Poetic Language, Interdiscursivity and Intertextuality in Fifth Graders’ Poetry: An Interpretive Study
In spite of views that children’s writing development is in large part a linguistic complex process involved in their engagement within and across social activities in and out of school, the literature is scant on the wide range of semiotic resources that children may draw on to animate their poetry...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of literacy research 2015-03, Vol.47 (1), p.49-82 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 82 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 49 |
container_title | Journal of literacy research |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Certo, Janine |
description | In spite of views that children’s writing development is in large part a linguistic complex process involved in their engagement within and across social activities in and out of school, the literature is scant on the wide range of semiotic resources that children may draw on to animate their poetry writing and performances. Drawing from a case study of poetry writing and performance in one U.S. fifth-grade classroom, this article uses interpretive methods and textual analysis to ask the following questions: (a) What, if any, poetic language do children draw on and identify in their written poems? (b) What interdiscursive and intertextual writing practices do children draw on to write poetry? and (c) How, if at all, might the act of reading an original poem influence children’s writing practices and literacy learning? Highlighted by three focal students, data suggest that children’s poems most often used features, including stanza break, varied types of rhyme, alliteration, and metaphor. Furthermore, some children’s poems could even be classified into distinct poetic structures. The data also suggest that children appropriated and recontextualized content for a single poem from a variety of semiotic resources in and out of school. Finally, children’s performances were caught up with satisfying multiple audiences, including themselves. This study suggests that elementary children can control the process of poetry writing and performance through active integration of formal poetic language taught with interdiscursive and intertextual practices. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1086296X15577183 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1728646423</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1068519</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_1086296X15577183</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1728646423</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-dc45d8c2eb2cbda85f8e367e4b22bcb6b87481fca95988d7833bfdb7af5de0f73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KAzEUhQdRsFb3boQBNy4czd8kmaWUtlYKKii4GzL5qSntTE0yYne-hq_nk5hhREQwm1zu-e65l5MkxxBcQMjYJQScooI-wTxnDHK8kwxiSTJOMNiNdZSzTt9PDrxfgvhyQAbJ_V2jg5XpXNSLViz0eTqrg3bKetk6b19t2KaiVn036LfQilXXs3U6sSY8p1MnlHb-8_0j7azc9jDZM2Ll9dH3P0weJ-OH0XU2v53ORlfzTGLIQqYkyRWXSFdIVkrw3HCNKdOkQqiSFa04IxwaKYq84FwxjnFlVMWEyZUGhuFhctb7blzz0mofynU8Wq9WotZN60vIEKeEEoQjevoHXTatq-N1JaQFZRAwRCIFekq6xnunTblxdi3ctoSg7DIu_2YcR076Ee2s_MHHNxBQnsMi6lmv-xjtr6X_-X0B1y2HGQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1696710724</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Poetic Language, Interdiscursivity and Intertextuality in Fifth Graders’ Poetry: An Interpretive Study</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Certo, Janine</creator><creatorcontrib>Certo, Janine</creatorcontrib><description>In spite of views that children’s writing development is in large part a linguistic complex process involved in their engagement within and across social activities in and out of school, the literature is scant on the wide range of semiotic resources that children may draw on to animate their poetry writing and performances. Drawing from a case study of poetry writing and performance in one U.S. fifth-grade classroom, this article uses interpretive methods and textual analysis to ask the following questions: (a) What, if any, poetic language do children draw on and identify in their written poems? (b) What interdiscursive and intertextual writing practices do children draw on to write poetry? and (c) How, if at all, might the act of reading an original poem influence children’s writing practices and literacy learning? Highlighted by three focal students, data suggest that children’s poems most often used features, including stanza break, varied types of rhyme, alliteration, and metaphor. Furthermore, some children’s poems could even be classified into distinct poetic structures. The data also suggest that children appropriated and recontextualized content for a single poem from a variety of semiotic resources in and out of school. Finally, children’s performances were caught up with satisfying multiple audiences, including themselves. This study suggests that elementary children can control the process of poetry writing and performance through active integration of formal poetic language taught with interdiscursive and intertextual practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1086-296X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-8430</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1086296X15577183</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLREF8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Case Studies ; Childrens literature ; Childrens poetry ; Childrens Writing ; Class Activities ; Classification ; Content Analysis ; Creative Development ; Creative Writing ; Discourse Analysis ; Elementary School Students ; Grade 5 ; Language Usage ; Linguistic Theory ; Linguistics ; Poetry ; Semiotics ; United States (Northeast) ; Writing Instruction ; Writing Processes</subject><ispartof>Journal of literacy research, 2015-03, Vol.47 (1), p.49-82</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2015</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Mar 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-dc45d8c2eb2cbda85f8e367e4b22bcb6b87481fca95988d7833bfdb7af5de0f73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1086296X15577183$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1086296X15577183$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,21806,27911,27912,43608,43609</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1068519$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Certo, Janine</creatorcontrib><title>Poetic Language, Interdiscursivity and Intertextuality in Fifth Graders’ Poetry: An Interpretive Study</title><title>Journal of literacy research</title><description>In spite of views that children’s writing development is in large part a linguistic complex process involved in their engagement within and across social activities in and out of school, the literature is scant on the wide range of semiotic resources that children may draw on to animate their poetry writing and performances. Drawing from a case study of poetry writing and performance in one U.S. fifth-grade classroom, this article uses interpretive methods and textual analysis to ask the following questions: (a) What, if any, poetic language do children draw on and identify in their written poems? (b) What interdiscursive and intertextual writing practices do children draw on to write poetry? and (c) How, if at all, might the act of reading an original poem influence children’s writing practices and literacy learning? Highlighted by three focal students, data suggest that children’s poems most often used features, including stanza break, varied types of rhyme, alliteration, and metaphor. Furthermore, some children’s poems could even be classified into distinct poetic structures. The data also suggest that children appropriated and recontextualized content for a single poem from a variety of semiotic resources in and out of school. Finally, children’s performances were caught up with satisfying multiple audiences, including themselves. This study suggests that elementary children can control the process of poetry writing and performance through active integration of formal poetic language taught with interdiscursive and intertextual practices.</description><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>Childrens literature</subject><subject>Childrens poetry</subject><subject>Childrens Writing</subject><subject>Class Activities</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Content Analysis</subject><subject>Creative Development</subject><subject>Creative Writing</subject><subject>Discourse Analysis</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>Grade 5</subject><subject>Language Usage</subject><subject>Linguistic Theory</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Poetry</subject><subject>Semiotics</subject><subject>United States (Northeast)</subject><subject>Writing Instruction</subject><subject>Writing Processes</subject><issn>1086-296X</issn><issn>1554-8430</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1KAzEUhQdRsFb3boQBNy4czd8kmaWUtlYKKii4GzL5qSntTE0yYne-hq_nk5hhREQwm1zu-e65l5MkxxBcQMjYJQScooI-wTxnDHK8kwxiSTJOMNiNdZSzTt9PDrxfgvhyQAbJ_V2jg5XpXNSLViz0eTqrg3bKetk6b19t2KaiVn036LfQilXXs3U6sSY8p1MnlHb-8_0j7azc9jDZM2Ll9dH3P0weJ-OH0XU2v53ORlfzTGLIQqYkyRWXSFdIVkrw3HCNKdOkQqiSFa04IxwaKYq84FwxjnFlVMWEyZUGhuFhctb7blzz0mofynU8Wq9WotZN60vIEKeEEoQjevoHXTatq-N1JaQFZRAwRCIFekq6xnunTblxdi3ctoSg7DIu_2YcR076Ee2s_MHHNxBQnsMi6lmv-xjtr6X_-X0B1y2HGQ</recordid><startdate>20150301</startdate><enddate>20150301</enddate><creator>Certo, Janine</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150301</creationdate><title>Poetic Language, Interdiscursivity and Intertextuality in Fifth Graders’ Poetry</title><author>Certo, Janine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317t-dc45d8c2eb2cbda85f8e367e4b22bcb6b87481fca95988d7833bfdb7af5de0f73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>Childrens literature</topic><topic>Childrens poetry</topic><topic>Childrens Writing</topic><topic>Class Activities</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Content Analysis</topic><topic>Creative Development</topic><topic>Creative Writing</topic><topic>Discourse Analysis</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>Grade 5</topic><topic>Language Usage</topic><topic>Linguistic Theory</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Poetry</topic><topic>Semiotics</topic><topic>United States (Northeast)</topic><topic>Writing Instruction</topic><topic>Writing Processes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Certo, Janine</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of literacy research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Certo, Janine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1068519</ericid><atitle>Poetic Language, Interdiscursivity and Intertextuality in Fifth Graders’ Poetry: An Interpretive Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of literacy research</jtitle><date>2015-03-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>49</spage><epage>82</epage><pages>49-82</pages><issn>1086-296X</issn><eissn>1554-8430</eissn><coden>JLREF8</coden><abstract>In spite of views that children’s writing development is in large part a linguistic complex process involved in their engagement within and across social activities in and out of school, the literature is scant on the wide range of semiotic resources that children may draw on to animate their poetry writing and performances. Drawing from a case study of poetry writing and performance in one U.S. fifth-grade classroom, this article uses interpretive methods and textual analysis to ask the following questions: (a) What, if any, poetic language do children draw on and identify in their written poems? (b) What interdiscursive and intertextual writing practices do children draw on to write poetry? and (c) How, if at all, might the act of reading an original poem influence children’s writing practices and literacy learning? Highlighted by three focal students, data suggest that children’s poems most often used features, including stanza break, varied types of rhyme, alliteration, and metaphor. Furthermore, some children’s poems could even be classified into distinct poetic structures. The data also suggest that children appropriated and recontextualized content for a single poem from a variety of semiotic resources in and out of school. Finally, children’s performances were caught up with satisfying multiple audiences, including themselves. This study suggests that elementary children can control the process of poetry writing and performance through active integration of formal poetic language taught with interdiscursive and intertextual practices.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1086296X15577183</doi><tpages>34</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1086-296X |
ispartof | Journal of literacy research, 2015-03, Vol.47 (1), p.49-82 |
issn | 1086-296X 1554-8430 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1728646423 |
source | SAGE Complete A-Z List; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Case Studies Childrens literature Childrens poetry Childrens Writing Class Activities Classification Content Analysis Creative Development Creative Writing Discourse Analysis Elementary School Students Grade 5 Language Usage Linguistic Theory Linguistics Poetry Semiotics United States (Northeast) Writing Instruction Writing Processes |
title | Poetic Language, Interdiscursivity and Intertextuality in Fifth Graders’ Poetry: An Interpretive Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T00%3A46%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Poetic%20Language,%20Interdiscursivity%20and%20Intertextuality%20in%20Fifth%20Graders%E2%80%99%20Poetry:%20An%20Interpretive%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20literacy%20research&rft.au=Certo,%20Janine&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=49&rft.epage=82&rft.pages=49-82&rft.issn=1086-296X&rft.eissn=1554-8430&rft.coden=JLREF8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1086296X15577183&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1728646423%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1696710724&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1068519&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1086296X15577183&rfr_iscdi=true |