Determination of optimal strip width in strip intercropping of maize (Zea mays L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Northeast Iran
Intercropping is a sustainable method for crop production used to maximize utilization of available resources. The aim of this study, conducted in 2009 and 2010, was to determine an optimal strip width in maize/bean strip intercropping. Treatments evaluated in the study were contribution of differen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cleaner production 2015-11, Vol.106, p.343-350 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 350 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 343 |
container_title | Journal of cleaner production |
container_volume | 106 |
creator | Nassiri Mahallati, Mehdi Koocheki, Alireza Mondani, Farzad Feizi, Hassan Amirmoradi, Shahram |
description | Intercropping is a sustainable method for crop production used to maximize utilization of available resources. The aim of this study, conducted in 2009 and 2010, was to determine an optimal strip width in maize/bean strip intercropping. Treatments evaluated in the study were contribution of different strip width and intercrops of 2 rows bean and 2 rows maize (II), 3 rows bean and 3 rows maize (III), 4 rows bean and 4 rows maize (IV), 5 rows bean and 5 rows maize (V), maize and bean monocultures. The higher than average temperature in 2010, led to decrease crop yields in that year. The climatic conditions had more effect on reduction of bean yield than maize. Radiation absorption, radiation use efficiency, biological yield, land equivalent ratio, crowding coefficient and system productivity index were greater in 2009 than in 2010. Radiation use efficiency for maize and bean were higher in 2009 than 2010 (8.9% and 17.6% respectively). The strip intercropping system enhanced radiation absorption, radiation use efficiency, biological yield, land equivalent ratio, crowding coefficient and system productivity index compared with the monoculture system. Increasing strip width from 2 to 5 rows resulted in a decrease all the criteria measured. The best strip width was with II and III strip intercropping treatments. Although biological yield in intercropping was less than in monoculture, total land productivity was improved by greater land equivalent ratio (1.39 and 1.37). This means that 39% and 37% more land was required for monoculture than intercropping to produce the same yields in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Therefore it was demonstrated that an intercropping system is more effective than a monoculture system in resource utilization. It also appears that equivalent row numbers of 3 and 4 for each crop in a strip manner is more promising in resource use than other combination of rows.
•Strip intercropping is an appropriate to optimize yield in low input systems.•Strip intercropping is a justified method to present technology in agroecosystems.•Light use efficiency approved in maize and bean strip intercropping.•System productivity has been shown to improve under strip intercropping. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.099 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718938747</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0959652614011779</els_id><sourcerecordid>1705065052</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6f885f37bc759dd16408f5de1526e8c15f4a8c750374712466db9b79ef3c0033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1uGyEUhVGVSnXcPEIlls5iJjAz_K2qKGmbSFabRVbZIMzcibHGMAHsyt33vYNl79sVcPnOke45CH2hpKaE8ptNvbEjTDHUDaFdmdVEqQ9oRqVQFRWSX6AZUUxVnDX8E7pMaUMIFUR0M_T3HjLErfMmu-BxGHCYstuaEacc3YR_uz6vsfPnp_OFtjFMk_OvR3pr3B_Aixcw5XpIeFlfY-N7vALj8eJpbRKEcZfwfje-muhOQLH7GWJeg0kZP0bjP6OPgxkTXJ3POXr-_u357qFa_vrxeHe7rGwrWK74ICUbWrGygqm-p7wjcmA90LIXSEvZ0BlZ_kgrOkGbjvN-pVZCwdBaQtp2jhYn25LV2w5S1luXLIyj8RB2SVNBpWplEf8HShjhjLCmoOyEllxSijDoKZYE40FToo8F6Y0-F6SPBR3HpaCi-3rSQdl47yDqZB14C72LYLPug_uHwzv4yZws</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1705065052</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determination of optimal strip width in strip intercropping of maize (Zea mays L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Northeast Iran</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Nassiri Mahallati, Mehdi ; Koocheki, Alireza ; Mondani, Farzad ; Feizi, Hassan ; Amirmoradi, Shahram</creator><creatorcontrib>Nassiri Mahallati, Mehdi ; Koocheki, Alireza ; Mondani, Farzad ; Feizi, Hassan ; Amirmoradi, Shahram</creatorcontrib><description>Intercropping is a sustainable method for crop production used to maximize utilization of available resources. The aim of this study, conducted in 2009 and 2010, was to determine an optimal strip width in maize/bean strip intercropping. Treatments evaluated in the study were contribution of different strip width and intercrops of 2 rows bean and 2 rows maize (II), 3 rows bean and 3 rows maize (III), 4 rows bean and 4 rows maize (IV), 5 rows bean and 5 rows maize (V), maize and bean monocultures. The higher than average temperature in 2010, led to decrease crop yields in that year. The climatic conditions had more effect on reduction of bean yield than maize. Radiation absorption, radiation use efficiency, biological yield, land equivalent ratio, crowding coefficient and system productivity index were greater in 2009 than in 2010. Radiation use efficiency for maize and bean were higher in 2009 than 2010 (8.9% and 17.6% respectively). The strip intercropping system enhanced radiation absorption, radiation use efficiency, biological yield, land equivalent ratio, crowding coefficient and system productivity index compared with the monoculture system. Increasing strip width from 2 to 5 rows resulted in a decrease all the criteria measured. The best strip width was with II and III strip intercropping treatments. Although biological yield in intercropping was less than in monoculture, total land productivity was improved by greater land equivalent ratio (1.39 and 1.37). This means that 39% and 37% more land was required for monoculture than intercropping to produce the same yields in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Therefore it was demonstrated that an intercropping system is more effective than a monoculture system in resource utilization. It also appears that equivalent row numbers of 3 and 4 for each crop in a strip manner is more promising in resource use than other combination of rows.
•Strip intercropping is an appropriate to optimize yield in low input systems.•Strip intercropping is a justified method to present technology in agroecosystems.•Light use efficiency approved in maize and bean strip intercropping.•System productivity has been shown to improve under strip intercropping.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-6526</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1786</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.099</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Beans ; Biological ; Crops ; Crowding coefficient ; Equivalence ; Land ; Land equivalent ratio ; Maize ; Phaseolus vulgaris ; Productivity ; Radiation absorption ; Radiation use efficiency ; Strip ; System productivity index ; Temperature ; Zea mays</subject><ispartof>Journal of cleaner production, 2015-11, Vol.106, p.343-350</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6f885f37bc759dd16408f5de1526e8c15f4a8c750374712466db9b79ef3c0033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6f885f37bc759dd16408f5de1526e8c15f4a8c750374712466db9b79ef3c0033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.099$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nassiri Mahallati, Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koocheki, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mondani, Farzad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feizi, Hassan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amirmoradi, Shahram</creatorcontrib><title>Determination of optimal strip width in strip intercropping of maize (Zea mays L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Northeast Iran</title><title>Journal of cleaner production</title><description>Intercropping is a sustainable method for crop production used to maximize utilization of available resources. The aim of this study, conducted in 2009 and 2010, was to determine an optimal strip width in maize/bean strip intercropping. Treatments evaluated in the study were contribution of different strip width and intercrops of 2 rows bean and 2 rows maize (II), 3 rows bean and 3 rows maize (III), 4 rows bean and 4 rows maize (IV), 5 rows bean and 5 rows maize (V), maize and bean monocultures. The higher than average temperature in 2010, led to decrease crop yields in that year. The climatic conditions had more effect on reduction of bean yield than maize. Radiation absorption, radiation use efficiency, biological yield, land equivalent ratio, crowding coefficient and system productivity index were greater in 2009 than in 2010. Radiation use efficiency for maize and bean were higher in 2009 than 2010 (8.9% and 17.6% respectively). The strip intercropping system enhanced radiation absorption, radiation use efficiency, biological yield, land equivalent ratio, crowding coefficient and system productivity index compared with the monoculture system. Increasing strip width from 2 to 5 rows resulted in a decrease all the criteria measured. The best strip width was with II and III strip intercropping treatments. Although biological yield in intercropping was less than in monoculture, total land productivity was improved by greater land equivalent ratio (1.39 and 1.37). This means that 39% and 37% more land was required for monoculture than intercropping to produce the same yields in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Therefore it was demonstrated that an intercropping system is more effective than a monoculture system in resource utilization. It also appears that equivalent row numbers of 3 and 4 for each crop in a strip manner is more promising in resource use than other combination of rows.
•Strip intercropping is an appropriate to optimize yield in low input systems.•Strip intercropping is a justified method to present technology in agroecosystems.•Light use efficiency approved in maize and bean strip intercropping.•System productivity has been shown to improve under strip intercropping.</description><subject>Beans</subject><subject>Biological</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Crowding coefficient</subject><subject>Equivalence</subject><subject>Land</subject><subject>Land equivalent ratio</subject><subject>Maize</subject><subject>Phaseolus vulgaris</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Radiation absorption</subject><subject>Radiation use efficiency</subject><subject>Strip</subject><subject>System productivity index</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><issn>0959-6526</issn><issn>1879-1786</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc1uGyEUhVGVSnXcPEIlls5iJjAz_K2qKGmbSFabRVbZIMzcibHGMAHsyt33vYNl79sVcPnOke45CH2hpKaE8ptNvbEjTDHUDaFdmdVEqQ9oRqVQFRWSX6AZUUxVnDX8E7pMaUMIFUR0M_T3HjLErfMmu-BxGHCYstuaEacc3YR_uz6vsfPnp_OFtjFMk_OvR3pr3B_Aixcw5XpIeFlfY-N7vALj8eJpbRKEcZfwfje-muhOQLH7GWJeg0kZP0bjP6OPgxkTXJ3POXr-_u357qFa_vrxeHe7rGwrWK74ICUbWrGygqm-p7wjcmA90LIXSEvZ0BlZ_kgrOkGbjvN-pVZCwdBaQtp2jhYn25LV2w5S1luXLIyj8RB2SVNBpWplEf8HShjhjLCmoOyEllxSijDoKZYE40FToo8F6Y0-F6SPBR3HpaCi-3rSQdl47yDqZB14C72LYLPug_uHwzv4yZws</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Nassiri Mahallati, Mehdi</creator><creator>Koocheki, Alireza</creator><creator>Mondani, Farzad</creator><creator>Feizi, Hassan</creator><creator>Amirmoradi, Shahram</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Determination of optimal strip width in strip intercropping of maize (Zea mays L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Northeast Iran</title><author>Nassiri Mahallati, Mehdi ; Koocheki, Alireza ; Mondani, Farzad ; Feizi, Hassan ; Amirmoradi, Shahram</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6f885f37bc759dd16408f5de1526e8c15f4a8c750374712466db9b79ef3c0033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Beans</topic><topic>Biological</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Crowding coefficient</topic><topic>Equivalence</topic><topic>Land</topic><topic>Land equivalent ratio</topic><topic>Maize</topic><topic>Phaseolus vulgaris</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Radiation absorption</topic><topic>Radiation use efficiency</topic><topic>Strip</topic><topic>System productivity index</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nassiri Mahallati, Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koocheki, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mondani, Farzad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feizi, Hassan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amirmoradi, Shahram</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Journal of cleaner production</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nassiri Mahallati, Mehdi</au><au>Koocheki, Alireza</au><au>Mondani, Farzad</au><au>Feizi, Hassan</au><au>Amirmoradi, Shahram</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determination of optimal strip width in strip intercropping of maize (Zea mays L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Northeast Iran</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cleaner production</jtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>106</volume><spage>343</spage><epage>350</epage><pages>343-350</pages><issn>0959-6526</issn><eissn>1879-1786</eissn><abstract>Intercropping is a sustainable method for crop production used to maximize utilization of available resources. The aim of this study, conducted in 2009 and 2010, was to determine an optimal strip width in maize/bean strip intercropping. Treatments evaluated in the study were contribution of different strip width and intercrops of 2 rows bean and 2 rows maize (II), 3 rows bean and 3 rows maize (III), 4 rows bean and 4 rows maize (IV), 5 rows bean and 5 rows maize (V), maize and bean monocultures. The higher than average temperature in 2010, led to decrease crop yields in that year. The climatic conditions had more effect on reduction of bean yield than maize. Radiation absorption, radiation use efficiency, biological yield, land equivalent ratio, crowding coefficient and system productivity index were greater in 2009 than in 2010. Radiation use efficiency for maize and bean were higher in 2009 than 2010 (8.9% and 17.6% respectively). The strip intercropping system enhanced radiation absorption, radiation use efficiency, biological yield, land equivalent ratio, crowding coefficient and system productivity index compared with the monoculture system. Increasing strip width from 2 to 5 rows resulted in a decrease all the criteria measured. The best strip width was with II and III strip intercropping treatments. Although biological yield in intercropping was less than in monoculture, total land productivity was improved by greater land equivalent ratio (1.39 and 1.37). This means that 39% and 37% more land was required for monoculture than intercropping to produce the same yields in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Therefore it was demonstrated that an intercropping system is more effective than a monoculture system in resource utilization. It also appears that equivalent row numbers of 3 and 4 for each crop in a strip manner is more promising in resource use than other combination of rows.
•Strip intercropping is an appropriate to optimize yield in low input systems.•Strip intercropping is a justified method to present technology in agroecosystems.•Light use efficiency approved in maize and bean strip intercropping.•System productivity has been shown to improve under strip intercropping.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.099</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0959-6526 |
ispartof | Journal of cleaner production, 2015-11, Vol.106, p.343-350 |
issn | 0959-6526 1879-1786 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718938747 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Beans Biological Crops Crowding coefficient Equivalence Land Land equivalent ratio Maize Phaseolus vulgaris Productivity Radiation absorption Radiation use efficiency Strip System productivity index Temperature Zea mays |
title | Determination of optimal strip width in strip intercropping of maize (Zea mays L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Northeast Iran |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T21%3A31%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determination%20of%20optimal%20strip%20width%20in%20strip%20intercropping%20of%20maize%20(Zea%20mays%20L.)%20and%20bean%20(Phaseolus%20vulgaris%20L.)%20in%20Northeast%20Iran&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cleaner%20production&rft.au=Nassiri%20Mahallati,%20Mehdi&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=106&rft.spage=343&rft.epage=350&rft.pages=343-350&rft.issn=0959-6526&rft.eissn=1879-1786&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.099&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1705065052%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1705065052&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0959652614011779&rfr_iscdi=true |