Probabilistic classification rules for setting conservation priorities
Decision rule sets are used widely to classify the conservation status of species. These classifications are intended to approximate the relative degree of threat faced by different species. They are important because they play a role in setting conservation priorities. It is suggested that such rul...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Biological conservation 1999-07, Vol.89 (2), p.227-231 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 231 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 227 |
| container_title | Biological conservation |
| container_volume | 89 |
| creator | Burgman, Mark A. Keith, David A. Rohlf, F.James Todd, Charles R. |
| description | Decision rule sets are used widely to classify the conservation status of species. These classifications are intended to approximate the relative degree of threat faced by different species. They are important because they play a role in setting conservation priorities. It is suggested that such rule sets should take into account estimates of the statistical distribution and confidence intervals reported for each of the parameters. Examples are provided for three threatened Australian plant species. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00001-4 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17216401</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0006320799000014</els_id><sourcerecordid>14516027</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-760754d492a23b8135af1ba2b26f057ac97e803b41cd7e6203026793f43f92803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEQgIMoWKs_QdiDiB5W89pkcxIpVoWCgnoO2Wwike2mZrYF_73pAz32NAzzzetD6JzgG4KJuH3DGIuSUSyvlLrOCSYlP0AjUktWUkXkIRr9IcfoBOArp5KJaoSmryk2pgldgCHYwnYGIPhgzRBiX6Rl56DwMRXghiH0n4WNPbi02pYXKcQUhuDgFB1504E728Ux-pg-vE-eytnL4_PkflZapuqhlALLirdcUUNZUxNWGU8aQxsqPK6ksUq6GrOGE9tKJyhmmAqpmOfMK5orY3S5nbtI8XvpYNDzANZ1neldXIImkhLBMdkP8ooITGUGqy1oUwRIzuv81dykH02wXuvVG7167U4rpTd6Nc99F7sFBqzpfDK9DfDfXLMqH5Kxuy3mspVVcEmDDa63rg3J2UG3MexZ9Auav43k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14516027</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Probabilistic classification rules for setting conservation priorities</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Burgman, Mark A. ; Keith, David A. ; Rohlf, F.James ; Todd, Charles R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Burgman, Mark A. ; Keith, David A. ; Rohlf, F.James ; Todd, Charles R.</creatorcontrib><description>Decision rule sets are used widely to classify the conservation status of species. These classifications are intended to approximate the relative degree of threat faced by different species. They are important because they play a role in setting conservation priorities. It is suggested that such rule sets should take into account estimates of the statistical distribution and confidence intervals reported for each of the parameters. Examples are provided for three threatened Australian plant species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3207</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2917</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00001-4</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BICOBK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conservation status ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Decision rules ; Extinction risk ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking ; Priorities</subject><ispartof>Biological conservation, 1999-07, Vol.89 (2), p.227-231</ispartof><rights>1999</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-760754d492a23b8135af1ba2b26f057ac97e803b41cd7e6203026793f43f92803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-760754d492a23b8135af1ba2b26f057ac97e803b41cd7e6203026793f43f92803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00001-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1835640$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burgman, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keith, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohlf, F.James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todd, Charles R.</creatorcontrib><title>Probabilistic classification rules for setting conservation priorities</title><title>Biological conservation</title><description>Decision rule sets are used widely to classify the conservation status of species. These classifications are intended to approximate the relative degree of threat faced by different species. They are important because they play a role in setting conservation priorities. It is suggested that such rule sets should take into account estimates of the statistical distribution and confidence intervals reported for each of the parameters. Examples are provided for three threatened Australian plant species.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conservation status</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Decision rules</subject><subject>Extinction risk</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</subject><subject>Priorities</subject><issn>0006-3207</issn><issn>1873-2917</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEQgIMoWKs_QdiDiB5W89pkcxIpVoWCgnoO2Wwike2mZrYF_73pAz32NAzzzetD6JzgG4KJuH3DGIuSUSyvlLrOCSYlP0AjUktWUkXkIRr9IcfoBOArp5KJaoSmryk2pgldgCHYwnYGIPhgzRBiX6Rl56DwMRXghiH0n4WNPbi02pYXKcQUhuDgFB1504E728Ux-pg-vE-eytnL4_PkflZapuqhlALLirdcUUNZUxNWGU8aQxsqPK6ksUq6GrOGE9tKJyhmmAqpmOfMK5orY3S5nbtI8XvpYNDzANZ1neldXIImkhLBMdkP8ooITGUGqy1oUwRIzuv81dykH02wXuvVG7167U4rpTd6Nc99F7sFBqzpfDK9DfDfXLMqH5Kxuy3mspVVcEmDDa63rg3J2UG3MexZ9Auav43k</recordid><startdate>19990701</startdate><enddate>19990701</enddate><creator>Burgman, Mark A.</creator><creator>Keith, David A.</creator><creator>Rohlf, F.James</creator><creator>Todd, Charles R.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990701</creationdate><title>Probabilistic classification rules for setting conservation priorities</title><author>Burgman, Mark A. ; Keith, David A. ; Rohlf, F.James ; Todd, Charles R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-760754d492a23b8135af1ba2b26f057ac97e803b41cd7e6203026793f43f92803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conservation status</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Decision rules</topic><topic>Extinction risk</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</topic><topic>Priorities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burgman, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keith, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohlf, F.James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Todd, Charles R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biological conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burgman, Mark A.</au><au>Keith, David A.</au><au>Rohlf, F.James</au><au>Todd, Charles R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Probabilistic classification rules for setting conservation priorities</atitle><jtitle>Biological conservation</jtitle><date>1999-07-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>227</spage><epage>231</epage><pages>227-231</pages><issn>0006-3207</issn><eissn>1873-2917</eissn><coden>BICOBK</coden><abstract>Decision rule sets are used widely to classify the conservation status of species. These classifications are intended to approximate the relative degree of threat faced by different species. They are important because they play a role in setting conservation priorities. It is suggested that such rule sets should take into account estimates of the statistical distribution and confidence intervals reported for each of the parameters. Examples are provided for three threatened Australian plant species.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00001-4</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0006-3207 |
| ispartof | Biological conservation, 1999-07, Vol.89 (2), p.227-231 |
| issn | 0006-3207 1873-2917 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17216401 |
| source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
| subjects | Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology Biological and medical sciences Conservation status Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife Decision rules Extinction risk Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking Priorities |
| title | Probabilistic classification rules for setting conservation priorities |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T19%3A40%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Probabilistic%20classification%20rules%20for%20setting%20conservation%20priorities&rft.jtitle=Biological%20conservation&rft.au=Burgman,%20Mark%20A.&rft.date=1999-07-01&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=227&rft.epage=231&rft.pages=227-231&rft.issn=0006-3207&rft.eissn=1873-2917&rft.coden=BICOBK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00001-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14516027%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14516027&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0006320799000014&rfr_iscdi=true |