Alzheimer’s disease research in the future: bibliometric analysis of cholinesterase inhibitors from 1993 to 2012

In this study, the bibliometric study of cholinesterase inhibitors was used to find the trend of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) research and the order of drugs which was most tolerated or more effective in AD treatment. 4,982 articles and reviews from the Science Citation Index Expanded during 1993–2012 w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientometrics 2014-03, Vol.98 (3), p.1865-1877
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Huaqi, Wan, Yuehua, Jiang, Shuian, Cheng, Yanxia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1877
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1865
container_title Scientometrics
container_volume 98
creator Chen, Huaqi
Wan, Yuehua
Jiang, Shuian
Cheng, Yanxia
description In this study, the bibliometric study of cholinesterase inhibitors was used to find the trend of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) research and the order of drugs which was most tolerated or more effective in AD treatment. 4,982 articles and reviews from the Science Citation Index Expanded during 1993–2012 were analyzed. The main results were as follows: The publication of cholinesterase inhibitor research increased overall during 1993–2012. Chinese Academy of Science had most publications, University of California, San Diego and Hebrew University of Jerusalem won first place with the highest average citation per paper and the highest h-index respectively. Neurosciences, pharmacology and chemistry were “raising” subject categories in cholinesterase inhibitors research. With the comprehensive analysis of distribution and change of author keywords in two 10-year-time periods, it can be concluded as follows: (i) the order of drugs which was most tolerated or more effective in AD treatment might be donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, tacrine, memantine and huperzine A, and memantine attracted increasing interest recently and might be used more frequently now, especially for moderate to severe dementia. (ii) The pathogenesis of oxidative stress hypothesis attracted extensive attention. The interest to β-amyloid cascade hypothesis increased slightly but that of the cholinergic hypothesis decreased during the past decade. (iii) “Oxidative stress”, “β-amyloid”, “neuroprotection”, “memory” and “cognition” are the main orientations in the AD research in the future.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11192-013-1132-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1728646078</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1728646078</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-30492d604a77bec5af6330a8dc1e345620982d9b60dfb00443931b7f693916e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1u1TAQhS0EEpfSB2DnDRKbUI_tJDa7quJPqsQG1pbjjBtXSVw8yaKseA1er09SX92KZVezOOc7Gn2MvQPxEYToLwgArGwEqAZAyUa9YAdojWmk6eAlO9TANBaUeM3eEN2KyihhDqxczn8mTAuWh7__iI-J0BPygvWWMPG08m1CHvdtL_iJD2mYU15wKylwv_r5nhLxHHmY8pxWpA3LkU_rlIa05UI8lrxwsFbxLXMpQL5lr6KfCc-f7hn79eXzz6tvzfWPr9-vLq-boKHfGiW0lWMntO_7AUPrY6eU8GYMgEq3nRTWyNEOnRjjIITWyioY-thZZaHDVp2xD6fdu5J_7_U1tyQKOM9-xbyTg7660Z3oTa3CqRpKJioY3V1Jiy_3DoQ7-nUnv65qdEe_TlXm_dO8p-DnWPwaEv0HpWm16fWxJ089qtF6g8Xd5r1UdfTM-CO-bYqD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1728646078</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Alzheimer’s disease research in the future: bibliometric analysis of cholinesterase inhibitors from 1993 to 2012</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Chen, Huaqi ; Wan, Yuehua ; Jiang, Shuian ; Cheng, Yanxia</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Huaqi ; Wan, Yuehua ; Jiang, Shuian ; Cheng, Yanxia</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, the bibliometric study of cholinesterase inhibitors was used to find the trend of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) research and the order of drugs which was most tolerated or more effective in AD treatment. 4,982 articles and reviews from the Science Citation Index Expanded during 1993–2012 were analyzed. The main results were as follows: The publication of cholinesterase inhibitor research increased overall during 1993–2012. Chinese Academy of Science had most publications, University of California, San Diego and Hebrew University of Jerusalem won first place with the highest average citation per paper and the highest h-index respectively. Neurosciences, pharmacology and chemistry were “raising” subject categories in cholinesterase inhibitors research. With the comprehensive analysis of distribution and change of author keywords in two 10-year-time periods, it can be concluded as follows: (i) the order of drugs which was most tolerated or more effective in AD treatment might be donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, tacrine, memantine and huperzine A, and memantine attracted increasing interest recently and might be used more frequently now, especially for moderate to severe dementia. (ii) The pathogenesis of oxidative stress hypothesis attracted extensive attention. The interest to β-amyloid cascade hypothesis increased slightly but that of the cholinergic hypothesis decreased during the past decade. (iii) “Oxidative stress”, “β-amyloid”, “neuroprotection”, “memory” and “cognition” are the main orientations in the AD research in the future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0138-9130</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1588-2861</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11192-013-1132-3</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SCNTDX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Bibliometrics ; Bibliometrics. Scientometrics ; Bibliometrics. Scientometrics. Evaluation ; Computer Science ; Diseases ; Exact sciences and technology ; Hirsch index ; Information and communication sciences ; Information science. Documentation ; Information Storage and Retrieval ; Keywords ; Library and information science. General aspects ; Library Science ; Pharmaceuticals ; Sciences and techniques of general use</subject><ispartof>Scientometrics, 2014-03, Vol.98 (3), p.1865-1877</ispartof><rights>Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2013</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-30492d604a77bec5af6330a8dc1e345620982d9b60dfb00443931b7f693916e53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-30492d604a77bec5af6330a8dc1e345620982d9b60dfb00443931b7f693916e53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11192-013-1132-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-013-1132-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28548743$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Huaqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Yuehua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Shuian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Yanxia</creatorcontrib><title>Alzheimer’s disease research in the future: bibliometric analysis of cholinesterase inhibitors from 1993 to 2012</title><title>Scientometrics</title><addtitle>Scientometrics</addtitle><description>In this study, the bibliometric study of cholinesterase inhibitors was used to find the trend of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) research and the order of drugs which was most tolerated or more effective in AD treatment. 4,982 articles and reviews from the Science Citation Index Expanded during 1993–2012 were analyzed. The main results were as follows: The publication of cholinesterase inhibitor research increased overall during 1993–2012. Chinese Academy of Science had most publications, University of California, San Diego and Hebrew University of Jerusalem won first place with the highest average citation per paper and the highest h-index respectively. Neurosciences, pharmacology and chemistry were “raising” subject categories in cholinesterase inhibitors research. With the comprehensive analysis of distribution and change of author keywords in two 10-year-time periods, it can be concluded as follows: (i) the order of drugs which was most tolerated or more effective in AD treatment might be donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, tacrine, memantine and huperzine A, and memantine attracted increasing interest recently and might be used more frequently now, especially for moderate to severe dementia. (ii) The pathogenesis of oxidative stress hypothesis attracted extensive attention. The interest to β-amyloid cascade hypothesis increased slightly but that of the cholinergic hypothesis decreased during the past decade. (iii) “Oxidative stress”, “β-amyloid”, “neuroprotection”, “memory” and “cognition” are the main orientations in the AD research in the future.</description><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Bibliometrics. Scientometrics</subject><subject>Bibliometrics. Scientometrics. Evaluation</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Diseases</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Hirsch index</subject><subject>Information and communication sciences</subject><subject>Information science. Documentation</subject><subject>Information Storage and Retrieval</subject><subject>Keywords</subject><subject>Library and information science. General aspects</subject><subject>Library Science</subject><subject>Pharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Sciences and techniques of general use</subject><issn>0138-9130</issn><issn>1588-2861</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1u1TAQhS0EEpfSB2DnDRKbUI_tJDa7quJPqsQG1pbjjBtXSVw8yaKseA1er09SX92KZVezOOc7Gn2MvQPxEYToLwgArGwEqAZAyUa9YAdojWmk6eAlO9TANBaUeM3eEN2KyihhDqxczn8mTAuWh7__iI-J0BPygvWWMPG08m1CHvdtL_iJD2mYU15wKylwv_r5nhLxHHmY8pxWpA3LkU_rlIa05UI8lrxwsFbxLXMpQL5lr6KfCc-f7hn79eXzz6tvzfWPr9-vLq-boKHfGiW0lWMntO_7AUPrY6eU8GYMgEq3nRTWyNEOnRjjIITWyioY-thZZaHDVp2xD6fdu5J_7_U1tyQKOM9-xbyTg7660Z3oTa3CqRpKJioY3V1Jiy_3DoQ7-nUnv65qdEe_TlXm_dO8p-DnWPwaEv0HpWm16fWxJ089qtF6g8Xd5r1UdfTM-CO-bYqD</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Chen, Huaqi</creator><creator>Wan, Yuehua</creator><creator>Jiang, Shuian</creator><creator>Cheng, Yanxia</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BP</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>Alzheimer’s disease research in the future: bibliometric analysis of cholinesterase inhibitors from 1993 to 2012</title><author>Chen, Huaqi ; Wan, Yuehua ; Jiang, Shuian ; Cheng, Yanxia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-30492d604a77bec5af6330a8dc1e345620982d9b60dfb00443931b7f693916e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Bibliometrics. Scientometrics</topic><topic>Bibliometrics. Scientometrics. Evaluation</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Diseases</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Hirsch index</topic><topic>Information and communication sciences</topic><topic>Information science. Documentation</topic><topic>Information Storage and Retrieval</topic><topic>Keywords</topic><topic>Library and information science. General aspects</topic><topic>Library Science</topic><topic>Pharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Sciences and techniques of general use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Huaqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Yuehua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Shuian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Yanxia</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA) - CILIP Edition</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><jtitle>Scientometrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Huaqi</au><au>Wan, Yuehua</au><au>Jiang, Shuian</au><au>Cheng, Yanxia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Alzheimer’s disease research in the future: bibliometric analysis of cholinesterase inhibitors from 1993 to 2012</atitle><jtitle>Scientometrics</jtitle><stitle>Scientometrics</stitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1865</spage><epage>1877</epage><pages>1865-1877</pages><issn>0138-9130</issn><eissn>1588-2861</eissn><coden>SCNTDX</coden><abstract>In this study, the bibliometric study of cholinesterase inhibitors was used to find the trend of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) research and the order of drugs which was most tolerated or more effective in AD treatment. 4,982 articles and reviews from the Science Citation Index Expanded during 1993–2012 were analyzed. The main results were as follows: The publication of cholinesterase inhibitor research increased overall during 1993–2012. Chinese Academy of Science had most publications, University of California, San Diego and Hebrew University of Jerusalem won first place with the highest average citation per paper and the highest h-index respectively. Neurosciences, pharmacology and chemistry were “raising” subject categories in cholinesterase inhibitors research. With the comprehensive analysis of distribution and change of author keywords in two 10-year-time periods, it can be concluded as follows: (i) the order of drugs which was most tolerated or more effective in AD treatment might be donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine, tacrine, memantine and huperzine A, and memantine attracted increasing interest recently and might be used more frequently now, especially for moderate to severe dementia. (ii) The pathogenesis of oxidative stress hypothesis attracted extensive attention. The interest to β-amyloid cascade hypothesis increased slightly but that of the cholinergic hypothesis decreased during the past decade. (iii) “Oxidative stress”, “β-amyloid”, “neuroprotection”, “memory” and “cognition” are the main orientations in the AD research in the future.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11192-013-1132-3</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0138-9130
ispartof Scientometrics, 2014-03, Vol.98 (3), p.1865-1877
issn 0138-9130
1588-2861
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1728646078
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Bibliometrics
Bibliometrics. Scientometrics
Bibliometrics. Scientometrics. Evaluation
Computer Science
Diseases
Exact sciences and technology
Hirsch index
Information and communication sciences
Information science. Documentation
Information Storage and Retrieval
Keywords
Library and information science. General aspects
Library Science
Pharmaceuticals
Sciences and techniques of general use
title Alzheimer’s disease research in the future: bibliometric analysis of cholinesterase inhibitors from 1993 to 2012
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T22%3A13%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Alzheimer%E2%80%99s%20disease%20research%20in%20the%20future:%20bibliometric%20analysis%20of%20cholinesterase%20inhibitors%20from%201993%20to%202012&rft.jtitle=Scientometrics&rft.au=Chen,%20Huaqi&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1865&rft.epage=1877&rft.pages=1865-1877&rft.issn=0138-9130&rft.eissn=1588-2861&rft.coden=SCNTDX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11192-013-1132-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1728646078%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1728646078&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true