Methods for targeting the restoration of grazing marsh and wet grassland communities at a national, regional and local scale

Grazing marsh has been recognised as a key habitat in the UK, and included within the Biodiversity Action Plan structure. In the present research, the conservation value of extant English grazing marsh and its geographical variation were assessed, and a strategy for targeting restoration of grazing...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal for nature conservation 2006, Vol.14 (1), p.46-66
Hauptverfasser: Mountford, J.O., Roy, D.B., Cooper, J.M., Manchester, S.J., Swetnam, R.D., Warman, E.A., Treweek, J.R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 66
container_issue 1
container_start_page 46
container_title Journal for nature conservation
container_volume 14
creator Mountford, J.O.
Roy, D.B.
Cooper, J.M.
Manchester, S.J.
Swetnam, R.D.
Warman, E.A.
Treweek, J.R.
description Grazing marsh has been recognised as a key habitat in the UK, and included within the Biodiversity Action Plan structure. In the present research, the conservation value of extant English grazing marsh and its geographical variation were assessed, and a strategy for targeting restoration of grazing marsh developed. A two-stage approach was taken: Botanical species groups were targeted for restoration, and areas identified where this might be attempted. Those species commonest in the wet grassland biotope were defined and classified into species groups on the basis of (a) their established strategy, habitat requirements and life forms; and (b) their occurrence in described plant communities ( National Vegetation Classification – NVC). Areas where restoration was practical were identified using co-occurrence mapping of species from both species groups and NVC communities, and the same method used to identify where marked declines in these groups had occurred since 1950. Using national databases (plants, birds, insects) and information on areas through which restoration schemes might be administered (e.g. the English Nature “Natural Areas”), six ecological attributes were derived enabling sites and areas to be ranked for restoration. Areas were also ranked by the total grazing marsh area they presently contained. Qualitative and quantitative rankings were compared. Ranked Natural Areas were assessed on the basis of the liability to flooding, altitude and land cover. Research identified two philosophies for targeting restoration, focusing either on high-quality areas where success is likely, or on degraded sites where relative gain in biodiversity may be greater.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jnc.2005.09.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17223717</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S161713810500066X</els_id><sourcerecordid>17223717</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-171956e97c6634daf8194e62d4c2c1f342ae64e4b98c969704f12421ec3bf7143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD9PwzAQxSMEEqXwAdg8MZHgc9ykFhOq-CeBWGC2XOeSOkriYrsgEB8eJ2Vm8T2f73fye0lyDjQDCsVVm7WDzhili4yKjFI4SGZQwDIFKvLDSZcp5Es4Tk68byllAFzMkp9nDBtbeVJbR4JyDQYzNCRskDj0wToVjB2IrUnj1Pf41CvnN0QNFfnEMHa978abtn2_G0ww6IkKRJFhQlV3GTc1k5qozuqofDzwNDmqVefx7K_Ok7e729fVQ_r0cv-4unlKNeN5SKEEsShQlLoocl6pegmCY8EqrpmGOudMYcGRr8VSi0KUlNfAOAPU-bougefz5GK_d-vs-y7akr3xGrv4b7Q7L6FkLC-hjIOwH9TOeu-wlltnouEvCVSOOctWxpzlmLOkQsacI3O9ZzA6-DDopNcGB42VcaiDrKz5h_4FyCaHFw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17223717</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methods for targeting the restoration of grazing marsh and wet grassland communities at a national, regional and local scale</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Mountford, J.O. ; Roy, D.B. ; Cooper, J.M. ; Manchester, S.J. ; Swetnam, R.D. ; Warman, E.A. ; Treweek, J.R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mountford, J.O. ; Roy, D.B. ; Cooper, J.M. ; Manchester, S.J. ; Swetnam, R.D. ; Warman, E.A. ; Treweek, J.R.</creatorcontrib><description>Grazing marsh has been recognised as a key habitat in the UK, and included within the Biodiversity Action Plan structure. In the present research, the conservation value of extant English grazing marsh and its geographical variation were assessed, and a strategy for targeting restoration of grazing marsh developed. A two-stage approach was taken: Botanical species groups were targeted for restoration, and areas identified where this might be attempted. Those species commonest in the wet grassland biotope were defined and classified into species groups on the basis of (a) their established strategy, habitat requirements and life forms; and (b) their occurrence in described plant communities ( National Vegetation Classification – NVC). Areas where restoration was practical were identified using co-occurrence mapping of species from both species groups and NVC communities, and the same method used to identify where marked declines in these groups had occurred since 1950. Using national databases (plants, birds, insects) and information on areas through which restoration schemes might be administered (e.g. the English Nature “Natural Areas”), six ecological attributes were derived enabling sites and areas to be ranked for restoration. Areas were also ranked by the total grazing marsh area they presently contained. Qualitative and quantitative rankings were compared. Ranked Natural Areas were assessed on the basis of the liability to flooding, altitude and land cover. Research identified two philosophies for targeting restoration, focusing either on high-quality areas where success is likely, or on degraded sites where relative gain in biodiversity may be greater.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1617-1381</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-1093</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2005.09.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier GmbH</publisher><subject>Attribute ; Co-occurrence ; Distribution ; Natural area ; Rank ; Species group</subject><ispartof>Journal for nature conservation, 2006, Vol.14 (1), p.46-66</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier GmbH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-171956e97c6634daf8194e62d4c2c1f342ae64e4b98c969704f12421ec3bf7143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-171956e97c6634daf8194e62d4c2c1f342ae64e4b98c969704f12421ec3bf7143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S161713810500066X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,4010,27902,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mountford, J.O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, D.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manchester, S.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swetnam, R.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warman, E.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treweek, J.R.</creatorcontrib><title>Methods for targeting the restoration of grazing marsh and wet grassland communities at a national, regional and local scale</title><title>Journal for nature conservation</title><description>Grazing marsh has been recognised as a key habitat in the UK, and included within the Biodiversity Action Plan structure. In the present research, the conservation value of extant English grazing marsh and its geographical variation were assessed, and a strategy for targeting restoration of grazing marsh developed. A two-stage approach was taken: Botanical species groups were targeted for restoration, and areas identified where this might be attempted. Those species commonest in the wet grassland biotope were defined and classified into species groups on the basis of (a) their established strategy, habitat requirements and life forms; and (b) their occurrence in described plant communities ( National Vegetation Classification – NVC). Areas where restoration was practical were identified using co-occurrence mapping of species from both species groups and NVC communities, and the same method used to identify where marked declines in these groups had occurred since 1950. Using national databases (plants, birds, insects) and information on areas through which restoration schemes might be administered (e.g. the English Nature “Natural Areas”), six ecological attributes were derived enabling sites and areas to be ranked for restoration. Areas were also ranked by the total grazing marsh area they presently contained. Qualitative and quantitative rankings were compared. Ranked Natural Areas were assessed on the basis of the liability to flooding, altitude and land cover. Research identified two philosophies for targeting restoration, focusing either on high-quality areas where success is likely, or on degraded sites where relative gain in biodiversity may be greater.</description><subject>Attribute</subject><subject>Co-occurrence</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Natural area</subject><subject>Rank</subject><subject>Species group</subject><issn>1617-1381</issn><issn>1618-1093</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD9PwzAQxSMEEqXwAdg8MZHgc9ykFhOq-CeBWGC2XOeSOkriYrsgEB8eJ2Vm8T2f73fye0lyDjQDCsVVm7WDzhili4yKjFI4SGZQwDIFKvLDSZcp5Es4Tk68byllAFzMkp9nDBtbeVJbR4JyDQYzNCRskDj0wToVjB2IrUnj1Pf41CvnN0QNFfnEMHa978abtn2_G0ww6IkKRJFhQlV3GTc1k5qozuqofDzwNDmqVefx7K_Ok7e729fVQ_r0cv-4unlKNeN5SKEEsShQlLoocl6pegmCY8EqrpmGOudMYcGRr8VSi0KUlNfAOAPU-bougefz5GK_d-vs-y7akr3xGrv4b7Q7L6FkLC-hjIOwH9TOeu-wlltnouEvCVSOOctWxpzlmLOkQsacI3O9ZzA6-DDopNcGB42VcaiDrKz5h_4FyCaHFw</recordid><startdate>2006</startdate><enddate>2006</enddate><creator>Mountford, J.O.</creator><creator>Roy, D.B.</creator><creator>Cooper, J.M.</creator><creator>Manchester, S.J.</creator><creator>Swetnam, R.D.</creator><creator>Warman, E.A.</creator><creator>Treweek, J.R.</creator><general>Elsevier GmbH</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2006</creationdate><title>Methods for targeting the restoration of grazing marsh and wet grassland communities at a national, regional and local scale</title><author>Mountford, J.O. ; Roy, D.B. ; Cooper, J.M. ; Manchester, S.J. ; Swetnam, R.D. ; Warman, E.A. ; Treweek, J.R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-171956e97c6634daf8194e62d4c2c1f342ae64e4b98c969704f12421ec3bf7143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Attribute</topic><topic>Co-occurrence</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Natural area</topic><topic>Rank</topic><topic>Species group</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mountford, J.O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, D.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manchester, S.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swetnam, R.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warman, E.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treweek, J.R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal for nature conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mountford, J.O.</au><au>Roy, D.B.</au><au>Cooper, J.M.</au><au>Manchester, S.J.</au><au>Swetnam, R.D.</au><au>Warman, E.A.</au><au>Treweek, J.R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methods for targeting the restoration of grazing marsh and wet grassland communities at a national, regional and local scale</atitle><jtitle>Journal for nature conservation</jtitle><date>2006</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>46</spage><epage>66</epage><pages>46-66</pages><issn>1617-1381</issn><eissn>1618-1093</eissn><abstract>Grazing marsh has been recognised as a key habitat in the UK, and included within the Biodiversity Action Plan structure. In the present research, the conservation value of extant English grazing marsh and its geographical variation were assessed, and a strategy for targeting restoration of grazing marsh developed. A two-stage approach was taken: Botanical species groups were targeted for restoration, and areas identified where this might be attempted. Those species commonest in the wet grassland biotope were defined and classified into species groups on the basis of (a) their established strategy, habitat requirements and life forms; and (b) their occurrence in described plant communities ( National Vegetation Classification – NVC). Areas where restoration was practical were identified using co-occurrence mapping of species from both species groups and NVC communities, and the same method used to identify where marked declines in these groups had occurred since 1950. Using national databases (plants, birds, insects) and information on areas through which restoration schemes might be administered (e.g. the English Nature “Natural Areas”), six ecological attributes were derived enabling sites and areas to be ranked for restoration. Areas were also ranked by the total grazing marsh area they presently contained. Qualitative and quantitative rankings were compared. Ranked Natural Areas were assessed on the basis of the liability to flooding, altitude and land cover. Research identified two philosophies for targeting restoration, focusing either on high-quality areas where success is likely, or on degraded sites where relative gain in biodiversity may be greater.</abstract><pub>Elsevier GmbH</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jnc.2005.09.001</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1617-1381
ispartof Journal for nature conservation, 2006, Vol.14 (1), p.46-66
issn 1617-1381
1618-1093
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17223717
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Attribute
Co-occurrence
Distribution
Natural area
Rank
Species group
title Methods for targeting the restoration of grazing marsh and wet grassland communities at a national, regional and local scale
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T17%3A01%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methods%20for%20targeting%20the%20restoration%20of%20grazing%20marsh%20and%20wet%20grassland%20communities%20at%20a%20national,%20regional%20and%20local%20scale&rft.jtitle=Journal%20for%20nature%20conservation&rft.au=Mountford,%20J.O.&rft.date=2006&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=46&rft.epage=66&rft.pages=46-66&rft.issn=1617-1381&rft.eissn=1618-1093&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jnc.2005.09.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17223717%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17223717&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S161713810500066X&rfr_iscdi=true