Beer, beef, and boards: the role of intermediaries in payment for ecosystem services arrangements in northwestern Montana
Payments for ecosystem or ecological services (PES) are voluntary, often market-based approaches to protecting environmental values. In the rural United States, some landowners receive PES through government led conservation programs, but little is known about their involvement in market based arran...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of environmental planning and management 2015-09, Vol.58 (9), p.1562-1576 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1576 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 1562 |
| container_title | Journal of environmental planning and management |
| container_volume | 58 |
| creator | Davis, Emily Jane Gwin, Lauren Moseley, Cassandra Gosnell, Hannah Burright, Harmony |
| description | Payments for ecosystem or ecological services (PES) are voluntary, often market-based approaches to protecting environmental values. In the rural United States, some landowners receive PES through government led conservation programs, but little is known about their involvement in market based arrangements. We analyzed three examples of market based PES arrangements in northwestern Montana: watershed restoration and craft brewing, niche meat production, and certified timber supplies. We find that intermediaries were working between buyers and sellers in each case to set conditions for transactions and undertake the mechanics of implementation. These findings align with existing conceptualizations of intermediaries as crucial links in PES arrangements, but also suggest that intermediaries for market based PES arrangements are not always facilitators or neutral nongovernmental actors; they may actually be from the private sector and drive the process by serving as buyers. This research contributes to stronger understanding of the possibilities for local market based conservation in the rural West. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/09640568.2014.938803 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718951199</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1710258618</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-2f447e9d08688df8190e516c6156814e1a1cf4b07d199f553092b502627031243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0cFu1DAQBuAIgcRSeAMOlrhwaJYZJ3ZsLggqaJGKuMDZ8iZjmiqxl3G21b49DgsXDqgna6TvH3n0V9VLhC2CgTdgdQtKm60EbLe2MQaaR9UGGw01KGUfV5uV1Kt5Wj3L-RYAVIN6Ux0_EPG52BGFc-HjIHbJ85DfiuWGBKeJRApijAvxTMPoeaRcRrH3x5niIkJiQX3Kx7zQLDLx3dgX4Zl9_EEr-c1j4uXmngriKL6kuPjon1dPgp8yvfjznlXfP338dnFVX3-9_Hzx_rruFcBSy9C2HdkBjDZmCAYtkELdayzHYEvosQ_tDroBrQ1KNWDlToHUsoMGZducVa9Pe_ecfh7KH9w85p6myUdKh-ywQ2MVlvRDKEhlNJoHULBoUUJX6Kt_6G06cCw3r0oi2E7LotqT6jnlzBTcnsfZ89EhuLVl97dlt7bsTi2X2LtTbIyli9nfJ54Gt_jjlDiUEvoxu-a_G34BcCWsGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1702109762</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Beer, beef, and boards: the role of intermediaries in payment for ecosystem services arrangements in northwestern Montana</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Davis, Emily Jane ; Gwin, Lauren ; Moseley, Cassandra ; Gosnell, Hannah ; Burright, Harmony</creator><creatorcontrib>Davis, Emily Jane ; Gwin, Lauren ; Moseley, Cassandra ; Gosnell, Hannah ; Burright, Harmony</creatorcontrib><description>Payments for ecosystem or ecological services (PES) are voluntary, often market-based approaches to protecting environmental values. In the rural United States, some landowners receive PES through government led conservation programs, but little is known about their involvement in market based arrangements. We analyzed three examples of market based PES arrangements in northwestern Montana: watershed restoration and craft brewing, niche meat production, and certified timber supplies. We find that intermediaries were working between buyers and sellers in each case to set conditions for transactions and undertake the mechanics of implementation. These findings align with existing conceptualizations of intermediaries as crucial links in PES arrangements, but also suggest that intermediaries for market based PES arrangements are not always facilitators or neutral nongovernmental actors; they may actually be from the private sector and drive the process by serving as buyers. This research contributes to stronger understanding of the possibilities for local market based conservation in the rural West.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-0568</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1360-0559</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2014.938803</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Boards ; Certification testing ; Conceptualization ; Conservation ; ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Environmental economics ; Environmental management ; Environmental protection ; Financial intermediaries ; intermediaries ; Markets ; Meat industry ; Montana ; Northwest ; Payments ; Restoration ; Rural ; Studies ; U.S.A</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental planning and management, 2015-09, Vol.58 (9), p.1562-1576</ispartof><rights>2014 University of Newcastle upon Tyne 2014</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-2f447e9d08688df8190e516c6156814e1a1cf4b07d199f553092b502627031243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-2f447e9d08688df8190e516c6156814e1a1cf4b07d199f553092b502627031243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09640568.2014.938803$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09640568.2014.938803$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,59647,60436</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davis, Emily Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gwin, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moseley, Cassandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gosnell, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burright, Harmony</creatorcontrib><title>Beer, beef, and boards: the role of intermediaries in payment for ecosystem services arrangements in northwestern Montana</title><title>Journal of environmental planning and management</title><description>Payments for ecosystem or ecological services (PES) are voluntary, often market-based approaches to protecting environmental values. In the rural United States, some landowners receive PES through government led conservation programs, but little is known about their involvement in market based arrangements. We analyzed three examples of market based PES arrangements in northwestern Montana: watershed restoration and craft brewing, niche meat production, and certified timber supplies. We find that intermediaries were working between buyers and sellers in each case to set conditions for transactions and undertake the mechanics of implementation. These findings align with existing conceptualizations of intermediaries as crucial links in PES arrangements, but also suggest that intermediaries for market based PES arrangements are not always facilitators or neutral nongovernmental actors; they may actually be from the private sector and drive the process by serving as buyers. This research contributes to stronger understanding of the possibilities for local market based conservation in the rural West.</description><subject>Boards</subject><subject>Certification testing</subject><subject>Conceptualization</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental economics</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Financial intermediaries</subject><subject>intermediaries</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Meat industry</subject><subject>Montana</subject><subject>Northwest</subject><subject>Payments</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>Rural</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><issn>0964-0568</issn><issn>1360-0559</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0cFu1DAQBuAIgcRSeAMOlrhwaJYZJ3ZsLggqaJGKuMDZ8iZjmiqxl3G21b49DgsXDqgna6TvH3n0V9VLhC2CgTdgdQtKm60EbLe2MQaaR9UGGw01KGUfV5uV1Kt5Wj3L-RYAVIN6Ux0_EPG52BGFc-HjIHbJ85DfiuWGBKeJRApijAvxTMPoeaRcRrH3x5niIkJiQX3Kx7zQLDLx3dgX4Zl9_EEr-c1j4uXmngriKL6kuPjon1dPgp8yvfjznlXfP338dnFVX3-9_Hzx_rruFcBSy9C2HdkBjDZmCAYtkELdayzHYEvosQ_tDroBrQ1KNWDlToHUsoMGZducVa9Pe_ecfh7KH9w85p6myUdKh-ywQ2MVlvRDKEhlNJoHULBoUUJX6Kt_6G06cCw3r0oi2E7LotqT6jnlzBTcnsfZ89EhuLVl97dlt7bsTi2X2LtTbIyli9nfJ54Gt_jjlDiUEvoxu-a_G34BcCWsGg</recordid><startdate>20150902</startdate><enddate>20150902</enddate><creator>Davis, Emily Jane</creator><creator>Gwin, Lauren</creator><creator>Moseley, Cassandra</creator><creator>Gosnell, Hannah</creator><creator>Burright, Harmony</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150902</creationdate><title>Beer, beef, and boards: the role of intermediaries in payment for ecosystem services arrangements in northwestern Montana</title><author>Davis, Emily Jane ; Gwin, Lauren ; Moseley, Cassandra ; Gosnell, Hannah ; Burright, Harmony</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-2f447e9d08688df8190e516c6156814e1a1cf4b07d199f553092b502627031243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Boards</topic><topic>Certification testing</topic><topic>Conceptualization</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental economics</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Financial intermediaries</topic><topic>intermediaries</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Meat industry</topic><topic>Montana</topic><topic>Northwest</topic><topic>Payments</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>Rural</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davis, Emily Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gwin, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moseley, Cassandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gosnell, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burright, Harmony</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental planning and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davis, Emily Jane</au><au>Gwin, Lauren</au><au>Moseley, Cassandra</au><au>Gosnell, Hannah</au><au>Burright, Harmony</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Beer, beef, and boards: the role of intermediaries in payment for ecosystem services arrangements in northwestern Montana</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental planning and management</jtitle><date>2015-09-02</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1562</spage><epage>1576</epage><pages>1562-1576</pages><issn>0964-0568</issn><eissn>1360-0559</eissn><abstract>Payments for ecosystem or ecological services (PES) are voluntary, often market-based approaches to protecting environmental values. In the rural United States, some landowners receive PES through government led conservation programs, but little is known about their involvement in market based arrangements. We analyzed three examples of market based PES arrangements in northwestern Montana: watershed restoration and craft brewing, niche meat production, and certified timber supplies. We find that intermediaries were working between buyers and sellers in each case to set conditions for transactions and undertake the mechanics of implementation. These findings align with existing conceptualizations of intermediaries as crucial links in PES arrangements, but also suggest that intermediaries for market based PES arrangements are not always facilitators or neutral nongovernmental actors; they may actually be from the private sector and drive the process by serving as buyers. This research contributes to stronger understanding of the possibilities for local market based conservation in the rural West.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/09640568.2014.938803</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0964-0568 |
| ispartof | Journal of environmental planning and management, 2015-09, Vol.58 (9), p.1562-1576 |
| issn | 0964-0568 1360-0559 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718951199 |
| source | PAIS Index; Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
| subjects | Boards Certification testing Conceptualization Conservation ecosystem services Ecosystems Environmental economics Environmental management Environmental protection Financial intermediaries intermediaries Markets Meat industry Montana Northwest Payments Restoration Rural Studies U.S.A |
| title | Beer, beef, and boards: the role of intermediaries in payment for ecosystem services arrangements in northwestern Montana |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T14%3A08%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Beer,%20beef,%20and%20boards:%20the%20role%20of%20intermediaries%20in%20payment%20for%20ecosystem%20services%20arrangements%20in%20northwestern%20Montana&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20planning%20and%20management&rft.au=Davis,%20Emily%20Jane&rft.date=2015-09-02&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1562&rft.epage=1576&rft.pages=1562-1576&rft.issn=0964-0568&rft.eissn=1360-0559&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09640568.2014.938803&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1710258618%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1702109762&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |