Fabrication of a screw-retained restoration avoiding the facial access hole: A clinical report

Abstract Dental implant restorations may be either screw-retained or cemented onto an abutment. While each method has its advantages and disadvantages, cemented restorations are commonly used in the maxillary arch, usually because of esthetic concerns. Available bone in the anterior maxilla dictates...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2015-11, Vol.114 (5), p.621-624
Hauptverfasser: Garcia-Gazaui, Sabrina, DDS, Razzoog, Michael, DDS, MS, MPH, Sierraalta, Marianella, DDS, MS, Saglik, Berna, DDS, MS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 624
container_issue 5
container_start_page 621
container_title The Journal of prosthetic dentistry
container_volume 114
creator Garcia-Gazaui, Sabrina, DDS
Razzoog, Michael, DDS, MS, MPH
Sierraalta, Marianella, DDS, MS
Saglik, Berna, DDS, MS
description Abstract Dental implant restorations may be either screw-retained or cemented onto an abutment. While each method has its advantages and disadvantages, cemented restorations are commonly used in the maxillary arch, usually because of esthetic concerns. Available bone in the anterior maxilla dictates the placement of the implant, which may result in a facially positioned screw-access opening. Still, a growing volume of literature states that periimplant soft tissues respond more favorably to screw-retained crowns than cement-retained crowns. This clinical report outlines a treatment with a new method of fabricating a custom abutment-crown combination for a screw-retained restoration. The technique allows the channel for the screw to be placed at an angle other than parallel to the implant body. In this case, the practitioner may choose either a screw-retained or cement-retained implant restoration, where previously only a cemented restoration was possible.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1728676067</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0022391315003364</els_id><sourcerecordid>1728676067</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-7f65c0836474f18e35d18bd8d4b5c20af4631f6839930e6966adf2464fc20fa13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9vFDEMxSMEokvhK1Q5cpnB-TOeGQ6IqqKAVIkDcCXKJg7NMjtZktlW_fZktV0OXDj54Pee7Z8ZuxDQChD4ZtPuciqe5qWVILoWsAXon7CVgLFvcNDiKVsBSNmoUagz9qKUDQAMXS-eszOJSmsxyhX7cW3XOTq7xDTzFLjlxWW6bzItNs7keaaypHzs27sUfZx_8uWWeLAu2olb56gUfpsmessvuZviXOOm6tulvLxkz4KdCr16rOfs-_WHb1efmpsvHz9fXd40Tku1NH3AzsGgUPc6iIFU58Ww9oPX685JsEGjEgEHNY4KCEdE64PUqEPtBivUOXt9zK1Ufu_rymYbi6NpsjOlfTGilwP2CNhXKR6lrgIsmYLZ5bi1-cEIMAe2ZmNObM2BrQE0lW01XjzO2K-35P_aTjCr4P1RQPXSu0jZFBdpduRjJrcYn-L_Z7z7J-IE9Bc9UNmkfZ4rRyNMkQbM18OHDw8WHYCq-NQfM82jCg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1728676067</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fabrication of a screw-retained restoration avoiding the facial access hole: A clinical report</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Garcia-Gazaui, Sabrina, DDS ; Razzoog, Michael, DDS, MS, MPH ; Sierraalta, Marianella, DDS, MS ; Saglik, Berna, DDS, MS</creator><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Gazaui, Sabrina, DDS ; Razzoog, Michael, DDS, MS, MPH ; Sierraalta, Marianella, DDS, MS ; Saglik, Berna, DDS, MS</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Dental implant restorations may be either screw-retained or cemented onto an abutment. While each method has its advantages and disadvantages, cemented restorations are commonly used in the maxillary arch, usually because of esthetic concerns. Available bone in the anterior maxilla dictates the placement of the implant, which may result in a facially positioned screw-access opening. Still, a growing volume of literature states that periimplant soft tissues respond more favorably to screw-retained crowns than cement-retained crowns. This clinical report outlines a treatment with a new method of fabricating a custom abutment-crown combination for a screw-retained restoration. The technique allows the channel for the screw to be placed at an angle other than parallel to the implant body. In this case, the practitioner may choose either a screw-retained or cement-retained implant restoration, where previously only a cemented restoration was possible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3913</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6841</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26344192</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Bone Screws ; Dental Implant-Abutment Design ; Dental Implantation - methods ; Dental Prosthesis Retention - methods ; Dentistry ; Female ; Humans</subject><ispartof>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2015-11, Vol.114 (5), p.621-624</ispartof><rights>Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</rights><rights>2015 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-7f65c0836474f18e35d18bd8d4b5c20af4631f6839930e6966adf2464fc20fa13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-7f65c0836474f18e35d18bd8d4b5c20af4631f6839930e6966adf2464fc20fa13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26344192$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Gazaui, Sabrina, DDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Razzoog, Michael, DDS, MS, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sierraalta, Marianella, DDS, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saglik, Berna, DDS, MS</creatorcontrib><title>Fabrication of a screw-retained restoration avoiding the facial access hole: A clinical report</title><title>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</title><addtitle>J Prosthet Dent</addtitle><description>Abstract Dental implant restorations may be either screw-retained or cemented onto an abutment. While each method has its advantages and disadvantages, cemented restorations are commonly used in the maxillary arch, usually because of esthetic concerns. Available bone in the anterior maxilla dictates the placement of the implant, which may result in a facially positioned screw-access opening. Still, a growing volume of literature states that periimplant soft tissues respond more favorably to screw-retained crowns than cement-retained crowns. This clinical report outlines a treatment with a new method of fabricating a custom abutment-crown combination for a screw-retained restoration. The technique allows the channel for the screw to be placed at an angle other than parallel to the implant body. In this case, the practitioner may choose either a screw-retained or cement-retained implant restoration, where previously only a cemented restoration was possible.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bone Screws</subject><subject>Dental Implant-Abutment Design</subject><subject>Dental Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis Retention - methods</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><issn>0022-3913</issn><issn>1097-6841</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9vFDEMxSMEokvhK1Q5cpnB-TOeGQ6IqqKAVIkDcCXKJg7NMjtZktlW_fZktV0OXDj54Pee7Z8ZuxDQChD4ZtPuciqe5qWVILoWsAXon7CVgLFvcNDiKVsBSNmoUagz9qKUDQAMXS-eszOJSmsxyhX7cW3XOTq7xDTzFLjlxWW6bzItNs7keaaypHzs27sUfZx_8uWWeLAu2olb56gUfpsmessvuZviXOOm6tulvLxkz4KdCr16rOfs-_WHb1efmpsvHz9fXd40Tku1NH3AzsGgUPc6iIFU58Ww9oPX685JsEGjEgEHNY4KCEdE64PUqEPtBivUOXt9zK1Ufu_rymYbi6NpsjOlfTGilwP2CNhXKR6lrgIsmYLZ5bi1-cEIMAe2ZmNObM2BrQE0lW01XjzO2K-35P_aTjCr4P1RQPXSu0jZFBdpduRjJrcYn-L_Z7z7J-IE9Bc9UNmkfZ4rRyNMkQbM18OHDw8WHYCq-NQfM82jCg</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Garcia-Gazaui, Sabrina, DDS</creator><creator>Razzoog, Michael, DDS, MS, MPH</creator><creator>Sierraalta, Marianella, DDS, MS</creator><creator>Saglik, Berna, DDS, MS</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Fabrication of a screw-retained restoration avoiding the facial access hole: A clinical report</title><author>Garcia-Gazaui, Sabrina, DDS ; Razzoog, Michael, DDS, MS, MPH ; Sierraalta, Marianella, DDS, MS ; Saglik, Berna, DDS, MS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-7f65c0836474f18e35d18bd8d4b5c20af4631f6839930e6966adf2464fc20fa13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bone Screws</topic><topic>Dental Implant-Abutment Design</topic><topic>Dental Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis Retention - methods</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Gazaui, Sabrina, DDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Razzoog, Michael, DDS, MS, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sierraalta, Marianella, DDS, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saglik, Berna, DDS, MS</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garcia-Gazaui, Sabrina, DDS</au><au>Razzoog, Michael, DDS, MS, MPH</au><au>Sierraalta, Marianella, DDS, MS</au><au>Saglik, Berna, DDS, MS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fabrication of a screw-retained restoration avoiding the facial access hole: A clinical report</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Prosthet Dent</addtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>621</spage><epage>624</epage><pages>621-624</pages><issn>0022-3913</issn><eissn>1097-6841</eissn><abstract>Abstract Dental implant restorations may be either screw-retained or cemented onto an abutment. While each method has its advantages and disadvantages, cemented restorations are commonly used in the maxillary arch, usually because of esthetic concerns. Available bone in the anterior maxilla dictates the placement of the implant, which may result in a facially positioned screw-access opening. Still, a growing volume of literature states that periimplant soft tissues respond more favorably to screw-retained crowns than cement-retained crowns. This clinical report outlines a treatment with a new method of fabricating a custom abutment-crown combination for a screw-retained restoration. The technique allows the channel for the screw to be placed at an angle other than parallel to the implant body. In this case, the practitioner may choose either a screw-retained or cement-retained implant restoration, where previously only a cemented restoration was possible.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26344192</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.007</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3913
ispartof The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2015-11, Vol.114 (5), p.621-624
issn 0022-3913
1097-6841
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1728676067
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Bone Screws
Dental Implant-Abutment Design
Dental Implantation - methods
Dental Prosthesis Retention - methods
Dentistry
Female
Humans
title Fabrication of a screw-retained restoration avoiding the facial access hole: A clinical report
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T23%3A46%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fabrication%20of%20a%20screw-retained%20restoration%20avoiding%20the%20facial%20access%20hole:%20A%20clinical%20report&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20prosthetic%20dentistry&rft.au=Garcia-Gazaui,%20Sabrina,%20DDS&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=621&rft.epage=624&rft.pages=621-624&rft.issn=0022-3913&rft.eissn=1097-6841&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1728676067%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1728676067&rft_id=info:pmid/26344192&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0022391315003364&rfr_iscdi=true