Myocardial Protection During Aortic Arch Repair in a Piglet Model: Beating Heart Technique Compared With Crystalloid Cardioplegia
Background Selective myocardial perfusion enables repair of congenital aortic arch obstruction without cardiac arrest. This study was inspired by the lack of prospective controlled studies of the beating heart (BH) technique compared with cold crystalloid cardioplegia (CC) regarding effects on myoca...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Annals of thoracic surgery 2015-11, Vol.100 (5), p.1758-1766 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1766 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1758 |
container_title | The Annals of thoracic surgery |
container_volume | 100 |
creator | Janssen, Carina, MD Kellermann, Stephanie, MD Münch, Frank, MCT Purbojo, Ariawan, MD Cesnjevar, Robert Anton, MD Rüffer, André, MD |
description | Background Selective myocardial perfusion enables repair of congenital aortic arch obstruction without cardiac arrest. This study was inspired by the lack of prospective controlled studies of the beating heart (BH) technique compared with cold crystalloid cardioplegia (CC) regarding effects on myocardial performance, ischemic damage, and serum electrolyte levels. Methods In a prospective study, 20 male piglets weighing 11.1 ± 1.3 kg were operated on using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and underwent 60 minutes of aortic cross-clamping. According to prospective randomization, myocardial protection included either a BH modification with selective myocardial perfusion using an individual roller pump or CC. Hemodynamic performance was evaluated by a conductance catheter technique before and after CPB and calculated in relation to baseline levels. Laboratory analysis included blood levels of troponin T and serum electrolytes. Results Eighteen piglets entered analysis. There were significantly higher slopes of end-systolic pressure-volume relations (168% ± 92% versus 89% ± 16%; p = 0.046) and preload-recruitable stroke work (PRSW) (139% ± 37% versus 103% ± 31%; p = 0.040) in BH piglets compared with those who underwent CC. Laboratory analysis during reperfusion revealed higher levels of troponin T (1.31 ± 0.28 ng/mL versus 0.49 ± 0.17 ng/mL; p < 0.01) and sodium (131 ± 4 mmol/L versus 120 ± 8 mmol/L; p = 0.003) and lower levels of potassium (4.8 ± 0.4 mmol/L versus 6.4 ± 1.0 mmol/L; p = 0.001) with BH compared with CC, whereas no significant differences were calculated at the end of the experiment. Conclusions The BH technique is associated with improved contractility compared with standard CC. There is comparable ischemic damage in both groups, with an earlier rise in blood levels of troponin T after BH and more fluctuation of serum electrolytes with CC. Evidence of ischemic changes should dissuade one from using the BH technique imprudently. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.06.017 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1729352161</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0003497515010231</els_id><sourcerecordid>1729352161</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-b183b2db29a44f4125667cb368e95777c024ea98f60c063b01621433b606b2d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUk1v1DAQtRCILoW_gHzkktQfsbPhgLQNlFZqRQVFHC3Hmd314o2D7SDtkX-Oo21B6qmnkTXvzRu_NwhhSkpKqDzblTptfdAmTqFkhIqSyJLQ-hlaUCFYIZlonqMFIYQXVVOLE_Qqxl1-stx-iU6Y5KyipF6gPzcHb3TorXb4NvgEJlk_4I9TsMMGr3xI1uBVMFv8FUZtA7YD1vjWbhwkfON7cO_xOeg0oy9Bh4TvwGwH-2sC3Pr9qAP0-IdNW9yGQ0zaOW973M6KfnSwsfo1erHWLsKb-3qKvl98umsvi-svn6_a1XVhRNWkoqNL3rG-Y42uqnVFmZCyNh2XS2hEXdeGsAp0s1xLYojkXbaJ0YrzThKZeZKfonfHuWPwebuY1N5GA87pAfwUFa1ZwwWjkmbo8gg1wccYYK3GYPc6HBQlag5A7dT_ANQcgCJS5QAy9e29ytTtof9HfHA8A86PAMh__W0hqGgsDAZ6G7L5qvf2KSofHg0xzg7WaPcTDhB3fgpD9lJRFZki6tt8CPMdUEEoYZzyv7b2sRc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1729352161</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Myocardial Protection During Aortic Arch Repair in a Piglet Model: Beating Heart Technique Compared With Crystalloid Cardioplegia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Janssen, Carina, MD ; Kellermann, Stephanie, MD ; Münch, Frank, MCT ; Purbojo, Ariawan, MD ; Cesnjevar, Robert Anton, MD ; Rüffer, André, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Janssen, Carina, MD ; Kellermann, Stephanie, MD ; Münch, Frank, MCT ; Purbojo, Ariawan, MD ; Cesnjevar, Robert Anton, MD ; Rüffer, André, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Background Selective myocardial perfusion enables repair of congenital aortic arch obstruction without cardiac arrest. This study was inspired by the lack of prospective controlled studies of the beating heart (BH) technique compared with cold crystalloid cardioplegia (CC) regarding effects on myocardial performance, ischemic damage, and serum electrolyte levels. Methods In a prospective study, 20 male piglets weighing 11.1 ± 1.3 kg were operated on using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and underwent 60 minutes of aortic cross-clamping. According to prospective randomization, myocardial protection included either a BH modification with selective myocardial perfusion using an individual roller pump or CC. Hemodynamic performance was evaluated by a conductance catheter technique before and after CPB and calculated in relation to baseline levels. Laboratory analysis included blood levels of troponin T and serum electrolytes. Results Eighteen piglets entered analysis. There were significantly higher slopes of end-systolic pressure-volume relations (168% ± 92% versus 89% ± 16%; p = 0.046) and preload-recruitable stroke work (PRSW) (139% ± 37% versus 103% ± 31%; p = 0.040) in BH piglets compared with those who underwent CC. Laboratory analysis during reperfusion revealed higher levels of troponin T (1.31 ± 0.28 ng/mL versus 0.49 ± 0.17 ng/mL; p < 0.01) and sodium (131 ± 4 mmol/L versus 120 ± 8 mmol/L; p = 0.003) and lower levels of potassium (4.8 ± 0.4 mmol/L versus 6.4 ± 1.0 mmol/L; p = 0.001) with BH compared with CC, whereas no significant differences were calculated at the end of the experiment. Conclusions The BH technique is associated with improved contractility compared with standard CC. There is comparable ischemic damage in both groups, with an earlier rise in blood levels of troponin T after BH and more fluctuation of serum electrolytes with CC. Evidence of ischemic changes should dissuade one from using the BH technique imprudently.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4975</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6259</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.06.017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26324107</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Aorta, Thoracic - surgery ; Cardiomyopathies - prevention & control ; Cardiopulmonary Bypass ; Cardiothoracic Surgery ; Heart Arrest, Induced ; Isotonic Solutions - therapeutic use ; Male ; Models, Animal ; Myocardial Contraction ; Postoperative Complications - prevention & control ; Random Allocation ; Surgery ; Swine</subject><ispartof>The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2015-11, Vol.100 (5), p.1758-1766</ispartof><rights>The Society of Thoracic Surgeons</rights><rights>2015 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-b183b2db29a44f4125667cb368e95777c024ea98f60c063b01621433b606b2d63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-b183b2db29a44f4125667cb368e95777c024ea98f60c063b01621433b606b2d63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26324107$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Janssen, Carina, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kellermann, Stephanie, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Münch, Frank, MCT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purbojo, Ariawan, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cesnjevar, Robert Anton, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rüffer, André, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Myocardial Protection During Aortic Arch Repair in a Piglet Model: Beating Heart Technique Compared With Crystalloid Cardioplegia</title><title>The Annals of thoracic surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Thorac Surg</addtitle><description>Background Selective myocardial perfusion enables repair of congenital aortic arch obstruction without cardiac arrest. This study was inspired by the lack of prospective controlled studies of the beating heart (BH) technique compared with cold crystalloid cardioplegia (CC) regarding effects on myocardial performance, ischemic damage, and serum electrolyte levels. Methods In a prospective study, 20 male piglets weighing 11.1 ± 1.3 kg were operated on using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and underwent 60 minutes of aortic cross-clamping. According to prospective randomization, myocardial protection included either a BH modification with selective myocardial perfusion using an individual roller pump or CC. Hemodynamic performance was evaluated by a conductance catheter technique before and after CPB and calculated in relation to baseline levels. Laboratory analysis included blood levels of troponin T and serum electrolytes. Results Eighteen piglets entered analysis. There were significantly higher slopes of end-systolic pressure-volume relations (168% ± 92% versus 89% ± 16%; p = 0.046) and preload-recruitable stroke work (PRSW) (139% ± 37% versus 103% ± 31%; p = 0.040) in BH piglets compared with those who underwent CC. Laboratory analysis during reperfusion revealed higher levels of troponin T (1.31 ± 0.28 ng/mL versus 0.49 ± 0.17 ng/mL; p < 0.01) and sodium (131 ± 4 mmol/L versus 120 ± 8 mmol/L; p = 0.003) and lower levels of potassium (4.8 ± 0.4 mmol/L versus 6.4 ± 1.0 mmol/L; p = 0.001) with BH compared with CC, whereas no significant differences were calculated at the end of the experiment. Conclusions The BH technique is associated with improved contractility compared with standard CC. There is comparable ischemic damage in both groups, with an earlier rise in blood levels of troponin T after BH and more fluctuation of serum electrolytes with CC. Evidence of ischemic changes should dissuade one from using the BH technique imprudently.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aorta, Thoracic - surgery</subject><subject>Cardiomyopathies - prevention & control</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary Bypass</subject><subject>Cardiothoracic Surgery</subject><subject>Heart Arrest, Induced</subject><subject>Isotonic Solutions - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Animal</subject><subject>Myocardial Contraction</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Swine</subject><issn>0003-4975</issn><issn>1552-6259</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUk1v1DAQtRCILoW_gHzkktQfsbPhgLQNlFZqRQVFHC3Hmd314o2D7SDtkX-Oo21B6qmnkTXvzRu_NwhhSkpKqDzblTptfdAmTqFkhIqSyJLQ-hlaUCFYIZlonqMFIYQXVVOLE_Qqxl1-stx-iU6Y5KyipF6gPzcHb3TorXb4NvgEJlk_4I9TsMMGr3xI1uBVMFv8FUZtA7YD1vjWbhwkfON7cO_xOeg0oy9Bh4TvwGwH-2sC3Pr9qAP0-IdNW9yGQ0zaOW973M6KfnSwsfo1erHWLsKb-3qKvl98umsvi-svn6_a1XVhRNWkoqNL3rG-Y42uqnVFmZCyNh2XS2hEXdeGsAp0s1xLYojkXbaJ0YrzThKZeZKfonfHuWPwebuY1N5GA87pAfwUFa1ZwwWjkmbo8gg1wccYYK3GYPc6HBQlag5A7dT_ANQcgCJS5QAy9e29ytTtof9HfHA8A86PAMh__W0hqGgsDAZ6G7L5qvf2KSofHg0xzg7WaPcTDhB3fgpD9lJRFZki6tt8CPMdUEEoYZzyv7b2sRc</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Janssen, Carina, MD</creator><creator>Kellermann, Stephanie, MD</creator><creator>Münch, Frank, MCT</creator><creator>Purbojo, Ariawan, MD</creator><creator>Cesnjevar, Robert Anton, MD</creator><creator>Rüffer, André, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Myocardial Protection During Aortic Arch Repair in a Piglet Model: Beating Heart Technique Compared With Crystalloid Cardioplegia</title><author>Janssen, Carina, MD ; Kellermann, Stephanie, MD ; Münch, Frank, MCT ; Purbojo, Ariawan, MD ; Cesnjevar, Robert Anton, MD ; Rüffer, André, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-b183b2db29a44f4125667cb368e95777c024ea98f60c063b01621433b606b2d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aorta, Thoracic - surgery</topic><topic>Cardiomyopathies - prevention & control</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary Bypass</topic><topic>Cardiothoracic Surgery</topic><topic>Heart Arrest, Induced</topic><topic>Isotonic Solutions - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Animal</topic><topic>Myocardial Contraction</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Swine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Janssen, Carina, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kellermann, Stephanie, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Münch, Frank, MCT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purbojo, Ariawan, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cesnjevar, Robert Anton, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rüffer, André, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Annals of thoracic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Janssen, Carina, MD</au><au>Kellermann, Stephanie, MD</au><au>Münch, Frank, MCT</au><au>Purbojo, Ariawan, MD</au><au>Cesnjevar, Robert Anton, MD</au><au>Rüffer, André, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Myocardial Protection During Aortic Arch Repair in a Piglet Model: Beating Heart Technique Compared With Crystalloid Cardioplegia</atitle><jtitle>The Annals of thoracic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Thorac Surg</addtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1758</spage><epage>1766</epage><pages>1758-1766</pages><issn>0003-4975</issn><eissn>1552-6259</eissn><abstract>Background Selective myocardial perfusion enables repair of congenital aortic arch obstruction without cardiac arrest. This study was inspired by the lack of prospective controlled studies of the beating heart (BH) technique compared with cold crystalloid cardioplegia (CC) regarding effects on myocardial performance, ischemic damage, and serum electrolyte levels. Methods In a prospective study, 20 male piglets weighing 11.1 ± 1.3 kg were operated on using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and underwent 60 minutes of aortic cross-clamping. According to prospective randomization, myocardial protection included either a BH modification with selective myocardial perfusion using an individual roller pump or CC. Hemodynamic performance was evaluated by a conductance catheter technique before and after CPB and calculated in relation to baseline levels. Laboratory analysis included blood levels of troponin T and serum electrolytes. Results Eighteen piglets entered analysis. There were significantly higher slopes of end-systolic pressure-volume relations (168% ± 92% versus 89% ± 16%; p = 0.046) and preload-recruitable stroke work (PRSW) (139% ± 37% versus 103% ± 31%; p = 0.040) in BH piglets compared with those who underwent CC. Laboratory analysis during reperfusion revealed higher levels of troponin T (1.31 ± 0.28 ng/mL versus 0.49 ± 0.17 ng/mL; p < 0.01) and sodium (131 ± 4 mmol/L versus 120 ± 8 mmol/L; p = 0.003) and lower levels of potassium (4.8 ± 0.4 mmol/L versus 6.4 ± 1.0 mmol/L; p = 0.001) with BH compared with CC, whereas no significant differences were calculated at the end of the experiment. Conclusions The BH technique is associated with improved contractility compared with standard CC. There is comparable ischemic damage in both groups, with an earlier rise in blood levels of troponin T after BH and more fluctuation of serum electrolytes with CC. Evidence of ischemic changes should dissuade one from using the BH technique imprudently.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26324107</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.06.017</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-4975 |
ispartof | The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2015-11, Vol.100 (5), p.1758-1766 |
issn | 0003-4975 1552-6259 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1729352161 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Animals Aorta, Thoracic - surgery Cardiomyopathies - prevention & control Cardiopulmonary Bypass Cardiothoracic Surgery Heart Arrest, Induced Isotonic Solutions - therapeutic use Male Models, Animal Myocardial Contraction Postoperative Complications - prevention & control Random Allocation Surgery Swine |
title | Myocardial Protection During Aortic Arch Repair in a Piglet Model: Beating Heart Technique Compared With Crystalloid Cardioplegia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T05%3A55%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Myocardial%20Protection%20During%20Aortic%20Arch%20Repair%20in%20a%20Piglet%20Model:%20Beating%20Heart%20Technique%20Compared%20With%20Crystalloid%20Cardioplegia&rft.jtitle=The%20Annals%20of%20thoracic%20surgery&rft.au=Janssen,%20Carina,%20MD&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1758&rft.epage=1766&rft.pages=1758-1766&rft.issn=0003-4975&rft.eissn=1552-6259&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.06.017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1729352161%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1729352161&rft_id=info:pmid/26324107&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0003497515010231&rfr_iscdi=true |