Revisiting Essure — Toward Safe and Effective Sterilization

Essure, a female-sterilization device, is being reevaluated by an FDA panel 13 years after its original approval. Would concerns about its safety and effectiveness have been addressed earlier with better research and result dissemination? Permanent sterilization is the second-most-common contracepti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New England journal of medicine 2015-10, Vol.373 (15), p.e17-e17
Hauptverfasser: Dhruva, Sanket S, Ross, Joseph S, Gariepy, Aileen M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e17
container_issue 15
container_start_page e17
container_title The New England journal of medicine
container_volume 373
creator Dhruva, Sanket S
Ross, Joseph S
Gariepy, Aileen M
description Essure, a female-sterilization device, is being reevaluated by an FDA panel 13 years after its original approval. Would concerns about its safety and effectiveness have been addressed earlier with better research and result dissemination? Permanent sterilization is the second-most-common contraceptive approach used by women in the United States, undergone by about 345,000 women per year. For many decades, laparoscopic surgery was the standard of care. In 2002, a novel hysteroscopic sterilization device was made available after expedited review and premarketing approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA): the Essure System (Bayer). With Essure, a coil designed to induce fibrosis and tubal occlusion is placed into each fallopian tube to prevent fertilization. Three months after placement of the coil, women undergo hysterosalpingography to confirm device placement and occlusion before discontinuing use of other contraceptive . . .
doi_str_mv 10.1056/NEJMp1510514
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1721351781</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3831416491</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-26859b5a3334ff97d9f15c43be30e883b271ebc2f914370c058816a81579b3223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0M9Kw0AQBvBFFK3Vm2cJ6MGD0Z2dbJI9eJAS_1EVbD2HTbIrW5qk7iYVPfkQPqFPYkqriDiXmcOPj-EjZA_oCVAent4lN7cz4N0NwRrpAUf0g4CG66RHKYv9IBK4Rbadm9BuIBCbZIuFKCLBoUfOHtTcONOY6slLnGut8j7fP7xx_SJt4Y2kVp6sCi_RWuWNmStv1ChrpuZNNqaudsiGllOndle7Tx4vkvHgyh_eX14Pzod-jgIan4UxFxmXiBhoLaJCaOB5gJlCquIYMxaBynKmBQQY0ZzyOIZQxsAjkSFj2CdHy9yZrZ9b5Zq0NC5X06msVN26FCIGyCGKoaMHf-ikbm3VfbdQlDPEcBF4vFS5rZ2zSqcza0ppX1Og6aLW9HetHd9fhbZZqYof_N1jBw6XoCxdWqlJ-X_OF9-wexU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1720523362</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revisiting Essure — Toward Safe and Effective Sterilization</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>New England Journal of Medicine</source><creator>Dhruva, Sanket S ; Ross, Joseph S ; Gariepy, Aileen M</creator><creatorcontrib>Dhruva, Sanket S ; Ross, Joseph S ; Gariepy, Aileen M</creatorcontrib><description>Essure, a female-sterilization device, is being reevaluated by an FDA panel 13 years after its original approval. Would concerns about its safety and effectiveness have been addressed earlier with better research and result dissemination? Permanent sterilization is the second-most-common contraceptive approach used by women in the United States, undergone by about 345,000 women per year. For many decades, laparoscopic surgery was the standard of care. In 2002, a novel hysteroscopic sterilization device was made available after expedited review and premarketing approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA): the Essure System (Bayer). With Essure, a coil designed to induce fibrosis and tubal occlusion is placed into each fallopian tube to prevent fertilization. Three months after placement of the coil, women undergo hysterosalpingography to confirm device placement and occlusion before discontinuing use of other contraceptive . . .</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-4793</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1510514</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26397951</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Massachusetts Medical Society</publisher><subject>Birth control ; Device Approval ; FDA approval ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Intention to Treat Analysis ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy, Unplanned ; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing ; Reproductive sterilization ; Sterilization ; Sterilization, Tubal - adverse effects ; Sterilization, Tubal - instrumentation ; United States ; United States Food and Drug Administration</subject><ispartof>The New England journal of medicine, 2015-10, Vol.373 (15), p.e17-e17</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-26859b5a3334ff97d9f15c43be30e883b271ebc2f914370c058816a81579b3223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-26859b5a3334ff97d9f15c43be30e883b271ebc2f914370c058816a81579b3223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMp1510514$$EPDF$$P50$$Gmms$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1720523362?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2759,2760,26103,27924,27925,52382,54064,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26397951$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dhruva, Sanket S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Joseph S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gariepy, Aileen M</creatorcontrib><title>Revisiting Essure — Toward Safe and Effective Sterilization</title><title>The New England journal of medicine</title><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><description>Essure, a female-sterilization device, is being reevaluated by an FDA panel 13 years after its original approval. Would concerns about its safety and effectiveness have been addressed earlier with better research and result dissemination? Permanent sterilization is the second-most-common contraceptive approach used by women in the United States, undergone by about 345,000 women per year. For many decades, laparoscopic surgery was the standard of care. In 2002, a novel hysteroscopic sterilization device was made available after expedited review and premarketing approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA): the Essure System (Bayer). With Essure, a coil designed to induce fibrosis and tubal occlusion is placed into each fallopian tube to prevent fertilization. Three months after placement of the coil, women undergo hysterosalpingography to confirm device placement and occlusion before discontinuing use of other contraceptive . . .</description><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Device Approval</subject><subject>FDA approval</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intention to Treat Analysis</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy, Unplanned</subject><subject>Product Surveillance, Postmarketing</subject><subject>Reproductive sterilization</subject><subject>Sterilization</subject><subject>Sterilization, Tubal - adverse effects</subject><subject>Sterilization, Tubal - instrumentation</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States Food and Drug Administration</subject><issn>0028-4793</issn><issn>1533-4406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0M9Kw0AQBvBFFK3Vm2cJ6MGD0Z2dbJI9eJAS_1EVbD2HTbIrW5qk7iYVPfkQPqFPYkqriDiXmcOPj-EjZA_oCVAent4lN7cz4N0NwRrpAUf0g4CG66RHKYv9IBK4Rbadm9BuIBCbZIuFKCLBoUfOHtTcONOY6slLnGut8j7fP7xx_SJt4Y2kVp6sCi_RWuWNmStv1ChrpuZNNqaudsiGllOndle7Tx4vkvHgyh_eX14Pzod-jgIan4UxFxmXiBhoLaJCaOB5gJlCquIYMxaBynKmBQQY0ZzyOIZQxsAjkSFj2CdHy9yZrZ9b5Zq0NC5X06msVN26FCIGyCGKoaMHf-ikbm3VfbdQlDPEcBF4vFS5rZ2zSqcza0ppX1Og6aLW9HetHd9fhbZZqYof_N1jBw6XoCxdWqlJ-X_OF9-wexU</recordid><startdate>20151008</startdate><enddate>20151008</enddate><creator>Dhruva, Sanket S</creator><creator>Ross, Joseph S</creator><creator>Gariepy, Aileen M</creator><general>Massachusetts Medical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K0Y</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151008</creationdate><title>Revisiting Essure — Toward Safe and Effective Sterilization</title><author>Dhruva, Sanket S ; Ross, Joseph S ; Gariepy, Aileen M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-26859b5a3334ff97d9f15c43be30e883b271ebc2f914370c058816a81579b3223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Device Approval</topic><topic>FDA approval</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intention to Treat Analysis</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy, Unplanned</topic><topic>Product Surveillance, Postmarketing</topic><topic>Reproductive sterilization</topic><topic>Sterilization</topic><topic>Sterilization, Tubal - adverse effects</topic><topic>Sterilization, Tubal - instrumentation</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States Food and Drug Administration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dhruva, Sanket S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Joseph S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gariepy, Aileen M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>New England Journal of Medicine</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dhruva, Sanket S</au><au>Ross, Joseph S</au><au>Gariepy, Aileen M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revisiting Essure — Toward Safe and Effective Sterilization</atitle><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><date>2015-10-08</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>373</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>e17</spage><epage>e17</epage><pages>e17-e17</pages><issn>0028-4793</issn><eissn>1533-4406</eissn><abstract>Essure, a female-sterilization device, is being reevaluated by an FDA panel 13 years after its original approval. Would concerns about its safety and effectiveness have been addressed earlier with better research and result dissemination? Permanent sterilization is the second-most-common contraceptive approach used by women in the United States, undergone by about 345,000 women per year. For many decades, laparoscopic surgery was the standard of care. In 2002, a novel hysteroscopic sterilization device was made available after expedited review and premarketing approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA): the Essure System (Bayer). With Essure, a coil designed to induce fibrosis and tubal occlusion is placed into each fallopian tube to prevent fertilization. Three months after placement of the coil, women undergo hysterosalpingography to confirm device placement and occlusion before discontinuing use of other contraceptive . . .</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Massachusetts Medical Society</pub><pmid>26397951</pmid><doi>10.1056/NEJMp1510514</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-4793
ispartof The New England journal of medicine, 2015-10, Vol.373 (15), p.e17-e17
issn 0028-4793
1533-4406
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1721351781
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; New England Journal of Medicine
subjects Birth control
Device Approval
FDA approval
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Intention to Treat Analysis
Pregnancy
Pregnancy, Unplanned
Product Surveillance, Postmarketing
Reproductive sterilization
Sterilization
Sterilization, Tubal - adverse effects
Sterilization, Tubal - instrumentation
United States
United States Food and Drug Administration
title Revisiting Essure — Toward Safe and Effective Sterilization
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T09%3A27%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revisiting%20Essure%20%E2%80%94%20Toward%20Safe%20and%20Effective%20Sterilization&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20England%20journal%20of%20medicine&rft.au=Dhruva,%20Sanket%20S&rft.date=2015-10-08&rft.volume=373&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=e17&rft.epage=e17&rft.pages=e17-e17&rft.issn=0028-4793&rft.eissn=1533-4406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1056/NEJMp1510514&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3831416491%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1720523362&rft_id=info:pmid/26397951&rfr_iscdi=true