Comparison of MR imaging features of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of pancreas between male and female patients
Abstract Purpose To evaluate MR imaging features of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPN) in male patients and to compare them with the MR imaging features in female patients. Materials and methods Fifty patients who were histologically confirmed as SPN (M:F = 8:42, mean age = 36.4 years) with preop...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of radiology 2015-11, Vol.84 (11), p.2065-2070 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2070 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2065 |
container_title | European journal of radiology |
container_volume | 84 |
creator | Sur, Young Keun Lee, Jei Hee Kim, Jai Keun Park, Min Jung Kim, Bohyun Park, Mi-Suk Choi, Jin-Young Kim, Young Bae Lee, Dakeun |
description | Abstract Purpose To evaluate MR imaging features of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPN) in male patients and to compare them with the MR imaging features in female patients. Materials and methods Fifty patients who were histologically confirmed as SPN (M:F = 8:42, mean age = 36.4 years) with preoperative MRI were included. The following imaging features were reviewed: size, location, shape, margin, encapsulation, solid-cystic ratio, pancreatic duct dilatation, parenchymal atrophy, T1 signal intensity, T2 signal intensity, and morphological and dynamic pattern of enhancement. The statistical differences between male and female patients were analyzed. Results The average age of male patients (50.8 ± 4.1 years) was significantly higher ( p < 0.01) than female patients (33.7 ± 2.0 years). The shape of SPN in male patients was predominantly lobulated ( n = 6/8, 75.0%) compared to female patients, in whom oval shaped SPN was most prevalent ( n = 26/42, 61.91%) ( P = 0.02). SPN in male patients contained less cystic component (solid, n = 4/8, 50.0%; mainly solid, n = 4/8, 50.0%) while cystic ( n = 5/42, 11.90%) or mainly cystic ( n = 13/42, 30.95%) lesions were significantly more prevalent in female patients ( P = 0.03). The majority of SPNs in both groups showed progressive heterogeneous enhancement pattern. Other MR imaging features showed no significant differences between the male and female patients. Conclusion On MRI, SPN in male patients appeared as mainly solid mass with a lobulating contour and heterogeneous progressive enhancement occurring at an older age than female patients. Recognition of imaging features of SPN in male patients compared to typical SPN in female patients should assist in correct differentiation of SPN from other pancreatic tumors. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.07.025 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1725026267</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0720048X15300656</els_id><sourcerecordid>1725026267</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-234f86439bd97276a4ec51ce272617ab72239f84f94cb00e852e1f83d54c11383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcuK1UAQhhtRnOPoEwiSpZvE6ls6WSjIwRuMCF7AXdPpVIaOSbrtTkbO29uZM7pw46qK4v_r8hUhTylUFGj9YqxwjKavGFBZgaqAyXvkQBvFSqWYuk8OoBiUIJrvF-RRSiMASNGyh-SC1UzWINoDCUc_BxNd8kvhh-Lj58LN5tot18WAZt0ipr2c_OT6IiTceh9McNNk4qlY0IfJpHlXBLPYiCYVHa6_EJdiNhMWZulzn9s0mNXhsqbH5MFgpoRP7uIl-fb2zdfj-_Lq07sPx9dXpZUS1pJxMTS14G3Xt_mY2gi0klpkitVUmU4xxtuhEUMrbAeAjWRIh4b3UlhKecMvyfNz3xD9zw3TqmeXLObN89pb0lQxCZlDrbKUn6U2-pQiDjrETCGeNAW9o9ajvkWtd9QalM6os-vZ3YCtm7H_6_nDNgtengWYz7xxGHWyGYHF3kW0q-69-8-AV__47eQWZ830A0-YRr_FJRPUVCemQX_Zv70_m0oOUMua_wYNEKYD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1725026267</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of MR imaging features of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of pancreas between male and female patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Sur, Young Keun ; Lee, Jei Hee ; Kim, Jai Keun ; Park, Min Jung ; Kim, Bohyun ; Park, Mi-Suk ; Choi, Jin-Young ; Kim, Young Bae ; Lee, Dakeun</creator><creatorcontrib>Sur, Young Keun ; Lee, Jei Hee ; Kim, Jai Keun ; Park, Min Jung ; Kim, Bohyun ; Park, Mi-Suk ; Choi, Jin-Young ; Kim, Young Bae ; Lee, Dakeun</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Purpose To evaluate MR imaging features of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPN) in male patients and to compare them with the MR imaging features in female patients. Materials and methods Fifty patients who were histologically confirmed as SPN (M:F = 8:42, mean age = 36.4 years) with preoperative MRI were included. The following imaging features were reviewed: size, location, shape, margin, encapsulation, solid-cystic ratio, pancreatic duct dilatation, parenchymal atrophy, T1 signal intensity, T2 signal intensity, and morphological and dynamic pattern of enhancement. The statistical differences between male and female patients were analyzed. Results The average age of male patients (50.8 ± 4.1 years) was significantly higher ( p < 0.01) than female patients (33.7 ± 2.0 years). The shape of SPN in male patients was predominantly lobulated ( n = 6/8, 75.0%) compared to female patients, in whom oval shaped SPN was most prevalent ( n = 26/42, 61.91%) ( P = 0.02). SPN in male patients contained less cystic component (solid, n = 4/8, 50.0%; mainly solid, n = 4/8, 50.0%) while cystic ( n = 5/42, 11.90%) or mainly cystic ( n = 13/42, 30.95%) lesions were significantly more prevalent in female patients ( P = 0.03). The majority of SPNs in both groups showed progressive heterogeneous enhancement pattern. Other MR imaging features showed no significant differences between the male and female patients. Conclusion On MRI, SPN in male patients appeared as mainly solid mass with a lobulating contour and heterogeneous progressive enhancement occurring at an older age than female patients. Recognition of imaging features of SPN in male patients compared to typical SPN in female patients should assist in correct differentiation of SPN from other pancreatic tumors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0720-048X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.07.025</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26256049</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Atrophy - pathology ; Carcinoma, Papillary - pathology ; Female ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Observer Variation ; Pancreas - pathology ; Pancreas MRI ; Pancreatic mass ; Pancreatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Radiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Sex Factors ; Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>European journal of radiology, 2015-11, Vol.84 (11), p.2065-2070</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-234f86439bd97276a4ec51ce272617ab72239f84f94cb00e852e1f83d54c11383</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-234f86439bd97276a4ec51ce272617ab72239f84f94cb00e852e1f83d54c11383</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X15300656$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26256049$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sur, Young Keun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jei Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jai Keun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Min Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Bohyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Mi-Suk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Jin-Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young Bae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Dakeun</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of MR imaging features of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of pancreas between male and female patients</title><title>European journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><description>Abstract Purpose To evaluate MR imaging features of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPN) in male patients and to compare them with the MR imaging features in female patients. Materials and methods Fifty patients who were histologically confirmed as SPN (M:F = 8:42, mean age = 36.4 years) with preoperative MRI were included. The following imaging features were reviewed: size, location, shape, margin, encapsulation, solid-cystic ratio, pancreatic duct dilatation, parenchymal atrophy, T1 signal intensity, T2 signal intensity, and morphological and dynamic pattern of enhancement. The statistical differences between male and female patients were analyzed. Results The average age of male patients (50.8 ± 4.1 years) was significantly higher ( p < 0.01) than female patients (33.7 ± 2.0 years). The shape of SPN in male patients was predominantly lobulated ( n = 6/8, 75.0%) compared to female patients, in whom oval shaped SPN was most prevalent ( n = 26/42, 61.91%) ( P = 0.02). SPN in male patients contained less cystic component (solid, n = 4/8, 50.0%; mainly solid, n = 4/8, 50.0%) while cystic ( n = 5/42, 11.90%) or mainly cystic ( n = 13/42, 30.95%) lesions were significantly more prevalent in female patients ( P = 0.03). The majority of SPNs in both groups showed progressive heterogeneous enhancement pattern. Other MR imaging features showed no significant differences between the male and female patients. Conclusion On MRI, SPN in male patients appeared as mainly solid mass with a lobulating contour and heterogeneous progressive enhancement occurring at an older age than female patients. Recognition of imaging features of SPN in male patients compared to typical SPN in female patients should assist in correct differentiation of SPN from other pancreatic tumors.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Atrophy - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Papillary - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Pancreas - pathology</subject><subject>Pancreas MRI</subject><subject>Pancreatic mass</subject><subject>Pancreatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0720-048X</issn><issn>1872-7727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcuK1UAQhhtRnOPoEwiSpZvE6ls6WSjIwRuMCF7AXdPpVIaOSbrtTkbO29uZM7pw46qK4v_r8hUhTylUFGj9YqxwjKavGFBZgaqAyXvkQBvFSqWYuk8OoBiUIJrvF-RRSiMASNGyh-SC1UzWINoDCUc_BxNd8kvhh-Lj58LN5tot18WAZt0ipr2c_OT6IiTceh9McNNk4qlY0IfJpHlXBLPYiCYVHa6_EJdiNhMWZulzn9s0mNXhsqbH5MFgpoRP7uIl-fb2zdfj-_Lq07sPx9dXpZUS1pJxMTS14G3Xt_mY2gi0klpkitVUmU4xxtuhEUMrbAeAjWRIh4b3UlhKecMvyfNz3xD9zw3TqmeXLObN89pb0lQxCZlDrbKUn6U2-pQiDjrETCGeNAW9o9ajvkWtd9QalM6os-vZ3YCtm7H_6_nDNgtengWYz7xxGHWyGYHF3kW0q-69-8-AV__47eQWZ830A0-YRr_FJRPUVCemQX_Zv70_m0oOUMua_wYNEKYD</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Sur, Young Keun</creator><creator>Lee, Jei Hee</creator><creator>Kim, Jai Keun</creator><creator>Park, Min Jung</creator><creator>Kim, Bohyun</creator><creator>Park, Mi-Suk</creator><creator>Choi, Jin-Young</creator><creator>Kim, Young Bae</creator><creator>Lee, Dakeun</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Comparison of MR imaging features of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of pancreas between male and female patients</title><author>Sur, Young Keun ; Lee, Jei Hee ; Kim, Jai Keun ; Park, Min Jung ; Kim, Bohyun ; Park, Mi-Suk ; Choi, Jin-Young ; Kim, Young Bae ; Lee, Dakeun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-234f86439bd97276a4ec51ce272617ab72239f84f94cb00e852e1f83d54c11383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Atrophy - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Papillary - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Pancreas - pathology</topic><topic>Pancreas MRI</topic><topic>Pancreatic mass</topic><topic>Pancreatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sur, Young Keun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jei Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jai Keun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Min Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Bohyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Mi-Suk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Jin-Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young Bae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Dakeun</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sur, Young Keun</au><au>Lee, Jei Hee</au><au>Kim, Jai Keun</au><au>Park, Min Jung</au><au>Kim, Bohyun</au><au>Park, Mi-Suk</au><au>Choi, Jin-Young</au><au>Kim, Young Bae</au><au>Lee, Dakeun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of MR imaging features of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of pancreas between male and female patients</atitle><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2065</spage><epage>2070</epage><pages>2065-2070</pages><issn>0720-048X</issn><eissn>1872-7727</eissn><abstract>Abstract Purpose To evaluate MR imaging features of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPN) in male patients and to compare them with the MR imaging features in female patients. Materials and methods Fifty patients who were histologically confirmed as SPN (M:F = 8:42, mean age = 36.4 years) with preoperative MRI were included. The following imaging features were reviewed: size, location, shape, margin, encapsulation, solid-cystic ratio, pancreatic duct dilatation, parenchymal atrophy, T1 signal intensity, T2 signal intensity, and morphological and dynamic pattern of enhancement. The statistical differences between male and female patients were analyzed. Results The average age of male patients (50.8 ± 4.1 years) was significantly higher ( p < 0.01) than female patients (33.7 ± 2.0 years). The shape of SPN in male patients was predominantly lobulated ( n = 6/8, 75.0%) compared to female patients, in whom oval shaped SPN was most prevalent ( n = 26/42, 61.91%) ( P = 0.02). SPN in male patients contained less cystic component (solid, n = 4/8, 50.0%; mainly solid, n = 4/8, 50.0%) while cystic ( n = 5/42, 11.90%) or mainly cystic ( n = 13/42, 30.95%) lesions were significantly more prevalent in female patients ( P = 0.03). The majority of SPNs in both groups showed progressive heterogeneous enhancement pattern. Other MR imaging features showed no significant differences between the male and female patients. Conclusion On MRI, SPN in male patients appeared as mainly solid mass with a lobulating contour and heterogeneous progressive enhancement occurring at an older age than female patients. Recognition of imaging features of SPN in male patients compared to typical SPN in female patients should assist in correct differentiation of SPN from other pancreatic tumors.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>26256049</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.07.025</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0720-048X |
ispartof | European journal of radiology, 2015-11, Vol.84 (11), p.2065-2070 |
issn | 0720-048X 1872-7727 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1725026267 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Atrophy - pathology Carcinoma, Papillary - pathology Female Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Male Middle Aged Observer Variation Pancreas - pathology Pancreas MRI Pancreatic mass Pancreatic Neoplasms - pathology Radiology Retrospective Studies Sex Factors Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm Young Adult |
title | Comparison of MR imaging features of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of pancreas between male and female patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T02%3A54%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20MR%20imaging%20features%20of%20solid%20pseudopapillary%20neoplasm%20of%20pancreas%20between%20male%20and%20female%20patients&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Sur,%20Young%20Keun&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2065&rft.epage=2070&rft.pages=2065-2070&rft.issn=0720-048X&rft.eissn=1872-7727&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.07.025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1725026267%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1725026267&rft_id=info:pmid/26256049&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0720048X15300656&rfr_iscdi=true |