Air samplings in a Campylobacter jejuni positive laying hen flock

The air in laying hen houses contains high concentrations of airborne bacteria. The numbers of these bacteria can be influenced by the efficiency of the chosen sampling method. In the presented study, AGI-30 Impingers and the Coriolis(®)µ air Sampler were compared in terms of their efficiency in sam...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine 2013, Vol.20 (1), p.16-20
Hauptverfasser: Ahmed, Marwa Fawzy El Metwaly, Schulz, Jochen, Hartung, Joerg
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 20
container_issue 1
container_start_page 16
container_title Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine
container_volume 20
creator Ahmed, Marwa Fawzy El Metwaly
Schulz, Jochen
Hartung, Joerg
description The air in laying hen houses contains high concentrations of airborne bacteria. The numbers of these bacteria can be influenced by the efficiency of the chosen sampling method. In the presented study, AGI-30 Impingers and the Coriolis(®)µ air Sampler were compared in terms of their efficiency in sampling aerobic mesophilic bacteria in a laying hen house. Measurements were conducted in a laying hen flock with high prevalences of C. jejuni in order to investigate if culturable cells of this organism can also be detected by the applied methods. Airborne dust was also analyzed for the presence of C. jejuni specific DNA to assess the possible occurrence of non-culturable C. jejuni in the hen house air. The numbers of mesophilic airborne bacteria ranged from 8 × 10(4) - 2 × 10(6) CFU/m(-3) when sampled using AGI-30 Impingers, and from 2 × 10(5) - 4 × 10(6) CFU/m -3 when sampled using a Coriolis(®)µ air Sampler. The concentrations detected simultaneously by both devices correlated well (rPearson = 0.755), but the Coriolis(®)µ air Sampler showed a significantly higher sampling efficiency (p
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1727672841</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1322729327</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p272t-31e8bc860296076b244351f87cf973ee85197efe44e03b6a75f0c76fb713663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0EtLxDAQB_AgiruufgUJePFSSCbv47L4ggUPei9pnWhq-rBphf32FtSLF08zAz-Gmf8RWXPrbAGgxfHSg4CCO61X5CznhjGwyvJTsgKhJANm1mS7jSPNvh1S7F4zjR31dLeMh9RXvp5wpA02cxfp0Oc4xU-kyR8WSt-woyH19fs5OQk-Zbz4qRvydHvzvLsv9o93D7vtvhjAwFQIjraqrWbgNDO6AimF4sGaOjgjEK3izmBAKZGJSnujAquNDpXhQmuxIdffW4ex_5gxT2Ubc40p-Q77OZfcgNEGrOT_UwHLRU6AWejVH9r089gtb5SgjJLWOWsXdfmj5qrFl3IYY-vHQ_mbovgCG0tsRw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2575489988</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Air samplings in a Campylobacter jejuni positive laying hen flock</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Ahmed, Marwa Fawzy El Metwaly ; Schulz, Jochen ; Hartung, Joerg</creator><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Marwa Fawzy El Metwaly ; Schulz, Jochen ; Hartung, Joerg</creatorcontrib><description>The air in laying hen houses contains high concentrations of airborne bacteria. The numbers of these bacteria can be influenced by the efficiency of the chosen sampling method. In the presented study, AGI-30 Impingers and the Coriolis(®)µ air Sampler were compared in terms of their efficiency in sampling aerobic mesophilic bacteria in a laying hen house. Measurements were conducted in a laying hen flock with high prevalences of C. jejuni in order to investigate if culturable cells of this organism can also be detected by the applied methods. Airborne dust was also analyzed for the presence of C. jejuni specific DNA to assess the possible occurrence of non-culturable C. jejuni in the hen house air. The numbers of mesophilic airborne bacteria ranged from 8 × 10(4) - 2 × 10(6) CFU/m(-3) when sampled using AGI-30 Impingers, and from 2 × 10(5) - 4 × 10(6) CFU/m -3 when sampled using a Coriolis(®)µ air Sampler. The concentrations detected simultaneously by both devices correlated well (rPearson = 0.755), but the Coriolis(®)µ air Sampler showed a significantly higher sampling efficiency (p&lt;0.001). Although, the within flock prevalence of C. jejuni was high during the experiments (between 70-93%), neither of the air sampling methods could detect culturable C. jejuni from the air. However, C. jejuni specific DNA was detected in 15 out of 18 airborne dust samples by mapA PCR. Based on the results, it can be concluded that airborne culturable C. jejuni were not detectable, even with an efficient air sampler, because of their low concentration. Therefore, the risk of airborne infection to poultry workers on inhaling airborne C. jejuni seems negligible. Also, the transmission of culturable C. jejuni to neighboring farms by the airborne route is unlikely. Otherwise, the detection of airborne C. jejuni specific DNA suggests that non-culturable cells could appear in the hen house air, and in future it should be verified whether sampling stress of the air sampling methods could induce the non-culturable state.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1232-1966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1898-2263</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23540207</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Poland: Institute of Rural Health</publisher><subject>Air Microbiology ; Air sampling ; Airborne bacteria ; Airborne microorganisms ; Animals ; Bacteria ; Campylobacter ; Campylobacter jejuni ; Campylobacter jejuni - isolation &amp; purification ; Chickens - microbiology ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; Dust ; Efficiency ; Farms ; Female ; Housing, Animal ; Mesophilic bacteria ; Oviposition ; Sampling methods ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine, 2013, Vol.20 (1), p.16-20</ispartof><rights>2013. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/pl/deed.en (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23540207$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Marwa Fawzy El Metwaly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz, Jochen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartung, Joerg</creatorcontrib><title>Air samplings in a Campylobacter jejuni positive laying hen flock</title><title>Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine</title><addtitle>Ann Agric Environ Med</addtitle><description>The air in laying hen houses contains high concentrations of airborne bacteria. The numbers of these bacteria can be influenced by the efficiency of the chosen sampling method. In the presented study, AGI-30 Impingers and the Coriolis(®)µ air Sampler were compared in terms of their efficiency in sampling aerobic mesophilic bacteria in a laying hen house. Measurements were conducted in a laying hen flock with high prevalences of C. jejuni in order to investigate if culturable cells of this organism can also be detected by the applied methods. Airborne dust was also analyzed for the presence of C. jejuni specific DNA to assess the possible occurrence of non-culturable C. jejuni in the hen house air. The numbers of mesophilic airborne bacteria ranged from 8 × 10(4) - 2 × 10(6) CFU/m(-3) when sampled using AGI-30 Impingers, and from 2 × 10(5) - 4 × 10(6) CFU/m -3 when sampled using a Coriolis(®)µ air Sampler. The concentrations detected simultaneously by both devices correlated well (rPearson = 0.755), but the Coriolis(®)µ air Sampler showed a significantly higher sampling efficiency (p&lt;0.001). Although, the within flock prevalence of C. jejuni was high during the experiments (between 70-93%), neither of the air sampling methods could detect culturable C. jejuni from the air. However, C. jejuni specific DNA was detected in 15 out of 18 airborne dust samples by mapA PCR. Based on the results, it can be concluded that airborne culturable C. jejuni were not detectable, even with an efficient air sampler, because of their low concentration. Therefore, the risk of airborne infection to poultry workers on inhaling airborne C. jejuni seems negligible. Also, the transmission of culturable C. jejuni to neighboring farms by the airborne route is unlikely. Otherwise, the detection of airborne C. jejuni specific DNA suggests that non-culturable cells could appear in the hen house air, and in future it should be verified whether sampling stress of the air sampling methods could induce the non-culturable state.</description><subject>Air Microbiology</subject><subject>Air sampling</subject><subject>Airborne bacteria</subject><subject>Airborne microorganisms</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Campylobacter</subject><subject>Campylobacter jejuni</subject><subject>Campylobacter jejuni - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Chickens - microbiology</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Dust</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Housing, Animal</subject><subject>Mesophilic bacteria</subject><subject>Oviposition</subject><subject>Sampling methods</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>1232-1966</issn><issn>1898-2263</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0EtLxDAQB_AgiruufgUJePFSSCbv47L4ggUPei9pnWhq-rBphf32FtSLF08zAz-Gmf8RWXPrbAGgxfHSg4CCO61X5CznhjGwyvJTsgKhJANm1mS7jSPNvh1S7F4zjR31dLeMh9RXvp5wpA02cxfp0Oc4xU-kyR8WSt-woyH19fs5OQk-Zbz4qRvydHvzvLsv9o93D7vtvhjAwFQIjraqrWbgNDO6AimF4sGaOjgjEK3izmBAKZGJSnujAquNDpXhQmuxIdffW4ex_5gxT2Ubc40p-Q77OZfcgNEGrOT_UwHLRU6AWejVH9r089gtb5SgjJLWOWsXdfmj5qrFl3IYY-vHQ_mbovgCG0tsRw</recordid><startdate>2013</startdate><enddate>2013</enddate><creator>Ahmed, Marwa Fawzy El Metwaly</creator><creator>Schulz, Jochen</creator><creator>Hartung, Joerg</creator><general>Institute of Rural Health</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2013</creationdate><title>Air samplings in a Campylobacter jejuni positive laying hen flock</title><author>Ahmed, Marwa Fawzy El Metwaly ; Schulz, Jochen ; Hartung, Joerg</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p272t-31e8bc860296076b244351f87cf973ee85197efe44e03b6a75f0c76fb713663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Air Microbiology</topic><topic>Air sampling</topic><topic>Airborne bacteria</topic><topic>Airborne microorganisms</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Campylobacter</topic><topic>Campylobacter jejuni</topic><topic>Campylobacter jejuni - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Chickens - microbiology</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Dust</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Housing, Animal</topic><topic>Mesophilic bacteria</topic><topic>Oviposition</topic><topic>Sampling methods</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Marwa Fawzy El Metwaly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulz, Jochen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartung, Joerg</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ahmed, Marwa Fawzy El Metwaly</au><au>Schulz, Jochen</au><au>Hartung, Joerg</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Air samplings in a Campylobacter jejuni positive laying hen flock</atitle><jtitle>Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Agric Environ Med</addtitle><date>2013</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>16</spage><epage>20</epage><pages>16-20</pages><issn>1232-1966</issn><eissn>1898-2263</eissn><abstract>The air in laying hen houses contains high concentrations of airborne bacteria. The numbers of these bacteria can be influenced by the efficiency of the chosen sampling method. In the presented study, AGI-30 Impingers and the Coriolis(®)µ air Sampler were compared in terms of their efficiency in sampling aerobic mesophilic bacteria in a laying hen house. Measurements were conducted in a laying hen flock with high prevalences of C. jejuni in order to investigate if culturable cells of this organism can also be detected by the applied methods. Airborne dust was also analyzed for the presence of C. jejuni specific DNA to assess the possible occurrence of non-culturable C. jejuni in the hen house air. The numbers of mesophilic airborne bacteria ranged from 8 × 10(4) - 2 × 10(6) CFU/m(-3) when sampled using AGI-30 Impingers, and from 2 × 10(5) - 4 × 10(6) CFU/m -3 when sampled using a Coriolis(®)µ air Sampler. The concentrations detected simultaneously by both devices correlated well (rPearson = 0.755), but the Coriolis(®)µ air Sampler showed a significantly higher sampling efficiency (p&lt;0.001). Although, the within flock prevalence of C. jejuni was high during the experiments (between 70-93%), neither of the air sampling methods could detect culturable C. jejuni from the air. However, C. jejuni specific DNA was detected in 15 out of 18 airborne dust samples by mapA PCR. Based on the results, it can be concluded that airborne culturable C. jejuni were not detectable, even with an efficient air sampler, because of their low concentration. Therefore, the risk of airborne infection to poultry workers on inhaling airborne C. jejuni seems negligible. Also, the transmission of culturable C. jejuni to neighboring farms by the airborne route is unlikely. Otherwise, the detection of airborne C. jejuni specific DNA suggests that non-culturable cells could appear in the hen house air, and in future it should be verified whether sampling stress of the air sampling methods could induce the non-culturable state.</abstract><cop>Poland</cop><pub>Institute of Rural Health</pub><pmid>23540207</pmid><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1232-1966
ispartof Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine, 2013, Vol.20 (1), p.16-20
issn 1232-1966
1898-2263
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1727672841
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Air Microbiology
Air sampling
Airborne bacteria
Airborne microorganisms
Animals
Bacteria
Campylobacter
Campylobacter jejuni
Campylobacter jejuni - isolation & purification
Chickens - microbiology
Deoxyribonucleic acid
DNA
Dust
Efficiency
Farms
Female
Housing, Animal
Mesophilic bacteria
Oviposition
Sampling methods
Time Factors
title Air samplings in a Campylobacter jejuni positive laying hen flock
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T19%3A39%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Air%20samplings%20in%20a%20Campylobacter%20jejuni%20positive%20laying%20hen%20flock&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20Agricultural%20and%20Environmental%20Medicine&rft.au=Ahmed,%20Marwa%20Fawzy%20El%20Metwaly&rft.date=2013&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=16&rft.epage=20&rft.pages=16-20&rft.issn=1232-1966&rft.eissn=1898-2263&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1322729327%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2575489988&rft_id=info:pmid/23540207&rfr_iscdi=true