Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with a New Xenograft: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Background Insufficient residual alveolar bone height is a common deterrent in the placement of dental implants in the posterior maxilla. The use of autografts, xenografts, allografts and alloplasts or a combination between them has been demonstrated to be effective for increasing bone height and bo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical implant dentistry and related research 2015-10, Vol.17 (S2), p.e586-e593 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e593 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | S2 |
| container_start_page | e586 |
| container_title | Clinical implant dentistry and related research |
| container_volume | 17 |
| creator | Calasans-Maia, Mônica Diuana Mourão, Carlos Fernando de A. B. Alves, Adriana Terezinha Neves Novellino Sartoretto, Suelen Cristina de Uzeda, Marcelo José P. G. Granjeiro, José Mauro |
| description | Background
Insufficient residual alveolar bone height is a common deterrent in the placement of dental implants in the posterior maxilla. The use of autografts, xenografts, allografts and alloplasts or a combination between them has been demonstrated to be effective for increasing bone height and bone volume in the deficient posterior maxilla.
Purpose
The aim of this clinical trial is to comparatively determine the density of newly formed in sinus floor augmentation bone after a 24‐week healing period treatment with a new bovine xenograft.
Materials and Methods
The sinus floor was grafted with Bio‐Oss® (n = 10) and Osseous® (n = 10). Histological sections were examined with a focus on the presence of connective tissue (CT) and newly formed bone (NFB). The sections were histomorphometrically evaluated and the definitive crown was inserted after 3 months.
Results
After 6 months, the mean value of new bone formation was 24.60 (±2.503), the CT was 42.60 (±4.006) and the remaining biomaterial was 25.40 (±2.547) in Bio‐Oss group. In Osseous group, the mean value of new bone formation was 24.90 (±3.542), the CT was 45.70 (±7.040) and the remaining biomaterial was 22.90 (±3.247).
Conclusions
Both biomaterials afforded a favorable implant position and the prosthetic rehabilitation. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/cid.12289 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1719421472</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1719421472</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3639-603035bdd892993202b76e9e7554941786c6ec0bd2468ddd6d95e75b501ef9113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtPGzEUha2KqkDoon8AeUkXQ_wYv9hFoYRIhEo0VenK8owdcOuZCfaMAvz6Og2w427ule53jnQOAF8wOsV5xrW3p5gQqT6AAyyQLCRBci_fjNACSaX2wWFKfxAiGHP8CewTxihTEh2A3wvz6EMw8Qn-8O2Q4GS4a1zbm953Ldz4_h4aeO028Na13V00q_4MTuCNaW3X-Gdn4bRr-9iFsD2Db31tAlxGb8IR-LgyIbnPL3sEfl58W04vi6vvs_l0clXUlFNVcEQRZZW1UhGlKEGkEtwpJxgrVYmF5DV3NaosKbm01nKrWH5WDGG3UhjTETjZ-a5j9zC41OvGp9rlTK3rhqSxwKokuBQko193aB27lKJb6XX0Tc6uMdLbJnVuUv9vMrPHL7ZD1Tj7Rr5Wl4HxDtj44J7ed9LT-fmrZbFT-NS7xzeFiX81F1Qw_et6ppcCLWbq9lwv6D-2xorB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1719421472</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with a New Xenograft: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Calasans-Maia, Mônica Diuana ; Mourão, Carlos Fernando de A. B. ; Alves, Adriana Terezinha Neves Novellino ; Sartoretto, Suelen Cristina ; de Uzeda, Marcelo José P. G. ; Granjeiro, José Mauro</creator><creatorcontrib>Calasans-Maia, Mônica Diuana ; Mourão, Carlos Fernando de A. B. ; Alves, Adriana Terezinha Neves Novellino ; Sartoretto, Suelen Cristina ; de Uzeda, Marcelo José P. G. ; Granjeiro, José Mauro</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Insufficient residual alveolar bone height is a common deterrent in the placement of dental implants in the posterior maxilla. The use of autografts, xenografts, allografts and alloplasts or a combination between them has been demonstrated to be effective for increasing bone height and bone volume in the deficient posterior maxilla.
Purpose
The aim of this clinical trial is to comparatively determine the density of newly formed in sinus floor augmentation bone after a 24‐week healing period treatment with a new bovine xenograft.
Materials and Methods
The sinus floor was grafted with Bio‐Oss® (n = 10) and Osseous® (n = 10). Histological sections were examined with a focus on the presence of connective tissue (CT) and newly formed bone (NFB). The sections were histomorphometrically evaluated and the definitive crown was inserted after 3 months.
Results
After 6 months, the mean value of new bone formation was 24.60 (±2.503), the CT was 42.60 (±4.006) and the remaining biomaterial was 25.40 (±2.547) in Bio‐Oss group. In Osseous group, the mean value of new bone formation was 24.90 (±3.542), the CT was 45.70 (±7.040) and the remaining biomaterial was 22.90 (±3.247).
Conclusions
Both biomaterials afforded a favorable implant position and the prosthetic rehabilitation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1523-0899</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-8208</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cid.12289</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25535980</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Animals ; atrophic maxilla ; bone augmentation ; Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use ; Cattle ; Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods ; Dentistry ; Female ; Heterografts - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Minerals - therapeutic use ; Sinus Floor Augmentation - methods ; sinus floor elevation ; xenograft</subject><ispartof>Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2015-10, Vol.17 (S2), p.e586-e593</ispartof><rights>2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3639-603035bdd892993202b76e9e7554941786c6ec0bd2468ddd6d95e75b501ef9113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3639-603035bdd892993202b76e9e7554941786c6ec0bd2468ddd6d95e75b501ef9113</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcid.12289$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcid.12289$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25535980$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Calasans-Maia, Mônica Diuana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mourão, Carlos Fernando de A. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Adriana Terezinha Neves Novellino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sartoretto, Suelen Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Uzeda, Marcelo José P. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Granjeiro, José Mauro</creatorcontrib><title>Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with a New Xenograft: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial</title><title>Clinical implant dentistry and related research</title><addtitle>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</addtitle><description>Background
Insufficient residual alveolar bone height is a common deterrent in the placement of dental implants in the posterior maxilla. The use of autografts, xenografts, allografts and alloplasts or a combination between them has been demonstrated to be effective for increasing bone height and bone volume in the deficient posterior maxilla.
Purpose
The aim of this clinical trial is to comparatively determine the density of newly formed in sinus floor augmentation bone after a 24‐week healing period treatment with a new bovine xenograft.
Materials and Methods
The sinus floor was grafted with Bio‐Oss® (n = 10) and Osseous® (n = 10). Histological sections were examined with a focus on the presence of connective tissue (CT) and newly formed bone (NFB). The sections were histomorphometrically evaluated and the definitive crown was inserted after 3 months.
Results
After 6 months, the mean value of new bone formation was 24.60 (±2.503), the CT was 42.60 (±4.006) and the remaining biomaterial was 25.40 (±2.547) in Bio‐Oss group. In Osseous group, the mean value of new bone formation was 24.90 (±3.542), the CT was 45.70 (±7.040) and the remaining biomaterial was 22.90 (±3.247).
Conclusions
Both biomaterials afforded a favorable implant position and the prosthetic rehabilitation.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>atrophic maxilla</subject><subject>bone augmentation</subject><subject>Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heterografts - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minerals - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Sinus Floor Augmentation - methods</subject><subject>sinus floor elevation</subject><subject>xenograft</subject><issn>1523-0899</issn><issn>1708-8208</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtPGzEUha2KqkDoon8AeUkXQ_wYv9hFoYRIhEo0VenK8owdcOuZCfaMAvz6Og2w427ule53jnQOAF8wOsV5xrW3p5gQqT6AAyyQLCRBci_fjNACSaX2wWFKfxAiGHP8CewTxihTEh2A3wvz6EMw8Qn-8O2Q4GS4a1zbm953Ldz4_h4aeO028Na13V00q_4MTuCNaW3X-Gdn4bRr-9iFsD2Db31tAlxGb8IR-LgyIbnPL3sEfl58W04vi6vvs_l0clXUlFNVcEQRZZW1UhGlKEGkEtwpJxgrVYmF5DV3NaosKbm01nKrWH5WDGG3UhjTETjZ-a5j9zC41OvGp9rlTK3rhqSxwKokuBQko193aB27lKJb6XX0Tc6uMdLbJnVuUv9vMrPHL7ZD1Tj7Rr5Wl4HxDtj44J7ed9LT-fmrZbFT-NS7xzeFiX81F1Qw_et6ppcCLWbq9lwv6D-2xorB</recordid><startdate>201510</startdate><enddate>201510</enddate><creator>Calasans-Maia, Mônica Diuana</creator><creator>Mourão, Carlos Fernando de A. B.</creator><creator>Alves, Adriana Terezinha Neves Novellino</creator><creator>Sartoretto, Suelen Cristina</creator><creator>de Uzeda, Marcelo José P. G.</creator><creator>Granjeiro, José Mauro</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201510</creationdate><title>Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with a New Xenograft: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial</title><author>Calasans-Maia, Mônica Diuana ; Mourão, Carlos Fernando de A. B. ; Alves, Adriana Terezinha Neves Novellino ; Sartoretto, Suelen Cristina ; de Uzeda, Marcelo José P. G. ; Granjeiro, José Mauro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3639-603035bdd892993202b76e9e7554941786c6ec0bd2468ddd6d95e75b501ef9113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>atrophic maxilla</topic><topic>bone augmentation</topic><topic>Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heterografts - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minerals - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Sinus Floor Augmentation - methods</topic><topic>sinus floor elevation</topic><topic>xenograft</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Calasans-Maia, Mônica Diuana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mourão, Carlos Fernando de A. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Adriana Terezinha Neves Novellino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sartoretto, Suelen Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Uzeda, Marcelo José P. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Granjeiro, José Mauro</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical implant dentistry and related research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Calasans-Maia, Mônica Diuana</au><au>Mourão, Carlos Fernando de A. B.</au><au>Alves, Adriana Terezinha Neves Novellino</au><au>Sartoretto, Suelen Cristina</au><au>de Uzeda, Marcelo José P. G.</au><au>Granjeiro, José Mauro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with a New Xenograft: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial</atitle><jtitle>Clinical implant dentistry and related research</jtitle><addtitle>Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research</addtitle><date>2015-10</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>S2</issue><spage>e586</spage><epage>e593</epage><pages>e586-e593</pages><issn>1523-0899</issn><eissn>1708-8208</eissn><abstract>Background
Insufficient residual alveolar bone height is a common deterrent in the placement of dental implants in the posterior maxilla. The use of autografts, xenografts, allografts and alloplasts or a combination between them has been demonstrated to be effective for increasing bone height and bone volume in the deficient posterior maxilla.
Purpose
The aim of this clinical trial is to comparatively determine the density of newly formed in sinus floor augmentation bone after a 24‐week healing period treatment with a new bovine xenograft.
Materials and Methods
The sinus floor was grafted with Bio‐Oss® (n = 10) and Osseous® (n = 10). Histological sections were examined with a focus on the presence of connective tissue (CT) and newly formed bone (NFB). The sections were histomorphometrically evaluated and the definitive crown was inserted after 3 months.
Results
After 6 months, the mean value of new bone formation was 24.60 (±2.503), the CT was 42.60 (±4.006) and the remaining biomaterial was 25.40 (±2.547) in Bio‐Oss group. In Osseous group, the mean value of new bone formation was 24.90 (±3.542), the CT was 45.70 (±7.040) and the remaining biomaterial was 22.90 (±3.247).
Conclusions
Both biomaterials afforded a favorable implant position and the prosthetic rehabilitation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>25535980</pmid><doi>10.1111/cid.12289</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1523-0899 |
| ispartof | Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2015-10, Vol.17 (S2), p.e586-e593 |
| issn | 1523-0899 1708-8208 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1719421472 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
| subjects | Adult Aged Animals atrophic maxilla bone augmentation Bone Substitutes - therapeutic use Cattle Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods Dentistry Female Heterografts - surgery Humans Male Middle Aged Minerals - therapeutic use Sinus Floor Augmentation - methods sinus floor elevation xenograft |
| title | Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with a New Xenograft: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T12%3A32%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Maxillary%20Sinus%20Augmentation%20with%20a%20New%20Xenograft:%20A%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Clinical%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20implant%20dentistry%20and%20related%20research&rft.au=Calasans-Maia,%20M%C3%B4nica%20Diuana&rft.date=2015-10&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=S2&rft.spage=e586&rft.epage=e593&rft.pages=e586-e593&rft.issn=1523-0899&rft.eissn=1708-8208&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cid.12289&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1719421472%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1719421472&rft_id=info:pmid/25535980&rfr_iscdi=true |