Land Rights in Cambodia: An Unfinished Reform
In Cambodia, an increasing demand for land has accompanied rapid economic expansion over the past decade, leading to land tenure insecurity for many of the country's poor. Despite the adoption of a new land law in 2001 and the establishment of the Land Management and Administration Project (LMA...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Asia-Pacific issues 2010-08 (97), p.1-1 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1 |
---|---|
container_issue | 97 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Asia-Pacific issues |
container_volume | |
creator | So, Sokbunthoeun |
description | In Cambodia, an increasing demand for land has accompanied rapid economic expansion over the past decade, leading to land tenure insecurity for many of the country's poor. Despite the adoption of a new land law in 2001 and the establishment of the Land Management and Administration Project (LMAP) in 2002, tenure problems have continued. The difficulties with land reform policy relate partly to LMAP's design problems and partly to poor execution. These difficulties are the result of both bureaucratic weakness and the implementation of land policy reform by a politicized and personalized bureaucracy characterized by patron-client relationships. While there is no quick fix to problems in the land sector, steps toward a solution should give top priority to resolving land claims in conflict-prone areas, encourage registration of all land transfers, incorporate the participation of residents in the development of solutions tailored to local settings, convince elites of the political utility of land reform, and include citizen empowerment on the reform agenda. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1722179198</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3816815191</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p131t-758552d9924c07a41e3c9f3b9f9b9b663117cae33da25f64f10d7cdc43f7ef6a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdzktLxDAYheEsFBxH_0PAjZtAvlwbd0PxBoUBcdZDmouToU3Gpv3_FnTl6mweDu8V2oBkjFCj1A26rfVMqeLMiA0inc0ef6Sv01xxyri1Y198sk94l_Ehx5RTPYVVhFim8Q5dRzvUcP-3W3R4ef5s30i3f31vdx25AIeZaNlIybwxTDiqrYDAnYm8N9H0pleKA2hnA-feMhmViEC9dt4JHnWIyvItevz9vUzlewl1Po6pujAMNoey1CNoxkAbMM1KH_7Rc1mmvNatChSlugHNfwAQw0o2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1716007817</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Land Rights in Cambodia: An Unfinished Reform</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>So, Sokbunthoeun</creator><creatorcontrib>So, Sokbunthoeun</creatorcontrib><description>In Cambodia, an increasing demand for land has accompanied rapid economic expansion over the past decade, leading to land tenure insecurity for many of the country's poor. Despite the adoption of a new land law in 2001 and the establishment of the Land Management and Administration Project (LMAP) in 2002, tenure problems have continued. The difficulties with land reform policy relate partly to LMAP's design problems and partly to poor execution. These difficulties are the result of both bureaucratic weakness and the implementation of land policy reform by a politicized and personalized bureaucracy characterized by patron-client relationships. While there is no quick fix to problems in the land sector, steps toward a solution should give top priority to resolving land claims in conflict-prone areas, encourage registration of all land transfers, incorporate the participation of residents in the development of solutions tailored to local settings, convince elites of the political utility of land reform, and include citizen empowerment on the reform agenda.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1522-0966</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Honolulu: East - West Center</publisher><subject>Bureaucracy ; Citizens ; Evictions ; Lakes ; Land reform ; Land tenure ; Land use planning ; Landowners ; Political leadership ; Politics ; Private property ; Public lands ; Registration ; Rural areas ; Urban areas</subject><ispartof>Asia-Pacific issues, 2010-08 (97), p.1-1</ispartof><rights>Copyright East - West Center Aug 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>So, Sokbunthoeun</creatorcontrib><title>Land Rights in Cambodia: An Unfinished Reform</title><title>Asia-Pacific issues</title><description>In Cambodia, an increasing demand for land has accompanied rapid economic expansion over the past decade, leading to land tenure insecurity for many of the country's poor. Despite the adoption of a new land law in 2001 and the establishment of the Land Management and Administration Project (LMAP) in 2002, tenure problems have continued. The difficulties with land reform policy relate partly to LMAP's design problems and partly to poor execution. These difficulties are the result of both bureaucratic weakness and the implementation of land policy reform by a politicized and personalized bureaucracy characterized by patron-client relationships. While there is no quick fix to problems in the land sector, steps toward a solution should give top priority to resolving land claims in conflict-prone areas, encourage registration of all land transfers, incorporate the participation of residents in the development of solutions tailored to local settings, convince elites of the political utility of land reform, and include citizen empowerment on the reform agenda.</description><subject>Bureaucracy</subject><subject>Citizens</subject><subject>Evictions</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Land reform</subject><subject>Land tenure</subject><subject>Land use planning</subject><subject>Landowners</subject><subject>Political leadership</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Private property</subject><subject>Public lands</subject><subject>Registration</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><issn>1522-0966</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdzktLxDAYheEsFBxH_0PAjZtAvlwbd0PxBoUBcdZDmouToU3Gpv3_FnTl6mweDu8V2oBkjFCj1A26rfVMqeLMiA0inc0ef6Sv01xxyri1Y198sk94l_Ehx5RTPYVVhFim8Q5dRzvUcP-3W3R4ef5s30i3f31vdx25AIeZaNlIybwxTDiqrYDAnYm8N9H0pleKA2hnA-feMhmViEC9dt4JHnWIyvItevz9vUzlewl1Po6pujAMNoey1CNoxkAbMM1KH_7Rc1mmvNatChSlugHNfwAQw0o2</recordid><startdate>20100801</startdate><enddate>20100801</enddate><creator>So, Sokbunthoeun</creator><general>East - West Center</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AI</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100801</creationdate><title>Land Rights in Cambodia: An Unfinished Reform</title><author>So, Sokbunthoeun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p131t-758552d9924c07a41e3c9f3b9f9b9b663117cae33da25f64f10d7cdc43f7ef6a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Bureaucracy</topic><topic>Citizens</topic><topic>Evictions</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Land reform</topic><topic>Land tenure</topic><topic>Land use planning</topic><topic>Landowners</topic><topic>Political leadership</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Private property</topic><topic>Public lands</topic><topic>Registration</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>So, Sokbunthoeun</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Asia-Pacific issues</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>So, Sokbunthoeun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Land Rights in Cambodia: An Unfinished Reform</atitle><jtitle>Asia-Pacific issues</jtitle><date>2010-08-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><issue>97</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>1</epage><pages>1-1</pages><issn>1522-0966</issn><abstract>In Cambodia, an increasing demand for land has accompanied rapid economic expansion over the past decade, leading to land tenure insecurity for many of the country's poor. Despite the adoption of a new land law in 2001 and the establishment of the Land Management and Administration Project (LMAP) in 2002, tenure problems have continued. The difficulties with land reform policy relate partly to LMAP's design problems and partly to poor execution. These difficulties are the result of both bureaucratic weakness and the implementation of land policy reform by a politicized and personalized bureaucracy characterized by patron-client relationships. While there is no quick fix to problems in the land sector, steps toward a solution should give top priority to resolving land claims in conflict-prone areas, encourage registration of all land transfers, incorporate the participation of residents in the development of solutions tailored to local settings, convince elites of the political utility of land reform, and include citizen empowerment on the reform agenda.</abstract><cop>Honolulu</cop><pub>East - West Center</pub><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1522-0966 |
ispartof | Asia-Pacific issues, 2010-08 (97), p.1-1 |
issn | 1522-0966 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1722179198 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Bureaucracy Citizens Evictions Lakes Land reform Land tenure Land use planning Landowners Political leadership Politics Private property Public lands Registration Rural areas Urban areas |
title | Land Rights in Cambodia: An Unfinished Reform |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T09%3A43%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Land%20Rights%20in%20Cambodia:%20An%20Unfinished%20Reform&rft.jtitle=Asia-Pacific%20issues&rft.au=So,%20Sokbunthoeun&rft.date=2010-08-01&rft.issue=97&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=1&rft.pages=1-1&rft.issn=1522-0966&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3816815191%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1716007817&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |