Modeling Colony-Site Dynamics: A Case Study of Gull-Billed Terns (Sterna nilotica) in Coastal Virginia

We developed a Markov process model for colony-site dynamics of Gull-billed Terns (Sterna nilotica). From 1993 through 1996, we monitored breeding numbers of Gull-billed Terns and their frequent colony associates, Common Terns (Sterna hirundo) and Black Skimmers (Rynchops niger), at colony sites alo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Auk 1998-10, Vol.115 (4), p.970-978
Hauptverfasser: Erwin, R. Michael, Nichols, James D., T. Brain Eyler, Stotts, Daniel B., Barry R. Truitt
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 978
container_issue 4
container_start_page 970
container_title The Auk
container_volume 115
creator Erwin, R. Michael
Nichols, James D.
T. Brain Eyler
Stotts, Daniel B.
Barry R. Truitt
description We developed a Markov process model for colony-site dynamics of Gull-billed Terns (Sterna nilotica). From 1993 through 1996, we monitored breeding numbers of Gull-billed Terns and their frequent colony associates, Common Terns (Sterna hirundo) and Black Skimmers (Rynchops niger), at colony sites along 80 km of the barrier island region of coastal Virginia. We also monitored flooding events and renesting. We developed the model for colony survival, extinction, and recolonization at potential colony sites over the four-year period. We then used data on annual site occupation by Gull-billed Terns to estimate model parameters and tested for differences between nesting substrates (barrier island vs. shellpile). Results revealed a dynamic system but provided no evidence that the dynamics were Markovian, i.e. the probability that a site was occupied in one year was not influenced by whether it had been occupied in the previous year. Nor did colony-level reproductive success the previous season seem to affect the probability of site occupancy. Site survival and recolonization rates were similar, and the estimated overall annual probability of a site being occupied was 0.59. Of the 25 sites that were used during the four-year period, 16 were used in one or two years only, and only three were used in all four years. Flooding and renesting were frequent in both habitat types in all years. The frequent flooding of nests on shellpiles argues for more effective management; augmentation with shell and sand to increase elevations as little as 20 cm could have reduced flooding at a number of sites. The low colonysite fidelity that we observed suggests that an effective management approach would be to provide a large number of sand and/or shellpile sites for use by nesting terns. Sites not used in one year may still be used in subsequent years.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/4089515
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17210568</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4089515</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4089515</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-9a3915850e9866126065e6e36b6aaddc0faba8b0c0dabf97005b67a01217d6d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EtLxDAUBeAgCo4P_AtBxMeietM2aeturE9QXMzgttym6ZAhk2jSLubfG3FgQHB1uPBx4FxCThhcpxkUNzmUFWd8h0xYlZVJnvJ8l0wAIE9KyMp9chDCMp48ugnp31ynjLYLWjvj7DqZ6UHR-7XFlZbhlk5pjUHR2TB2a-p6-jQak9xpY1RH58rbQC9nQ0ykVhs3aIlXVNtYhmFAQz-0X2ir8Yjs9WiCOt7kIZk_Pszr5-T1_emlnr4mMivSIakwqxgvOaiqFIKlAgRXQmWiFYhdJ6HHFssWJHTY9lURV7SiQGApKzrRZYfk_Lf207uvUYWhWekglTFolRtDw4qUARdlhKd_4NKNcYWJphI5r1LgEV38IuldCF71zafXK_TrhkHz8-tm8-sozzZ1GCSa3qOVOmx5kfOsgC1bhsH5f9u-ATN4ho8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>196459205</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modeling Colony-Site Dynamics: A Case Study of Gull-Billed Terns (Sterna nilotica) in Coastal Virginia</title><source>SORA - Searchable Ornithological Research Archive</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Erwin, R. Michael ; Nichols, James D. ; T. Brain Eyler ; Stotts, Daniel B. ; Barry R. Truitt</creator><creatorcontrib>Erwin, R. Michael ; Nichols, James D. ; T. Brain Eyler ; Stotts, Daniel B. ; Barry R. Truitt</creatorcontrib><description>We developed a Markov process model for colony-site dynamics of Gull-billed Terns (Sterna nilotica). From 1993 through 1996, we monitored breeding numbers of Gull-billed Terns and their frequent colony associates, Common Terns (Sterna hirundo) and Black Skimmers (Rynchops niger), at colony sites along 80 km of the barrier island region of coastal Virginia. We also monitored flooding events and renesting. We developed the model for colony survival, extinction, and recolonization at potential colony sites over the four-year period. We then used data on annual site occupation by Gull-billed Terns to estimate model parameters and tested for differences between nesting substrates (barrier island vs. shellpile). Results revealed a dynamic system but provided no evidence that the dynamics were Markovian, i.e. the probability that a site was occupied in one year was not influenced by whether it had been occupied in the previous year. Nor did colony-level reproductive success the previous season seem to affect the probability of site occupancy. Site survival and recolonization rates were similar, and the estimated overall annual probability of a site being occupied was 0.59. Of the 25 sites that were used during the four-year period, 16 were used in one or two years only, and only three were used in all four years. Flooding and renesting were frequent in both habitat types in all years. The frequent flooding of nests on shellpiles argues for more effective management; augmentation with shell and sand to increase elevations as little as 20 cm could have reduced flooding at a number of sites. The low colonysite fidelity that we observed suggests that an effective management approach would be to provide a large number of sand and/or shellpile sites for use by nesting terns. Sites not used in one year may still be used in subsequent years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-8038</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-4254</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2732-4613</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/4089515</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AUKJAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrence, KS: The American Ornithologists' Union</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal populations ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Aves ; Aviculture ; Barrier islands ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bird nesting ; Birds ; Breeding ; Coasts ; Colonies ; Demecology ; Dynamic modeling ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Habitat selection ; Marine ; Markov processes ; Nesting sites ; Parametric models ; Rynchops niger ; Sterna ; Sterna nilotica ; Vertebrata ; Wildlife habitats</subject><ispartof>The Auk, 1998-10, Vol.115 (4), p.970-978</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1998 The American Ornithologists' Union</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Ornithologists' Union Oct 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-9a3915850e9866126065e6e36b6aaddc0faba8b0c0dabf97005b67a01217d6d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-9a3915850e9866126065e6e36b6aaddc0faba8b0c0dabf97005b67a01217d6d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4089515$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4089515$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1745370$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Erwin, R. Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols, James D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>T. Brain Eyler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stotts, Daniel B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barry R. Truitt</creatorcontrib><title>Modeling Colony-Site Dynamics: A Case Study of Gull-Billed Terns (Sterna nilotica) in Coastal Virginia</title><title>The Auk</title><description>We developed a Markov process model for colony-site dynamics of Gull-billed Terns (Sterna nilotica). From 1993 through 1996, we monitored breeding numbers of Gull-billed Terns and their frequent colony associates, Common Terns (Sterna hirundo) and Black Skimmers (Rynchops niger), at colony sites along 80 km of the barrier island region of coastal Virginia. We also monitored flooding events and renesting. We developed the model for colony survival, extinction, and recolonization at potential colony sites over the four-year period. We then used data on annual site occupation by Gull-billed Terns to estimate model parameters and tested for differences between nesting substrates (barrier island vs. shellpile). Results revealed a dynamic system but provided no evidence that the dynamics were Markovian, i.e. the probability that a site was occupied in one year was not influenced by whether it had been occupied in the previous year. Nor did colony-level reproductive success the previous season seem to affect the probability of site occupancy. Site survival and recolonization rates were similar, and the estimated overall annual probability of a site being occupied was 0.59. Of the 25 sites that were used during the four-year period, 16 were used in one or two years only, and only three were used in all four years. Flooding and renesting were frequent in both habitat types in all years. The frequent flooding of nests on shellpiles argues for more effective management; augmentation with shell and sand to increase elevations as little as 20 cm could have reduced flooding at a number of sites. The low colonysite fidelity that we observed suggests that an effective management approach would be to provide a large number of sand and/or shellpile sites for use by nesting terns. Sites not used in one year may still be used in subsequent years.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Aviculture</subject><subject>Barrier islands</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Coasts</subject><subject>Colonies</subject><subject>Demecology</subject><subject>Dynamic modeling</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Habitat selection</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Markov processes</subject><subject>Nesting sites</subject><subject>Parametric models</subject><subject>Rynchops niger</subject><subject>Sterna</subject><subject>Sterna nilotica</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><subject>Wildlife habitats</subject><issn>0004-8038</issn><issn>1938-4254</issn><issn>2732-4613</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp10EtLxDAUBeAgCo4P_AtBxMeietM2aeturE9QXMzgttym6ZAhk2jSLubfG3FgQHB1uPBx4FxCThhcpxkUNzmUFWd8h0xYlZVJnvJ8l0wAIE9KyMp9chDCMp48ugnp31ynjLYLWjvj7DqZ6UHR-7XFlZbhlk5pjUHR2TB2a-p6-jQak9xpY1RH58rbQC9nQ0ykVhs3aIlXVNtYhmFAQz-0X2ir8Yjs9WiCOt7kIZk_Pszr5-T1_emlnr4mMivSIakwqxgvOaiqFIKlAgRXQmWiFYhdJ6HHFssWJHTY9lURV7SiQGApKzrRZYfk_Lf207uvUYWhWekglTFolRtDw4qUARdlhKd_4NKNcYWJphI5r1LgEV38IuldCF71zafXK_TrhkHz8-tm8-sozzZ1GCSa3qOVOmx5kfOsgC1bhsH5f9u-ATN4ho8</recordid><startdate>19981001</startdate><enddate>19981001</enddate><creator>Erwin, R. Michael</creator><creator>Nichols, James D.</creator><creator>T. Brain Eyler</creator><creator>Stotts, Daniel B.</creator><creator>Barry R. Truitt</creator><general>The American Ornithologists' Union</general><general>Ornithological Societies North America</general><general>American Ornithological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19981001</creationdate><title>Modeling Colony-Site Dynamics: A Case Study of Gull-Billed Terns (Sterna nilotica) in Coastal Virginia</title><author>Erwin, R. Michael ; Nichols, James D. ; T. Brain Eyler ; Stotts, Daniel B. ; Barry R. Truitt</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-9a3915850e9866126065e6e36b6aaddc0faba8b0c0dabf97005b67a01217d6d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Aviculture</topic><topic>Barrier islands</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Coasts</topic><topic>Colonies</topic><topic>Demecology</topic><topic>Dynamic modeling</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Habitat selection</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Markov processes</topic><topic>Nesting sites</topic><topic>Parametric models</topic><topic>Rynchops niger</topic><topic>Sterna</topic><topic>Sterna nilotica</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><topic>Wildlife habitats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Erwin, R. Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols, James D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>T. Brain Eyler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stotts, Daniel B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barry R. Truitt</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Auk</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Erwin, R. Michael</au><au>Nichols, James D.</au><au>T. Brain Eyler</au><au>Stotts, Daniel B.</au><au>Barry R. Truitt</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modeling Colony-Site Dynamics: A Case Study of Gull-Billed Terns (Sterna nilotica) in Coastal Virginia</atitle><jtitle>The Auk</jtitle><date>1998-10-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>970</spage><epage>978</epage><pages>970-978</pages><issn>0004-8038</issn><eissn>1938-4254</eissn><eissn>2732-4613</eissn><coden>AUKJAF</coden><abstract>We developed a Markov process model for colony-site dynamics of Gull-billed Terns (Sterna nilotica). From 1993 through 1996, we monitored breeding numbers of Gull-billed Terns and their frequent colony associates, Common Terns (Sterna hirundo) and Black Skimmers (Rynchops niger), at colony sites along 80 km of the barrier island region of coastal Virginia. We also monitored flooding events and renesting. We developed the model for colony survival, extinction, and recolonization at potential colony sites over the four-year period. We then used data on annual site occupation by Gull-billed Terns to estimate model parameters and tested for differences between nesting substrates (barrier island vs. shellpile). Results revealed a dynamic system but provided no evidence that the dynamics were Markovian, i.e. the probability that a site was occupied in one year was not influenced by whether it had been occupied in the previous year. Nor did colony-level reproductive success the previous season seem to affect the probability of site occupancy. Site survival and recolonization rates were similar, and the estimated overall annual probability of a site being occupied was 0.59. Of the 25 sites that were used during the four-year period, 16 were used in one or two years only, and only three were used in all four years. Flooding and renesting were frequent in both habitat types in all years. The frequent flooding of nests on shellpiles argues for more effective management; augmentation with shell and sand to increase elevations as little as 20 cm could have reduced flooding at a number of sites. The low colonysite fidelity that we observed suggests that an effective management approach would be to provide a large number of sand and/or shellpile sites for use by nesting terns. Sites not used in one year may still be used in subsequent years.</abstract><cop>Lawrence, KS</cop><pub>The American Ornithologists' Union</pub><doi>10.2307/4089515</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-8038
ispartof The Auk, 1998-10, Vol.115 (4), p.970-978
issn 0004-8038
1938-4254
2732-4613
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17210568
source SORA - Searchable Ornithological Research Archive; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal populations
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Aves
Aviculture
Barrier islands
Biological and medical sciences
Bird nesting
Birds
Breeding
Coasts
Colonies
Demecology
Dynamic modeling
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Habitat selection
Marine
Markov processes
Nesting sites
Parametric models
Rynchops niger
Sterna
Sterna nilotica
Vertebrata
Wildlife habitats
title Modeling Colony-Site Dynamics: A Case Study of Gull-Billed Terns (Sterna nilotica) in Coastal Virginia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T15%3A33%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modeling%20Colony-Site%20Dynamics:%20A%20Case%20Study%20of%20Gull-Billed%20Terns%20(Sterna%20nilotica)%20in%20Coastal%20Virginia&rft.jtitle=The%20Auk&rft.au=Erwin,%20R.%20Michael&rft.date=1998-10-01&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=970&rft.epage=978&rft.pages=970-978&rft.issn=0004-8038&rft.eissn=1938-4254&rft.coden=AUKJAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/4089515&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4089515%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=196459205&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4089515&rfr_iscdi=true