Effect of delaying prophylaxis against CMV in D+/R− solid organ transplant recipients in the development of CMV-specific cellular immunity and occurrence of late CMV disease

Summary Objectives Evaluate the protective effect against late CMV disease of delaying antiviral prophylaxis initiation in D+/R− patients receiving solid organ transplant (SOT). Methods Prospective multicenter study in D+/R− SOT recipients in Spain (Sept/09–Sept/12). Whole blood specimens were prosp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of infection 2015-11, Vol.71 (5), p.561-570
Hauptverfasser: San-Juan, R, Navarro, D, García-Reyne, A, Montejo, M, Muñoz, P, Carratala, J, Len, O, Fortun, J, Muñoz-Cobo, B, Gimenez, E, Eworo, A, Sabe, N, Meije, Y, Martín-Davila, P, Andres, A, Delgado, J, Jimenez, C, Amat, P, Fernández-Ruiz, M, López-Medrano, F, Lumbreras, C, Aguado, J.M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 570
container_issue 5
container_start_page 561
container_title The Journal of infection
container_volume 71
creator San-Juan, R
Navarro, D
García-Reyne, A
Montejo, M
Muñoz, P
Carratala, J
Len, O
Fortun, J
Muñoz-Cobo, B
Gimenez, E
Eworo, A
Sabe, N
Meije, Y
Martín-Davila, P
Andres, A
Delgado, J
Jimenez, C
Amat, P
Fernández-Ruiz, M
López-Medrano, F
Lumbreras, C
Aguado, J.M
description Summary Objectives Evaluate the protective effect against late CMV disease of delaying antiviral prophylaxis initiation in D+/R− patients receiving solid organ transplant (SOT). Methods Prospective multicenter study in D+/R− SOT recipients in Spain (Sept/09–Sept/12). Whole blood specimens were prospectively collected after Tx for CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMI) determination. Two prophylaxis strategies were compared: early prophylaxis (EP; starting within the first 3 days after Tx) and delayed prophylaxis (DP; starting 14 days after Tx). Risk factors for the occurrence of CMV disease were determined by survival analysis and proportional risk Cox regression models. Results We included 95 patients (50 EP V 45 DP). Twenty six patients (27.4%) developed CMV disease: 32.7% EP vs . 20% DP; (p = 0.2). No cases of CMV disease were reported previously to beginning delayed prophylaxis. The percentage of individuals with detectable CMI response was higher in patients with DP although differences did not reach statistic significance (42% vs 29.6% at day 200 after Tx; p = 0.4). There was a clear trend towards less end-organ CMV disease in patients receiving DP (18.2% EP vs  5% DP; p = 0.09) and DP was the only protective factor in the multivariate analysis (HR: 0.26; CI: 0.05–1.2; p = 0.09). Conclusions A 14-day delay in CMV prophylaxis in D+/R− SOT recipients is safe and may reduce the incidence of late CMV end-organ disease although correlation of this effect with CMI responses was not complete.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jinf.2015.06.013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1728670587</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0163445315002273</els_id><sourcerecordid>1728670587</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-335995422ba3622201c4885766771a5fb0340ee8a401d29b4be0d3e1369359063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kt2K1TAUhYsoznH0BbyQXArSTn7atAUR5Dj-wIjg321I090zqWnaSdLBvoHXvojv5JOYeEYvvPAqEL61kr3WzrKHBBcEE342FqO2Q0ExqQrMC0zYrWxHKkZzWpf0draLEMvLsmIn2T3vR4xxy1p-NzuhnDSMtvUu-3E-DKACmgfUg5Gbtge0uHm53Iz8qj2SB6mtD2j_9jPSFr14cvb-57fvyM9G92h2B2lRcNL6xUgbkAOlFw02-ASHS4im12DmZYp36Y1ok_slUoNWSIExq5EO6WlarQ4bkjaaKrU6B1ZBEhgZ4PfjvfYgPdzP7gzSeHhwc55mn16ef9y_zi_evXqzf36RqzhhyBmr2rYqKe0k45TGiFTZNFXNeV0TWQ0dZiUGaGSJSU_bruwA9wwI421UYs5Os8dH3xjG1Qo-iEn79GFpYV69IDVteI2rpo4oPaLKzd47GMTi9CTdJggWqSgxilSUSEUJzEUsKooe3fiv3QT9X8mfZiLw9AhAnPJagxNe6ZRKr2PKQfSz_r__s3_kymirlTRfYAM_zquzMT9BhKcCiw9pVdKmkApjSmvGfgH9T7rF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1728670587</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of delaying prophylaxis against CMV in D+/R− solid organ transplant recipients in the development of CMV-specific cellular immunity and occurrence of late CMV disease</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>San-Juan, R ; Navarro, D ; García-Reyne, A ; Montejo, M ; Muñoz, P ; Carratala, J ; Len, O ; Fortun, J ; Muñoz-Cobo, B ; Gimenez, E ; Eworo, A ; Sabe, N ; Meije, Y ; Martín-Davila, P ; Andres, A ; Delgado, J ; Jimenez, C ; Amat, P ; Fernández-Ruiz, M ; López-Medrano, F ; Lumbreras, C ; Aguado, J.M</creator><creatorcontrib>San-Juan, R ; Navarro, D ; García-Reyne, A ; Montejo, M ; Muñoz, P ; Carratala, J ; Len, O ; Fortun, J ; Muñoz-Cobo, B ; Gimenez, E ; Eworo, A ; Sabe, N ; Meije, Y ; Martín-Davila, P ; Andres, A ; Delgado, J ; Jimenez, C ; Amat, P ; Fernández-Ruiz, M ; López-Medrano, F ; Lumbreras, C ; Aguado, J.M ; REIPI Network, Spain ; GESITRA Study Group from the SEIMC</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Objectives Evaluate the protective effect against late CMV disease of delaying antiviral prophylaxis initiation in D+/R− patients receiving solid organ transplant (SOT). Methods Prospective multicenter study in D+/R− SOT recipients in Spain (Sept/09–Sept/12). Whole blood specimens were prospectively collected after Tx for CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMI) determination. Two prophylaxis strategies were compared: early prophylaxis (EP; starting within the first 3 days after Tx) and delayed prophylaxis (DP; starting 14 days after Tx). Risk factors for the occurrence of CMV disease were determined by survival analysis and proportional risk Cox regression models. Results We included 95 patients (50 EP V 45 DP). Twenty six patients (27.4%) developed CMV disease: 32.7% EP vs . 20% DP; (p = 0.2). No cases of CMV disease were reported previously to beginning delayed prophylaxis. The percentage of individuals with detectable CMI response was higher in patients with DP although differences did not reach statistic significance (42% vs 29.6% at day 200 after Tx; p = 0.4). There was a clear trend towards less end-organ CMV disease in patients receiving DP (18.2% EP vs  5% DP; p = 0.09) and DP was the only protective factor in the multivariate analysis (HR: 0.26; CI: 0.05–1.2; p = 0.09). Conclusions A 14-day delay in CMV prophylaxis in D+/R− SOT recipients is safe and may reduce the incidence of late CMV end-organ disease although correlation of this effect with CMI responses was not complete.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0163-4453</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2742</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2015.06.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26183297</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Antiviral Agents - therapeutic use ; CMV disease ; CMV-specific cellular immunity ; Cytomegalovirus - drug effects ; Cytomegalovirus - immunology ; Cytomegalovirus Infections - drug therapy ; Cytomegalovirus Infections - epidemiology ; Cytomegalovirus Infections - immunology ; Cytomegalovirus Infections - prevention &amp; control ; Cytomegalovirus Infections - virology ; D+/R ; Delayed CMV prophylaxis ; Female ; Ganciclovir - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Immunity, Cellular ; Incidence ; Infectious Disease ; Liver Transplantation ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Prospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Spain - epidemiology ; Survival Analysis ; Transplant Recipients</subject><ispartof>The Journal of infection, 2015-11, Vol.71 (5), p.561-570</ispartof><rights>The British Infection Association</rights><rights>2015 The British Infection Association</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-335995422ba3622201c4885766771a5fb0340ee8a401d29b4be0d3e1369359063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-335995422ba3622201c4885766771a5fb0340ee8a401d29b4be0d3e1369359063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2015.06.013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26183297$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>San-Juan, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Reyne, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montejo, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carratala, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Len, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fortun, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz-Cobo, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gimenez, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eworo, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabe, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meije, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín-Davila, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andres, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delgado, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimenez, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amat, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Ruiz, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Medrano, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lumbreras, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguado, J.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>REIPI Network, Spain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GESITRA Study Group from the SEIMC</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of delaying prophylaxis against CMV in D+/R− solid organ transplant recipients in the development of CMV-specific cellular immunity and occurrence of late CMV disease</title><title>The Journal of infection</title><addtitle>J Infect</addtitle><description>Summary Objectives Evaluate the protective effect against late CMV disease of delaying antiviral prophylaxis initiation in D+/R− patients receiving solid organ transplant (SOT). Methods Prospective multicenter study in D+/R− SOT recipients in Spain (Sept/09–Sept/12). Whole blood specimens were prospectively collected after Tx for CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMI) determination. Two prophylaxis strategies were compared: early prophylaxis (EP; starting within the first 3 days after Tx) and delayed prophylaxis (DP; starting 14 days after Tx). Risk factors for the occurrence of CMV disease were determined by survival analysis and proportional risk Cox regression models. Results We included 95 patients (50 EP V 45 DP). Twenty six patients (27.4%) developed CMV disease: 32.7% EP vs . 20% DP; (p = 0.2). No cases of CMV disease were reported previously to beginning delayed prophylaxis. The percentage of individuals with detectable CMI response was higher in patients with DP although differences did not reach statistic significance (42% vs 29.6% at day 200 after Tx; p = 0.4). There was a clear trend towards less end-organ CMV disease in patients receiving DP (18.2% EP vs  5% DP; p = 0.09) and DP was the only protective factor in the multivariate analysis (HR: 0.26; CI: 0.05–1.2; p = 0.09). Conclusions A 14-day delay in CMV prophylaxis in D+/R− SOT recipients is safe and may reduce the incidence of late CMV end-organ disease although correlation of this effect with CMI responses was not complete.</description><subject>Antiviral Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>CMV disease</subject><subject>CMV-specific cellular immunity</subject><subject>Cytomegalovirus - drug effects</subject><subject>Cytomegalovirus - immunology</subject><subject>Cytomegalovirus Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Cytomegalovirus Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cytomegalovirus Infections - immunology</subject><subject>Cytomegalovirus Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Cytomegalovirus Infections - virology</subject><subject>D+/R</subject><subject>Delayed CMV prophylaxis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Ganciclovir - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunity, Cellular</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Infectious Disease</subject><subject>Liver Transplantation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Spain - epidemiology</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Transplant Recipients</subject><issn>0163-4453</issn><issn>1532-2742</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kt2K1TAUhYsoznH0BbyQXArSTn7atAUR5Dj-wIjg321I090zqWnaSdLBvoHXvojv5JOYeEYvvPAqEL61kr3WzrKHBBcEE342FqO2Q0ExqQrMC0zYrWxHKkZzWpf0draLEMvLsmIn2T3vR4xxy1p-NzuhnDSMtvUu-3E-DKACmgfUg5Gbtge0uHm53Iz8qj2SB6mtD2j_9jPSFr14cvb-57fvyM9G92h2B2lRcNL6xUgbkAOlFw02-ASHS4im12DmZYp36Y1ok_slUoNWSIExq5EO6WlarQ4bkjaaKrU6B1ZBEhgZ4PfjvfYgPdzP7gzSeHhwc55mn16ef9y_zi_evXqzf36RqzhhyBmr2rYqKe0k45TGiFTZNFXNeV0TWQ0dZiUGaGSJSU_bruwA9wwI421UYs5Os8dH3xjG1Qo-iEn79GFpYV69IDVteI2rpo4oPaLKzd47GMTi9CTdJggWqSgxilSUSEUJzEUsKooe3fiv3QT9X8mfZiLw9AhAnPJagxNe6ZRKr2PKQfSz_r__s3_kymirlTRfYAM_zquzMT9BhKcCiw9pVdKmkApjSmvGfgH9T7rF</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>San-Juan, R</creator><creator>Navarro, D</creator><creator>García-Reyne, A</creator><creator>Montejo, M</creator><creator>Muñoz, P</creator><creator>Carratala, J</creator><creator>Len, O</creator><creator>Fortun, J</creator><creator>Muñoz-Cobo, B</creator><creator>Gimenez, E</creator><creator>Eworo, A</creator><creator>Sabe, N</creator><creator>Meije, Y</creator><creator>Martín-Davila, P</creator><creator>Andres, A</creator><creator>Delgado, J</creator><creator>Jimenez, C</creator><creator>Amat, P</creator><creator>Fernández-Ruiz, M</creator><creator>López-Medrano, F</creator><creator>Lumbreras, C</creator><creator>Aguado, J.M</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Effect of delaying prophylaxis against CMV in D+/R− solid organ transplant recipients in the development of CMV-specific cellular immunity and occurrence of late CMV disease</title><author>San-Juan, R ; Navarro, D ; García-Reyne, A ; Montejo, M ; Muñoz, P ; Carratala, J ; Len, O ; Fortun, J ; Muñoz-Cobo, B ; Gimenez, E ; Eworo, A ; Sabe, N ; Meije, Y ; Martín-Davila, P ; Andres, A ; Delgado, J ; Jimenez, C ; Amat, P ; Fernández-Ruiz, M ; López-Medrano, F ; Lumbreras, C ; Aguado, J.M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-335995422ba3622201c4885766771a5fb0340ee8a401d29b4be0d3e1369359063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Antiviral Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>CMV disease</topic><topic>CMV-specific cellular immunity</topic><topic>Cytomegalovirus - drug effects</topic><topic>Cytomegalovirus - immunology</topic><topic>Cytomegalovirus Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Cytomegalovirus Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cytomegalovirus Infections - immunology</topic><topic>Cytomegalovirus Infections - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Cytomegalovirus Infections - virology</topic><topic>D+/R</topic><topic>Delayed CMV prophylaxis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Ganciclovir - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunity, Cellular</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Infectious Disease</topic><topic>Liver Transplantation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Spain - epidemiology</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Transplant Recipients</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>San-Juan, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Reyne, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montejo, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carratala, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Len, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fortun, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muñoz-Cobo, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gimenez, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eworo, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabe, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meije, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín-Davila, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andres, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delgado, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jimenez, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amat, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Ruiz, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Medrano, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lumbreras, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguado, J.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>REIPI Network, Spain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GESITRA Study Group from the SEIMC</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>San-Juan, R</au><au>Navarro, D</au><au>García-Reyne, A</au><au>Montejo, M</au><au>Muñoz, P</au><au>Carratala, J</au><au>Len, O</au><au>Fortun, J</au><au>Muñoz-Cobo, B</au><au>Gimenez, E</au><au>Eworo, A</au><au>Sabe, N</au><au>Meije, Y</au><au>Martín-Davila, P</au><au>Andres, A</au><au>Delgado, J</au><au>Jimenez, C</au><au>Amat, P</au><au>Fernández-Ruiz, M</au><au>López-Medrano, F</au><au>Lumbreras, C</au><au>Aguado, J.M</au><aucorp>REIPI Network, Spain</aucorp><aucorp>GESITRA Study Group from the SEIMC</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of delaying prophylaxis against CMV in D+/R− solid organ transplant recipients in the development of CMV-specific cellular immunity and occurrence of late CMV disease</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of infection</jtitle><addtitle>J Infect</addtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>561</spage><epage>570</epage><pages>561-570</pages><issn>0163-4453</issn><eissn>1532-2742</eissn><abstract>Summary Objectives Evaluate the protective effect against late CMV disease of delaying antiviral prophylaxis initiation in D+/R− patients receiving solid organ transplant (SOT). Methods Prospective multicenter study in D+/R− SOT recipients in Spain (Sept/09–Sept/12). Whole blood specimens were prospectively collected after Tx for CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity (CMI) determination. Two prophylaxis strategies were compared: early prophylaxis (EP; starting within the first 3 days after Tx) and delayed prophylaxis (DP; starting 14 days after Tx). Risk factors for the occurrence of CMV disease were determined by survival analysis and proportional risk Cox regression models. Results We included 95 patients (50 EP V 45 DP). Twenty six patients (27.4%) developed CMV disease: 32.7% EP vs . 20% DP; (p = 0.2). No cases of CMV disease were reported previously to beginning delayed prophylaxis. The percentage of individuals with detectable CMI response was higher in patients with DP although differences did not reach statistic significance (42% vs 29.6% at day 200 after Tx; p = 0.4). There was a clear trend towards less end-organ CMV disease in patients receiving DP (18.2% EP vs  5% DP; p = 0.09) and DP was the only protective factor in the multivariate analysis (HR: 0.26; CI: 0.05–1.2; p = 0.09). Conclusions A 14-day delay in CMV prophylaxis in D+/R− SOT recipients is safe and may reduce the incidence of late CMV end-organ disease although correlation of this effect with CMI responses was not complete.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26183297</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jinf.2015.06.013</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0163-4453
ispartof The Journal of infection, 2015-11, Vol.71 (5), p.561-570
issn 0163-4453
1532-2742
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1728670587
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Antiviral Agents - therapeutic use
CMV disease
CMV-specific cellular immunity
Cytomegalovirus - drug effects
Cytomegalovirus - immunology
Cytomegalovirus Infections - drug therapy
Cytomegalovirus Infections - epidemiology
Cytomegalovirus Infections - immunology
Cytomegalovirus Infections - prevention & control
Cytomegalovirus Infections - virology
D+/R
Delayed CMV prophylaxis
Female
Ganciclovir - therapeutic use
Humans
Immunity, Cellular
Incidence
Infectious Disease
Liver Transplantation
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications - prevention & control
Proportional Hazards Models
Prospective Studies
Risk Factors
Spain - epidemiology
Survival Analysis
Transplant Recipients
title Effect of delaying prophylaxis against CMV in D+/R− solid organ transplant recipients in the development of CMV-specific cellular immunity and occurrence of late CMV disease
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T11%3A49%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20delaying%20prophylaxis%20against%20CMV%20in%20D+/R%E2%88%92%20solid%20organ%20transplant%20recipients%20in%20the%20development%20of%20CMV-specific%20cellular%20immunity%20and%20occurrence%20of%20late%20CMV%20disease&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20infection&rft.au=San-Juan,%20R&rft.aucorp=REIPI%20Network,%20Spain&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=561&rft.epage=570&rft.pages=561-570&rft.issn=0163-4453&rft.eissn=1532-2742&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jinf.2015.06.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1728670587%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1728670587&rft_id=info:pmid/26183297&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0163445315002273&rfr_iscdi=true