Contemporary Reading of Advice and Consent
This essay revisits deLeon's argument describing the development of the policy sciences. The authors propose two “new” phenomena that have affected the mission and shape of the policy sciences, one--the rise in importance of the non-profit sector--being exogenous in nature, the second--the adop...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Policy studies journal 2011-02, Vol.39 (s1), p.27-39 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 39 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | s1 |
| container_start_page | 27 |
| container_title | Policy studies journal |
| container_volume | 39 |
| creator | deLeon, Peter Gallagher, B. Kathleen |
| description | This essay revisits deLeon's argument describing the development of the policy sciences. The authors propose two “new” phenomena that have affected the mission and shape of the policy sciences, one--the rise in importance of the non-profit sector--being exogenous in nature, the second--the adoption of the concept of governance--being endogenous. It ends with an illustration. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00389_3.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1728649416</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A253322308</galeid><sourcerecordid>A253322308</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c8583-e64b3be2e0342dfa33849db397fadbf7d28e39e7f58bf03e5d3c7fc260cb312e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVk11v0zAUhiMEEmXwG6jGDSCl-CuxwxVVBV1H6QZlWu-OnOQ4SkmTYrfQ_XscUg2GKij2hS37eV8df7xBcErJgPr2ajmgkaAhIZINGPGrhHCVAB_s7gW92637QY_QhIQsYYuHwSPnloQQJiTpBS9HTb3B1bqx2t70P6HOy7roN6Y_zL-VGfZ1nfc94rDePA4eGF05fLIfT4Krd28_j87C6cV4MhpOw0xFiocYi5SnyJBwwXKjOVciyVOeSKPz1MicKeQJShOp1BCOUc4zaTIWkyzllCE_CZ53vmvbfN2i28CqdBlWla6x2TqgkqlYJILG_0YZo4LIiDOPnv6BLputrf1BQEWJ8gylHnrWQYWuEMraNBurs9YThizinDFOlKfCA1SBNVpdNTWa0i_f4QcHeN9zXJXZQcGLO4KsfaPdptBb5-D95eRodjKfHc9-uD6ePTu-BjWe_u3y9mzWVBUWCP4njS5gyGPORKJEdCT_u__rjs9s45xFA2tbrvznBkqgzQwsoQ0GtMGANjOwzwzsvPhNJ_7uX-TmP5RwOT__Of1Vb-l8nbcW2n6BWHIZwfVsDGq2UB_jxTksPP-0441uQBe2dHA19-bcJzZiQkj-A7vPKrc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>859875311</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contemporary Reading of Advice and Consent</title><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>deLeon, Peter ; Gallagher, B. Kathleen</creator><creatorcontrib>deLeon, Peter ; Gallagher, B. Kathleen</creatorcontrib><description>This essay revisits deLeon's argument describing the development of the policy sciences. The authors propose two “new” phenomena that have affected the mission and shape of the policy sciences, one--the rise in importance of the non-profit sector--being exogenous in nature, the second--the adoption of the concept of governance--being endogenous. It ends with an illustration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0190-292X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-0072</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00389_3.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PSJOD9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Advice and Consent ; Analysis ; Company business management ; Consent ; Corporations, Nonprofit ; Democracy ; Development Policy ; Government ; Management ; Methods ; Nonprofit organizations ; Policy making ; Policy sciences ; Political science ; Politics ; Poverty ; Public policy ; Public sector ; Religion ; Women</subject><ispartof>Policy studies journal, 2011-02, Vol.39 (s1), p.27-39</ispartof><rights>2011 Policy Studies Organization</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Policy Studies Organization</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Policy Studies Organization</rights><rights>Copyright Policy Studies Organization Apr 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c8583-e64b3be2e0342dfa33849db397fadbf7d28e39e7f58bf03e5d3c7fc260cb312e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c8583-e64b3be2e0342dfa33849db397fadbf7d28e39e7f58bf03e5d3c7fc260cb312e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1541-0072.2010.00389_3.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1541-0072.2010.00389_3.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,12824,27842,27843,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>deLeon, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, B. Kathleen</creatorcontrib><title>Contemporary Reading of Advice and Consent</title><title>Policy studies journal</title><addtitle>Policy Studies Journal</addtitle><description>This essay revisits deLeon's argument describing the development of the policy sciences. The authors propose two “new” phenomena that have affected the mission and shape of the policy sciences, one--the rise in importance of the non-profit sector--being exogenous in nature, the second--the adoption of the concept of governance--being endogenous. It ends with an illustration.</description><subject>Advice and Consent</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Company business management</subject><subject>Consent</subject><subject>Corporations, Nonprofit</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Development Policy</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Nonprofit organizations</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Policy sciences</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Public sector</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0190-292X</issn><issn>1541-0072</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>KPI</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqVk11v0zAUhiMEEmXwG6jGDSCl-CuxwxVVBV1H6QZlWu-OnOQ4SkmTYrfQ_XscUg2GKij2hS37eV8df7xBcErJgPr2ajmgkaAhIZINGPGrhHCVAB_s7gW92637QY_QhIQsYYuHwSPnloQQJiTpBS9HTb3B1bqx2t70P6HOy7roN6Y_zL-VGfZ1nfc94rDePA4eGF05fLIfT4Krd28_j87C6cV4MhpOw0xFiocYi5SnyJBwwXKjOVciyVOeSKPz1MicKeQJShOp1BCOUc4zaTIWkyzllCE_CZ53vmvbfN2i28CqdBlWla6x2TqgkqlYJILG_0YZo4LIiDOPnv6BLputrf1BQEWJ8gylHnrWQYWuEMraNBurs9YThizinDFOlKfCA1SBNVpdNTWa0i_f4QcHeN9zXJXZQcGLO4KsfaPdptBb5-D95eRodjKfHc9-uD6ePTu-BjWe_u3y9mzWVBUWCP4njS5gyGPORKJEdCT_u__rjs9s45xFA2tbrvznBkqgzQwsoQ0GtMGANjOwzwzsvPhNJ_7uX-TmP5RwOT__Of1Vb-l8nbcW2n6BWHIZwfVsDGq2UB_jxTksPP-0441uQBe2dHA19-bcJzZiQkj-A7vPKrc</recordid><startdate>20110201</startdate><enddate>20110201</enddate><creator>deLeon, Peter</creator><creator>Gallagher, B. Kathleen</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Policy Studies Organization</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>IHI</scope><scope>IMW</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>KPI</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110201</creationdate><title>Contemporary Reading of Advice and Consent</title><author>deLeon, Peter ; Gallagher, B. Kathleen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c8583-e64b3be2e0342dfa33849db397fadbf7d28e39e7f58bf03e5d3c7fc260cb312e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Advice and Consent</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Company business management</topic><topic>Consent</topic><topic>Corporations, Nonprofit</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Development Policy</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Nonprofit organizations</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Policy sciences</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Public sector</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>deLeon, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, B. Kathleen</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: U.S. History</collection><collection>Gale In Context: World History</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Global Issues</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Policy studies journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>deLeon, Peter</au><au>Gallagher, B. Kathleen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contemporary Reading of Advice and Consent</atitle><jtitle>Policy studies journal</jtitle><addtitle>Policy Studies Journal</addtitle><date>2011-02-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>s1</issue><spage>27</spage><epage>39</epage><pages>27-39</pages><issn>0190-292X</issn><eissn>1541-0072</eissn><coden>PSJOD9</coden><abstract>This essay revisits deLeon's argument describing the development of the policy sciences. The authors propose two “new” phenomena that have affected the mission and shape of the policy sciences, one--the rise in importance of the non-profit sector--being exogenous in nature, the second--the adoption of the concept of governance--being endogenous. It ends with an illustration.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00389_3.x</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0190-292X |
| ispartof | Policy studies journal, 2011-02, Vol.39 (s1), p.27-39 |
| issn | 0190-292X 1541-0072 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1728649416 |
| source | Political Science Complete; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Advice and Consent Analysis Company business management Consent Corporations, Nonprofit Democracy Development Policy Government Management Methods Nonprofit organizations Policy making Policy sciences Political science Politics Poverty Public policy Public sector Religion Women |
| title | Contemporary Reading of Advice and Consent |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T16%3A19%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contemporary%20Reading%20of%20Advice%20and%20Consent&rft.jtitle=Policy%20studies%20journal&rft.au=deLeon,%20Peter&rft.date=2011-02-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=s1&rft.spage=27&rft.epage=39&rft.pages=27-39&rft.issn=0190-292X&rft.eissn=1541-0072&rft.coden=PSJOD9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00389_3.x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA253322308%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=859875311&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A253322308&rfr_iscdi=true |