Developmental instability in fragmented populations of prairie phlox: a cautionary tale
Considerable attention has recently been focused on using levels of developmental instability among members of a population to detect environmental or genetic stresses on animals or plants. It is not yet clear, however, that high developmental instability in a sample of individuals always indicates...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Conservation biology 1999-04, Vol.13 (2), p.274-281 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 281 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 274 |
container_title | Conservation biology |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Heard, Stephen B. Campbell, Michael A. Bonine, Mary L. Hendrix, Stephen D. |
description | Considerable attention has recently been focused on using levels of developmental instability among members of a population to detect environmental or genetic stresses on animals or plants. It is not yet clear, however, that high developmental instability in a sample of individuals always indicates environmental stress or poor genetic quality. We studied 13 fragmented populations of prairie phlox (Phlox pilosa L.) to test the hypothesis that developmental instability should decrease with increasing population size-as expected if small populations suffer genetic problems associated with inbreeding or are exposed to more environmental stress than larger populations. We used two different measures of developmental instability, each calculated for two different traits: radial asymmetry of flowers (for petal width and petal length) and modular fluctuating asymmetry of leaves (for leaf widths at two points along the leaf). There were weak but significant correlations among individuals for four of six pairwise combinations of these measures. Surprisingly, three of our four measures of developmental instability showed strong population size effects that were opposite to those expected: developmental instability increased with population size. We conclude that measures of developmental instability cannot be applied uncritically for biomonitoring without considerable knowledge of developmental mechanisms, natural history, and population biology of the species in question. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.013002274.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17237048</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2641469</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2641469</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5234-bf02d44124a5ff2c541d2b6d0e9f9e4bfab2a874497b677f7e35e3faebad49f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkE1v1DAYhC0EEkvhH4CUQ8UtwV-JY8SFLuy2UkWllqoSF-tNYhcv3jjYWbr77-soZTlzsq0ZPzMahE4JLgjm1YdNQUrKciKYLIiUssCEYUyp4MX-GVocxedogeu6zuta0pfoVYwbjLEsCV-guy_6j3Z-2Op-BJfZPo7QWGfHQ7pnJsD9pOguG_ywczBa38fMm2wIYIPV2fDT-f3HDLIWdpMI4ZAlkH6NXhhwUb95Ok_Q7err9-V5fnm1vlh-vszbVI7njcG045xQDqUxtC056WhTdVhLIzVvDDQUasG5FE0lhBGalZoZ0A10XBrOTtD7mTsE_3un46i2NrbaOei130VFBGUC8zoZP83GNvgYgzZqCHab6iqC1bSm2qhpMDUNpqY11XFNtU_fT59yILbg0jB9a-M_hpCM4yllNdserNOH_4pQy6uzi7_PBHo7gzZx9OEIohUnvJJJzmfZxlHvjzKEX6oSTJTq7ttaXd-s1terH-fqLPnfzX4DXsF9SNVvb6YGmKRAzh4B6YCtmA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17237048</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Developmental instability in fragmented populations of prairie phlox: a cautionary tale</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Heard, Stephen B. ; Campbell, Michael A. ; Bonine, Mary L. ; Hendrix, Stephen D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Heard, Stephen B. ; Campbell, Michael A. ; Bonine, Mary L. ; Hendrix, Stephen D.</creatorcontrib><description>Considerable attention has recently been focused on using levels of developmental instability among members of a population to detect environmental or genetic stresses on animals or plants. It is not yet clear, however, that high developmental instability in a sample of individuals always indicates environmental stress or poor genetic quality. We studied 13 fragmented populations of prairie phlox (Phlox pilosa L.) to test the hypothesis that developmental instability should decrease with increasing population size-as expected if small populations suffer genetic problems associated with inbreeding or are exposed to more environmental stress than larger populations. We used two different measures of developmental instability, each calculated for two different traits: radial asymmetry of flowers (for petal width and petal length) and modular fluctuating asymmetry of leaves (for leaf widths at two points along the leaf). There were weak but significant correlations among individuals for four of six pairwise combinations of these measures. Surprisingly, three of our four measures of developmental instability showed strong population size effects that were opposite to those expected: developmental instability increased with population size. We conclude that measures of developmental instability cannot be applied uncritically for biomonitoring without considerable knowledge of developmental mechanisms, natural history, and population biology of the species in question.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-8892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1739</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.013002274.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CBIOEF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA, USA: Blackwell Science Inc</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conservation biology ; Demecology ; Flowers ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION ; IOWA ; Leaves ; Petals ; PHLOX ; PHLOX PILOSA ; Plant genetics ; Plants ; Plants and fungi ; Population genetics ; POPULATION SIZE ; Prairies ; Stems</subject><ispartof>Conservation biology, 1999-04, Vol.13 (2), p.274-281</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1999 Society for Conservation Biology</rights><rights>1999 Society for Conservation Biology</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5234-bf02d44124a5ff2c541d2b6d0e9f9e4bfab2a874497b677f7e35e3faebad49f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5234-bf02d44124a5ff2c541d2b6d0e9f9e4bfab2a874497b677f7e35e3faebad49f43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2641469$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2641469$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1793408$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heard, Stephen B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonine, Mary L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendrix, Stephen D.</creatorcontrib><title>Developmental instability in fragmented populations of prairie phlox: a cautionary tale</title><title>Conservation biology</title><addtitle>Conservation Biology</addtitle><description>Considerable attention has recently been focused on using levels of developmental instability among members of a population to detect environmental or genetic stresses on animals or plants. It is not yet clear, however, that high developmental instability in a sample of individuals always indicates environmental stress or poor genetic quality. We studied 13 fragmented populations of prairie phlox (Phlox pilosa L.) to test the hypothesis that developmental instability should decrease with increasing population size-as expected if small populations suffer genetic problems associated with inbreeding or are exposed to more environmental stress than larger populations. We used two different measures of developmental instability, each calculated for two different traits: radial asymmetry of flowers (for petal width and petal length) and modular fluctuating asymmetry of leaves (for leaf widths at two points along the leaf). There were weak but significant correlations among individuals for four of six pairwise combinations of these measures. Surprisingly, three of our four measures of developmental instability showed strong population size effects that were opposite to those expected: developmental instability increased with population size. We conclude that measures of developmental instability cannot be applied uncritically for biomonitoring without considerable knowledge of developmental mechanisms, natural history, and population biology of the species in question.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Demecology</subject><subject>Flowers</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>HABITAT FRAGMENTATION</subject><subject>IOWA</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Petals</subject><subject>PHLOX</subject><subject>PHLOX PILOSA</subject><subject>Plant genetics</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Plants and fungi</subject><subject>Population genetics</subject><subject>POPULATION SIZE</subject><subject>Prairies</subject><subject>Stems</subject><issn>0888-8892</issn><issn>1523-1739</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkE1v1DAYhC0EEkvhH4CUQ8UtwV-JY8SFLuy2UkWllqoSF-tNYhcv3jjYWbr77-soZTlzsq0ZPzMahE4JLgjm1YdNQUrKciKYLIiUssCEYUyp4MX-GVocxedogeu6zuta0pfoVYwbjLEsCV-guy_6j3Z-2Op-BJfZPo7QWGfHQ7pnJsD9pOguG_ywczBa38fMm2wIYIPV2fDT-f3HDLIWdpMI4ZAlkH6NXhhwUb95Ok_Q7err9-V5fnm1vlh-vszbVI7njcG045xQDqUxtC056WhTdVhLIzVvDDQUasG5FE0lhBGalZoZ0A10XBrOTtD7mTsE_3un46i2NrbaOei130VFBGUC8zoZP83GNvgYgzZqCHab6iqC1bSm2qhpMDUNpqY11XFNtU_fT59yILbg0jB9a-M_hpCM4yllNdserNOH_4pQy6uzi7_PBHo7gzZx9OEIohUnvJJJzmfZxlHvjzKEX6oSTJTq7ttaXd-s1terH-fqLPnfzX4DXsF9SNVvb6YGmKRAzh4B6YCtmA</recordid><startdate>199904</startdate><enddate>199904</enddate><creator>Heard, Stephen B.</creator><creator>Campbell, Michael A.</creator><creator>Bonine, Mary L.</creator><creator>Hendrix, Stephen D.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Inc</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199904</creationdate><title>Developmental instability in fragmented populations of prairie phlox: a cautionary tale</title><author>Heard, Stephen B. ; Campbell, Michael A. ; Bonine, Mary L. ; Hendrix, Stephen D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5234-bf02d44124a5ff2c541d2b6d0e9f9e4bfab2a874497b677f7e35e3faebad49f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Demecology</topic><topic>Flowers</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>HABITAT FRAGMENTATION</topic><topic>IOWA</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Petals</topic><topic>PHLOX</topic><topic>PHLOX PILOSA</topic><topic>Plant genetics</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Plants and fungi</topic><topic>Population genetics</topic><topic>POPULATION SIZE</topic><topic>Prairies</topic><topic>Stems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heard, Stephen B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonine, Mary L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendrix, Stephen D.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heard, Stephen B.</au><au>Campbell, Michael A.</au><au>Bonine, Mary L.</au><au>Hendrix, Stephen D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Developmental instability in fragmented populations of prairie phlox: a cautionary tale</atitle><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle><addtitle>Conservation Biology</addtitle><date>1999-04</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>274</spage><epage>281</epage><pages>274-281</pages><issn>0888-8892</issn><eissn>1523-1739</eissn><coden>CBIOEF</coden><abstract>Considerable attention has recently been focused on using levels of developmental instability among members of a population to detect environmental or genetic stresses on animals or plants. It is not yet clear, however, that high developmental instability in a sample of individuals always indicates environmental stress or poor genetic quality. We studied 13 fragmented populations of prairie phlox (Phlox pilosa L.) to test the hypothesis that developmental instability should decrease with increasing population size-as expected if small populations suffer genetic problems associated with inbreeding or are exposed to more environmental stress than larger populations. We used two different measures of developmental instability, each calculated for two different traits: radial asymmetry of flowers (for petal width and petal length) and modular fluctuating asymmetry of leaves (for leaf widths at two points along the leaf). There were weak but significant correlations among individuals for four of six pairwise combinations of these measures. Surprisingly, three of our four measures of developmental instability showed strong population size effects that were opposite to those expected: developmental instability increased with population size. We conclude that measures of developmental instability cannot be applied uncritically for biomonitoring without considerable knowledge of developmental mechanisms, natural history, and population biology of the species in question.</abstract><cop>Boston, MA, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Inc</pub><doi>10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.013002274.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0888-8892 |
ispartof | Conservation biology, 1999-04, Vol.13 (2), p.274-281 |
issn | 0888-8892 1523-1739 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17237048 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Biological and medical sciences Conservation biology Demecology Flowers Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology HABITAT FRAGMENTATION IOWA Leaves Petals PHLOX PHLOX PILOSA Plant genetics Plants Plants and fungi Population genetics POPULATION SIZE Prairies Stems |
title | Developmental instability in fragmented populations of prairie phlox: a cautionary tale |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T05%3A51%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Developmental%20instability%20in%20fragmented%20populations%20of%20prairie%20phlox:%20a%20cautionary%20tale&rft.jtitle=Conservation%20biology&rft.au=Heard,%20Stephen%20B.&rft.date=1999-04&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=274&rft.epage=281&rft.pages=274-281&rft.issn=0888-8892&rft.eissn=1523-1739&rft.coden=CBIOEF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.013002274.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2641469%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17237048&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2641469&rfr_iscdi=true |