Bent versus straight tips in micropulsed longitudinal phacoemulsification

Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate bent and straight phacoemulsification tips to determine which tip is more efficient in removal of lens fragments, using micropulsed longitudinal ultrasound in phacoemulsification. Design In vitro laboratory study. Methods The John A. Moran Eye...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of ophthalmology 2015-10, Vol.50 (5), p.354-359
Hauptverfasser: Stagg, Brian C., MD, Gupta, Isha, BS, Cahoon, Judd, BS, Ronquillo, Cecinio, BS, Shi, Dallas, BS, Zaugg, Brian, MD, Gardiner, Gareth, BS, Barlow, William R., MD, Pettey, Jeff H., MD, Aabid Farukhi, M., BS, Jensen, Jason, BS, Olson, Randall J., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 359
container_issue 5
container_start_page 354
container_title Canadian journal of ophthalmology
container_volume 50
creator Stagg, Brian C., MD
Gupta, Isha, BS
Cahoon, Judd, BS
Ronquillo, Cecinio, BS
Shi, Dallas, BS
Zaugg, Brian, MD
Gardiner, Gareth, BS
Barlow, William R., MD
Pettey, Jeff H., MD
Aabid Farukhi, M., BS
Jensen, Jason, BS
Olson, Randall J., MD
description Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate bent and straight phacoemulsification tips to determine which tip is more efficient in removal of lens fragments, using micropulsed longitudinal ultrasound in phacoemulsification. Design In vitro laboratory study. Methods The John A. Moran Eye Center Laboratories, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, was the study setting. Pig lenses hardened in a manner comparable with dense human cataracts were cut into 2-mm cubes and removed with micropulsed longitudinal ultrasound using settings previously shown to be optimally efficient (6 milliseconds on and 6 milliseconds off for a bent tip). To verify this time as most efficient for a straight tip, we also tested times of 5, 6, and 7 milliseconds time on and off. The tips were either straight or with a 20-degree bend. Twenty cubes were used for each comparative run. Results For the straight tip, 6 milliseconds on (1.56 ± 0.815 seconds) was significantly more efficient than 7 milliseconds on (2.45 ± 1.56 seconds, p = 0.001) and not significantly more efficient than 5 milliseconds on (1.69 ± 0.86 seconds, p = 0.43). Five milliseconds off time (1.45 ± 0.76s) was more efficient than 6 milliseconds (2.06 ± 1.37 seconds, p = 0.004) and 7 milliseconds off (2.18 ± 1.24s, p = 0.001). The straight tip was more efficient than the bent tip (1.38 ± 0.83 versus 2.93 ± 2.14 seconds, p = 0.006). Conclusions Results are contrary to accepted common belief. Micropulsed longitudinal phacoemulsification is more efficient with a straight rather than a bent tip.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jcjo.2015.06.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1721917842</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0008418215002690</els_id><sourcerecordid>1721917842</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ab294dfcf97ebd292fac9e00eb0f94574e40d00fc7e2e7fbb6b08dcae9eb19023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2L1TAUhoMozvXqH3AhXbppPUnT5gZE0MGPgQEX6jqkyclMatvUJB2Yf2_KHV24cHUW5zkvvM8h5CWFhgLt34zNaMbQMKBdA30D0D4iBypoV7dtD4_JAQBONacndkGepTQWoBW8f0ouWM-7Tgo4kKsPuOTqDmPaUpVy1P7mNlfZr6nySzV7E8O6TQltNYXlxufN-kVP1XqrTcC5bLzzRmcflufkidOFfPEwj-THp4_fL7_U118_X12-v64NpzTXemCSW2ecFDhYJpnTRiIADuAk7wRHDhbAGYEMhRuGfoCTNRolDlQCa4_k9Tl3jeHXhimr2SeD06QXDFtSVDAqqTjxHWVntLRIKaJTa_SzjveKgtoVqlHtCtWuUEGvdkNH8uohfxtmtH9P_jgrwNszgKXlnceokvG4GLQ-osnKBv___Hf_nJvJL0Xi9BPvMY1hi8Vw6aESU6C-7U_cf0g7ANZLaH8DpCKZVg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1721917842</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bent versus straight tips in micropulsed longitudinal phacoemulsification</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Stagg, Brian C., MD ; Gupta, Isha, BS ; Cahoon, Judd, BS ; Ronquillo, Cecinio, BS ; Shi, Dallas, BS ; Zaugg, Brian, MD ; Gardiner, Gareth, BS ; Barlow, William R., MD ; Pettey, Jeff H., MD ; Aabid Farukhi, M., BS ; Jensen, Jason, BS ; Olson, Randall J., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Stagg, Brian C., MD ; Gupta, Isha, BS ; Cahoon, Judd, BS ; Ronquillo, Cecinio, BS ; Shi, Dallas, BS ; Zaugg, Brian, MD ; Gardiner, Gareth, BS ; Barlow, William R., MD ; Pettey, Jeff H., MD ; Aabid Farukhi, M., BS ; Jensen, Jason, BS ; Olson, Randall J., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate bent and straight phacoemulsification tips to determine which tip is more efficient in removal of lens fragments, using micropulsed longitudinal ultrasound in phacoemulsification. Design In vitro laboratory study. Methods The John A. Moran Eye Center Laboratories, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, was the study setting. Pig lenses hardened in a manner comparable with dense human cataracts were cut into 2-mm cubes and removed with micropulsed longitudinal ultrasound using settings previously shown to be optimally efficient (6 milliseconds on and 6 milliseconds off for a bent tip). To verify this time as most efficient for a straight tip, we also tested times of 5, 6, and 7 milliseconds time on and off. The tips were either straight or with a 20-degree bend. Twenty cubes were used for each comparative run. Results For the straight tip, 6 milliseconds on (1.56 ± 0.815 seconds) was significantly more efficient than 7 milliseconds on (2.45 ± 1.56 seconds, p = 0.001) and not significantly more efficient than 5 milliseconds on (1.69 ± 0.86 seconds, p = 0.43). Five milliseconds off time (1.45 ± 0.76s) was more efficient than 6 milliseconds (2.06 ± 1.37 seconds, p = 0.004) and 7 milliseconds off (2.18 ± 1.24s, p = 0.001). The straight tip was more efficient than the bent tip (1.38 ± 0.83 versus 2.93 ± 2.14 seconds, p = 0.006). Conclusions Results are contrary to accepted common belief. Micropulsed longitudinal phacoemulsification is more efficient with a straight rather than a bent tip.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-4182</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1715-3360</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2015.06.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26455970</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Equipment Design ; Internal Medicine ; Lens, Crystalline - surgery ; Operative Time ; Ophthalmology ; Phacoemulsification - instrumentation ; Sus scrofa ; Ultrasonics - instrumentation</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of ophthalmology, 2015-10, Vol.50 (5), p.354-359</ispartof><rights>Canadian Ophthalmological Society</rights><rights>2015 Canadian Ophthalmological Society</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Canadian Ophthalmological Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ab294dfcf97ebd292fac9e00eb0f94574e40d00fc7e2e7fbb6b08dcae9eb19023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ab294dfcf97ebd292fac9e00eb0f94574e40d00fc7e2e7fbb6b08dcae9eb19023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0008418215002690$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26455970$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stagg, Brian C., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Isha, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cahoon, Judd, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ronquillo, Cecinio, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Dallas, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaugg, Brian, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardiner, Gareth, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barlow, William R., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettey, Jeff H., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aabid Farukhi, M., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Jason, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson, Randall J., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Bent versus straight tips in micropulsed longitudinal phacoemulsification</title><title>Canadian journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Can J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate bent and straight phacoemulsification tips to determine which tip is more efficient in removal of lens fragments, using micropulsed longitudinal ultrasound in phacoemulsification. Design In vitro laboratory study. Methods The John A. Moran Eye Center Laboratories, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, was the study setting. Pig lenses hardened in a manner comparable with dense human cataracts were cut into 2-mm cubes and removed with micropulsed longitudinal ultrasound using settings previously shown to be optimally efficient (6 milliseconds on and 6 milliseconds off for a bent tip). To verify this time as most efficient for a straight tip, we also tested times of 5, 6, and 7 milliseconds time on and off. The tips were either straight or with a 20-degree bend. Twenty cubes were used for each comparative run. Results For the straight tip, 6 milliseconds on (1.56 ± 0.815 seconds) was significantly more efficient than 7 milliseconds on (2.45 ± 1.56 seconds, p = 0.001) and not significantly more efficient than 5 milliseconds on (1.69 ± 0.86 seconds, p = 0.43). Five milliseconds off time (1.45 ± 0.76s) was more efficient than 6 milliseconds (2.06 ± 1.37 seconds, p = 0.004) and 7 milliseconds off (2.18 ± 1.24s, p = 0.001). The straight tip was more efficient than the bent tip (1.38 ± 0.83 versus 2.93 ± 2.14 seconds, p = 0.006). Conclusions Results are contrary to accepted common belief. Micropulsed longitudinal phacoemulsification is more efficient with a straight rather than a bent tip.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Lens, Crystalline - surgery</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Phacoemulsification - instrumentation</subject><subject>Sus scrofa</subject><subject>Ultrasonics - instrumentation</subject><issn>0008-4182</issn><issn>1715-3360</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU2L1TAUhoMozvXqH3AhXbppPUnT5gZE0MGPgQEX6jqkyclMatvUJB2Yf2_KHV24cHUW5zkvvM8h5CWFhgLt34zNaMbQMKBdA30D0D4iBypoV7dtD4_JAQBONacndkGepTQWoBW8f0ouWM-7Tgo4kKsPuOTqDmPaUpVy1P7mNlfZr6nySzV7E8O6TQltNYXlxufN-kVP1XqrTcC5bLzzRmcflufkidOFfPEwj-THp4_fL7_U118_X12-v64NpzTXemCSW2ecFDhYJpnTRiIADuAk7wRHDhbAGYEMhRuGfoCTNRolDlQCa4_k9Tl3jeHXhimr2SeD06QXDFtSVDAqqTjxHWVntLRIKaJTa_SzjveKgtoVqlHtCtWuUEGvdkNH8uohfxtmtH9P_jgrwNszgKXlnceokvG4GLQ-osnKBv___Hf_nJvJL0Xi9BPvMY1hi8Vw6aESU6C-7U_cf0g7ANZLaH8DpCKZVg</recordid><startdate>20151001</startdate><enddate>20151001</enddate><creator>Stagg, Brian C., MD</creator><creator>Gupta, Isha, BS</creator><creator>Cahoon, Judd, BS</creator><creator>Ronquillo, Cecinio, BS</creator><creator>Shi, Dallas, BS</creator><creator>Zaugg, Brian, MD</creator><creator>Gardiner, Gareth, BS</creator><creator>Barlow, William R., MD</creator><creator>Pettey, Jeff H., MD</creator><creator>Aabid Farukhi, M., BS</creator><creator>Jensen, Jason, BS</creator><creator>Olson, Randall J., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151001</creationdate><title>Bent versus straight tips in micropulsed longitudinal phacoemulsification</title><author>Stagg, Brian C., MD ; Gupta, Isha, BS ; Cahoon, Judd, BS ; Ronquillo, Cecinio, BS ; Shi, Dallas, BS ; Zaugg, Brian, MD ; Gardiner, Gareth, BS ; Barlow, William R., MD ; Pettey, Jeff H., MD ; Aabid Farukhi, M., BS ; Jensen, Jason, BS ; Olson, Randall J., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ab294dfcf97ebd292fac9e00eb0f94574e40d00fc7e2e7fbb6b08dcae9eb19023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Lens, Crystalline - surgery</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Phacoemulsification - instrumentation</topic><topic>Sus scrofa</topic><topic>Ultrasonics - instrumentation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stagg, Brian C., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Isha, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cahoon, Judd, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ronquillo, Cecinio, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Dallas, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaugg, Brian, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardiner, Gareth, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barlow, William R., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettey, Jeff H., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aabid Farukhi, M., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Jason, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson, Randall J., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stagg, Brian C., MD</au><au>Gupta, Isha, BS</au><au>Cahoon, Judd, BS</au><au>Ronquillo, Cecinio, BS</au><au>Shi, Dallas, BS</au><au>Zaugg, Brian, MD</au><au>Gardiner, Gareth, BS</au><au>Barlow, William R., MD</au><au>Pettey, Jeff H., MD</au><au>Aabid Farukhi, M., BS</au><au>Jensen, Jason, BS</au><au>Olson, Randall J., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bent versus straight tips in micropulsed longitudinal phacoemulsification</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Can J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2015-10-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>354</spage><epage>359</epage><pages>354-359</pages><issn>0008-4182</issn><eissn>1715-3360</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate bent and straight phacoemulsification tips to determine which tip is more efficient in removal of lens fragments, using micropulsed longitudinal ultrasound in phacoemulsification. Design In vitro laboratory study. Methods The John A. Moran Eye Center Laboratories, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, was the study setting. Pig lenses hardened in a manner comparable with dense human cataracts were cut into 2-mm cubes and removed with micropulsed longitudinal ultrasound using settings previously shown to be optimally efficient (6 milliseconds on and 6 milliseconds off for a bent tip). To verify this time as most efficient for a straight tip, we also tested times of 5, 6, and 7 milliseconds time on and off. The tips were either straight or with a 20-degree bend. Twenty cubes were used for each comparative run. Results For the straight tip, 6 milliseconds on (1.56 ± 0.815 seconds) was significantly more efficient than 7 milliseconds on (2.45 ± 1.56 seconds, p = 0.001) and not significantly more efficient than 5 milliseconds on (1.69 ± 0.86 seconds, p = 0.43). Five milliseconds off time (1.45 ± 0.76s) was more efficient than 6 milliseconds (2.06 ± 1.37 seconds, p = 0.004) and 7 milliseconds off (2.18 ± 1.24s, p = 0.001). The straight tip was more efficient than the bent tip (1.38 ± 0.83 versus 2.93 ± 2.14 seconds, p = 0.006). Conclusions Results are contrary to accepted common belief. Micropulsed longitudinal phacoemulsification is more efficient with a straight rather than a bent tip.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26455970</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jcjo.2015.06.003</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-4182
ispartof Canadian journal of ophthalmology, 2015-10, Vol.50 (5), p.354-359
issn 0008-4182
1715-3360
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1721917842
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Animals
Equipment Design
Internal Medicine
Lens, Crystalline - surgery
Operative Time
Ophthalmology
Phacoemulsification - instrumentation
Sus scrofa
Ultrasonics - instrumentation
title Bent versus straight tips in micropulsed longitudinal phacoemulsification
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T22%3A29%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bent%20versus%20straight%20tips%20in%20micropulsed%20longitudinal%20phacoemulsification&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Stagg,%20Brian%20C.,%20MD&rft.date=2015-10-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=354&rft.epage=359&rft.pages=354-359&rft.issn=0008-4182&rft.eissn=1715-3360&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcjo.2015.06.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1721917842%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1721917842&rft_id=info:pmid/26455970&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0008418215002690&rfr_iscdi=true