Integration of nonchemical, postharvest treatments for control of navel orangeworm (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and Indianmeal moth (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in walnuts

We propose a treatment strategy combining an initial disinfestation treatment with 1 of 3 protective treatments as an alternative for chemical fumigation of walnuts for control of postharvest insect populations. The initial disinfestation treatment (0.4% O2 for 6 d) was designed to disinfest walnuts...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of economic entomology 1998-12, Vol.91 (6), p.1437-1444
Hauptverfasser: Johnson, J.A, Vail, P.V, Soderstrom, E.L, Curtis, C.E, Brandl, D.G, Tebbets, J.S, Valero, K.A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1444
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1437
container_title Journal of economic entomology
container_volume 91
creator Johnson, J.A
Vail, P.V
Soderstrom, E.L
Curtis, C.E
Brandl, D.G
Tebbets, J.S
Valero, K.A
description We propose a treatment strategy combining an initial disinfestation treatment with 1 of 3 protective treatments as an alternative for chemical fumigation of walnuts for control of postharvest insect populations. The initial disinfestation treatment (0.4% O2 for 6 d) was designed to disinfest walnuts of field populations of navel orangeworm, Amyelois transitella (Walker). The protective treatments were low temperature (10 degrees C) storage, controlled atmosphere (5% O2) storage, and application of the Indianmeal moth granulosis virus, and were designed to prevent establishment of indianmeal moth, Plodia interpunctella (Hubner). The initial disinfestation treatment was effective against laboratory populations of navel orangeworm. Efficacy of protective treatments was determined by exposure to Indianmeal moth population levels far higher than those found in commercial walnut storage facilities. All 3 protective treatments prevented development of damaging Indianmeal moth populations as measured by pheromone trap catches and sample evaluation of the walnuts. No Indianmeal moths were trapped, nor were any seriously damaged walnuts (nuts with obvious damage that rendered the nutmeat less marketable or unmarketable) recovered from either low temperature or controlled atmosphere storage. Very low numbers of moths (less than or equal to 21/wk) were trapped from walnuts treated with virus, and only 0.2% of the walnuts were seriously damaged. In contrast, large numbers of moths (119-793/wk) were trapped from untreated nuts, and 35% of the sampled walnuts showed serious damage. Quality analysis by a commercial laboratory showed that overall walnut quality for all protective treatments was maintained at levels acceptable by industry standards.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jee/91.6.1437
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17189625</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17189625</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-78ee3df26d3a29fc1e1957a55580e4fc894fd1ae55784922fd2f1a1045c175d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFrFTEUhQdR8FldujYLEQXnNTeZzCTdSVH74IGFWnAXLpmb96bMJGOS19Lf4x916iu46uqexXcO3HOq6i3wNXAjT2-ITg2s2zU0sntWrcBIXQsDv55XK86FqHlj5MvqVc43nEMrgK-qP5tQaJewDDGw6FmIwe1pGhyOn9kcc9ljuqVcWEmEZaJQMvMxMRdDSXH8Z8FbWkTCsKO7mCb2cUvz0Me5UMIzdnmfcBx6pE8MQ882oR8wTIQjm2LZPw0Pgd3hGA4lv65eeBwzvXm8J9X1t68_zy_q7Y_vm_Mv29pJpUvdaSLZe9H2EoXxDgiM6lAppTk13mnT-B6QlOp0Y4TwvfCAwBvloFM9lyfVh2PunOLvw_K0nYbsaBwxUDxkCx1o0wq1gPURdCnmnMjbOQ0TpnsL3D5MYZcprAHb2ocpFv79YzDmpVi_VOWG_N_U8RakXrB3R8xjtLhLC3J9JThILrTRnGv5F-CNlhc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17189625</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integration of nonchemical, postharvest treatments for control of navel orangeworm (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and Indianmeal moth (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in walnuts</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Johnson, J.A ; Vail, P.V ; Soderstrom, E.L ; Curtis, C.E ; Brandl, D.G ; Tebbets, J.S ; Valero, K.A</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnson, J.A ; Vail, P.V ; Soderstrom, E.L ; Curtis, C.E ; Brandl, D.G ; Tebbets, J.S ; Valero, K.A</creatorcontrib><description>We propose a treatment strategy combining an initial disinfestation treatment with 1 of 3 protective treatments as an alternative for chemical fumigation of walnuts for control of postharvest insect populations. The initial disinfestation treatment (0.4% O2 for 6 d) was designed to disinfest walnuts of field populations of navel orangeworm, Amyelois transitella (Walker). The protective treatments were low temperature (10 degrees C) storage, controlled atmosphere (5% O2) storage, and application of the Indianmeal moth granulosis virus, and were designed to prevent establishment of indianmeal moth, Plodia interpunctella (Hubner). The initial disinfestation treatment was effective against laboratory populations of navel orangeworm. Efficacy of protective treatments was determined by exposure to Indianmeal moth population levels far higher than those found in commercial walnut storage facilities. All 3 protective treatments prevented development of damaging Indianmeal moth populations as measured by pheromone trap catches and sample evaluation of the walnuts. No Indianmeal moths were trapped, nor were any seriously damaged walnuts (nuts with obvious damage that rendered the nutmeat less marketable or unmarketable) recovered from either low temperature or controlled atmosphere storage. Very low numbers of moths (less than or equal to 21/wk) were trapped from walnuts treated with virus, and only 0.2% of the walnuts were seriously damaged. In contrast, large numbers of moths (119-793/wk) were trapped from untreated nuts, and 35% of the sampled walnuts showed serious damage. Quality analysis by a commercial laboratory showed that overall walnut quality for all protective treatments was maintained at levels acceptable by industry standards.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-291X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jee/91.6.1437</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEENAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lanham, MD: Entomological Society of America</publisher><subject>Amyelois transitella ; Biological and medical sciences ; cold storage ; controlled atmosphere storage ; controlled atmospheres ; damage ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Granulovirus ; insect control ; integrated pest management ; Invertebrates ; Juglans ; Medically important nuisances and vectors, pests of stored products and materials: population survey and control ; oxygen ; Pests of stored products ; Plodia interpunctella ; population density ; postharvest treatment ; Pyralidae ; quality ; storage pests ; walnuts</subject><ispartof>Journal of economic entomology, 1998-12, Vol.91 (6), p.1437-1444</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-78ee3df26d3a29fc1e1957a55580e4fc894fd1ae55784922fd2f1a1045c175d03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1706138$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnson, J.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vail, P.V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soderstrom, E.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curtis, C.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandl, D.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tebbets, J.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valero, K.A</creatorcontrib><title>Integration of nonchemical, postharvest treatments for control of navel orangeworm (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and Indianmeal moth (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in walnuts</title><title>Journal of economic entomology</title><description>We propose a treatment strategy combining an initial disinfestation treatment with 1 of 3 protective treatments as an alternative for chemical fumigation of walnuts for control of postharvest insect populations. The initial disinfestation treatment (0.4% O2 for 6 d) was designed to disinfest walnuts of field populations of navel orangeworm, Amyelois transitella (Walker). The protective treatments were low temperature (10 degrees C) storage, controlled atmosphere (5% O2) storage, and application of the Indianmeal moth granulosis virus, and were designed to prevent establishment of indianmeal moth, Plodia interpunctella (Hubner). The initial disinfestation treatment was effective against laboratory populations of navel orangeworm. Efficacy of protective treatments was determined by exposure to Indianmeal moth population levels far higher than those found in commercial walnut storage facilities. All 3 protective treatments prevented development of damaging Indianmeal moth populations as measured by pheromone trap catches and sample evaluation of the walnuts. No Indianmeal moths were trapped, nor were any seriously damaged walnuts (nuts with obvious damage that rendered the nutmeat less marketable or unmarketable) recovered from either low temperature or controlled atmosphere storage. Very low numbers of moths (less than or equal to 21/wk) were trapped from walnuts treated with virus, and only 0.2% of the walnuts were seriously damaged. In contrast, large numbers of moths (119-793/wk) were trapped from untreated nuts, and 35% of the sampled walnuts showed serious damage. Quality analysis by a commercial laboratory showed that overall walnut quality for all protective treatments was maintained at levels acceptable by industry standards.</description><subject>Amyelois transitella</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>cold storage</subject><subject>controlled atmosphere storage</subject><subject>controlled atmospheres</subject><subject>damage</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Granulovirus</subject><subject>insect control</subject><subject>integrated pest management</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Juglans</subject><subject>Medically important nuisances and vectors, pests of stored products and materials: population survey and control</subject><subject>oxygen</subject><subject>Pests of stored products</subject><subject>Plodia interpunctella</subject><subject>population density</subject><subject>postharvest treatment</subject><subject>Pyralidae</subject><subject>quality</subject><subject>storage pests</subject><subject>walnuts</subject><issn>0022-0493</issn><issn>1938-291X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kUFrFTEUhQdR8FldujYLEQXnNTeZzCTdSVH74IGFWnAXLpmb96bMJGOS19Lf4x916iu46uqexXcO3HOq6i3wNXAjT2-ITg2s2zU0sntWrcBIXQsDv55XK86FqHlj5MvqVc43nEMrgK-qP5tQaJewDDGw6FmIwe1pGhyOn9kcc9ljuqVcWEmEZaJQMvMxMRdDSXH8Z8FbWkTCsKO7mCb2cUvz0Me5UMIzdnmfcBx6pE8MQ882oR8wTIQjm2LZPw0Pgd3hGA4lv65eeBwzvXm8J9X1t68_zy_q7Y_vm_Mv29pJpUvdaSLZe9H2EoXxDgiM6lAppTk13mnT-B6QlOp0Y4TwvfCAwBvloFM9lyfVh2PunOLvw_K0nYbsaBwxUDxkCx1o0wq1gPURdCnmnMjbOQ0TpnsL3D5MYZcprAHb2ocpFv79YzDmpVi_VOWG_N_U8RakXrB3R8xjtLhLC3J9JThILrTRnGv5F-CNlhc</recordid><startdate>19981201</startdate><enddate>19981201</enddate><creator>Johnson, J.A</creator><creator>Vail, P.V</creator><creator>Soderstrom, E.L</creator><creator>Curtis, C.E</creator><creator>Brandl, D.G</creator><creator>Tebbets, J.S</creator><creator>Valero, K.A</creator><general>Entomological Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19981201</creationdate><title>Integration of nonchemical, postharvest treatments for control of navel orangeworm (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and Indianmeal moth (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in walnuts</title><author>Johnson, J.A ; Vail, P.V ; Soderstrom, E.L ; Curtis, C.E ; Brandl, D.G ; Tebbets, J.S ; Valero, K.A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-78ee3df26d3a29fc1e1957a55580e4fc894fd1ae55784922fd2f1a1045c175d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Amyelois transitella</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>cold storage</topic><topic>controlled atmosphere storage</topic><topic>controlled atmospheres</topic><topic>damage</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Granulovirus</topic><topic>insect control</topic><topic>integrated pest management</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Juglans</topic><topic>Medically important nuisances and vectors, pests of stored products and materials: population survey and control</topic><topic>oxygen</topic><topic>Pests of stored products</topic><topic>Plodia interpunctella</topic><topic>population density</topic><topic>postharvest treatment</topic><topic>Pyralidae</topic><topic>quality</topic><topic>storage pests</topic><topic>walnuts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnson, J.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vail, P.V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soderstrom, E.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curtis, C.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandl, D.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tebbets, J.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valero, K.A</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnson, J.A</au><au>Vail, P.V</au><au>Soderstrom, E.L</au><au>Curtis, C.E</au><au>Brandl, D.G</au><au>Tebbets, J.S</au><au>Valero, K.A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Integration of nonchemical, postharvest treatments for control of navel orangeworm (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and Indianmeal moth (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in walnuts</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle><date>1998-12-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1437</spage><epage>1444</epage><pages>1437-1444</pages><issn>0022-0493</issn><eissn>1938-291X</eissn><coden>JEENAI</coden><abstract>We propose a treatment strategy combining an initial disinfestation treatment with 1 of 3 protective treatments as an alternative for chemical fumigation of walnuts for control of postharvest insect populations. The initial disinfestation treatment (0.4% O2 for 6 d) was designed to disinfest walnuts of field populations of navel orangeworm, Amyelois transitella (Walker). The protective treatments were low temperature (10 degrees C) storage, controlled atmosphere (5% O2) storage, and application of the Indianmeal moth granulosis virus, and were designed to prevent establishment of indianmeal moth, Plodia interpunctella (Hubner). The initial disinfestation treatment was effective against laboratory populations of navel orangeworm. Efficacy of protective treatments was determined by exposure to Indianmeal moth population levels far higher than those found in commercial walnut storage facilities. All 3 protective treatments prevented development of damaging Indianmeal moth populations as measured by pheromone trap catches and sample evaluation of the walnuts. No Indianmeal moths were trapped, nor were any seriously damaged walnuts (nuts with obvious damage that rendered the nutmeat less marketable or unmarketable) recovered from either low temperature or controlled atmosphere storage. Very low numbers of moths (less than or equal to 21/wk) were trapped from walnuts treated with virus, and only 0.2% of the walnuts were seriously damaged. In contrast, large numbers of moths (119-793/wk) were trapped from untreated nuts, and 35% of the sampled walnuts showed serious damage. Quality analysis by a commercial laboratory showed that overall walnut quality for all protective treatments was maintained at levels acceptable by industry standards.</abstract><cop>Lanham, MD</cop><pub>Entomological Society of America</pub><doi>10.1093/jee/91.6.1437</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0493
ispartof Journal of economic entomology, 1998-12, Vol.91 (6), p.1437-1444
issn 0022-0493
1938-291X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17189625
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Amyelois transitella
Biological and medical sciences
cold storage
controlled atmosphere storage
controlled atmospheres
damage
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Granulovirus
insect control
integrated pest management
Invertebrates
Juglans
Medically important nuisances and vectors, pests of stored products and materials: population survey and control
oxygen
Pests of stored products
Plodia interpunctella
population density
postharvest treatment
Pyralidae
quality
storage pests
walnuts
title Integration of nonchemical, postharvest treatments for control of navel orangeworm (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and Indianmeal moth (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in walnuts
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T09%3A30%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integration%20of%20nonchemical,%20postharvest%20treatments%20for%20control%20of%20navel%20orangeworm%20(Lepidoptera:%20Pyralidae)%20and%20Indianmeal%20moth%20(Lepidoptera:%20Pyralidae)%20in%20walnuts&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20entomology&rft.au=Johnson,%20J.A&rft.date=1998-12-01&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1437&rft.epage=1444&rft.pages=1437-1444&rft.issn=0022-0493&rft.eissn=1938-291X&rft.coden=JEENAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jee/91.6.1437&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17189625%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17189625&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true