducing structural damage and allowing for rapid return to occupancy following earthquakes with shorter return periods. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/eqe.2245
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1730064382</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2942353741</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5275-96977c07f7acf7c30395397a1848be6d87c1d4a9bf9db8f8419f9f2b9c24f7613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0ElLAzEYxvEgCtYF_AgDIngZzTZZDh5UahWL4obeQpq-wegsbdJR--2dYhERxFMuP56X_BHaIfiAYEwPYQoHlPJiBfUI1iLXiherqIexVrlSXK6jjZReMMZMYNlDR3cQUhVcFiFNmjpBBm-2bO0sNHXW-Gz2DFkZ6lcYZ64p26rOfLQVZGmeZlBtoTVvywTby3cTPZz170_P8-H14OL0eJi7gsoi10JL6bD00jovHcNMF0xLSxRXIxBjJR0Zc6tHXo9HyitOtNeejrSj3EtB2Cba_9qdxGbaQpqZKiQHZWlraNpkiGQYC84U_Z_y7jIVVOiO7v6iL00b6-4jhjAqMCPi520Xm5QieDOJobJxbgg2i-SmS24WyTu6txy0ydmyK1W7kL49lZQzokTn8i_3HkqY_7ln-jf95e7Shy76x7e38dUIyWRhHq8GZjA4uTq5ZU_mkn0C_12b_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1326031661</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seismic response evaluation of the linked column frame system</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Malakoutian, Mohammad ; Berman, Jeffrey W. ; Dusicka, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Malakoutian, Mohammad ; Berman, Jeffrey W. ; Dusicka, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>SUMMARY The linked column frame (LCF) system is proposed as a seismic load resisting system that uses conventional components to limit seismic damage to relatively easily replaced elements. The LCF features a primary lateral system, denoted the linked column, which is made up of dual columns connected with replaceable links, and a secondary flexible moment frame system with beams having fully restrained connections at one end and simple connections at the other. The linked columns are designed to limit seismic forces and provide energy dissipation via link yielding, while preventing damage to the moment frame under certain earthquake hazard levels. A design procedure is proposed that ensures plastic hinges develop in the links of the linked columns at a significantly lower story drift than when plastic hinges develop in the moment frame beams. The large drift difference helps enable design of this system for two distinct performance states: rapid return to occupancy, where only link damage occurs and relatively simple link replacement is possible, and collapse prevention, where both the links and the beams of the moment frame may be damaged. A series of 3‐story, 6‐story, and 9‐story prototype LCF buildings were designed using the proposed design approach. Nonlinear models were developed for the designs with the link models validated using recent experimental results. The seismic response of these systems was investigated for ground motions representing various seismic hazard levels. Results show that the LCF system not only provides collapse prevention, but also has the capability of limiting economic loss by reducing structural damage and allowing for rapid return to occupancy following earthquakes with shorter return periods. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-8847</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9845</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2245</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJEEBG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Columns (structural) ; Damage ; Design engineering ; Dynamical systems ; Dynamics ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Earthquakes, seismology ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; Engineering geology ; Exact sciences and technology ; Frames ; Internal geophysics ; link column frame ; Links ; Low cycle fatigue ; nonlinear response history analysis ; rapid return to occupancy ; seismic design</subject><ispartof>Earthquake engineering &amp; structural dynamics, 2013-05, Vol.42 (6), p.795-814</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5275-96977c07f7acf7c30395397a1848be6d87c1d4a9bf9db8f8419f9f2b9c24f7613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5275-96977c07f7acf7c30395397a1848be6d87c1d4a9bf9db8f8419f9f2b9c24f7613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Feqe.2245$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Feqe.2245$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27243186$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Malakoutian, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berman, Jeffrey W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dusicka, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Seismic response evaluation of the linked column frame system</title><title>Earthquake engineering &amp; structural dynamics</title><addtitle>Earthquake Engng Struct. Dyn</addtitle><description>SUMMARY The linked column frame (LCF) system is proposed as a seismic load resisting system that uses conventional components to limit seismic damage to relatively easily replaced elements. The LCF features a primary lateral system, denoted the linked column, which is made up of dual columns connected with replaceable links, and a secondary flexible moment frame system with beams having fully restrained connections at one end and simple connections at the other. The linked columns are designed to limit seismic forces and provide energy dissipation via link yielding, while preventing damage to the moment frame under certain earthquake hazard levels. A design procedure is proposed that ensures plastic hinges develop in the links of the linked columns at a significantly lower story drift than when plastic hinges develop in the moment frame beams. The large drift difference helps enable design of this system for two distinct performance states: rapid return to occupancy, where only link damage occurs and relatively simple link replacement is possible, and collapse prevention, where both the links and the beams of the moment frame may be damaged. A series of 3‐story, 6‐story, and 9‐story prototype LCF buildings were designed using the proposed design approach. Nonlinear models were developed for the designs with the link models validated using recent experimental results. The seismic response of these systems was investigated for ground motions representing various seismic hazard levels. Results show that the LCF system not only provides collapse prevention, but also has the capability of limiting economic loss by reducing structural damage and allowing for rapid return to occupancy following earthquakes with shorter return periods. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Columns (structural)</subject><subject>Damage</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>Dynamical systems</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Earthquakes, seismology</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>Engineering geology</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Frames</subject><subject>Internal geophysics</subject><subject>link column frame</subject><subject>Links</subject><subject>Low cycle fatigue</subject><subject>nonlinear response history analysis</subject><subject>rapid return to occupancy</subject><subject>seismic design</subject><issn>0098-8847</issn><issn>1096-9845</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0ElLAzEYxvEgCtYF_AgDIngZzTZZDh5UahWL4obeQpq-wegsbdJR--2dYhERxFMuP56X_BHaIfiAYEwPYQoHlPJiBfUI1iLXiherqIexVrlSXK6jjZReMMZMYNlDR3cQUhVcFiFNmjpBBm-2bO0sNHXW-Gz2DFkZ6lcYZ64p26rOfLQVZGmeZlBtoTVvywTby3cTPZz170_P8-H14OL0eJi7gsoi10JL6bD00jovHcNMF0xLSxRXIxBjJR0Zc6tHXo9HyitOtNeejrSj3EtB2Cba_9qdxGbaQpqZKiQHZWlraNpkiGQYC84U_Z_y7jIVVOiO7v6iL00b6-4jhjAqMCPi520Xm5QieDOJobJxbgg2i-SmS24WyTu6txy0ydmyK1W7kL49lZQzokTn8i_3HkqY_7ln-jf95e7Shy76x7e38dUIyWRhHq8GZjA4uTq5ZU_mkn0C_12b_Q</recordid><startdate>201305</startdate><enddate>201305</enddate><creator>Malakoutian, Mohammad</creator><creator>Berman, Jeffrey W.</creator><creator>Dusicka, Peter</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SM</scope><scope>7SU</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201305</creationdate><title>Seismic response evaluation of the linked column frame system</title><author>Malakoutian, Mohammad ; Berman, Jeffrey W. ; Dusicka, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5275-96977c07f7acf7c30395397a1848be6d87c1d4a9bf9db8f8419f9f2b9c24f7613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Columns (structural)</topic><topic>Damage</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>Dynamical systems</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Earthquakes, seismology</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>Engineering geology</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Frames</topic><topic>Internal geophysics</topic><topic>link column frame</topic><topic>Links</topic><topic>Low cycle fatigue</topic><topic>nonlinear response history analysis</topic><topic>rapid return to occupancy</topic><topic>seismic design</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Malakoutian, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berman, Jeffrey W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dusicka, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Earthquake Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Earthquake engineering &amp; structural dynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Malakoutian, Mohammad</au><au>Berman, Jeffrey W.</au><au>Dusicka, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seismic response evaluation of the linked column frame system</atitle><jtitle>Earthquake engineering &amp; structural dynamics</jtitle><addtitle>Earthquake Engng Struct. Dyn</addtitle><date>2013-05</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>795</spage><epage>814</epage><pages>795-814</pages><issn>0098-8847</issn><eissn>1096-9845</eissn><coden>IJEEBG</coden><abstract>SUMMARY The linked column frame (LCF) system is proposed as a seismic load resisting system that uses conventional components to limit seismic damage to relatively easily replaced elements. The LCF features a primary lateral system, denoted the linked column, which is made up of dual columns connected with replaceable links, and a secondary flexible moment frame system with beams having fully restrained connections at one end and simple connections at the other. The linked columns are designed to limit seismic forces and provide energy dissipation via link yielding, while preventing damage to the moment frame under certain earthquake hazard levels. A design procedure is proposed that ensures plastic hinges develop in the links of the linked columns at a significantly lower story drift than when plastic hinges develop in the moment frame beams. The large drift difference helps enable design of this system for two distinct performance states: rapid return to occupancy, where only link damage occurs and relatively simple link replacement is possible, and collapse prevention, where both the links and the beams of the moment frame may be damaged. A series of 3‐story, 6‐story, and 9‐story prototype LCF buildings were designed using the proposed design approach. Nonlinear models were developed for the designs with the link models validated using recent experimental results. The seismic response of these systems was investigated for ground motions representing various seismic hazard levels. Results show that the LCF system not only provides collapse prevention, but also has the capability of limiting economic loss by reducing structural damage and allowing for rapid return to occupancy following earthquakes with shorter return periods. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/eqe.2245</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0098-8847
ispartof Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 2013-05, Vol.42 (6), p.795-814
issn 0098-8847
1096-9845
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1730064382
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Columns (structural)
Damage
Design engineering
Dynamical systems
Dynamics
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Earthquakes, seismology
Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics
Engineering geology
Exact sciences and technology
Frames
Internal geophysics
link column frame
Links
Low cycle fatigue
nonlinear response history analysis
rapid return to occupancy
seismic design
title Seismic response evaluation of the linked column frame system
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T15%3A59%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seismic%20response%20evaluation%20of%20the%20linked%20column%20frame%20system&rft.jtitle=Earthquake%20engineering%20&%20structural%20dynamics&rft.au=Malakoutian,%20Mohammad&rft.date=2013-05&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=795&rft.epage=814&rft.pages=795-814&rft.issn=0098-8847&rft.eissn=1096-9845&rft.coden=IJEEBG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/eqe.2245&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2942353741%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1326031661&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true