Impacts of depleting forage species in the California Current
Human demands for food and fish meal are often in direct competition with forage needs of marine mammals, birds and piscivorous harvested fish. Here, two well-developed ecosystem models for the California Current on the West Coast of the USA were used to test the impacts on other parts of the ecosys...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental conservation 2013-12, Vol.40 (4), p.380-393 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 393 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 380 |
container_title | Environmental conservation |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | KAPLAN, ISAAC C. BROWN, CHRISTOPHER J. FULTON, ELIZABETH A. GRAY, IRIS A. FIELD, JOHN C. SMITH, ANTHONY D.M. |
description | Human demands for food and fish meal are often in direct competition with forage needs of marine mammals, birds and piscivorous harvested fish. Here, two well-developed ecosystem models for the California Current on the West Coast of the USA were used to test the impacts on other parts of the ecosystem of harvesting euphausiids, forage fish, mackerel and mesopelagic fish such as myctophids. Depleting individual forage groups to levels that led to maximum sustainable yield of those groups may have both positive and negative effects on other species in the California Current. The most common impacts were on predators of forage groups, some of which showed declines of >20% under the scenarios that involved depletion of forage groups to 40% of unfished levels. Depletion of euphausiids and forage fish, which each comprise >10% of system biomass, had the largest impact on other species. Depleting euphausiids to 40% of unfished levels altered the abundance of 13–30% of the other functional groups by >20%; while depleting forage fish to 40% altered the abundance of 20–50% of the other functional groups by >20%. There are clear trade-offs between the harvest of forage groups and the ability of the California Current to sustain other trophic levels. Though higher trophic level species, such as groundfish, are often managed on the basis of reference points that can reduce biomass to below half of unfished levels, this level of forage species removal is likely to impact the abundance of other target species, protected species and the structure of the ecosystem. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0376892913000052 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718953898</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0376892913000052</cupid><jstor_id>26319218</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26319218</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-884425e0f2b1998be7511193d1cb2a92e68f7dcaf111fef232492f5b7e8b620e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhoMouH78AA9CwIuXaiZpm-TgQYofCwse1HNJ28mapV8m7cF_b8suIorgXAbmfd53mCHkDNgVMJDXz0zIVGmuQbCpEr5HFhCnOoqFkvtkMcvRrB-SoxA2E5ImUi3IzbLpTTkE2llaYV_j4No1tZ03a6Shx9JhoK6lwxvSzNRuUlpnaDZ6j-1wQg6sqQOe7voxeb2_e8keo9XTwzK7XUVlzJIhUiqOeYLM8gK0VgXKBAC0qKAsuNEcU2VlVRo7TS1aLnisuU0KiapIOUNxTC63ub3v3kcMQ964UGJdmxa7MeQgQelEKK3-gTKIpQQ2oxc_0E03-nY6JIdUJ1LIWKcTBVuq9F0IHm3ee9cY_5EDy-ff579-P3nOt55NGDr_ZeCpAM1h3ix2maYpvKvW-G31n6mfR2qM6w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1695737496</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impacts of depleting forage species in the California Current</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>KAPLAN, ISAAC C. ; BROWN, CHRISTOPHER J. ; FULTON, ELIZABETH A. ; GRAY, IRIS A. ; FIELD, JOHN C. ; SMITH, ANTHONY D.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>KAPLAN, ISAAC C. ; BROWN, CHRISTOPHER J. ; FULTON, ELIZABETH A. ; GRAY, IRIS A. ; FIELD, JOHN C. ; SMITH, ANTHONY D.M.</creatorcontrib><description>Human demands for food and fish meal are often in direct competition with forage needs of marine mammals, birds and piscivorous harvested fish. Here, two well-developed ecosystem models for the California Current on the West Coast of the USA were used to test the impacts on other parts of the ecosystem of harvesting euphausiids, forage fish, mackerel and mesopelagic fish such as myctophids. Depleting individual forage groups to levels that led to maximum sustainable yield of those groups may have both positive and negative effects on other species in the California Current. The most common impacts were on predators of forage groups, some of which showed declines of >20% under the scenarios that involved depletion of forage groups to 40% of unfished levels. Depletion of euphausiids and forage fish, which each comprise >10% of system biomass, had the largest impact on other species. Depleting euphausiids to 40% of unfished levels altered the abundance of 13–30% of the other functional groups by >20%; while depleting forage fish to 40% altered the abundance of 20–50% of the other functional groups by >20%. There are clear trade-offs between the harvest of forage groups and the ability of the California Current to sustain other trophic levels. Though higher trophic level species, such as groundfish, are often managed on the basis of reference points that can reduce biomass to below half of unfished levels, this level of forage species removal is likely to impact the abundance of other target species, protected species and the structure of the ecosystem.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0376-8929</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-4387</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0376892913000052</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EVCNA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Biomass ; Brackish ; Conservation biology ; Depletion ; Ecosystem models ; Ecosystems ; Environmental impact ; Euphausiid ; Fish ; Fish harvest ; Fisheries management ; Forage ; Forages ; Functional groups ; Mackerel ; Marine ; Marine ecology ; Marine ecosystems ; Marine mammals ; Predators ; Protected species ; Scomber ; Sustainable yield ; THEMATIC SECTION: Politics, Science and Policy of Reference Points for Resource Management ; Trophic levels</subject><ispartof>Environmental conservation, 2013-12, Vol.40 (4), p.380-393</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2013</rights><rights>Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-884425e0f2b1998be7511193d1cb2a92e68f7dcaf111fef232492f5b7e8b620e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-884425e0f2b1998be7511193d1cb2a92e68f7dcaf111fef232492f5b7e8b620e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26319218$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0376892913000052/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,799,27901,27902,55603,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>KAPLAN, ISAAC C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BROWN, CHRISTOPHER J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FULTON, ELIZABETH A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRAY, IRIS A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FIELD, JOHN C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SMITH, ANTHONY D.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Impacts of depleting forage species in the California Current</title><title>Environmental conservation</title><addtitle>Envir. Conserv</addtitle><description>Human demands for food and fish meal are often in direct competition with forage needs of marine mammals, birds and piscivorous harvested fish. Here, two well-developed ecosystem models for the California Current on the West Coast of the USA were used to test the impacts on other parts of the ecosystem of harvesting euphausiids, forage fish, mackerel and mesopelagic fish such as myctophids. Depleting individual forage groups to levels that led to maximum sustainable yield of those groups may have both positive and negative effects on other species in the California Current. The most common impacts were on predators of forage groups, some of which showed declines of >20% under the scenarios that involved depletion of forage groups to 40% of unfished levels. Depletion of euphausiids and forage fish, which each comprise >10% of system biomass, had the largest impact on other species. Depleting euphausiids to 40% of unfished levels altered the abundance of 13–30% of the other functional groups by >20%; while depleting forage fish to 40% altered the abundance of 20–50% of the other functional groups by >20%. There are clear trade-offs between the harvest of forage groups and the ability of the California Current to sustain other trophic levels. Though higher trophic level species, such as groundfish, are often managed on the basis of reference points that can reduce biomass to below half of unfished levels, this level of forage species removal is likely to impact the abundance of other target species, protected species and the structure of the ecosystem.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Depletion</subject><subject>Ecosystem models</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Euphausiid</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish harvest</subject><subject>Fisheries management</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Forages</subject><subject>Functional groups</subject><subject>Mackerel</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine ecology</subject><subject>Marine ecosystems</subject><subject>Marine mammals</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Protected species</subject><subject>Scomber</subject><subject>Sustainable yield</subject><subject>THEMATIC SECTION: Politics, Science and Policy of Reference Points for Resource Management</subject><subject>Trophic levels</subject><issn>0376-8929</issn><issn>1469-4387</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhoMouH78AA9CwIuXaiZpm-TgQYofCwse1HNJ28mapV8m7cF_b8suIorgXAbmfd53mCHkDNgVMJDXz0zIVGmuQbCpEr5HFhCnOoqFkvtkMcvRrB-SoxA2E5ImUi3IzbLpTTkE2llaYV_j4No1tZ03a6Shx9JhoK6lwxvSzNRuUlpnaDZ6j-1wQg6sqQOe7voxeb2_e8keo9XTwzK7XUVlzJIhUiqOeYLM8gK0VgXKBAC0qKAsuNEcU2VlVRo7TS1aLnisuU0KiapIOUNxTC63ub3v3kcMQ964UGJdmxa7MeQgQelEKK3-gTKIpQQ2oxc_0E03-nY6JIdUJ1LIWKcTBVuq9F0IHm3ee9cY_5EDy-ff579-P3nOt55NGDr_ZeCpAM1h3ix2maYpvKvW-G31n6mfR2qM6w</recordid><startdate>20131201</startdate><enddate>20131201</enddate><creator>KAPLAN, ISAAC C.</creator><creator>BROWN, CHRISTOPHER J.</creator><creator>FULTON, ELIZABETH A.</creator><creator>GRAY, IRIS A.</creator><creator>FIELD, JOHN C.</creator><creator>SMITH, ANTHONY D.M.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131201</creationdate><title>Impacts of depleting forage species in the California Current</title><author>KAPLAN, ISAAC C. ; BROWN, CHRISTOPHER J. ; FULTON, ELIZABETH A. ; GRAY, IRIS A. ; FIELD, JOHN C. ; SMITH, ANTHONY D.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-884425e0f2b1998be7511193d1cb2a92e68f7dcaf111fef232492f5b7e8b620e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Depletion</topic><topic>Ecosystem models</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Euphausiid</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish harvest</topic><topic>Fisheries management</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Forages</topic><topic>Functional groups</topic><topic>Mackerel</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine ecology</topic><topic>Marine ecosystems</topic><topic>Marine mammals</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Protected species</topic><topic>Scomber</topic><topic>Sustainable yield</topic><topic>THEMATIC SECTION: Politics, Science and Policy of Reference Points for Resource Management</topic><topic>Trophic levels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KAPLAN, ISAAC C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BROWN, CHRISTOPHER J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FULTON, ELIZABETH A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRAY, IRIS A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FIELD, JOHN C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SMITH, ANTHONY D.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KAPLAN, ISAAC C.</au><au>BROWN, CHRISTOPHER J.</au><au>FULTON, ELIZABETH A.</au><au>GRAY, IRIS A.</au><au>FIELD, JOHN C.</au><au>SMITH, ANTHONY D.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impacts of depleting forage species in the California Current</atitle><jtitle>Environmental conservation</jtitle><addtitle>Envir. Conserv</addtitle><date>2013-12-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>380</spage><epage>393</epage><pages>380-393</pages><issn>0376-8929</issn><eissn>1469-4387</eissn><coden>EVCNA4</coden><abstract>Human demands for food and fish meal are often in direct competition with forage needs of marine mammals, birds and piscivorous harvested fish. Here, two well-developed ecosystem models for the California Current on the West Coast of the USA were used to test the impacts on other parts of the ecosystem of harvesting euphausiids, forage fish, mackerel and mesopelagic fish such as myctophids. Depleting individual forage groups to levels that led to maximum sustainable yield of those groups may have both positive and negative effects on other species in the California Current. The most common impacts were on predators of forage groups, some of which showed declines of >20% under the scenarios that involved depletion of forage groups to 40% of unfished levels. Depletion of euphausiids and forage fish, which each comprise >10% of system biomass, had the largest impact on other species. Depleting euphausiids to 40% of unfished levels altered the abundance of 13–30% of the other functional groups by >20%; while depleting forage fish to 40% altered the abundance of 20–50% of the other functional groups by >20%. There are clear trade-offs between the harvest of forage groups and the ability of the California Current to sustain other trophic levels. Though higher trophic level species, such as groundfish, are often managed on the basis of reference points that can reduce biomass to below half of unfished levels, this level of forage species removal is likely to impact the abundance of other target species, protected species and the structure of the ecosystem.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0376892913000052</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0376-8929 |
ispartof | Environmental conservation, 2013-12, Vol.40 (4), p.380-393 |
issn | 0376-8929 1469-4387 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718953898 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Cambridge Journals |
subjects | Abundance Biomass Brackish Conservation biology Depletion Ecosystem models Ecosystems Environmental impact Euphausiid Fish Fish harvest Fisheries management Forage Forages Functional groups Mackerel Marine Marine ecology Marine ecosystems Marine mammals Predators Protected species Scomber Sustainable yield THEMATIC SECTION: Politics, Science and Policy of Reference Points for Resource Management Trophic levels |
title | Impacts of depleting forage species in the California Current |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T05%3A06%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impacts%20of%20depleting%20forage%20species%20in%20the%20California%20Current&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20conservation&rft.au=KAPLAN,%20ISAAC%20C.&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=380&rft.epage=393&rft.pages=380-393&rft.issn=0376-8929&rft.eissn=1469-4387&rft.coden=EVCNA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0376892913000052&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26319218%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1695737496&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0376892913000052&rft_jstor_id=26319218&rfr_iscdi=true |