Microbial source markers assessment in the Bogotá River basin (Colombia)

The microbiological indicators traditionally used to assess fecal contamination are insufficient to identify the source. The aim of this study was to detect microbial markers to identify the source of fecal pollution in the Bogotá River (Colombia). For this, we determined non-discriminating indicato...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of water and health 2015-09, Vol.13 (3), p.801-810
Hauptverfasser: Venegas, Camilo, Diez, Hugo, Blanch, Anicet R, Jofre, Juan, Campos, Claudia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 810
container_issue 3
container_start_page 801
container_title Journal of water and health
container_volume 13
creator Venegas, Camilo
Diez, Hugo
Blanch, Anicet R
Jofre, Juan
Campos, Claudia
description The microbiological indicators traditionally used to assess fecal contamination are insufficient to identify the source. The aim of this study was to detect microbial markers to identify the source of fecal pollution in the Bogotá River (Colombia). For this, we determined non-discriminating indicators such as Escherichia coli, somatic coliphages and phages infecting strain RYC2056 of Bacteroides, and potential source tracking markers as phages infecting strains GA17, HB13, and CA8 of Bacteroides, sorbitol-fermenting bifidobacteria, and molecular markers of Bifidobacterium adolescentis, Bifiodobacterium dentium, and Bacteroidetes in raw municipal wastewaters, slaughterhouse wastewaters, and the Bogotá River. Bacteriophages infecting Bacteroides strain GA17 and the molecular markers identified the wastewater sources. In contrast, sorbitol-fermenting bifidobacteria failed regarding specificity. In the Bogotá River, phages infecting strain GA17 were detected in all samples downstream of Bogotá, whereas they should be concentrated from 1 l samples in upstream samples containing less than 10(3) E. coli/100 ml to be detected. In the river water, the fraction of positive detections of molecular markers was lower than that of phages infecting strain GA17. The ratio SOMCPH/GA17PH was shown also to be a good marker. These results provide information that will allow focusing measures for sanitation of the Bogotá River.
doi_str_mv 10.2166/wh.2015.240
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1722177246</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1722177246</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-468ed95dfa6c7947c22f59fb591984a7962fe35a33fc03cc5f61b03bffb869f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1LAzEQhoMotlZP3mXBS0W2JpOvzVGLH4WKIHoO2TSxW3e7dbO1-HP8Lf4xU1o9ePI0w_DMwDwvQscED4AIcbGaDgATPgCGd1CXKCVSmYHajT2TMs0U4A46CGGGMQjgsI86ICiAFLyLRveFbeq8MGUS6mVjXVKZ5tU1ITEhuBAqN2-TYp60U5dc1S91-_WZPBbvrklyE-K8P6zLuor7Z4doz5syuKNt7aHnm-un4V06frgdDS_HqaWZbFMmMjdRfOKNsFIxaQE8Vz7niqiMGakEeEe5odRbTK3lXpAc09z7PBPKU9pD_c3dRVO_LV1odVUE68rSzF29DJpIACIlMPEPFGcKM8xZRE__oLOoYx4f0URRrARhREbqfENFZyE0zutFU0RhH5pgvQ5Dr6Z6HYaOYUT6ZHtzmVdu8sv-2KffPLeDXQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1930961417</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Microbial source markers assessment in the Bogotá River basin (Colombia)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Venegas, Camilo ; Diez, Hugo ; Blanch, Anicet R ; Jofre, Juan ; Campos, Claudia</creator><creatorcontrib>Venegas, Camilo ; Diez, Hugo ; Blanch, Anicet R ; Jofre, Juan ; Campos, Claudia</creatorcontrib><description>The microbiological indicators traditionally used to assess fecal contamination are insufficient to identify the source. The aim of this study was to detect microbial markers to identify the source of fecal pollution in the Bogotá River (Colombia). For this, we determined non-discriminating indicators such as Escherichia coli, somatic coliphages and phages infecting strain RYC2056 of Bacteroides, and potential source tracking markers as phages infecting strains GA17, HB13, and CA8 of Bacteroides, sorbitol-fermenting bifidobacteria, and molecular markers of Bifidobacterium adolescentis, Bifiodobacterium dentium, and Bacteroidetes in raw municipal wastewaters, slaughterhouse wastewaters, and the Bogotá River. Bacteriophages infecting Bacteroides strain GA17 and the molecular markers identified the wastewater sources. In contrast, sorbitol-fermenting bifidobacteria failed regarding specificity. In the Bogotá River, phages infecting strain GA17 were detected in all samples downstream of Bogotá, whereas they should be concentrated from 1 l samples in upstream samples containing less than 10(3) E. coli/100 ml to be detected. In the river water, the fraction of positive detections of molecular markers was lower than that of phages infecting strain GA17. The ratio SOMCPH/GA17PH was shown also to be a good marker. These results provide information that will allow focusing measures for sanitation of the Bogotá River.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1477-8920</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-7829</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2166/wh.2015.240</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26322765</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IWA Publishing</publisher><subject>Abattoirs ; Bacteriophages ; Bacteroides ; Bacteroides - genetics ; Bacteroides fragilis ; Bacteroidetes ; Bifidobacterium adolescentis ; Colombia ; Contamination ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; DNA, Bacterial - analysis ; DNA, Bacterial - genetics ; E coli ; Fecal coliforms ; Feces ; Fermentation ; Freshwater ; Genes, Bacterial - genetics ; Genetic Markers - genetics ; Indicators ; Markers ; Microorganisms ; Mitochondrial DNA ; Municipal wastewater ; Phages ; Pollution ; Ribosomal DNA ; River basins ; River water ; Rivers ; Rivers - microbiology ; Sanitation ; Sorbitol ; Specificity ; Waste Water - microbiology ; Wastewater ; Water pollution</subject><ispartof>Journal of water and health, 2015-09, Vol.13 (3), p.801-810</ispartof><rights>Copyright IWA Publishing Sep 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-468ed95dfa6c7947c22f59fb591984a7962fe35a33fc03cc5f61b03bffb869f33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-468ed95dfa6c7947c22f59fb591984a7962fe35a33fc03cc5f61b03bffb869f33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26322765$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Venegas, Camilo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diez, Hugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanch, Anicet R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jofre, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campos, Claudia</creatorcontrib><title>Microbial source markers assessment in the Bogotá River basin (Colombia)</title><title>Journal of water and health</title><addtitle>J Water Health</addtitle><description>The microbiological indicators traditionally used to assess fecal contamination are insufficient to identify the source. The aim of this study was to detect microbial markers to identify the source of fecal pollution in the Bogotá River (Colombia). For this, we determined non-discriminating indicators such as Escherichia coli, somatic coliphages and phages infecting strain RYC2056 of Bacteroides, and potential source tracking markers as phages infecting strains GA17, HB13, and CA8 of Bacteroides, sorbitol-fermenting bifidobacteria, and molecular markers of Bifidobacterium adolescentis, Bifiodobacterium dentium, and Bacteroidetes in raw municipal wastewaters, slaughterhouse wastewaters, and the Bogotá River. Bacteriophages infecting Bacteroides strain GA17 and the molecular markers identified the wastewater sources. In contrast, sorbitol-fermenting bifidobacteria failed regarding specificity. In the Bogotá River, phages infecting strain GA17 were detected in all samples downstream of Bogotá, whereas they should be concentrated from 1 l samples in upstream samples containing less than 10(3) E. coli/100 ml to be detected. In the river water, the fraction of positive detections of molecular markers was lower than that of phages infecting strain GA17. The ratio SOMCPH/GA17PH was shown also to be a good marker. These results provide information that will allow focusing measures for sanitation of the Bogotá River.</description><subject>Abattoirs</subject><subject>Bacteriophages</subject><subject>Bacteroides</subject><subject>Bacteroides - genetics</subject><subject>Bacteroides fragilis</subject><subject>Bacteroidetes</subject><subject>Bifidobacterium adolescentis</subject><subject>Colombia</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - analysis</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Fecal coliforms</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Genes, Bacterial - genetics</subject><subject>Genetic Markers - genetics</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Markers</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Mitochondrial DNA</subject><subject>Municipal wastewater</subject><subject>Phages</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Ribosomal DNA</subject><subject>River basins</subject><subject>River water</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Rivers - microbiology</subject><subject>Sanitation</subject><subject>Sorbitol</subject><subject>Specificity</subject><subject>Waste Water - microbiology</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><issn>1477-8920</issn><issn>1996-7829</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1LAzEQhoMotlZP3mXBS0W2JpOvzVGLH4WKIHoO2TSxW3e7dbO1-HP8Lf4xU1o9ePI0w_DMwDwvQscED4AIcbGaDgATPgCGd1CXKCVSmYHajT2TMs0U4A46CGGGMQjgsI86ICiAFLyLRveFbeq8MGUS6mVjXVKZ5tU1ITEhuBAqN2-TYp60U5dc1S91-_WZPBbvrklyE-K8P6zLuor7Z4doz5syuKNt7aHnm-un4V06frgdDS_HqaWZbFMmMjdRfOKNsFIxaQE8Vz7niqiMGakEeEe5odRbTK3lXpAc09z7PBPKU9pD_c3dRVO_LV1odVUE68rSzF29DJpIACIlMPEPFGcKM8xZRE__oLOoYx4f0URRrARhREbqfENFZyE0zutFU0RhH5pgvQ5Dr6Z6HYaOYUT6ZHtzmVdu8sv-2KffPLeDXQ</recordid><startdate>201509</startdate><enddate>201509</enddate><creator>Venegas, Camilo</creator><creator>Diez, Hugo</creator><creator>Blanch, Anicet R</creator><creator>Jofre, Juan</creator><creator>Campos, Claudia</creator><general>IWA Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201509</creationdate><title>Microbial source markers assessment in the Bogotá River basin (Colombia)</title><author>Venegas, Camilo ; Diez, Hugo ; Blanch, Anicet R ; Jofre, Juan ; Campos, Claudia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-468ed95dfa6c7947c22f59fb591984a7962fe35a33fc03cc5f61b03bffb869f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Abattoirs</topic><topic>Bacteriophages</topic><topic>Bacteroides</topic><topic>Bacteroides - genetics</topic><topic>Bacteroides fragilis</topic><topic>Bacteroidetes</topic><topic>Bifidobacterium adolescentis</topic><topic>Colombia</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - analysis</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Fecal coliforms</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Genes, Bacterial - genetics</topic><topic>Genetic Markers - genetics</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Markers</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Mitochondrial DNA</topic><topic>Municipal wastewater</topic><topic>Phages</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Ribosomal DNA</topic><topic>River basins</topic><topic>River water</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Rivers - microbiology</topic><topic>Sanitation</topic><topic>Sorbitol</topic><topic>Specificity</topic><topic>Waste Water - microbiology</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Venegas, Camilo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diez, Hugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanch, Anicet R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jofre, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campos, Claudia</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of water and health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Venegas, Camilo</au><au>Diez, Hugo</au><au>Blanch, Anicet R</au><au>Jofre, Juan</au><au>Campos, Claudia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Microbial source markers assessment in the Bogotá River basin (Colombia)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of water and health</jtitle><addtitle>J Water Health</addtitle><date>2015-09</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>801</spage><epage>810</epage><pages>801-810</pages><issn>1477-8920</issn><eissn>1996-7829</eissn><abstract>The microbiological indicators traditionally used to assess fecal contamination are insufficient to identify the source. The aim of this study was to detect microbial markers to identify the source of fecal pollution in the Bogotá River (Colombia). For this, we determined non-discriminating indicators such as Escherichia coli, somatic coliphages and phages infecting strain RYC2056 of Bacteroides, and potential source tracking markers as phages infecting strains GA17, HB13, and CA8 of Bacteroides, sorbitol-fermenting bifidobacteria, and molecular markers of Bifidobacterium adolescentis, Bifiodobacterium dentium, and Bacteroidetes in raw municipal wastewaters, slaughterhouse wastewaters, and the Bogotá River. Bacteriophages infecting Bacteroides strain GA17 and the molecular markers identified the wastewater sources. In contrast, sorbitol-fermenting bifidobacteria failed regarding specificity. In the Bogotá River, phages infecting strain GA17 were detected in all samples downstream of Bogotá, whereas they should be concentrated from 1 l samples in upstream samples containing less than 10(3) E. coli/100 ml to be detected. In the river water, the fraction of positive detections of molecular markers was lower than that of phages infecting strain GA17. The ratio SOMCPH/GA17PH was shown also to be a good marker. These results provide information that will allow focusing measures for sanitation of the Bogotá River.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IWA Publishing</pub><pmid>26322765</pmid><doi>10.2166/wh.2015.240</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1477-8920
ispartof Journal of water and health, 2015-09, Vol.13 (3), p.801-810
issn 1477-8920
1996-7829
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1722177246
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Abattoirs
Bacteriophages
Bacteroides
Bacteroides - genetics
Bacteroides fragilis
Bacteroidetes
Bifidobacterium adolescentis
Colombia
Contamination
Deoxyribonucleic acid
DNA
DNA, Bacterial - analysis
DNA, Bacterial - genetics
E coli
Fecal coliforms
Feces
Fermentation
Freshwater
Genes, Bacterial - genetics
Genetic Markers - genetics
Indicators
Markers
Microorganisms
Mitochondrial DNA
Municipal wastewater
Phages
Pollution
Ribosomal DNA
River basins
River water
Rivers
Rivers - microbiology
Sanitation
Sorbitol
Specificity
Waste Water - microbiology
Wastewater
Water pollution
title Microbial source markers assessment in the Bogotá River basin (Colombia)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T02%3A20%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Microbial%20source%20markers%20assessment%20in%20the%20Bogot%C3%A1%20River%20basin%20(Colombia)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20water%20and%20health&rft.au=Venegas,%20Camilo&rft.date=2015-09&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=801&rft.epage=810&rft.pages=801-810&rft.issn=1477-8920&rft.eissn=1996-7829&rft_id=info:doi/10.2166/wh.2015.240&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1722177246%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1930961417&rft_id=info:pmid/26322765&rfr_iscdi=true