Bent versus straight tips in micropulsed longitudinal phacoemulsification
Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate bent and straight phacoemulsification tips to determine which tip is more efficient in removal of lens fragments, using micropulsed longitudinal ultrasound in phacoemulsification. Design In vitro laboratory study. Methods The John A. Moran Eye...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian journal of ophthalmology 2015-10, Vol.50 (5), p.354-359 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 359 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 354 |
container_title | Canadian journal of ophthalmology |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Stagg, Brian C., MD Gupta, Isha, BS Cahoon, Judd, BS Ronquillo, Cecinio, BS Shi, Dallas, BS Zaugg, Brian, MD Gardiner, Gareth, BS Barlow, William R., MD Pettey, Jeff H., MD Aabid Farukhi, M., BS Jensen, Jason, BS Olson, Randall J., MD |
description | Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate bent and straight phacoemulsification tips to determine which tip is more efficient in removal of lens fragments, using micropulsed longitudinal ultrasound in phacoemulsification. Design In vitro laboratory study. Methods The John A. Moran Eye Center Laboratories, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, was the study setting. Pig lenses hardened in a manner comparable with dense human cataracts were cut into 2-mm cubes and removed with micropulsed longitudinal ultrasound using settings previously shown to be optimally efficient (6 milliseconds on and 6 milliseconds off for a bent tip). To verify this time as most efficient for a straight tip, we also tested times of 5, 6, and 7 milliseconds time on and off. The tips were either straight or with a 20-degree bend. Twenty cubes were used for each comparative run. Results For the straight tip, 6 milliseconds on (1.56 ± 0.815 seconds) was significantly more efficient than 7 milliseconds on (2.45 ± 1.56 seconds, p = 0.001) and not significantly more efficient than 5 milliseconds on (1.69 ± 0.86 seconds, p = 0.43). Five milliseconds off time (1.45 ± 0.76s) was more efficient than 6 milliseconds (2.06 ± 1.37 seconds, p = 0.004) and 7 milliseconds off (2.18 ± 1.24s, p = 0.001). The straight tip was more efficient than the bent tip (1.38 ± 0.83 versus 2.93 ± 2.14 seconds, p = 0.006). Conclusions Results are contrary to accepted common belief. Micropulsed longitudinal phacoemulsification is more efficient with a straight rather than a bent tip. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jcjo.2015.06.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1721917842</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0008418215002690</els_id><sourcerecordid>1721917842</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ab294dfcf97ebd292fac9e00eb0f94574e40d00fc7e2e7fbb6b08dcae9eb19023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2L1TAUhoMozvXqH3AhXbppPUnT5gZE0MGPgQEX6jqkyclMatvUJB2Yf2_KHV24cHUW5zkvvM8h5CWFhgLt34zNaMbQMKBdA30D0D4iBypoV7dtD4_JAQBONacndkGepTQWoBW8f0ouWM-7Tgo4kKsPuOTqDmPaUpVy1P7mNlfZr6nySzV7E8O6TQltNYXlxufN-kVP1XqrTcC5bLzzRmcflufkidOFfPEwj-THp4_fL7_U118_X12-v64NpzTXemCSW2ecFDhYJpnTRiIADuAk7wRHDhbAGYEMhRuGfoCTNRolDlQCa4_k9Tl3jeHXhimr2SeD06QXDFtSVDAqqTjxHWVntLRIKaJTa_SzjveKgtoVqlHtCtWuUEGvdkNH8uohfxtmtH9P_jgrwNszgKXlnceokvG4GLQ-osnKBv___Hf_nJvJL0Xi9BPvMY1hi8Vw6aESU6C-7U_cf0g7ANZLaH8DpCKZVg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1721917842</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bent versus straight tips in micropulsed longitudinal phacoemulsification</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Stagg, Brian C., MD ; Gupta, Isha, BS ; Cahoon, Judd, BS ; Ronquillo, Cecinio, BS ; Shi, Dallas, BS ; Zaugg, Brian, MD ; Gardiner, Gareth, BS ; Barlow, William R., MD ; Pettey, Jeff H., MD ; Aabid Farukhi, M., BS ; Jensen, Jason, BS ; Olson, Randall J., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Stagg, Brian C., MD ; Gupta, Isha, BS ; Cahoon, Judd, BS ; Ronquillo, Cecinio, BS ; Shi, Dallas, BS ; Zaugg, Brian, MD ; Gardiner, Gareth, BS ; Barlow, William R., MD ; Pettey, Jeff H., MD ; Aabid Farukhi, M., BS ; Jensen, Jason, BS ; Olson, Randall J., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate bent and straight phacoemulsification tips to determine which tip is more efficient in removal of lens fragments, using micropulsed longitudinal ultrasound in phacoemulsification. Design In vitro laboratory study. Methods The John A. Moran Eye Center Laboratories, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, was the study setting. Pig lenses hardened in a manner comparable with dense human cataracts were cut into 2-mm cubes and removed with micropulsed longitudinal ultrasound using settings previously shown to be optimally efficient (6 milliseconds on and 6 milliseconds off for a bent tip). To verify this time as most efficient for a straight tip, we also tested times of 5, 6, and 7 milliseconds time on and off. The tips were either straight or with a 20-degree bend. Twenty cubes were used for each comparative run. Results For the straight tip, 6 milliseconds on (1.56 ± 0.815 seconds) was significantly more efficient than 7 milliseconds on (2.45 ± 1.56 seconds, p = 0.001) and not significantly more efficient than 5 milliseconds on (1.69 ± 0.86 seconds, p = 0.43). Five milliseconds off time (1.45 ± 0.76s) was more efficient than 6 milliseconds (2.06 ± 1.37 seconds, p = 0.004) and 7 milliseconds off (2.18 ± 1.24s, p = 0.001). The straight tip was more efficient than the bent tip (1.38 ± 0.83 versus 2.93 ± 2.14 seconds, p = 0.006). Conclusions Results are contrary to accepted common belief. Micropulsed longitudinal phacoemulsification is more efficient with a straight rather than a bent tip.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-4182</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1715-3360</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2015.06.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26455970</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Equipment Design ; Internal Medicine ; Lens, Crystalline - surgery ; Operative Time ; Ophthalmology ; Phacoemulsification - instrumentation ; Sus scrofa ; Ultrasonics - instrumentation</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of ophthalmology, 2015-10, Vol.50 (5), p.354-359</ispartof><rights>Canadian Ophthalmological Society</rights><rights>2015 Canadian Ophthalmological Society</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Canadian Ophthalmological Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ab294dfcf97ebd292fac9e00eb0f94574e40d00fc7e2e7fbb6b08dcae9eb19023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ab294dfcf97ebd292fac9e00eb0f94574e40d00fc7e2e7fbb6b08dcae9eb19023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0008418215002690$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26455970$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stagg, Brian C., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Isha, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cahoon, Judd, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ronquillo, Cecinio, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Dallas, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaugg, Brian, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardiner, Gareth, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barlow, William R., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettey, Jeff H., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aabid Farukhi, M., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Jason, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson, Randall J., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Bent versus straight tips in micropulsed longitudinal phacoemulsification</title><title>Canadian journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Can J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate bent and straight phacoemulsification tips to determine which tip is more efficient in removal of lens fragments, using micropulsed longitudinal ultrasound in phacoemulsification. Design In vitro laboratory study. Methods The John A. Moran Eye Center Laboratories, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, was the study setting. Pig lenses hardened in a manner comparable with dense human cataracts were cut into 2-mm cubes and removed with micropulsed longitudinal ultrasound using settings previously shown to be optimally efficient (6 milliseconds on and 6 milliseconds off for a bent tip). To verify this time as most efficient for a straight tip, we also tested times of 5, 6, and 7 milliseconds time on and off. The tips were either straight or with a 20-degree bend. Twenty cubes were used for each comparative run. Results For the straight tip, 6 milliseconds on (1.56 ± 0.815 seconds) was significantly more efficient than 7 milliseconds on (2.45 ± 1.56 seconds, p = 0.001) and not significantly more efficient than 5 milliseconds on (1.69 ± 0.86 seconds, p = 0.43). Five milliseconds off time (1.45 ± 0.76s) was more efficient than 6 milliseconds (2.06 ± 1.37 seconds, p = 0.004) and 7 milliseconds off (2.18 ± 1.24s, p = 0.001). The straight tip was more efficient than the bent tip (1.38 ± 0.83 versus 2.93 ± 2.14 seconds, p = 0.006). Conclusions Results are contrary to accepted common belief. Micropulsed longitudinal phacoemulsification is more efficient with a straight rather than a bent tip.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Lens, Crystalline - surgery</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Phacoemulsification - instrumentation</subject><subject>Sus scrofa</subject><subject>Ultrasonics - instrumentation</subject><issn>0008-4182</issn><issn>1715-3360</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU2L1TAUhoMozvXqH3AhXbppPUnT5gZE0MGPgQEX6jqkyclMatvUJB2Yf2_KHV24cHUW5zkvvM8h5CWFhgLt34zNaMbQMKBdA30D0D4iBypoV7dtD4_JAQBONacndkGepTQWoBW8f0ouWM-7Tgo4kKsPuOTqDmPaUpVy1P7mNlfZr6nySzV7E8O6TQltNYXlxufN-kVP1XqrTcC5bLzzRmcflufkidOFfPEwj-THp4_fL7_U118_X12-v64NpzTXemCSW2ecFDhYJpnTRiIADuAk7wRHDhbAGYEMhRuGfoCTNRolDlQCa4_k9Tl3jeHXhimr2SeD06QXDFtSVDAqqTjxHWVntLRIKaJTa_SzjveKgtoVqlHtCtWuUEGvdkNH8uohfxtmtH9P_jgrwNszgKXlnceokvG4GLQ-osnKBv___Hf_nJvJL0Xi9BPvMY1hi8Vw6aESU6C-7U_cf0g7ANZLaH8DpCKZVg</recordid><startdate>20151001</startdate><enddate>20151001</enddate><creator>Stagg, Brian C., MD</creator><creator>Gupta, Isha, BS</creator><creator>Cahoon, Judd, BS</creator><creator>Ronquillo, Cecinio, BS</creator><creator>Shi, Dallas, BS</creator><creator>Zaugg, Brian, MD</creator><creator>Gardiner, Gareth, BS</creator><creator>Barlow, William R., MD</creator><creator>Pettey, Jeff H., MD</creator><creator>Aabid Farukhi, M., BS</creator><creator>Jensen, Jason, BS</creator><creator>Olson, Randall J., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151001</creationdate><title>Bent versus straight tips in micropulsed longitudinal phacoemulsification</title><author>Stagg, Brian C., MD ; Gupta, Isha, BS ; Cahoon, Judd, BS ; Ronquillo, Cecinio, BS ; Shi, Dallas, BS ; Zaugg, Brian, MD ; Gardiner, Gareth, BS ; Barlow, William R., MD ; Pettey, Jeff H., MD ; Aabid Farukhi, M., BS ; Jensen, Jason, BS ; Olson, Randall J., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ab294dfcf97ebd292fac9e00eb0f94574e40d00fc7e2e7fbb6b08dcae9eb19023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Lens, Crystalline - surgery</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Phacoemulsification - instrumentation</topic><topic>Sus scrofa</topic><topic>Ultrasonics - instrumentation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stagg, Brian C., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Isha, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cahoon, Judd, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ronquillo, Cecinio, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Dallas, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaugg, Brian, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardiner, Gareth, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barlow, William R., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettey, Jeff H., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aabid Farukhi, M., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Jason, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson, Randall J., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stagg, Brian C., MD</au><au>Gupta, Isha, BS</au><au>Cahoon, Judd, BS</au><au>Ronquillo, Cecinio, BS</au><au>Shi, Dallas, BS</au><au>Zaugg, Brian, MD</au><au>Gardiner, Gareth, BS</au><au>Barlow, William R., MD</au><au>Pettey, Jeff H., MD</au><au>Aabid Farukhi, M., BS</au><au>Jensen, Jason, BS</au><au>Olson, Randall J., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bent versus straight tips in micropulsed longitudinal phacoemulsification</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Can J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2015-10-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>354</spage><epage>359</epage><pages>354-359</pages><issn>0008-4182</issn><eissn>1715-3360</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate bent and straight phacoemulsification tips to determine which tip is more efficient in removal of lens fragments, using micropulsed longitudinal ultrasound in phacoemulsification. Design In vitro laboratory study. Methods The John A. Moran Eye Center Laboratories, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, was the study setting. Pig lenses hardened in a manner comparable with dense human cataracts were cut into 2-mm cubes and removed with micropulsed longitudinal ultrasound using settings previously shown to be optimally efficient (6 milliseconds on and 6 milliseconds off for a bent tip). To verify this time as most efficient for a straight tip, we also tested times of 5, 6, and 7 milliseconds time on and off. The tips were either straight or with a 20-degree bend. Twenty cubes were used for each comparative run. Results For the straight tip, 6 milliseconds on (1.56 ± 0.815 seconds) was significantly more efficient than 7 milliseconds on (2.45 ± 1.56 seconds, p = 0.001) and not significantly more efficient than 5 milliseconds on (1.69 ± 0.86 seconds, p = 0.43). Five milliseconds off time (1.45 ± 0.76s) was more efficient than 6 milliseconds (2.06 ± 1.37 seconds, p = 0.004) and 7 milliseconds off (2.18 ± 1.24s, p = 0.001). The straight tip was more efficient than the bent tip (1.38 ± 0.83 versus 2.93 ± 2.14 seconds, p = 0.006). Conclusions Results are contrary to accepted common belief. Micropulsed longitudinal phacoemulsification is more efficient with a straight rather than a bent tip.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26455970</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jcjo.2015.06.003</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-4182 |
ispartof | Canadian journal of ophthalmology, 2015-10, Vol.50 (5), p.354-359 |
issn | 0008-4182 1715-3360 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1721917842 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Animals Equipment Design Internal Medicine Lens, Crystalline - surgery Operative Time Ophthalmology Phacoemulsification - instrumentation Sus scrofa Ultrasonics - instrumentation |
title | Bent versus straight tips in micropulsed longitudinal phacoemulsification |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T22%3A29%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bent%20versus%20straight%20tips%20in%20micropulsed%20longitudinal%20phacoemulsification&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Stagg,%20Brian%20C.,%20MD&rft.date=2015-10-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=354&rft.epage=359&rft.pages=354-359&rft.issn=0008-4182&rft.eissn=1715-3360&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcjo.2015.06.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1721917842%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1721917842&rft_id=info:pmid/26455970&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0008418215002690&rfr_iscdi=true |