Dose Dependent Selectivity and Response of Different Types of Mammalian Cells to Surface Dielectric Barrier Discharge (SDBD) Plasma
Cold Atmospheric plasma has been studied extensively over the last decade with applications ranging from bacterial decontamination to wound healing. Although numerous designs of plasma applicators have been developed for direct exposure, prolonged exposure required for decontamination of tissues and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plasma processes and polymers 2015-07, Vol.12 (7), p.666-677 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 677 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 666 |
container_title | Plasma processes and polymers |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Pai, Kedar K. Singarapu, Kumar Jacob, Jamey D. Madihally, Sundararajan V. |
description | Cold Atmospheric plasma has been studied extensively over the last decade with applications ranging from bacterial decontamination to wound healing. Although numerous designs of plasma applicators have been developed for direct exposure, prolonged exposure required for decontamination of tissues and skin may be detrimental to mammalian cells. In this study, we evaluate the effect of plasma generated by surface dielectric barrier discharge (SDBD) on mammalian cells, including HUVEC, Neuroblastoma, and HepG2. SDBD actuator induces flow and can transport plasma‐generated species to the surface being treated. Cell morphology, viability, and functionality are evaluated by incubating cells after exposure to SDBD for 1, 4 and 8 min. All cell types demonstrate retention of viability without any necrotic response, although, with an increase in the number of injured cells, with increase in exposure time. Cell‐specific responses are observed with HUVEC demonstrating highest resilience as compared to neuroblastoma and HepG2 (lowest). Migration assay using HUVEC shows no effect on viability and functionality with 4 min exposure. The 8 min tests demonstrated no additional change in morphology, so we conclude that SDBD does not affect the cell morphology at longer exposure durations as compared to other plasma sources and can be applied safely in medical applications.
Surface dielectric barrier discharge (SDBD) is used to demonstrate the viability mammalian of cells after long plasma exposure durations. The effects on cell morphology, viability, and functionality are studied after exposing the cells to different doses (time) of plasma. Retention of viability and effects on cell functionality are demonstrated after plasma exposure. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ppap.201400134 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718946042</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3747312681</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4604-d67c1d356c3daa31978b314cc0b40b5dfdf18f7c58408531a81b65952b49e2b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1v1DAQxSMEEqVw5WyJSzmkeGI7cY7dDVtoS1ntFnG0Js4EXPKFnQX2zD9O0q32wGk8o997ftKLotfAz4Hz5N0w4HCecJCcg5BPohNIIYm1TvOnx7fiz6MXIdxzLrjS_CT6W_SBWEEDdRV1I9tSQ3Z0v9y4Z9hVbENh6LsJ6WtWuLomP1N3-4HCfPqEbYuNw44tqWkCG3u23fka7eTpHqy8s2yB3jvy0ynY7-i_ETvbFoviLVs3GFp8GT2rsQn06nGeRl9W7--WH-Kbz5cflxc3sZUpl3GVZhYqoVIrKkQBeaZLAdJaXkpeqqquatB1ZpWWXCsBqKFMVa6SUuaUlIk4jc4OvoPvf-4ojKadAk25saN-FwxkoPP5qxl98x963-98N6UzkOYZZFrmcqLyA_XbNbQ3g3ct-r0BbuZCzFyIORZi1uuL9XGbtPFB68JIf45a9D9MmolMma-3l2Z1u1lcba83ZiX-ATIckCM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1697178494</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dose Dependent Selectivity and Response of Different Types of Mammalian Cells to Surface Dielectric Barrier Discharge (SDBD) Plasma</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Pai, Kedar K. ; Singarapu, Kumar ; Jacob, Jamey D. ; Madihally, Sundararajan V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pai, Kedar K. ; Singarapu, Kumar ; Jacob, Jamey D. ; Madihally, Sundararajan V.</creatorcontrib><description>Cold Atmospheric plasma has been studied extensively over the last decade with applications ranging from bacterial decontamination to wound healing. Although numerous designs of plasma applicators have been developed for direct exposure, prolonged exposure required for decontamination of tissues and skin may be detrimental to mammalian cells. In this study, we evaluate the effect of plasma generated by surface dielectric barrier discharge (SDBD) on mammalian cells, including HUVEC, Neuroblastoma, and HepG2. SDBD actuator induces flow and can transport plasma‐generated species to the surface being treated. Cell morphology, viability, and functionality are evaluated by incubating cells after exposure to SDBD for 1, 4 and 8 min. All cell types demonstrate retention of viability without any necrotic response, although, with an increase in the number of injured cells, with increase in exposure time. Cell‐specific responses are observed with HUVEC demonstrating highest resilience as compared to neuroblastoma and HepG2 (lowest). Migration assay using HUVEC shows no effect on viability and functionality with 4 min exposure. The 8 min tests demonstrated no additional change in morphology, so we conclude that SDBD does not affect the cell morphology at longer exposure durations as compared to other plasma sources and can be applied safely in medical applications.
Surface dielectric barrier discharge (SDBD) is used to demonstrate the viability mammalian of cells after long plasma exposure durations. The effects on cell morphology, viability, and functionality are studied after exposing the cells to different doses (time) of plasma. Retention of viability and effects on cell functionality are demonstrated after plasma exposure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1612-8850</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1612-8869</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ppap.201400134</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Weinheim: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Atmospherics ; Bacteria ; Decontamination ; Dielectric barrier discharge ; Exposure ; mammalian ; Mammals ; migration ; Morphology ; nonthermal plasma ; Plasma ; surface dielectric barrier discharges (SDBD) ; Viability</subject><ispartof>Plasma processes and polymers, 2015-07, Vol.12 (7), p.666-677</ispartof><rights>2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4604-d67c1d356c3daa31978b314cc0b40b5dfdf18f7c58408531a81b65952b49e2b23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fppap.201400134$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fppap.201400134$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pai, Kedar K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singarapu, Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacob, Jamey D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madihally, Sundararajan V.</creatorcontrib><title>Dose Dependent Selectivity and Response of Different Types of Mammalian Cells to Surface Dielectric Barrier Discharge (SDBD) Plasma</title><title>Plasma processes and polymers</title><addtitle>Plasma Process. Polym</addtitle><description>Cold Atmospheric plasma has been studied extensively over the last decade with applications ranging from bacterial decontamination to wound healing. Although numerous designs of plasma applicators have been developed for direct exposure, prolonged exposure required for decontamination of tissues and skin may be detrimental to mammalian cells. In this study, we evaluate the effect of plasma generated by surface dielectric barrier discharge (SDBD) on mammalian cells, including HUVEC, Neuroblastoma, and HepG2. SDBD actuator induces flow and can transport plasma‐generated species to the surface being treated. Cell morphology, viability, and functionality are evaluated by incubating cells after exposure to SDBD for 1, 4 and 8 min. All cell types demonstrate retention of viability without any necrotic response, although, with an increase in the number of injured cells, with increase in exposure time. Cell‐specific responses are observed with HUVEC demonstrating highest resilience as compared to neuroblastoma and HepG2 (lowest). Migration assay using HUVEC shows no effect on viability and functionality with 4 min exposure. The 8 min tests demonstrated no additional change in morphology, so we conclude that SDBD does not affect the cell morphology at longer exposure durations as compared to other plasma sources and can be applied safely in medical applications.
Surface dielectric barrier discharge (SDBD) is used to demonstrate the viability mammalian of cells after long plasma exposure durations. The effects on cell morphology, viability, and functionality are studied after exposing the cells to different doses (time) of plasma. Retention of viability and effects on cell functionality are demonstrated after plasma exposure.</description><subject>Atmospherics</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Decontamination</subject><subject>Dielectric barrier discharge</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>mammalian</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>migration</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>nonthermal plasma</subject><subject>Plasma</subject><subject>surface dielectric barrier discharges (SDBD)</subject><subject>Viability</subject><issn>1612-8850</issn><issn>1612-8869</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkc1v1DAQxSMEEqVw5WyJSzmkeGI7cY7dDVtoS1ntFnG0Js4EXPKFnQX2zD9O0q32wGk8o997ftKLotfAz4Hz5N0w4HCecJCcg5BPohNIIYm1TvOnx7fiz6MXIdxzLrjS_CT6W_SBWEEDdRV1I9tSQ3Z0v9y4Z9hVbENh6LsJ6WtWuLomP1N3-4HCfPqEbYuNw44tqWkCG3u23fka7eTpHqy8s2yB3jvy0ynY7-i_ETvbFoviLVs3GFp8GT2rsQn06nGeRl9W7--WH-Kbz5cflxc3sZUpl3GVZhYqoVIrKkQBeaZLAdJaXkpeqqquatB1ZpWWXCsBqKFMVa6SUuaUlIk4jc4OvoPvf-4ojKadAk25saN-FwxkoPP5qxl98x963-98N6UzkOYZZFrmcqLyA_XbNbQ3g3ct-r0BbuZCzFyIORZi1uuL9XGbtPFB68JIf45a9D9MmolMma-3l2Z1u1lcba83ZiX-ATIckCM</recordid><startdate>201507</startdate><enddate>201507</enddate><creator>Pai, Kedar K.</creator><creator>Singarapu, Kumar</creator><creator>Jacob, Jamey D.</creator><creator>Madihally, Sundararajan V.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201507</creationdate><title>Dose Dependent Selectivity and Response of Different Types of Mammalian Cells to Surface Dielectric Barrier Discharge (SDBD) Plasma</title><author>Pai, Kedar K. ; Singarapu, Kumar ; Jacob, Jamey D. ; Madihally, Sundararajan V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4604-d67c1d356c3daa31978b314cc0b40b5dfdf18f7c58408531a81b65952b49e2b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Atmospherics</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Decontamination</topic><topic>Dielectric barrier discharge</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>mammalian</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>migration</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>nonthermal plasma</topic><topic>Plasma</topic><topic>surface dielectric barrier discharges (SDBD)</topic><topic>Viability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pai, Kedar K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singarapu, Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacob, Jamey D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madihally, Sundararajan V.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Plasma processes and polymers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pai, Kedar K.</au><au>Singarapu, Kumar</au><au>Jacob, Jamey D.</au><au>Madihally, Sundararajan V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dose Dependent Selectivity and Response of Different Types of Mammalian Cells to Surface Dielectric Barrier Discharge (SDBD) Plasma</atitle><jtitle>Plasma processes and polymers</jtitle><addtitle>Plasma Process. Polym</addtitle><date>2015-07</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>666</spage><epage>677</epage><pages>666-677</pages><issn>1612-8850</issn><eissn>1612-8869</eissn><abstract>Cold Atmospheric plasma has been studied extensively over the last decade with applications ranging from bacterial decontamination to wound healing. Although numerous designs of plasma applicators have been developed for direct exposure, prolonged exposure required for decontamination of tissues and skin may be detrimental to mammalian cells. In this study, we evaluate the effect of plasma generated by surface dielectric barrier discharge (SDBD) on mammalian cells, including HUVEC, Neuroblastoma, and HepG2. SDBD actuator induces flow and can transport plasma‐generated species to the surface being treated. Cell morphology, viability, and functionality are evaluated by incubating cells after exposure to SDBD for 1, 4 and 8 min. All cell types demonstrate retention of viability without any necrotic response, although, with an increase in the number of injured cells, with increase in exposure time. Cell‐specific responses are observed with HUVEC demonstrating highest resilience as compared to neuroblastoma and HepG2 (lowest). Migration assay using HUVEC shows no effect on viability and functionality with 4 min exposure. The 8 min tests demonstrated no additional change in morphology, so we conclude that SDBD does not affect the cell morphology at longer exposure durations as compared to other plasma sources and can be applied safely in medical applications.
Surface dielectric barrier discharge (SDBD) is used to demonstrate the viability mammalian of cells after long plasma exposure durations. The effects on cell morphology, viability, and functionality are studied after exposing the cells to different doses (time) of plasma. Retention of viability and effects on cell functionality are demonstrated after plasma exposure.</abstract><cop>Weinheim</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/ppap.201400134</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1612-8850 |
ispartof | Plasma processes and polymers, 2015-07, Vol.12 (7), p.666-677 |
issn | 1612-8850 1612-8869 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718946042 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Atmospherics Bacteria Decontamination Dielectric barrier discharge Exposure mammalian Mammals migration Morphology nonthermal plasma Plasma surface dielectric barrier discharges (SDBD) Viability |
title | Dose Dependent Selectivity and Response of Different Types of Mammalian Cells to Surface Dielectric Barrier Discharge (SDBD) Plasma |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T15%3A17%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dose%20Dependent%20Selectivity%20and%20Response%20of%20Different%20Types%20of%20Mammalian%20Cells%20to%20Surface%20Dielectric%20Barrier%20Discharge%20(SDBD)%20Plasma&rft.jtitle=Plasma%20processes%20and%20polymers&rft.au=Pai,%20Kedar%20K.&rft.date=2015-07&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=666&rft.epage=677&rft.pages=666-677&rft.issn=1612-8850&rft.eissn=1612-8869&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ppap.201400134&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E3747312681%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1697178494&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |