Fabrication of a screw-retained restoration avoiding the facial access hole: A clinical report
Abstract Dental implant restorations may be either screw-retained or cemented onto an abutment. While each method has its advantages and disadvantages, cemented restorations are commonly used in the maxillary arch, usually because of esthetic concerns. Available bone in the anterior maxilla dictates...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2015-11, Vol.114 (5), p.621-624 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 624 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 621 |
container_title | The Journal of prosthetic dentistry |
container_volume | 114 |
creator | Garcia-Gazaui, Sabrina, DDS Razzoog, Michael, DDS, MS, MPH Sierraalta, Marianella, DDS, MS Saglik, Berna, DDS, MS |
description | Abstract Dental implant restorations may be either screw-retained or cemented onto an abutment. While each method has its advantages and disadvantages, cemented restorations are commonly used in the maxillary arch, usually because of esthetic concerns. Available bone in the anterior maxilla dictates the placement of the implant, which may result in a facially positioned screw-access opening. Still, a growing volume of literature states that periimplant soft tissues respond more favorably to screw-retained crowns than cement-retained crowns. This clinical report outlines a treatment with a new method of fabricating a custom abutment-crown combination for a screw-retained restoration. The technique allows the channel for the screw to be placed at an angle other than parallel to the implant body. In this case, the practitioner may choose either a screw-retained or cement-retained implant restoration, where previously only a cemented restoration was possible. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1728676067</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0022391315003364</els_id><sourcerecordid>1728676067</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-7f65c0836474f18e35d18bd8d4b5c20af4631f6839930e6966adf2464fc20fa13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9vFDEMxSMEokvhK1Q5cpnB-TOeGQ6IqqKAVIkDcCXKJg7NMjtZktlW_fZktV0OXDj54Pee7Z8ZuxDQChD4ZtPuciqe5qWVILoWsAXon7CVgLFvcNDiKVsBSNmoUagz9qKUDQAMXS-eszOJSmsxyhX7cW3XOTq7xDTzFLjlxWW6bzItNs7keaaypHzs27sUfZx_8uWWeLAu2olb56gUfpsmessvuZviXOOm6tulvLxkz4KdCr16rOfs-_WHb1efmpsvHz9fXd40Tku1NH3AzsGgUPc6iIFU58Ww9oPX685JsEGjEgEHNY4KCEdE64PUqEPtBivUOXt9zK1Ufu_rymYbi6NpsjOlfTGilwP2CNhXKR6lrgIsmYLZ5bi1-cEIMAe2ZmNObM2BrQE0lW01XjzO2K-35P_aTjCr4P1RQPXSu0jZFBdpduRjJrcYn-L_Z7z7J-IE9Bc9UNmkfZ4rRyNMkQbM18OHDw8WHYCq-NQfM82jCg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1728676067</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fabrication of a screw-retained restoration avoiding the facial access hole: A clinical report</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Garcia-Gazaui, Sabrina, DDS ; Razzoog, Michael, DDS, MS, MPH ; Sierraalta, Marianella, DDS, MS ; Saglik, Berna, DDS, MS</creator><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Gazaui, Sabrina, DDS ; Razzoog, Michael, DDS, MS, MPH ; Sierraalta, Marianella, DDS, MS ; Saglik, Berna, DDS, MS</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Dental implant restorations may be either screw-retained or cemented onto an abutment. While each method has its advantages and disadvantages, cemented restorations are commonly used in the maxillary arch, usually because of esthetic concerns. Available bone in the anterior maxilla dictates the placement of the implant, which may result in a facially positioned screw-access opening. Still, a growing volume of literature states that periimplant soft tissues respond more favorably to screw-retained crowns than cement-retained crowns. This clinical report outlines a treatment with a new method of fabricating a custom abutment-crown combination for a screw-retained restoration. The technique allows the channel for the screw to be placed at an angle other than parallel to the implant body. In this case, the practitioner may choose either a screw-retained or cement-retained implant restoration, where previously only a cemented restoration was possible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3913</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6841</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26344192</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Bone Screws ; Dental Implant-Abutment Design ; Dental Implantation - methods ; Dental Prosthesis Retention - methods ; Dentistry ; Female ; Humans</subject><ispartof>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2015-11, Vol.114 (5), p.621-624</ispartof><rights>Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</rights><rights>2015 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-7f65c0836474f18e35d18bd8d4b5c20af4631f6839930e6966adf2464fc20fa13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-7f65c0836474f18e35d18bd8d4b5c20af4631f6839930e6966adf2464fc20fa13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26344192$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Gazaui, Sabrina, DDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Razzoog, Michael, DDS, MS, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sierraalta, Marianella, DDS, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saglik, Berna, DDS, MS</creatorcontrib><title>Fabrication of a screw-retained restoration avoiding the facial access hole: A clinical report</title><title>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</title><addtitle>J Prosthet Dent</addtitle><description>Abstract Dental implant restorations may be either screw-retained or cemented onto an abutment. While each method has its advantages and disadvantages, cemented restorations are commonly used in the maxillary arch, usually because of esthetic concerns. Available bone in the anterior maxilla dictates the placement of the implant, which may result in a facially positioned screw-access opening. Still, a growing volume of literature states that periimplant soft tissues respond more favorably to screw-retained crowns than cement-retained crowns. This clinical report outlines a treatment with a new method of fabricating a custom abutment-crown combination for a screw-retained restoration. The technique allows the channel for the screw to be placed at an angle other than parallel to the implant body. In this case, the practitioner may choose either a screw-retained or cement-retained implant restoration, where previously only a cemented restoration was possible.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bone Screws</subject><subject>Dental Implant-Abutment Design</subject><subject>Dental Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis Retention - methods</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><issn>0022-3913</issn><issn>1097-6841</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9vFDEMxSMEokvhK1Q5cpnB-TOeGQ6IqqKAVIkDcCXKJg7NMjtZktlW_fZktV0OXDj54Pee7Z8ZuxDQChD4ZtPuciqe5qWVILoWsAXon7CVgLFvcNDiKVsBSNmoUagz9qKUDQAMXS-eszOJSmsxyhX7cW3XOTq7xDTzFLjlxWW6bzItNs7keaaypHzs27sUfZx_8uWWeLAu2olb56gUfpsmessvuZviXOOm6tulvLxkz4KdCr16rOfs-_WHb1efmpsvHz9fXd40Tku1NH3AzsGgUPc6iIFU58Ww9oPX685JsEGjEgEHNY4KCEdE64PUqEPtBivUOXt9zK1Ufu_rymYbi6NpsjOlfTGilwP2CNhXKR6lrgIsmYLZ5bi1-cEIMAe2ZmNObM2BrQE0lW01XjzO2K-35P_aTjCr4P1RQPXSu0jZFBdpduRjJrcYn-L_Z7z7J-IE9Bc9UNmkfZ4rRyNMkQbM18OHDw8WHYCq-NQfM82jCg</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Garcia-Gazaui, Sabrina, DDS</creator><creator>Razzoog, Michael, DDS, MS, MPH</creator><creator>Sierraalta, Marianella, DDS, MS</creator><creator>Saglik, Berna, DDS, MS</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Fabrication of a screw-retained restoration avoiding the facial access hole: A clinical report</title><author>Garcia-Gazaui, Sabrina, DDS ; Razzoog, Michael, DDS, MS, MPH ; Sierraalta, Marianella, DDS, MS ; Saglik, Berna, DDS, MS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-7f65c0836474f18e35d18bd8d4b5c20af4631f6839930e6966adf2464fc20fa13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bone Screws</topic><topic>Dental Implant-Abutment Design</topic><topic>Dental Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis Retention - methods</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Gazaui, Sabrina, DDS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Razzoog, Michael, DDS, MS, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sierraalta, Marianella, DDS, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saglik, Berna, DDS, MS</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garcia-Gazaui, Sabrina, DDS</au><au>Razzoog, Michael, DDS, MS, MPH</au><au>Sierraalta, Marianella, DDS, MS</au><au>Saglik, Berna, DDS, MS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fabrication of a screw-retained restoration avoiding the facial access hole: A clinical report</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Prosthet Dent</addtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>621</spage><epage>624</epage><pages>621-624</pages><issn>0022-3913</issn><eissn>1097-6841</eissn><abstract>Abstract Dental implant restorations may be either screw-retained or cemented onto an abutment. While each method has its advantages and disadvantages, cemented restorations are commonly used in the maxillary arch, usually because of esthetic concerns. Available bone in the anterior maxilla dictates the placement of the implant, which may result in a facially positioned screw-access opening. Still, a growing volume of literature states that periimplant soft tissues respond more favorably to screw-retained crowns than cement-retained crowns. This clinical report outlines a treatment with a new method of fabricating a custom abutment-crown combination for a screw-retained restoration. The technique allows the channel for the screw to be placed at an angle other than parallel to the implant body. In this case, the practitioner may choose either a screw-retained or cement-retained implant restoration, where previously only a cemented restoration was possible.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26344192</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.007</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3913 |
ispartof | The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2015-11, Vol.114 (5), p.621-624 |
issn | 0022-3913 1097-6841 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1728676067 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Adult Bone Screws Dental Implant-Abutment Design Dental Implantation - methods Dental Prosthesis Retention - methods Dentistry Female Humans |
title | Fabrication of a screw-retained restoration avoiding the facial access hole: A clinical report |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T23%3A46%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fabrication%20of%20a%20screw-retained%20restoration%20avoiding%20the%20facial%20access%20hole:%20A%20clinical%20report&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20prosthetic%20dentistry&rft.au=Garcia-Gazaui,%20Sabrina,%20DDS&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=621&rft.epage=624&rft.pages=621-624&rft.issn=0022-3913&rft.eissn=1097-6841&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1728676067%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1728676067&rft_id=info:pmid/26344192&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0022391315003364&rfr_iscdi=true |