Optimizations and Nuances in Neurosurgical Technique for the Minimization of Complications in Subdural Electrode Placement for Epilepsy Surgery
Background Surgical intervention is an important therapeutic option for patients with intractable epilepsy and a well-characterized epileptogenic focus. Invasive monitoring with subdural electrodes is an effective technique for localizing epileptogenic foci. Previous studies reported varying complic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World neurosurgery 2015-10, Vol.84 (4), p.989-997 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 997 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 989 |
container_title | World neurosurgery |
container_volume | 84 |
creator | Falowski, Steven M DiLorenzo, Daniel J Shannon, Larry R Wallace, David J Devries, James Kellogg, Robert G Cozzi, Nicholas P Fogg, Lou F Byrne, Richard W |
description | Background Surgical intervention is an important therapeutic option for patients with intractable epilepsy and a well-characterized epileptogenic focus. Invasive monitoring with subdural electrodes is an effective technique for localizing epileptogenic foci. Previous studies reported varying complication rates, and these may deter more widespread adoption. We present potentially valuable technical nuances that may be associated with low complication rates. We assess the potential contribution of specific aspects of surgical technique to the reduction of complication rates. Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients from the Rush University Surgical Epilepsy database who underwent craniotomies for invasive electroencephalography monitoring for medically intractable epilepsy using our technique. We analyzed and compared complication rates and techniques with those reported elsewhere. Results The sample group comprised 127 consecutive patients who underwent electrode implantation. The average monitoring period was 6 days. There were 5 complications (3.9%), including 1 subdural hematoma requiring surgery (0.8%), 1 infection (0.8%), 2 pulmonary emboli (1.6%), and 1 deep vein thrombosis (0.8%). There were no symptomatic cerebrospinal fluid leaks or permanent neurologic complications. These results compare favorably with published results. Analysis and comparison of our technique anecdotally suggest the importance of use of a subgaleal drain throughout the monitoring period, postoperative antibiotic coverage for 1 week, meticulous hemostasis, and secure suturing of the electrodes to the dura mater to minimize trauma to superficial vessels as potential contributors to improved complication rates. Conclusions A very low incidence of major morbidity can be achieved in invasive electroencephalography monitoring with this protocol. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.01.018 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1721360329</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1878875015000406</els_id><sourcerecordid>1721360329</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-5e80fcb7d071d3a9dee841909a18b0ee50582adfa46f2d44dab14c78fbc6ecd53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAUtBCIVqV_gAPykcsufkmcOBJCQqvlQyotUsvZcuyX1ktiBzsGbf9E_zIOW_bAAetJfoeZkd7MEPIS2BoY1G92618O07pgwNcM8ogn5BREI1aiqdunx52zE3Ie447lV0IlmvI5OSl4LYC3_JQ8XE2zHe29mq13kSpn6GVSTmOk1tFLTMHHFG6tVgO9QX3n7I-EtPeBzndIv1h3JFPf040fpyFjD2JZ4Dp1JoXM3Q6o5-AN0q-D0jiim_-obCc74BT3GRluMexfkGe9GiKeP_5n5NuH7c3m0-ri6uPnzfuLla4A5hVHwXrdNYY1YErVGkRRQctaBaJjiJxxUSjTq6ruC1NVRnVQ6Ub0na5RG16ekdcH3Sn4fFGc5WijxmFQDn2KEpoCypqVRZuhxQGqsxcxYC-nYEcV9hKYXLKQO7lkIZcsJIM8IpNePeqnbkRzpPx1PgPeHgCYr_xpMcioLWbjjQ3ZKmm8_b_-u3_oeshh5Ji-4x7jzqfgsn8SZCwkk9dLG5YyAM89qFhd_gaM_rOn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1721360329</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimizations and Nuances in Neurosurgical Technique for the Minimization of Complications in Subdural Electrode Placement for Epilepsy Surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Falowski, Steven M ; DiLorenzo, Daniel J ; Shannon, Larry R ; Wallace, David J ; Devries, James ; Kellogg, Robert G ; Cozzi, Nicholas P ; Fogg, Lou F ; Byrne, Richard W</creator><creatorcontrib>Falowski, Steven M ; DiLorenzo, Daniel J ; Shannon, Larry R ; Wallace, David J ; Devries, James ; Kellogg, Robert G ; Cozzi, Nicholas P ; Fogg, Lou F ; Byrne, Richard W</creatorcontrib><description>Background Surgical intervention is an important therapeutic option for patients with intractable epilepsy and a well-characterized epileptogenic focus. Invasive monitoring with subdural electrodes is an effective technique for localizing epileptogenic foci. Previous studies reported varying complication rates, and these may deter more widespread adoption. We present potentially valuable technical nuances that may be associated with low complication rates. We assess the potential contribution of specific aspects of surgical technique to the reduction of complication rates. Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients from the Rush University Surgical Epilepsy database who underwent craniotomies for invasive electroencephalography monitoring for medically intractable epilepsy using our technique. We analyzed and compared complication rates and techniques with those reported elsewhere. Results The sample group comprised 127 consecutive patients who underwent electrode implantation. The average monitoring period was 6 days. There were 5 complications (3.9%), including 1 subdural hematoma requiring surgery (0.8%), 1 infection (0.8%), 2 pulmonary emboli (1.6%), and 1 deep vein thrombosis (0.8%). There were no symptomatic cerebrospinal fluid leaks or permanent neurologic complications. These results compare favorably with published results. Analysis and comparison of our technique anecdotally suggest the importance of use of a subgaleal drain throughout the monitoring period, postoperative antibiotic coverage for 1 week, meticulous hemostasis, and secure suturing of the electrodes to the dura mater to minimize trauma to superficial vessels as potential contributors to improved complication rates. Conclusions A very low incidence of major morbidity can be achieved in invasive electroencephalography monitoring with this protocol.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1878-8750</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-8769</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.01.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25681595</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Complications ; Craniotomy ; Depth electrode ; Drainage ; Electrodes ; Electrodes, Implanted - adverse effects ; Electroencephalography ; Epilepsy ; Epilepsy - surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Implanted electrodes ; Intracranial EEG ; Intracranial Pressure ; Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring ; Invasive EEG ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neurosurgery ; Neurosurgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Neurosurgical Procedures - methods ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - prevention & control ; Postoperative Hemorrhage - epidemiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Subdural electrodes ; Subdural Space - surgery ; Surgical closure technique ; Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>World neurosurgery, 2015-10, Vol.84 (4), p.989-997</ispartof><rights>2015</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-5e80fcb7d071d3a9dee841909a18b0ee50582adfa46f2d44dab14c78fbc6ecd53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-5e80fcb7d071d3a9dee841909a18b0ee50582adfa46f2d44dab14c78fbc6ecd53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.01.018$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25681595$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Falowski, Steven M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DiLorenzo, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shannon, Larry R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devries, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kellogg, Robert G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cozzi, Nicholas P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fogg, Lou F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byrne, Richard W</creatorcontrib><title>Optimizations and Nuances in Neurosurgical Technique for the Minimization of Complications in Subdural Electrode Placement for Epilepsy Surgery</title><title>World neurosurgery</title><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><description>Background Surgical intervention is an important therapeutic option for patients with intractable epilepsy and a well-characterized epileptogenic focus. Invasive monitoring with subdural electrodes is an effective technique for localizing epileptogenic foci. Previous studies reported varying complication rates, and these may deter more widespread adoption. We present potentially valuable technical nuances that may be associated with low complication rates. We assess the potential contribution of specific aspects of surgical technique to the reduction of complication rates. Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients from the Rush University Surgical Epilepsy database who underwent craniotomies for invasive electroencephalography monitoring for medically intractable epilepsy using our technique. We analyzed and compared complication rates and techniques with those reported elsewhere. Results The sample group comprised 127 consecutive patients who underwent electrode implantation. The average monitoring period was 6 days. There were 5 complications (3.9%), including 1 subdural hematoma requiring surgery (0.8%), 1 infection (0.8%), 2 pulmonary emboli (1.6%), and 1 deep vein thrombosis (0.8%). There were no symptomatic cerebrospinal fluid leaks or permanent neurologic complications. These results compare favorably with published results. Analysis and comparison of our technique anecdotally suggest the importance of use of a subgaleal drain throughout the monitoring period, postoperative antibiotic coverage for 1 week, meticulous hemostasis, and secure suturing of the electrodes to the dura mater to minimize trauma to superficial vessels as potential contributors to improved complication rates. Conclusions A very low incidence of major morbidity can be achieved in invasive electroencephalography monitoring with this protocol.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Craniotomy</subject><subject>Depth electrode</subject><subject>Drainage</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Electrodes, Implanted - adverse effects</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Epilepsy</subject><subject>Epilepsy - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implanted electrodes</subject><subject>Intracranial EEG</subject><subject>Intracranial Pressure</subject><subject>Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring</subject><subject>Invasive EEG</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Neurosurgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Neurosurgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</subject><subject>Postoperative Hemorrhage - epidemiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Subdural electrodes</subject><subject>Subdural Space - surgery</subject><subject>Surgical closure technique</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1878-8750</issn><issn>1878-8769</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk1v1DAUtBCIVqV_gAPykcsufkmcOBJCQqvlQyotUsvZcuyX1ktiBzsGbf9E_zIOW_bAAetJfoeZkd7MEPIS2BoY1G92618O07pgwNcM8ogn5BREI1aiqdunx52zE3Ie447lV0IlmvI5OSl4LYC3_JQ8XE2zHe29mq13kSpn6GVSTmOk1tFLTMHHFG6tVgO9QX3n7I-EtPeBzndIv1h3JFPf040fpyFjD2JZ4Dp1JoXM3Q6o5-AN0q-D0jiim_-obCc74BT3GRluMexfkGe9GiKeP_5n5NuH7c3m0-ri6uPnzfuLla4A5hVHwXrdNYY1YErVGkRRQctaBaJjiJxxUSjTq6ruC1NVRnVQ6Ub0na5RG16ekdcH3Sn4fFGc5WijxmFQDn2KEpoCypqVRZuhxQGqsxcxYC-nYEcV9hKYXLKQO7lkIZcsJIM8IpNePeqnbkRzpPx1PgPeHgCYr_xpMcioLWbjjQ3ZKmm8_b_-u3_oeshh5Ji-4x7jzqfgsn8SZCwkk9dLG5YyAM89qFhd_gaM_rOn</recordid><startdate>20151001</startdate><enddate>20151001</enddate><creator>Falowski, Steven M</creator><creator>DiLorenzo, Daniel J</creator><creator>Shannon, Larry R</creator><creator>Wallace, David J</creator><creator>Devries, James</creator><creator>Kellogg, Robert G</creator><creator>Cozzi, Nicholas P</creator><creator>Fogg, Lou F</creator><creator>Byrne, Richard W</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151001</creationdate><title>Optimizations and Nuances in Neurosurgical Technique for the Minimization of Complications in Subdural Electrode Placement for Epilepsy Surgery</title><author>Falowski, Steven M ; DiLorenzo, Daniel J ; Shannon, Larry R ; Wallace, David J ; Devries, James ; Kellogg, Robert G ; Cozzi, Nicholas P ; Fogg, Lou F ; Byrne, Richard W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-5e80fcb7d071d3a9dee841909a18b0ee50582adfa46f2d44dab14c78fbc6ecd53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Craniotomy</topic><topic>Depth electrode</topic><topic>Drainage</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Electrodes, Implanted - adverse effects</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Epilepsy</topic><topic>Epilepsy - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implanted electrodes</topic><topic>Intracranial EEG</topic><topic>Intracranial Pressure</topic><topic>Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring</topic><topic>Invasive EEG</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Neurosurgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Neurosurgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</topic><topic>Postoperative Hemorrhage - epidemiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Subdural electrodes</topic><topic>Subdural Space - surgery</topic><topic>Surgical closure technique</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Falowski, Steven M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DiLorenzo, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shannon, Larry R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devries, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kellogg, Robert G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cozzi, Nicholas P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fogg, Lou F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byrne, Richard W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Falowski, Steven M</au><au>DiLorenzo, Daniel J</au><au>Shannon, Larry R</au><au>Wallace, David J</au><au>Devries, James</au><au>Kellogg, Robert G</au><au>Cozzi, Nicholas P</au><au>Fogg, Lou F</au><au>Byrne, Richard W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimizations and Nuances in Neurosurgical Technique for the Minimization of Complications in Subdural Electrode Placement for Epilepsy Surgery</atitle><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><date>2015-10-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>989</spage><epage>997</epage><pages>989-997</pages><issn>1878-8750</issn><eissn>1878-8769</eissn><abstract>Background Surgical intervention is an important therapeutic option for patients with intractable epilepsy and a well-characterized epileptogenic focus. Invasive monitoring with subdural electrodes is an effective technique for localizing epileptogenic foci. Previous studies reported varying complication rates, and these may deter more widespread adoption. We present potentially valuable technical nuances that may be associated with low complication rates. We assess the potential contribution of specific aspects of surgical technique to the reduction of complication rates. Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients from the Rush University Surgical Epilepsy database who underwent craniotomies for invasive electroencephalography monitoring for medically intractable epilepsy using our technique. We analyzed and compared complication rates and techniques with those reported elsewhere. Results The sample group comprised 127 consecutive patients who underwent electrode implantation. The average monitoring period was 6 days. There were 5 complications (3.9%), including 1 subdural hematoma requiring surgery (0.8%), 1 infection (0.8%), 2 pulmonary emboli (1.6%), and 1 deep vein thrombosis (0.8%). There were no symptomatic cerebrospinal fluid leaks or permanent neurologic complications. These results compare favorably with published results. Analysis and comparison of our technique anecdotally suggest the importance of use of a subgaleal drain throughout the monitoring period, postoperative antibiotic coverage for 1 week, meticulous hemostasis, and secure suturing of the electrodes to the dura mater to minimize trauma to superficial vessels as potential contributors to improved complication rates. Conclusions A very low incidence of major morbidity can be achieved in invasive electroencephalography monitoring with this protocol.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>25681595</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.wneu.2015.01.018</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1878-8750 |
ispartof | World neurosurgery, 2015-10, Vol.84 (4), p.989-997 |
issn | 1878-8750 1878-8769 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1721360329 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Child Child, Preschool Complications Craniotomy Depth electrode Drainage Electrodes Electrodes, Implanted - adverse effects Electroencephalography Epilepsy Epilepsy - surgery Female Humans Implanted electrodes Intracranial EEG Intracranial Pressure Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Invasive EEG Male Middle Aged Neurosurgery Neurosurgical Procedures - adverse effects Neurosurgical Procedures - methods Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Postoperative Complications - prevention & control Postoperative Hemorrhage - epidemiology Retrospective Studies Subdural electrodes Subdural Space - surgery Surgical closure technique Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology Young Adult |
title | Optimizations and Nuances in Neurosurgical Technique for the Minimization of Complications in Subdural Electrode Placement for Epilepsy Surgery |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T22%3A15%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimizations%20and%20Nuances%20in%20Neurosurgical%20Technique%20for%20the%20Minimization%20of%20Complications%20in%20Subdural%20Electrode%20Placement%20for%20Epilepsy%20Surgery&rft.jtitle=World%20neurosurgery&rft.au=Falowski,%20Steven%20M&rft.date=2015-10-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=989&rft.epage=997&rft.pages=989-997&rft.issn=1878-8750&rft.eissn=1878-8769&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.01.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1721360329%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1721360329&rft_id=info:pmid/25681595&rft_els_id=S1878875015000406&rfr_iscdi=true |