MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR THE WOLVERINE IN SCANDINAVIA

The use of Population Viability Analysis has recently been criticized mainly because uncertainties in population predictions are often ignored. We analyzed the viability of Scandinavian wolverine Gulo gulo populations that allow for the inclusion of uncertainties in parameter estimates and stochasti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of wildlife management 2005-07, Vol.69 (3), p.1001-1014
Hauptverfasser: SÆTHER, BERNT-ERIK, ENGEN, STEINAR, PERSSON, JENS, BRØSETH, HENRIK, LANDA, ARILD, WILLEBRAND, TOMAS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1014
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1001
container_title The Journal of wildlife management
container_volume 69
creator SÆTHER, BERNT-ERIK
ENGEN, STEINAR
PERSSON, JENS
BRØSETH, HENRIK
LANDA, ARILD
WILLEBRAND, TOMAS
description The use of Population Viability Analysis has recently been criticized mainly because uncertainties in population predictions are often ignored. We analyzed the viability of Scandinavian wolverine Gulo gulo populations that allow for the inclusion of uncertainties in parameter estimates and stochastic effects on population dynamics. We used the insight gained from analyses of stochastic population models to quantitatively analyze different management options for the wolverine. These management options were based on data from an individual-based demographic study in the Sarek National Park, Sweden, and data from monitoring schemes in Norway and Sweden. Stochastic components in population dynamics of the wolverine were large. Strong density regulation occurred around the carrying capacity. According to the World Conservation Union (2001), the carrying capacity of populations must exceed 46 sexually mature (≥3-yr-old) females to be considered not vulnerable. Continuation of the current levels of offtake in Norway will lead to extinction of the wolverine over large parts of the country. Hence, current rates of mortality of female wolverine make the northern population endangered, whereas the southern population is classified as vulnerable. Management plans allowing harvest of individuals should be based on a proportional threshold harvest strategy. Only 40–60% of the surplus individuals exceeding a certain threshold for harvesting should be removed. Our analyses emphasized the importance of including estimates of precision in parameter estimates, including stochastic factors in recommendations based on Population Viability Analysis, and examining the robustness of the conclusions against variation in crucial parameters by sensitivity analyses.
doi_str_mv 10.2193/0022-541X(2005)069[1001:MSFTWI]2.0.CO;2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17284028</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3803339</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3803339</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b5383-308db38c99a92ea5e238775d831532bb1d939535a6f5b4b71cab9aff8eb3fd693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkEFvmzAUgK1plZZl-wc7oB2m7UBq-2GwtxNjhFIF0AJLJk3TEyRGIk1DhxO1_fcDUeXQY08-vO99ev4IuWR0xpmCS0o5t4XDfn_mlIov1FV_GKXsa5LPi3X8l8_oLMi-8Vdk0tOezSXzXpPJeesNeWvMjlJgTLoT4iZ-6kdhEqaFlRdLvwijOMyteba0iqvQWmeLVbiM09CKUysP_PRHnPqr2H9HLupyb_T7p3dKfs3DIriyF1kUB_7CrgRIsIHKbQVyo1SpuC6F5iA9T2wlMAG8qthWgRIgSrcWlVN5bFNWqqxrqSuot66CKfk0eu-69t9JmyPeNmaj9_vyoNuTQeZx6VAue_DjM3DXnrpDfxtycLjHOBc9FI3QpmuN6XSNd11zW3aPyCgOcXHIhEMmHOJiHxeHuDjGRY4Ug6w3Tkkymu6bvX58qQav10nEhILe92H07cyx7c4-kBQAhgz2OG7MUT-cx2V3g64HnsB1GuHquyMd9lNi3vPhyFdN2x70i7_5H0K4rXU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>234271225</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR THE WOLVERINE IN SCANDINAVIA</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>SÆTHER, BERNT-ERIK ; ENGEN, STEINAR ; PERSSON, JENS ; BRØSETH, HENRIK ; LANDA, ARILD ; WILLEBRAND, TOMAS</creator><contributor>Krausman</contributor><creatorcontrib>SÆTHER, BERNT-ERIK ; ENGEN, STEINAR ; PERSSON, JENS ; BRØSETH, HENRIK ; LANDA, ARILD ; WILLEBRAND, TOMAS ; Krausman</creatorcontrib><description>The use of Population Viability Analysis has recently been criticized mainly because uncertainties in population predictions are often ignored. We analyzed the viability of Scandinavian wolverine Gulo gulo populations that allow for the inclusion of uncertainties in parameter estimates and stochastic effects on population dynamics. We used the insight gained from analyses of stochastic population models to quantitatively analyze different management options for the wolverine. These management options were based on data from an individual-based demographic study in the Sarek National Park, Sweden, and data from monitoring schemes in Norway and Sweden. Stochastic components in population dynamics of the wolverine were large. Strong density regulation occurred around the carrying capacity. According to the World Conservation Union (2001), the carrying capacity of populations must exceed 46 sexually mature (≥3-yr-old) females to be considered not vulnerable. Continuation of the current levels of offtake in Norway will lead to extinction of the wolverine over large parts of the country. Hence, current rates of mortality of female wolverine make the northern population endangered, whereas the southern population is classified as vulnerable. Management plans allowing harvest of individuals should be based on a proportional threshold harvest strategy. Only 40–60% of the surplus individuals exceeding a certain threshold for harvesting should be removed. Our analyses emphasized the importance of including estimates of precision in parameter estimates, including stochastic factors in recommendations based on Population Viability Analysis, and examining the robustness of the conclusions against variation in crucial parameters by sensitivity analyses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2193/0022-541X(2005)069[1001:MSFTWI]2.0.CO;2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWMAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal populations ; Carrying capacity ; Conservation biology ; Demography ; density dependence ; Endangered &amp; extinct species ; Environmental conservation ; Gulo gulo ; Mammals ; Marine ; National parks ; Population dynamics ; Population ecology ; Population estimates ; Population size ; Population Viability Analysis ; risk of extinction ; Scandinavia ; Sensitivity analysis ; Species extinction ; stochastic effects ; Stochastic models ; Viability ; Wildlife management ; wolverine</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2005-07, Vol.69 (3), p.1001-1014</ispartof><rights>The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>Copyright 2005 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>2005 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>Copyright Wildlife Society Jul 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b5383-308db38c99a92ea5e238775d831532bb1d939535a6f5b4b71cab9aff8eb3fd693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b5383-308db38c99a92ea5e238775d831532bb1d939535a6f5b4b71cab9aff8eb3fd693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3803339$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3803339$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Krausman</contributor><creatorcontrib>SÆTHER, BERNT-ERIK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ENGEN, STEINAR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PERSSON, JENS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRØSETH, HENRIK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LANDA, ARILD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WILLEBRAND, TOMAS</creatorcontrib><title>MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR THE WOLVERINE IN SCANDINAVIA</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>The use of Population Viability Analysis has recently been criticized mainly because uncertainties in population predictions are often ignored. We analyzed the viability of Scandinavian wolverine Gulo gulo populations that allow for the inclusion of uncertainties in parameter estimates and stochastic effects on population dynamics. We used the insight gained from analyses of stochastic population models to quantitatively analyze different management options for the wolverine. These management options were based on data from an individual-based demographic study in the Sarek National Park, Sweden, and data from monitoring schemes in Norway and Sweden. Stochastic components in population dynamics of the wolverine were large. Strong density regulation occurred around the carrying capacity. According to the World Conservation Union (2001), the carrying capacity of populations must exceed 46 sexually mature (≥3-yr-old) females to be considered not vulnerable. Continuation of the current levels of offtake in Norway will lead to extinction of the wolverine over large parts of the country. Hence, current rates of mortality of female wolverine make the northern population endangered, whereas the southern population is classified as vulnerable. Management plans allowing harvest of individuals should be based on a proportional threshold harvest strategy. Only 40–60% of the surplus individuals exceeding a certain threshold for harvesting should be removed. Our analyses emphasized the importance of including estimates of precision in parameter estimates, including stochastic factors in recommendations based on Population Viability Analysis, and examining the robustness of the conclusions against variation in crucial parameters by sensitivity analyses.</description><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Carrying capacity</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>density dependence</subject><subject>Endangered &amp; extinct species</subject><subject>Environmental conservation</subject><subject>Gulo gulo</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Population dynamics</subject><subject>Population ecology</subject><subject>Population estimates</subject><subject>Population size</subject><subject>Population Viability Analysis</subject><subject>risk of extinction</subject><subject>Scandinavia</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Species extinction</subject><subject>stochastic effects</subject><subject>Stochastic models</subject><subject>Viability</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><subject>wolverine</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqdkEFvmzAUgK1plZZl-wc7oB2m7UBq-2GwtxNjhFIF0AJLJk3TEyRGIk1DhxO1_fcDUeXQY08-vO99ev4IuWR0xpmCS0o5t4XDfn_mlIov1FV_GKXsa5LPi3X8l8_oLMi-8Vdk0tOezSXzXpPJeesNeWvMjlJgTLoT4iZ-6kdhEqaFlRdLvwijOMyteba0iqvQWmeLVbiM09CKUysP_PRHnPqr2H9HLupyb_T7p3dKfs3DIriyF1kUB_7CrgRIsIHKbQVyo1SpuC6F5iA9T2wlMAG8qthWgRIgSrcWlVN5bFNWqqxrqSuot66CKfk0eu-69t9JmyPeNmaj9_vyoNuTQeZx6VAue_DjM3DXnrpDfxtycLjHOBc9FI3QpmuN6XSNd11zW3aPyCgOcXHIhEMmHOJiHxeHuDjGRY4Ug6w3Tkkymu6bvX58qQav10nEhILe92H07cyx7c4-kBQAhgz2OG7MUT-cx2V3g64HnsB1GuHquyMd9lNi3vPhyFdN2x70i7_5H0K4rXU</recordid><startdate>200507</startdate><enddate>200507</enddate><creator>SÆTHER, BERNT-ERIK</creator><creator>ENGEN, STEINAR</creator><creator>PERSSON, JENS</creator><creator>BRØSETH, HENRIK</creator><creator>LANDA, ARILD</creator><creator>WILLEBRAND, TOMAS</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>The Wildlife Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200507</creationdate><title>MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR THE WOLVERINE IN SCANDINAVIA</title><author>SÆTHER, BERNT-ERIK ; ENGEN, STEINAR ; PERSSON, JENS ; BRØSETH, HENRIK ; LANDA, ARILD ; WILLEBRAND, TOMAS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b5383-308db38c99a92ea5e238775d831532bb1d939535a6f5b4b71cab9aff8eb3fd693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Carrying capacity</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>density dependence</topic><topic>Endangered &amp; extinct species</topic><topic>Environmental conservation</topic><topic>Gulo gulo</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Population dynamics</topic><topic>Population ecology</topic><topic>Population estimates</topic><topic>Population size</topic><topic>Population Viability Analysis</topic><topic>risk of extinction</topic><topic>Scandinavia</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Species extinction</topic><topic>stochastic effects</topic><topic>Stochastic models</topic><topic>Viability</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><topic>wolverine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SÆTHER, BERNT-ERIK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ENGEN, STEINAR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PERSSON, JENS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRØSETH, HENRIK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LANDA, ARILD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WILLEBRAND, TOMAS</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SÆTHER, BERNT-ERIK</au><au>ENGEN, STEINAR</au><au>PERSSON, JENS</au><au>BRØSETH, HENRIK</au><au>LANDA, ARILD</au><au>WILLEBRAND, TOMAS</au><au>Krausman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR THE WOLVERINE IN SCANDINAVIA</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>2005-07</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1001</spage><epage>1014</epage><pages>1001-1014</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><coden>JWMAA9</coden><abstract>The use of Population Viability Analysis has recently been criticized mainly because uncertainties in population predictions are often ignored. We analyzed the viability of Scandinavian wolverine Gulo gulo populations that allow for the inclusion of uncertainties in parameter estimates and stochastic effects on population dynamics. We used the insight gained from analyses of stochastic population models to quantitatively analyze different management options for the wolverine. These management options were based on data from an individual-based demographic study in the Sarek National Park, Sweden, and data from monitoring schemes in Norway and Sweden. Stochastic components in population dynamics of the wolverine were large. Strong density regulation occurred around the carrying capacity. According to the World Conservation Union (2001), the carrying capacity of populations must exceed 46 sexually mature (≥3-yr-old) females to be considered not vulnerable. Continuation of the current levels of offtake in Norway will lead to extinction of the wolverine over large parts of the country. Hence, current rates of mortality of female wolverine make the northern population endangered, whereas the southern population is classified as vulnerable. Management plans allowing harvest of individuals should be based on a proportional threshold harvest strategy. Only 40–60% of the surplus individuals exceeding a certain threshold for harvesting should be removed. Our analyses emphasized the importance of including estimates of precision in parameter estimates, including stochastic factors in recommendations based on Population Viability Analysis, and examining the robustness of the conclusions against variation in crucial parameters by sensitivity analyses.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.2193/0022-541X(2005)069[1001:MSFTWI]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-541X
ispartof The Journal of wildlife management, 2005-07, Vol.69 (3), p.1001-1014
issn 0022-541X
1937-2817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17284028
source Wiley Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Animal populations
Carrying capacity
Conservation biology
Demography
density dependence
Endangered & extinct species
Environmental conservation
Gulo gulo
Mammals
Marine
National parks
Population dynamics
Population ecology
Population estimates
Population size
Population Viability Analysis
risk of extinction
Scandinavia
Sensitivity analysis
Species extinction
stochastic effects
Stochastic models
Viability
Wildlife management
wolverine
title MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR THE WOLVERINE IN SCANDINAVIA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T03%3A22%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MANAGEMENT%20STRATEGIES%20FOR%20THE%20WOLVERINE%20IN%20SCANDINAVIA&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=S%C3%86THER,%20BERNT-ERIK&rft.date=2005-07&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1001&rft.epage=1014&rft.pages=1001-1014&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft.coden=JWMAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.2193/0022-541X(2005)069%5B1001:MSFTWI%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3803339%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=234271225&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3803339&rfr_iscdi=true