Nicaragua: 25 Years Later

The case concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua, better known as the ‘Nicaragua case’ or simply Nicaragua, is arguably one of the most important and controversial cases ever to be heard by the International Court of Justice. Twenty-five years after the judgment on t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Leiden journal of international law 2012-03, Vol.25 (1), p.131-133
Hauptverfasser: HOSS, CRISTINA, VILLALPANDO, SANTIAGO, SIVAKUMARAN, SANDESH
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 133
container_issue 1
container_start_page 131
container_title Leiden journal of international law
container_volume 25
creator HOSS, CRISTINA
VILLALPANDO, SANTIAGO
SIVAKUMARAN, SANDESH
description The case concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua, better known as the ‘Nicaragua case’ or simply Nicaragua, is arguably one of the most important and controversial cases ever to be heard by the International Court of Justice. Twenty-five years after the judgment on the merits was handed down, it is high time to reassess the impact of Nicaragua on international law. The joint efforts of the Grotius Centre of the Leiden Law School, the Centre on International Courts and Tribunals at University College London, the Netherlands Society of International Law, and the law firm Foley Hoag LLP resulted in a one-day conference, on 27 June 2011, the very day on which the judgment on the merits of the Nicaragua case was handed down, 25 years ago.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0922156511000616
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1728651789</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0922156511000616</cupid><sourcerecordid>2580110781</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-ddec1070a332856ce8fe34cd265908d1d8b8d7f32b6323a122cbbe4e6340e25d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LAzEUxIMoWKsfoLfiycvqey-7SdabFP9B0YN68LRkk7dlS9utSffgtzelBUERT3OY3wzMCDFCuERAffUCJREWqkAEAIXqQAww1yYrVWkOxWBrZ1v_WJzEOE9MacAMxOipdTbYWW-vx1SM39mGOJ7aDYdTcdTYReSzvQ7F293t6-Qhmz7fP05uppmThjaZ9-wQNFgpyRTKsWlY5s6TKkowHr2pjdeNpFpJkhaJXF1zzkrmwFR4ORQXu9516D56jptq2UbHi4VdcdfHCjWZNEub8n8UpDaaECmh5z_QedeHVRpSlQQoQZFMEO4gF7oYAzfVOrRLGz5TU7W9tfp1a8rIfcYu69D6GX83_536AjxIdOU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>920130623</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nicaragua: 25 Years Later</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>HOSS, CRISTINA ; VILLALPANDO, SANTIAGO ; SIVAKUMARAN, SANDESH</creator><creatorcontrib>HOSS, CRISTINA ; VILLALPANDO, SANTIAGO ; SIVAKUMARAN, SANDESH</creatorcontrib><description>The case concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua, better known as the ‘Nicaragua case’ or simply Nicaragua, is arguably one of the most important and controversial cases ever to be heard by the International Court of Justice. Twenty-five years after the judgment on the merits was handed down, it is high time to reassess the impact of Nicaragua on international law. The joint efforts of the Grotius Centre of the Leiden Law School, the Centre on International Courts and Tribunals at University College London, the Netherlands Society of International Law, and the law firm Foley Hoag LLP resulted in a one-day conference, on 27 June 2011, the very day on which the judgment on the merits of the Nicaragua case was handed down, 25 years ago.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0922-1565</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-9698</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0922156511000616</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Colleges ; Colleges and universities ; Conferences ; Congresses and Conventions ; Court decisions ; Court hearings &amp; proceedings ; Courts ; Genocide ; Humanitarianism ; International Court ; International court of justice ; International courts ; International Law ; International relations ; Intervention ; Judges &amp; magistrates ; Jurisdiction ; Law ; London, England ; Military engagements ; Netherlands ; Nicaragua ; Paramilitary Forces ; Schools ; State court decisions ; Studies ; Tribunals &amp; commissions</subject><ispartof>Leiden journal of international law, 2012-03, Vol.25 (1), p.131-133</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Foundation of the Leiden Journal of International Law 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-ddec1070a332856ce8fe34cd265908d1d8b8d7f32b6323a122cbbe4e6340e25d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-ddec1070a332856ce8fe34cd265908d1d8b8d7f32b6323a122cbbe4e6340e25d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0922156511000616/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27842,27843,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>HOSS, CRISTINA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VILLALPANDO, SANTIAGO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIVAKUMARAN, SANDESH</creatorcontrib><title>Nicaragua: 25 Years Later</title><title>Leiden journal of international law</title><description>The case concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua, better known as the ‘Nicaragua case’ or simply Nicaragua, is arguably one of the most important and controversial cases ever to be heard by the International Court of Justice. Twenty-five years after the judgment on the merits was handed down, it is high time to reassess the impact of Nicaragua on international law. The joint efforts of the Grotius Centre of the Leiden Law School, the Centre on International Courts and Tribunals at University College London, the Netherlands Society of International Law, and the law firm Foley Hoag LLP resulted in a one-day conference, on 27 June 2011, the very day on which the judgment on the merits of the Nicaragua case was handed down, 25 years ago.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Colleges</subject><subject>Colleges and universities</subject><subject>Conferences</subject><subject>Congresses and Conventions</subject><subject>Court decisions</subject><subject>Court hearings &amp; proceedings</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Genocide</subject><subject>Humanitarianism</subject><subject>International Court</subject><subject>International court of justice</subject><subject>International courts</subject><subject>International Law</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Judges &amp; magistrates</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>London, England</subject><subject>Military engagements</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Nicaragua</subject><subject>Paramilitary Forces</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tribunals &amp; commissions</subject><issn>0922-1565</issn><issn>1478-9698</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE9LAzEUxIMoWKsfoLfiycvqey-7SdabFP9B0YN68LRkk7dlS9utSffgtzelBUERT3OY3wzMCDFCuERAffUCJREWqkAEAIXqQAww1yYrVWkOxWBrZ1v_WJzEOE9MacAMxOipdTbYWW-vx1SM39mGOJ7aDYdTcdTYReSzvQ7F293t6-Qhmz7fP05uppmThjaZ9-wQNFgpyRTKsWlY5s6TKkowHr2pjdeNpFpJkhaJXF1zzkrmwFR4ORQXu9516D56jptq2UbHi4VdcdfHCjWZNEub8n8UpDaaECmh5z_QedeHVRpSlQQoQZFMEO4gF7oYAzfVOrRLGz5TU7W9tfp1a8rIfcYu69D6GX83_536AjxIdOU</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>HOSS, CRISTINA</creator><creator>VILLALPANDO, SANTIAGO</creator><creator>SIVAKUMARAN, SANDESH</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>Nicaragua: 25 Years Later</title><author>HOSS, CRISTINA ; VILLALPANDO, SANTIAGO ; SIVAKUMARAN, SANDESH</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-ddec1070a332856ce8fe34cd265908d1d8b8d7f32b6323a122cbbe4e6340e25d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Colleges</topic><topic>Colleges and universities</topic><topic>Conferences</topic><topic>Congresses and Conventions</topic><topic>Court decisions</topic><topic>Court hearings &amp; proceedings</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Genocide</topic><topic>Humanitarianism</topic><topic>International Court</topic><topic>International court of justice</topic><topic>International courts</topic><topic>International Law</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Judges &amp; magistrates</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>London, England</topic><topic>Military engagements</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Nicaragua</topic><topic>Paramilitary Forces</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tribunals &amp; commissions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HOSS, CRISTINA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VILLALPANDO, SANTIAGO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIVAKUMARAN, SANDESH</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Leiden journal of international law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HOSS, CRISTINA</au><au>VILLALPANDO, SANTIAGO</au><au>SIVAKUMARAN, SANDESH</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nicaragua: 25 Years Later</atitle><jtitle>Leiden journal of international law</jtitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>133</epage><pages>131-133</pages><issn>0922-1565</issn><eissn>1478-9698</eissn><abstract>The case concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua, better known as the ‘Nicaragua case’ or simply Nicaragua, is arguably one of the most important and controversial cases ever to be heard by the International Court of Justice. Twenty-five years after the judgment on the merits was handed down, it is high time to reassess the impact of Nicaragua on international law. The joint efforts of the Grotius Centre of the Leiden Law School, the Centre on International Courts and Tribunals at University College London, the Netherlands Society of International Law, and the law firm Foley Hoag LLP resulted in a one-day conference, on 27 June 2011, the very day on which the judgment on the merits of the Nicaragua case was handed down, 25 years ago.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0922156511000616</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0922-1565
ispartof Leiden journal of international law, 2012-03, Vol.25 (1), p.131-133
issn 0922-1565
1478-9698
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1728651789
source PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Cambridge Journals
subjects Analysis
Colleges
Colleges and universities
Conferences
Congresses and Conventions
Court decisions
Court hearings & proceedings
Courts
Genocide
Humanitarianism
International Court
International court of justice
International courts
International Law
International relations
Intervention
Judges & magistrates
Jurisdiction
Law
London, England
Military engagements
Netherlands
Nicaragua
Paramilitary Forces
Schools
State court decisions
Studies
Tribunals & commissions
title Nicaragua: 25 Years Later
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T11%3A41%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nicaragua:%2025%20Years%20Later&rft.jtitle=Leiden%20journal%20of%20international%20law&rft.au=HOSS,%20CRISTINA&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=133&rft.pages=131-133&rft.issn=0922-1565&rft.eissn=1478-9698&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0922156511000616&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2580110781%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=920130623&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0922156511000616&rfr_iscdi=true