Multiplicity in confirmatory clinical trials: a case study with discussion from a JSM panel

An invited panel session was conducted in the 2012 Joint Statistical Meetings, San Diego, California, USA, to stimulate the discussion on multiplicity issues in confirmatory clinical trials for drug development. A total of 11 expert panel members were invited and 9 participated. Prior to the session...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Statistics in medicine 2015-11, Vol.34 (26), p.3461-3480
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Sue-Jane, Bretz, Frank, Dmitrienko, Alex, Hsu, Jason, Hung, H. M. James, Koch, Gary, Maurer, Willi, Offen, Walt, O'Neill, Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3480
container_issue 26
container_start_page 3461
container_title Statistics in medicine
container_volume 34
creator Wang, Sue-Jane
Bretz, Frank
Dmitrienko, Alex
Hsu, Jason
Hung, H. M. James
Koch, Gary
Maurer, Willi
Offen, Walt
O'Neill, Robert
description An invited panel session was conducted in the 2012 Joint Statistical Meetings, San Diego, California, USA, to stimulate the discussion on multiplicity issues in confirmatory clinical trials for drug development. A total of 11 expert panel members were invited and 9 participated. Prior to the session, a case study was previously provided to the panel members to facilitate the discussion, focusing on the key components of the study design and multiplicity. The Phase 3 development program for this new experimental treatment was based on a single randomized controlled trial alone. Each panelist was asked to clarify if he or she responded as if he or she were a pharmaceutical drug sponsor, an academic panelist or a health regulatory scientist. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/sim.6561
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1720451931</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1720451931</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4571-252f5be94f6fbbc46a0ca8c994173c514123eb56ad04ebeed409121aca0943e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M1r2zAYBnBRVpqsG-wvKIJddnGqVx9WvNsIWz9IWmgzdthByLJM1cp2Ktl0_u-n0DSFQk_v5fc-PDwIfQEyA0LoaXTNLBc5HKApkEJmhIr5BzQlVMoslyAm6GOM94QACCqP0ITmAJTNYYr-rgbfu413xvUjdi02XVu70Oi-CyM23rXOaI_74LSP37HGRkeLYz9UI35y_R2uXDRDjK5rcR26JonL2xXe6Nb6T-iwTl_28-4eo9-_fq4X59ny-uxi8WOZGS4kZFTQWpS24HVel6XhuSZGz01RcJDMCOCpqi1FrivCbWltxUkBFLTRpODMAjtG355zN6F7HGzsVZNKWe9TiW6ICiQlXEDBtvTrG3rfDaFN7bYKJOFzzl8DTehiDLZWm-AaHUYFRG0HV2lwtR080ZNd4FA2ttrDl4UTyJ7Bk_N2fDdI3V6sdoE772Jv_-29Dg8ql0wK9efqTDFYSEbXN2rJ_gPewJfm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1721704844</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multiplicity in confirmatory clinical trials: a case study with discussion from a JSM panel</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Wang, Sue-Jane ; Bretz, Frank ; Dmitrienko, Alex ; Hsu, Jason ; Hung, H. M. James ; Koch, Gary ; Maurer, Willi ; Offen, Walt ; O'Neill, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Sue-Jane ; Bretz, Frank ; Dmitrienko, Alex ; Hsu, Jason ; Hung, H. M. James ; Koch, Gary ; Maurer, Willi ; Offen, Walt ; O'Neill, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>An invited panel session was conducted in the 2012 Joint Statistical Meetings, San Diego, California, USA, to stimulate the discussion on multiplicity issues in confirmatory clinical trials for drug development. A total of 11 expert panel members were invited and 9 participated. Prior to the session, a case study was previously provided to the panel members to facilitate the discussion, focusing on the key components of the study design and multiplicity. The Phase 3 development program for this new experimental treatment was based on a single randomized controlled trial alone. Each panelist was asked to clarify if he or she responded as if he or she were a pharmaceutical drug sponsor, an academic panelist or a health regulatory scientist. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-6715</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0258</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/sim.6561</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26112381</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SMEDDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>accelerated approval ; biomarker endpoint ; Clinical trials ; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Congresses as Topic ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; decision theoretic ; Drug Discovery - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Endpoint Determination - methods ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Medical treatment ; multiplicity in regions ; primary and key secondary endpoints ; R&amp;D ; Research &amp; development ; Research Design - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - drug therapy ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Statistics in medicine, 2015-11, Vol.34 (26), p.3461-3480</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Nov 20, 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4571-252f5be94f6fbbc46a0ca8c994173c514123eb56ad04ebeed409121aca0943e13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4571-252f5be94f6fbbc46a0ca8c994173c514123eb56ad04ebeed409121aca0943e13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fsim.6561$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fsim.6561$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27911,27912,45561,45562</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26112381$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Sue-Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bretz, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dmitrienko, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hung, H. M. James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koch, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maurer, Willi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Offen, Walt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Neill, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Multiplicity in confirmatory clinical trials: a case study with discussion from a JSM panel</title><title>Statistics in medicine</title><addtitle>Statist. Med</addtitle><description>An invited panel session was conducted in the 2012 Joint Statistical Meetings, San Diego, California, USA, to stimulate the discussion on multiplicity issues in confirmatory clinical trials for drug development. A total of 11 expert panel members were invited and 9 participated. Prior to the session, a case study was previously provided to the panel members to facilitate the discussion, focusing on the key components of the study design and multiplicity. The Phase 3 development program for this new experimental treatment was based on a single randomized controlled trial alone. Each panelist was asked to clarify if he or she responded as if he or she were a pharmaceutical drug sponsor, an academic panelist or a health regulatory scientist. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>accelerated approval</subject><subject>biomarker endpoint</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Congresses as Topic</subject><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical</subject><subject>decision theoretic</subject><subject>Drug Discovery - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Endpoint Determination - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>multiplicity in regions</subject><subject>primary and key secondary endpoints</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Research Design - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - drug therapy</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0277-6715</issn><issn>1097-0258</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10M1r2zAYBnBRVpqsG-wvKIJddnGqVx9WvNsIWz9IWmgzdthByLJM1cp2Ktl0_u-n0DSFQk_v5fc-PDwIfQEyA0LoaXTNLBc5HKApkEJmhIr5BzQlVMoslyAm6GOM94QACCqP0ITmAJTNYYr-rgbfu413xvUjdi02XVu70Oi-CyM23rXOaI_74LSP37HGRkeLYz9UI35y_R2uXDRDjK5rcR26JonL2xXe6Nb6T-iwTl_28-4eo9-_fq4X59ny-uxi8WOZGS4kZFTQWpS24HVel6XhuSZGz01RcJDMCOCpqi1FrivCbWltxUkBFLTRpODMAjtG355zN6F7HGzsVZNKWe9TiW6ICiQlXEDBtvTrG3rfDaFN7bYKJOFzzl8DTehiDLZWm-AaHUYFRG0HV2lwtR080ZNd4FA2ttrDl4UTyJ7Bk_N2fDdI3V6sdoE772Jv_-29Dg8ql0wK9efqTDFYSEbXN2rJ_gPewJfm</recordid><startdate>20151120</startdate><enddate>20151120</enddate><creator>Wang, Sue-Jane</creator><creator>Bretz, Frank</creator><creator>Dmitrienko, Alex</creator><creator>Hsu, Jason</creator><creator>Hung, H. M. James</creator><creator>Koch, Gary</creator><creator>Maurer, Willi</creator><creator>Offen, Walt</creator><creator>O'Neill, Robert</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151120</creationdate><title>Multiplicity in confirmatory clinical trials: a case study with discussion from a JSM panel</title><author>Wang, Sue-Jane ; Bretz, Frank ; Dmitrienko, Alex ; Hsu, Jason ; Hung, H. M. James ; Koch, Gary ; Maurer, Willi ; Offen, Walt ; O'Neill, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4571-252f5be94f6fbbc46a0ca8c994173c514123eb56ad04ebeed409121aca0943e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>accelerated approval</topic><topic>biomarker endpoint</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Congresses as Topic</topic><topic>Data Interpretation, Statistical</topic><topic>decision theoretic</topic><topic>Drug Discovery - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Endpoint Determination - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>multiplicity in regions</topic><topic>primary and key secondary endpoints</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Research Design - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - drug therapy</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Sue-Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bretz, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dmitrienko, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hung, H. M. James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koch, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maurer, Willi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Offen, Walt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Neill, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Statistics in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Sue-Jane</au><au>Bretz, Frank</au><au>Dmitrienko, Alex</au><au>Hsu, Jason</au><au>Hung, H. M. James</au><au>Koch, Gary</au><au>Maurer, Willi</au><au>Offen, Walt</au><au>O'Neill, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multiplicity in confirmatory clinical trials: a case study with discussion from a JSM panel</atitle><jtitle>Statistics in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Statist. Med</addtitle><date>2015-11-20</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>26</issue><spage>3461</spage><epage>3480</epage><pages>3461-3480</pages><issn>0277-6715</issn><eissn>1097-0258</eissn><coden>SMEDDA</coden><abstract>An invited panel session was conducted in the 2012 Joint Statistical Meetings, San Diego, California, USA, to stimulate the discussion on multiplicity issues in confirmatory clinical trials for drug development. A total of 11 expert panel members were invited and 9 participated. Prior to the session, a case study was previously provided to the panel members to facilitate the discussion, focusing on the key components of the study design and multiplicity. The Phase 3 development program for this new experimental treatment was based on a single randomized controlled trial alone. Each panelist was asked to clarify if he or she responded as if he or she were a pharmaceutical drug sponsor, an academic panelist or a health regulatory scientist. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26112381</pmid><doi>10.1002/sim.6561</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0277-6715
ispartof Statistics in medicine, 2015-11, Vol.34 (26), p.3461-3480
issn 0277-6715
1097-0258
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1720451931
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects accelerated approval
biomarker endpoint
Clinical trials
Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic - statistics & numerical data
Congresses as Topic
Data Interpretation, Statistical
decision theoretic
Drug Discovery - statistics & numerical data
Endpoint Determination - methods
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Medical treatment
multiplicity in regions
primary and key secondary endpoints
R&D
Research & development
Research Design - statistics & numerical data
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - drug therapy
Treatment Outcome
title Multiplicity in confirmatory clinical trials: a case study with discussion from a JSM panel
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T21%3A36%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multiplicity%20in%20confirmatory%20clinical%20trials:%20a%20case%20study%20with%20discussion%20from%20a%20JSM%20panel&rft.jtitle=Statistics%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Wang,%20Sue-Jane&rft.date=2015-11-20&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=26&rft.spage=3461&rft.epage=3480&rft.pages=3461-3480&rft.issn=0277-6715&rft.eissn=1097-0258&rft.coden=SMEDDA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/sim.6561&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1720451931%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1721704844&rft_id=info:pmid/26112381&rfr_iscdi=true