Impact of Genetic Relatedness and Emotional Closeness on Intergenerational Relations

Both emotional closeness and genetic relatedness are known to influence helping behavior between family generations, yet few studies have explored them together. The authors investigated the associations between (a) parenthood and perceived emotional closeness toward own parents and parents-in-law a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of marriage and family 2015-08, Vol.77 (4), p.889-907
Hauptverfasser: Danielsbacka, Mirkka, Tanskanen, Antti O., Rotkirch, Anna
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 907
container_issue 4
container_start_page 889
container_title Journal of marriage and family
container_volume 77
creator Danielsbacka, Mirkka
Tanskanen, Antti O.
Rotkirch, Anna
description Both emotional closeness and genetic relatedness are known to influence helping behavior between family generations, yet few studies have explored them together. The authors investigated the associations between (a) parenthood and perceived emotional closeness toward own parents and parents-in-law and (b) emotional closeness and receiving child care from grandparents across and within lineage lines. The data include information on the 8 dyads of possible parent–grandparent relations from a nationally representative survey of young adults in Finland (born 1962–1990, sample N = 1,216). The results show that parenthood was associated with women's emotional closeness to their own mothers and men's emotional closeness to their parents-in-law. Maternal grandmothers provided the most grandchild care. After controlling for emotional closeness, the difference in child care provision between one's own mother and one's mother-in-law disappeared for women but was accentuated in men. Thus, emotional closeness shapes intergenerational relations differently for kin and in-laws.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jomf.12206
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1728660214</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24582816</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24582816</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4976-cf978d7c06687013558d7b18c326e78d67f5a6586abbc619566ccaf3b1b5a9fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9r2zAUx0XpoGm3S-8FQy-j4E4_n-xjF5I0IVsgy9hRyLJcnNpWKjl0_e-nxG0PO4y9i_Te9_MVenwRuiT4lsT6snVtdUsoxXCCRkRykjLJ5CkaYUxpSjkXZ-g8hC2ORXM8Qpt5u9OmT1yVzGxn-9oka9vo3padDSHRXZlMWtfXrtNNMm5csMe565J511v_EFuvX-WjMV7DR_Sh0k2wn17PC_RzOtmM79PlajYf3y1Tw3MJqalymZXSYIBMYsKEiF1BMsMo2KiArIQGkYEuCgMkFwDG6IoVpBA6r0p2gT4P7-68e9rb0Ku2DsY2je6s2wdFJM0AMCX8P1DMGRdYQkSv_0K3bu_jgpGCXErG418jdTNQxrsQvK3Uztet9i-KYHXIQh2yUMcsIkwG-Llu7Ms_SLVYfZu-ea4Gzzb0zr97KBcZzchBTwe9Dr39_a5r_6ggZi7Ur-8zJX-sl4vN4qsC9gdNLqOo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1697734013</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of Genetic Relatedness and Emotional Closeness on Intergenerational Relations</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Danielsbacka, Mirkka ; Tanskanen, Antti O. ; Rotkirch, Anna</creator><creatorcontrib>Danielsbacka, Mirkka ; Tanskanen, Antti O. ; Rotkirch, Anna</creatorcontrib><description>Both emotional closeness and genetic relatedness are known to influence helping behavior between family generations, yet few studies have explored them together. The authors investigated the associations between (a) parenthood and perceived emotional closeness toward own parents and parents-in-law and (b) emotional closeness and receiving child care from grandparents across and within lineage lines. The data include information on the 8 dyads of possible parent–grandparent relations from a nationally representative survey of young adults in Finland (born 1962–1990, sample N = 1,216). The results show that parenthood was associated with women's emotional closeness to their own mothers and men's emotional closeness to their parents-in-law. Maternal grandmothers provided the most grandchild care. After controlling for emotional closeness, the difference in child care provision between one's own mother and one's mother-in-law disappeared for women but was accentuated in men. Thus, emotional closeness shapes intergenerational relations differently for kin and in-laws.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2445</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-3737</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jomf.12206</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JMFAA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Child care ; Child Care Services ; Children ; Emotions ; Family ; Family (Sociological Unit) ; Genetics ; Grandchildren ; Grandparents ; Helping Relationship ; Intergenerational Relations ; Intergenerational Relationships ; Lineage ; Males ; Mothers ; Parenthood ; Parents ; Parents &amp; parenting ; Sex Differences ; Social Scientists ; Social support ; Youth</subject><ispartof>Journal of marriage and family, 2015-08, Vol.77 (4), p.889-907</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2015 National Council on Family Relations</rights><rights>2015 National Council on Family Relations</rights><rights>Copyright National Council on Family Relations Aug 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4976-cf978d7c06687013558d7b18c326e78d67f5a6586abbc619566ccaf3b1b5a9fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4976-cf978d7c06687013558d7b18c326e78d67f5a6586abbc619566ccaf3b1b5a9fd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24582816$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24582816$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27344,27924,27925,33774,33775,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Danielsbacka, Mirkka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanskanen, Antti O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotkirch, Anna</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of Genetic Relatedness and Emotional Closeness on Intergenerational Relations</title><title>Journal of marriage and family</title><addtitle>Fam Relat</addtitle><description>Both emotional closeness and genetic relatedness are known to influence helping behavior between family generations, yet few studies have explored them together. The authors investigated the associations between (a) parenthood and perceived emotional closeness toward own parents and parents-in-law and (b) emotional closeness and receiving child care from grandparents across and within lineage lines. The data include information on the 8 dyads of possible parent–grandparent relations from a nationally representative survey of young adults in Finland (born 1962–1990, sample N = 1,216). The results show that parenthood was associated with women's emotional closeness to their own mothers and men's emotional closeness to their parents-in-law. Maternal grandmothers provided the most grandchild care. After controlling for emotional closeness, the difference in child care provision between one's own mother and one's mother-in-law disappeared for women but was accentuated in men. Thus, emotional closeness shapes intergenerational relations differently for kin and in-laws.</description><subject>Child care</subject><subject>Child Care Services</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>Family (Sociological Unit)</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Grandchildren</subject><subject>Grandparents</subject><subject>Helping Relationship</subject><subject>Intergenerational Relations</subject><subject>Intergenerational Relationships</subject><subject>Lineage</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Mothers</subject><subject>Parenthood</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Parents &amp; parenting</subject><subject>Sex Differences</subject><subject>Social Scientists</subject><subject>Social support</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>0022-2445</issn><issn>1741-3737</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>88H</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2N</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc9r2zAUx0XpoGm3S-8FQy-j4E4_n-xjF5I0IVsgy9hRyLJcnNpWKjl0_e-nxG0PO4y9i_Te9_MVenwRuiT4lsT6snVtdUsoxXCCRkRykjLJ5CkaYUxpSjkXZ-g8hC2ORXM8Qpt5u9OmT1yVzGxn-9oka9vo3padDSHRXZlMWtfXrtNNMm5csMe565J511v_EFuvX-WjMV7DR_Sh0k2wn17PC_RzOtmM79PlajYf3y1Tw3MJqalymZXSYIBMYsKEiF1BMsMo2KiArIQGkYEuCgMkFwDG6IoVpBA6r0p2gT4P7-68e9rb0Ku2DsY2je6s2wdFJM0AMCX8P1DMGRdYQkSv_0K3bu_jgpGCXErG418jdTNQxrsQvK3Uztet9i-KYHXIQh2yUMcsIkwG-Llu7Ms_SLVYfZu-ea4Gzzb0zr97KBcZzchBTwe9Dr39_a5r_6ggZi7Ur-8zJX-sl4vN4qsC9gdNLqOo</recordid><startdate>201508</startdate><enddate>201508</enddate><creator>Danielsbacka, Mirkka</creator><creator>Tanskanen, Antti O.</creator><creator>Rotkirch, Anna</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>The National Council on Family Relations</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201508</creationdate><title>Impact of Genetic Relatedness and Emotional Closeness on Intergenerational Relations</title><author>Danielsbacka, Mirkka ; Tanskanen, Antti O. ; Rotkirch, Anna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4976-cf978d7c06687013558d7b18c326e78d67f5a6586abbc619566ccaf3b1b5a9fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Child care</topic><topic>Child Care Services</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>Family (Sociological Unit)</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Grandchildren</topic><topic>Grandparents</topic><topic>Helping Relationship</topic><topic>Intergenerational Relations</topic><topic>Intergenerational Relationships</topic><topic>Lineage</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Mothers</topic><topic>Parenthood</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Parents &amp; parenting</topic><topic>Sex Differences</topic><topic>Social Scientists</topic><topic>Social support</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Danielsbacka, Mirkka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanskanen, Antti O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotkirch, Anna</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Religion Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of marriage and family</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Danielsbacka, Mirkka</au><au>Tanskanen, Antti O.</au><au>Rotkirch, Anna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of Genetic Relatedness and Emotional Closeness on Intergenerational Relations</atitle><jtitle>Journal of marriage and family</jtitle><addtitle>Fam Relat</addtitle><date>2015-08</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>889</spage><epage>907</epage><pages>889-907</pages><issn>0022-2445</issn><eissn>1741-3737</eissn><coden>JMFAA6</coden><abstract>Both emotional closeness and genetic relatedness are known to influence helping behavior between family generations, yet few studies have explored them together. The authors investigated the associations between (a) parenthood and perceived emotional closeness toward own parents and parents-in-law and (b) emotional closeness and receiving child care from grandparents across and within lineage lines. The data include information on the 8 dyads of possible parent–grandparent relations from a nationally representative survey of young adults in Finland (born 1962–1990, sample N = 1,216). The results show that parenthood was associated with women's emotional closeness to their own mothers and men's emotional closeness to their parents-in-law. Maternal grandmothers provided the most grandchild care. After controlling for emotional closeness, the difference in child care provision between one's own mother and one's mother-in-law disappeared for women but was accentuated in men. Thus, emotional closeness shapes intergenerational relations differently for kin and in-laws.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/jomf.12206</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2445
ispartof Journal of marriage and family, 2015-08, Vol.77 (4), p.889-907
issn 0022-2445
1741-3737
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1728660214
source Wiley Journals; Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Child care
Child Care Services
Children
Emotions
Family
Family (Sociological Unit)
Genetics
Grandchildren
Grandparents
Helping Relationship
Intergenerational Relations
Intergenerational Relationships
Lineage
Males
Mothers
Parenthood
Parents
Parents & parenting
Sex Differences
Social Scientists
Social support
Youth
title Impact of Genetic Relatedness and Emotional Closeness on Intergenerational Relations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T04%3A13%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20Genetic%20Relatedness%20and%20Emotional%20Closeness%20on%20Intergenerational%20Relations&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20marriage%20and%20family&rft.au=Danielsbacka,%20Mirkka&rft.date=2015-08&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=889&rft.epage=907&rft.pages=889-907&rft.issn=0022-2445&rft.eissn=1741-3737&rft.coden=JMFAA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jomf.12206&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24582816%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1697734013&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24582816&rfr_iscdi=true