Bystander Anti-Racism: A Review of the Literature

This review of literature on anti‐racist prosocial action points to the strong and largely untapped policy potential of bystander anti‐racism. Bystander anti‐racism is conceptualized as action taken by “ordinary” people in response to incidents of interpersonal or systemic racism. The utility of bys...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Analyses of social issues and public policy 2011-12, Vol.11 (1), p.263-284
Hauptverfasser: Nelson, Jacqueline K., Dunn, Kevin M., Paradies, Yin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 284
container_issue 1
container_start_page 263
container_title Analyses of social issues and public policy
container_volume 11
creator Nelson, Jacqueline K.
Dunn, Kevin M.
Paradies, Yin
description This review of literature on anti‐racist prosocial action points to the strong and largely untapped policy potential of bystander anti‐racism. Bystander anti‐racism is conceptualized as action taken by “ordinary” people in response to incidents of interpersonal or systemic racism. The utility of bystander anti‐racism is also demonstrated, with evidence suggesting productive effects for targets and bystanders, as well as perpetrators. The relative merits of confrontational or diplomatic action are reviewed, as is the delicate balance between communicating disapproval and maintaining interpersonal relations. The potential of bystander anti‐racism will be enhanced where there are social norms that are intolerant of racism. The literature has paid little attention to the influence of context or to affective drivers of bystander anti‐racism. We recommend changes to Ashburn‐Nardo's five‐stage Confronting Prejudice Model, to better facilitate anti‐racism policy and practice. The additions adapt the model to organizational settings, and more strongly acknowledge the importance of social norms and contexts, as well as the specific functions of racism. Through these changes, there is a scope to increase the prominence of bystander anti‐racism as a vital element of anti‐racism policy.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2011.01274.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1728649562</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1030866780</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3964-732d8e438dafbd9d7c21a42208a6bf4868601ff814060e67e4f2123084a524053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LwzAYgIMoOKf_oXjy0pqv5sODUKdOZcwxFb2FrE0xtetm07rt35s62cGL7yUv5OGB9wEgQDBCfs6LCMUEhpiiOMIQoQgizGm03gO93cd-t2MZcirkIThyroCeEkj2ALrauEZXmamDpGpsONWpdfOLIAmm5suaVbDIg-bdBCPbmFo3bW2OwUGuS2dOft8-eLm9eR7chaPH4f0gGYUpkYyGnOBMGEpEpvNZJjOeYqQpxlBoNsupYIJBlOcCUcigYdzQHCNMoKA6xhTGpA_Ott5lvfhsjWvU3LrUlKWuzKJ1CnEsGJUxw_-j0HsZ4wJ69PQPWizauvKHKIkkJVAy4aHLLbSypdmoZW3nut54jeqSq0J1ZVVXVnXJ1U9ytVbJUzLpVi8ItwLrGrPeCXT9oRgnPFav46EavF1PxuKBK0K-AZ40gfQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>919430968</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bystander Anti-Racism: A Review of the Literature</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Nelson, Jacqueline K. ; Dunn, Kevin M. ; Paradies, Yin</creator><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Jacqueline K. ; Dunn, Kevin M. ; Paradies, Yin</creatorcontrib><description>This review of literature on anti‐racist prosocial action points to the strong and largely untapped policy potential of bystander anti‐racism. Bystander anti‐racism is conceptualized as action taken by “ordinary” people in response to incidents of interpersonal or systemic racism. The utility of bystander anti‐racism is also demonstrated, with evidence suggesting productive effects for targets and bystanders, as well as perpetrators. The relative merits of confrontational or diplomatic action are reviewed, as is the delicate balance between communicating disapproval and maintaining interpersonal relations. The potential of bystander anti‐racism will be enhanced where there are social norms that are intolerant of racism. The literature has paid little attention to the influence of context or to affective drivers of bystander anti‐racism. We recommend changes to Ashburn‐Nardo's five‐stage Confronting Prejudice Model, to better facilitate anti‐racism policy and practice. The additions adapt the model to organizational settings, and more strongly acknowledge the importance of social norms and contexts, as well as the specific functions of racism. Through these changes, there is a scope to increase the prominence of bystander anti‐racism as a vital element of anti‐racism policy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1529-7489</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-2415</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-2415.2011.01274.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Interpersonal Relations ; Literature Reviews ; Personal relationships ; Prejudice ; Racial discrimination ; Racism ; Social psychology</subject><ispartof>Analyses of social issues and public policy, 2011-12, Vol.11 (1), p.263-284</ispartof><rights>2011 The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3964-732d8e438dafbd9d7c21a42208a6bf4868601ff814060e67e4f2123084a524053</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1530-2415.2011.01274.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1530-2415.2011.01274.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27842,27843,27901,27902,33751,33752,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Jacqueline K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Kevin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paradies, Yin</creatorcontrib><title>Bystander Anti-Racism: A Review of the Literature</title><title>Analyses of social issues and public policy</title><description>This review of literature on anti‐racist prosocial action points to the strong and largely untapped policy potential of bystander anti‐racism. Bystander anti‐racism is conceptualized as action taken by “ordinary” people in response to incidents of interpersonal or systemic racism. The utility of bystander anti‐racism is also demonstrated, with evidence suggesting productive effects for targets and bystanders, as well as perpetrators. The relative merits of confrontational or diplomatic action are reviewed, as is the delicate balance between communicating disapproval and maintaining interpersonal relations. The potential of bystander anti‐racism will be enhanced where there are social norms that are intolerant of racism. The literature has paid little attention to the influence of context or to affective drivers of bystander anti‐racism. We recommend changes to Ashburn‐Nardo's five‐stage Confronting Prejudice Model, to better facilitate anti‐racism policy and practice. The additions adapt the model to organizational settings, and more strongly acknowledge the importance of social norms and contexts, as well as the specific functions of racism. Through these changes, there is a scope to increase the prominence of bystander anti‐racism as a vital element of anti‐racism policy.</description><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Personal relationships</subject><subject>Prejudice</subject><subject>Racial discrimination</subject><subject>Racism</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><issn>1529-7489</issn><issn>1530-2415</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LwzAYgIMoOKf_oXjy0pqv5sODUKdOZcwxFb2FrE0xtetm07rt35s62cGL7yUv5OGB9wEgQDBCfs6LCMUEhpiiOMIQoQgizGm03gO93cd-t2MZcirkIThyroCeEkj2ALrauEZXmamDpGpsONWpdfOLIAmm5suaVbDIg-bdBCPbmFo3bW2OwUGuS2dOft8-eLm9eR7chaPH4f0gGYUpkYyGnOBMGEpEpvNZJjOeYqQpxlBoNsupYIJBlOcCUcigYdzQHCNMoKA6xhTGpA_Ott5lvfhsjWvU3LrUlKWuzKJ1CnEsGJUxw_-j0HsZ4wJ69PQPWizauvKHKIkkJVAy4aHLLbSypdmoZW3nut54jeqSq0J1ZVVXVnXJ1U9ytVbJUzLpVi8ItwLrGrPeCXT9oRgnPFav46EavF1PxuKBK0K-AZ40gfQ</recordid><startdate>201112</startdate><enddate>201112</enddate><creator>Nelson, Jacqueline K.</creator><creator>Dunn, Kevin M.</creator><creator>Paradies, Yin</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201112</creationdate><title>Bystander Anti-Racism: A Review of the Literature</title><author>Nelson, Jacqueline K. ; Dunn, Kevin M. ; Paradies, Yin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3964-732d8e438dafbd9d7c21a42208a6bf4868601ff814060e67e4f2123084a524053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Personal relationships</topic><topic>Prejudice</topic><topic>Racial discrimination</topic><topic>Racism</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Jacqueline K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Kevin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paradies, Yin</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Analyses of social issues and public policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nelson, Jacqueline K.</au><au>Dunn, Kevin M.</au><au>Paradies, Yin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bystander Anti-Racism: A Review of the Literature</atitle><jtitle>Analyses of social issues and public policy</jtitle><date>2011-12</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>263</spage><epage>284</epage><pages>263-284</pages><issn>1529-7489</issn><eissn>1530-2415</eissn><abstract>This review of literature on anti‐racist prosocial action points to the strong and largely untapped policy potential of bystander anti‐racism. Bystander anti‐racism is conceptualized as action taken by “ordinary” people in response to incidents of interpersonal or systemic racism. The utility of bystander anti‐racism is also demonstrated, with evidence suggesting productive effects for targets and bystanders, as well as perpetrators. The relative merits of confrontational or diplomatic action are reviewed, as is the delicate balance between communicating disapproval and maintaining interpersonal relations. The potential of bystander anti‐racism will be enhanced where there are social norms that are intolerant of racism. The literature has paid little attention to the influence of context or to affective drivers of bystander anti‐racism. We recommend changes to Ashburn‐Nardo's five‐stage Confronting Prejudice Model, to better facilitate anti‐racism policy and practice. The additions adapt the model to organizational settings, and more strongly acknowledge the importance of social norms and contexts, as well as the specific functions of racism. Through these changes, there is a scope to increase the prominence of bystander anti‐racism as a vital element of anti‐racism policy.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1530-2415.2011.01274.x</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1529-7489
ispartof Analyses of social issues and public policy, 2011-12, Vol.11 (1), p.263-284
issn 1529-7489
1530-2415
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1728649562
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Interpersonal Relations
Literature Reviews
Personal relationships
Prejudice
Racial discrimination
Racism
Social psychology
title Bystander Anti-Racism: A Review of the Literature
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T23%3A02%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bystander%20Anti-Racism:%20A%20Review%20of%20the%20Literature&rft.jtitle=Analyses%20of%20social%20issues%20and%20public%20policy&rft.au=Nelson,%20Jacqueline%20K.&rft.date=2011-12&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=263&rft.epage=284&rft.pages=263-284&rft.issn=1529-7489&rft.eissn=1530-2415&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2011.01274.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E1030866780%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=919430968&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true