Nicaragua: 25 Years Later
The case concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua, better known as the ‘Nicaragua case’ or simply Nicaragua, is arguably one of the most important and controversial cases ever to be heard by the International Court of Justice. Twenty-five years after the judgment on t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Leiden journal of international law 2012-03, Vol.25 (1), p.131-133 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 133 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 131 |
container_title | Leiden journal of international law |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | HOSS, CRISTINA VILLALPANDO, SANTIAGO SIVAKUMARAN, SANDESH |
description | The case concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua, better known as the ‘Nicaragua case’ or simply Nicaragua, is arguably one of the most important and controversial cases ever to be heard by the International Court of Justice. Twenty-five years after the judgment on the merits was handed down, it is high time to reassess the impact of Nicaragua on international law. The joint efforts of the Grotius Centre of the Leiden Law School, the Centre on International Courts and Tribunals at University College London, the Netherlands Society of International Law, and the law firm Foley Hoag LLP resulted in a one-day conference, on 27 June 2011, the very day on which the judgment on the merits of the Nicaragua case was handed down, 25 years ago. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0922156511000616 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1728651789</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0922156511000616</cupid><sourcerecordid>2580110781</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-ddec1070a332856ce8fe34cd265908d1d8b8d7f32b6323a122cbbe4e6340e25d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LAzEUxIMoWKsfoLfiycvqey-7SdabFP9B0YN68LRkk7dlS9utSffgtzelBUERT3OY3wzMCDFCuERAffUCJREWqkAEAIXqQAww1yYrVWkOxWBrZ1v_WJzEOE9MacAMxOipdTbYWW-vx1SM39mGOJ7aDYdTcdTYReSzvQ7F293t6-Qhmz7fP05uppmThjaZ9-wQNFgpyRTKsWlY5s6TKkowHr2pjdeNpFpJkhaJXF1zzkrmwFR4ORQXu9516D56jptq2UbHi4VdcdfHCjWZNEub8n8UpDaaECmh5z_QedeHVRpSlQQoQZFMEO4gF7oYAzfVOrRLGz5TU7W9tfp1a8rIfcYu69D6GX83_536AjxIdOU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>920130623</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nicaragua: 25 Years Later</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>HOSS, CRISTINA ; VILLALPANDO, SANTIAGO ; SIVAKUMARAN, SANDESH</creator><creatorcontrib>HOSS, CRISTINA ; VILLALPANDO, SANTIAGO ; SIVAKUMARAN, SANDESH</creatorcontrib><description>The case concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua, better known as the ‘Nicaragua case’ or simply Nicaragua, is arguably one of the most important and controversial cases ever to be heard by the International Court of Justice. Twenty-five years after the judgment on the merits was handed down, it is high time to reassess the impact of Nicaragua on international law. The joint efforts of the Grotius Centre of the Leiden Law School, the Centre on International Courts and Tribunals at University College London, the Netherlands Society of International Law, and the law firm Foley Hoag LLP resulted in a one-day conference, on 27 June 2011, the very day on which the judgment on the merits of the Nicaragua case was handed down, 25 years ago.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0922-1565</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-9698</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0922156511000616</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Colleges ; Colleges and universities ; Conferences ; Congresses and Conventions ; Court decisions ; Court hearings & proceedings ; Courts ; Genocide ; Humanitarianism ; International Court ; International court of justice ; International courts ; International Law ; International relations ; Intervention ; Judges & magistrates ; Jurisdiction ; Law ; London, England ; Military engagements ; Netherlands ; Nicaragua ; Paramilitary Forces ; Schools ; State court decisions ; Studies ; Tribunals & commissions</subject><ispartof>Leiden journal of international law, 2012-03, Vol.25 (1), p.131-133</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Foundation of the Leiden Journal of International Law 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-ddec1070a332856ce8fe34cd265908d1d8b8d7f32b6323a122cbbe4e6340e25d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-ddec1070a332856ce8fe34cd265908d1d8b8d7f32b6323a122cbbe4e6340e25d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0922156511000616/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27842,27843,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>HOSS, CRISTINA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VILLALPANDO, SANTIAGO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIVAKUMARAN, SANDESH</creatorcontrib><title>Nicaragua: 25 Years Later</title><title>Leiden journal of international law</title><description>The case concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua, better known as the ‘Nicaragua case’ or simply Nicaragua, is arguably one of the most important and controversial cases ever to be heard by the International Court of Justice. Twenty-five years after the judgment on the merits was handed down, it is high time to reassess the impact of Nicaragua on international law. The joint efforts of the Grotius Centre of the Leiden Law School, the Centre on International Courts and Tribunals at University College London, the Netherlands Society of International Law, and the law firm Foley Hoag LLP resulted in a one-day conference, on 27 June 2011, the very day on which the judgment on the merits of the Nicaragua case was handed down, 25 years ago.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Colleges</subject><subject>Colleges and universities</subject><subject>Conferences</subject><subject>Congresses and Conventions</subject><subject>Court decisions</subject><subject>Court hearings & proceedings</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Genocide</subject><subject>Humanitarianism</subject><subject>International Court</subject><subject>International court of justice</subject><subject>International courts</subject><subject>International Law</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Judges & magistrates</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>London, England</subject><subject>Military engagements</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Nicaragua</subject><subject>Paramilitary Forces</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>State court decisions</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tribunals & commissions</subject><issn>0922-1565</issn><issn>1478-9698</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE9LAzEUxIMoWKsfoLfiycvqey-7SdabFP9B0YN68LRkk7dlS9utSffgtzelBUERT3OY3wzMCDFCuERAffUCJREWqkAEAIXqQAww1yYrVWkOxWBrZ1v_WJzEOE9MacAMxOipdTbYWW-vx1SM39mGOJ7aDYdTcdTYReSzvQ7F293t6-Qhmz7fP05uppmThjaZ9-wQNFgpyRTKsWlY5s6TKkowHr2pjdeNpFpJkhaJXF1zzkrmwFR4ORQXu9516D56jptq2UbHi4VdcdfHCjWZNEub8n8UpDaaECmh5z_QedeHVRpSlQQoQZFMEO4gF7oYAzfVOrRLGz5TU7W9tfp1a8rIfcYu69D6GX83_536AjxIdOU</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>HOSS, CRISTINA</creator><creator>VILLALPANDO, SANTIAGO</creator><creator>SIVAKUMARAN, SANDESH</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>Nicaragua: 25 Years Later</title><author>HOSS, CRISTINA ; VILLALPANDO, SANTIAGO ; SIVAKUMARAN, SANDESH</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-ddec1070a332856ce8fe34cd265908d1d8b8d7f32b6323a122cbbe4e6340e25d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Colleges</topic><topic>Colleges and universities</topic><topic>Conferences</topic><topic>Congresses and Conventions</topic><topic>Court decisions</topic><topic>Court hearings & proceedings</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Genocide</topic><topic>Humanitarianism</topic><topic>International Court</topic><topic>International court of justice</topic><topic>International courts</topic><topic>International Law</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Judges & magistrates</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>London, England</topic><topic>Military engagements</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Nicaragua</topic><topic>Paramilitary Forces</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>State court decisions</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tribunals & commissions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HOSS, CRISTINA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VILLALPANDO, SANTIAGO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIVAKUMARAN, SANDESH</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Leiden journal of international law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HOSS, CRISTINA</au><au>VILLALPANDO, SANTIAGO</au><au>SIVAKUMARAN, SANDESH</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nicaragua: 25 Years Later</atitle><jtitle>Leiden journal of international law</jtitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>133</epage><pages>131-133</pages><issn>0922-1565</issn><eissn>1478-9698</eissn><abstract>The case concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua, better known as the ‘Nicaragua case’ or simply Nicaragua, is arguably one of the most important and controversial cases ever to be heard by the International Court of Justice. Twenty-five years after the judgment on the merits was handed down, it is high time to reassess the impact of Nicaragua on international law. The joint efforts of the Grotius Centre of the Leiden Law School, the Centre on International Courts and Tribunals at University College London, the Netherlands Society of International Law, and the law firm Foley Hoag LLP resulted in a one-day conference, on 27 June 2011, the very day on which the judgment on the merits of the Nicaragua case was handed down, 25 years ago.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0922156511000616</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0922-1565 |
ispartof | Leiden journal of international law, 2012-03, Vol.25 (1), p.131-133 |
issn | 0922-1565 1478-9698 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1728651789 |
source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Cambridge Journals |
subjects | Analysis Colleges Colleges and universities Conferences Congresses and Conventions Court decisions Court hearings & proceedings Courts Genocide Humanitarianism International Court International court of justice International courts International Law International relations Intervention Judges & magistrates Jurisdiction Law London, England Military engagements Netherlands Nicaragua Paramilitary Forces Schools State court decisions Studies Tribunals & commissions |
title | Nicaragua: 25 Years Later |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T11%3A41%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nicaragua:%2025%20Years%20Later&rft.jtitle=Leiden%20journal%20of%20international%20law&rft.au=HOSS,%20CRISTINA&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=133&rft.pages=131-133&rft.issn=0922-1565&rft.eissn=1478-9698&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0922156511000616&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2580110781%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=920130623&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0922156511000616&rfr_iscdi=true |