Determination of optimal strip width in strip intercropping of maize (Zea mays L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Northeast Iran

Intercropping is a sustainable method for crop production used to maximize utilization of available resources. The aim of this study, conducted in 2009 and 2010, was to determine an optimal strip width in maize/bean strip intercropping. Treatments evaluated in the study were contribution of differen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cleaner production 2015-11, Vol.106, p.343-350
Hauptverfasser: Nassiri Mahallati, Mehdi, Koocheki, Alireza, Mondani, Farzad, Feizi, Hassan, Amirmoradi, Shahram
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 350
container_issue
container_start_page 343
container_title Journal of cleaner production
container_volume 106
creator Nassiri Mahallati, Mehdi
Koocheki, Alireza
Mondani, Farzad
Feizi, Hassan
Amirmoradi, Shahram
description Intercropping is a sustainable method for crop production used to maximize utilization of available resources. The aim of this study, conducted in 2009 and 2010, was to determine an optimal strip width in maize/bean strip intercropping. Treatments evaluated in the study were contribution of different strip width and intercrops of 2 rows bean and 2 rows maize (II), 3 rows bean and 3 rows maize (III), 4 rows bean and 4 rows maize (IV), 5 rows bean and 5 rows maize (V), maize and bean monocultures. The higher than average temperature in 2010, led to decrease crop yields in that year. The climatic conditions had more effect on reduction of bean yield than maize. Radiation absorption, radiation use efficiency, biological yield, land equivalent ratio, crowding coefficient and system productivity index were greater in 2009 than in 2010. Radiation use efficiency for maize and bean were higher in 2009 than 2010 (8.9% and 17.6% respectively). The strip intercropping system enhanced radiation absorption, radiation use efficiency, biological yield, land equivalent ratio, crowding coefficient and system productivity index compared with the monoculture system. Increasing strip width from 2 to 5 rows resulted in a decrease all the criteria measured. The best strip width was with II and III strip intercropping treatments. Although biological yield in intercropping was less than in monoculture, total land productivity was improved by greater land equivalent ratio (1.39 and 1.37). This means that 39% and 37% more land was required for monoculture than intercropping to produce the same yields in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Therefore it was demonstrated that an intercropping system is more effective than a monoculture system in resource utilization. It also appears that equivalent row numbers of 3 and 4 for each crop in a strip manner is more promising in resource use than other combination of rows. •Strip intercropping is an appropriate to optimize yield in low input systems.•Strip intercropping is a justified method to present technology in agroecosystems.•Light use efficiency approved in maize and bean strip intercropping.•System productivity has been shown to improve under strip intercropping.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.099
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718938747</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0959652614011779</els_id><sourcerecordid>1705065052</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6f885f37bc759dd16408f5de1526e8c15f4a8c750374712466db9b79ef3c0033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1uGyEUhVGVSnXcPEIlls5iJjAz_K2qKGmbSFabRVbZIMzcibHGMAHsyt33vYNl79sVcPnOke45CH2hpKaE8ptNvbEjTDHUDaFdmdVEqQ9oRqVQFRWSX6AZUUxVnDX8E7pMaUMIFUR0M_T3HjLErfMmu-BxGHCYstuaEacc3YR_uz6vsfPnp_OFtjFMk_OvR3pr3B_Aixcw5XpIeFlfY-N7vALj8eJpbRKEcZfwfje-muhOQLH7GWJeg0kZP0bjP6OPgxkTXJ3POXr-_u357qFa_vrxeHe7rGwrWK74ICUbWrGygqm-p7wjcmA90LIXSEvZ0BlZ_kgrOkGbjvN-pVZCwdBaQtp2jhYn25LV2w5S1luXLIyj8RB2SVNBpWplEf8HShjhjLCmoOyEllxSijDoKZYE40FToo8F6Y0-F6SPBR3HpaCi-3rSQdl47yDqZB14C72LYLPug_uHwzv4yZws</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1705065052</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determination of optimal strip width in strip intercropping of maize (Zea mays L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Northeast Iran</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Nassiri Mahallati, Mehdi ; Koocheki, Alireza ; Mondani, Farzad ; Feizi, Hassan ; Amirmoradi, Shahram</creator><creatorcontrib>Nassiri Mahallati, Mehdi ; Koocheki, Alireza ; Mondani, Farzad ; Feizi, Hassan ; Amirmoradi, Shahram</creatorcontrib><description>Intercropping is a sustainable method for crop production used to maximize utilization of available resources. The aim of this study, conducted in 2009 and 2010, was to determine an optimal strip width in maize/bean strip intercropping. Treatments evaluated in the study were contribution of different strip width and intercrops of 2 rows bean and 2 rows maize (II), 3 rows bean and 3 rows maize (III), 4 rows bean and 4 rows maize (IV), 5 rows bean and 5 rows maize (V), maize and bean monocultures. The higher than average temperature in 2010, led to decrease crop yields in that year. The climatic conditions had more effect on reduction of bean yield than maize. Radiation absorption, radiation use efficiency, biological yield, land equivalent ratio, crowding coefficient and system productivity index were greater in 2009 than in 2010. Radiation use efficiency for maize and bean were higher in 2009 than 2010 (8.9% and 17.6% respectively). The strip intercropping system enhanced radiation absorption, radiation use efficiency, biological yield, land equivalent ratio, crowding coefficient and system productivity index compared with the monoculture system. Increasing strip width from 2 to 5 rows resulted in a decrease all the criteria measured. The best strip width was with II and III strip intercropping treatments. Although biological yield in intercropping was less than in monoculture, total land productivity was improved by greater land equivalent ratio (1.39 and 1.37). This means that 39% and 37% more land was required for monoculture than intercropping to produce the same yields in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Therefore it was demonstrated that an intercropping system is more effective than a monoculture system in resource utilization. It also appears that equivalent row numbers of 3 and 4 for each crop in a strip manner is more promising in resource use than other combination of rows. •Strip intercropping is an appropriate to optimize yield in low input systems.•Strip intercropping is a justified method to present technology in agroecosystems.•Light use efficiency approved in maize and bean strip intercropping.•System productivity has been shown to improve under strip intercropping.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-6526</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1786</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.099</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Beans ; Biological ; Crops ; Crowding coefficient ; Equivalence ; Land ; Land equivalent ratio ; Maize ; Phaseolus vulgaris ; Productivity ; Radiation absorption ; Radiation use efficiency ; Strip ; System productivity index ; Temperature ; Zea mays</subject><ispartof>Journal of cleaner production, 2015-11, Vol.106, p.343-350</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6f885f37bc759dd16408f5de1526e8c15f4a8c750374712466db9b79ef3c0033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6f885f37bc759dd16408f5de1526e8c15f4a8c750374712466db9b79ef3c0033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.099$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nassiri Mahallati, Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koocheki, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mondani, Farzad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feizi, Hassan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amirmoradi, Shahram</creatorcontrib><title>Determination of optimal strip width in strip intercropping of maize (Zea mays L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Northeast Iran</title><title>Journal of cleaner production</title><description>Intercropping is a sustainable method for crop production used to maximize utilization of available resources. The aim of this study, conducted in 2009 and 2010, was to determine an optimal strip width in maize/bean strip intercropping. Treatments evaluated in the study were contribution of different strip width and intercrops of 2 rows bean and 2 rows maize (II), 3 rows bean and 3 rows maize (III), 4 rows bean and 4 rows maize (IV), 5 rows bean and 5 rows maize (V), maize and bean monocultures. The higher than average temperature in 2010, led to decrease crop yields in that year. The climatic conditions had more effect on reduction of bean yield than maize. Radiation absorption, radiation use efficiency, biological yield, land equivalent ratio, crowding coefficient and system productivity index were greater in 2009 than in 2010. Radiation use efficiency for maize and bean were higher in 2009 than 2010 (8.9% and 17.6% respectively). The strip intercropping system enhanced radiation absorption, radiation use efficiency, biological yield, land equivalent ratio, crowding coefficient and system productivity index compared with the monoculture system. Increasing strip width from 2 to 5 rows resulted in a decrease all the criteria measured. The best strip width was with II and III strip intercropping treatments. Although biological yield in intercropping was less than in monoculture, total land productivity was improved by greater land equivalent ratio (1.39 and 1.37). This means that 39% and 37% more land was required for monoculture than intercropping to produce the same yields in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Therefore it was demonstrated that an intercropping system is more effective than a monoculture system in resource utilization. It also appears that equivalent row numbers of 3 and 4 for each crop in a strip manner is more promising in resource use than other combination of rows. •Strip intercropping is an appropriate to optimize yield in low input systems.•Strip intercropping is a justified method to present technology in agroecosystems.•Light use efficiency approved in maize and bean strip intercropping.•System productivity has been shown to improve under strip intercropping.</description><subject>Beans</subject><subject>Biological</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Crowding coefficient</subject><subject>Equivalence</subject><subject>Land</subject><subject>Land equivalent ratio</subject><subject>Maize</subject><subject>Phaseolus vulgaris</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Radiation absorption</subject><subject>Radiation use efficiency</subject><subject>Strip</subject><subject>System productivity index</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><issn>0959-6526</issn><issn>1879-1786</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc1uGyEUhVGVSnXcPEIlls5iJjAz_K2qKGmbSFabRVbZIMzcibHGMAHsyt33vYNl79sVcPnOke45CH2hpKaE8ptNvbEjTDHUDaFdmdVEqQ9oRqVQFRWSX6AZUUxVnDX8E7pMaUMIFUR0M_T3HjLErfMmu-BxGHCYstuaEacc3YR_uz6vsfPnp_OFtjFMk_OvR3pr3B_Aixcw5XpIeFlfY-N7vALj8eJpbRKEcZfwfje-muhOQLH7GWJeg0kZP0bjP6OPgxkTXJ3POXr-_u357qFa_vrxeHe7rGwrWK74ICUbWrGygqm-p7wjcmA90LIXSEvZ0BlZ_kgrOkGbjvN-pVZCwdBaQtp2jhYn25LV2w5S1luXLIyj8RB2SVNBpWplEf8HShjhjLCmoOyEllxSijDoKZYE40FToo8F6Y0-F6SPBR3HpaCi-3rSQdl47yDqZB14C72LYLPug_uHwzv4yZws</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Nassiri Mahallati, Mehdi</creator><creator>Koocheki, Alireza</creator><creator>Mondani, Farzad</creator><creator>Feizi, Hassan</creator><creator>Amirmoradi, Shahram</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Determination of optimal strip width in strip intercropping of maize (Zea mays L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Northeast Iran</title><author>Nassiri Mahallati, Mehdi ; Koocheki, Alireza ; Mondani, Farzad ; Feizi, Hassan ; Amirmoradi, Shahram</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6f885f37bc759dd16408f5de1526e8c15f4a8c750374712466db9b79ef3c0033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Beans</topic><topic>Biological</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Crowding coefficient</topic><topic>Equivalence</topic><topic>Land</topic><topic>Land equivalent ratio</topic><topic>Maize</topic><topic>Phaseolus vulgaris</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Radiation absorption</topic><topic>Radiation use efficiency</topic><topic>Strip</topic><topic>System productivity index</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nassiri Mahallati, Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koocheki, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mondani, Farzad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feizi, Hassan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amirmoradi, Shahram</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Journal of cleaner production</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nassiri Mahallati, Mehdi</au><au>Koocheki, Alireza</au><au>Mondani, Farzad</au><au>Feizi, Hassan</au><au>Amirmoradi, Shahram</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determination of optimal strip width in strip intercropping of maize (Zea mays L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Northeast Iran</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cleaner production</jtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>106</volume><spage>343</spage><epage>350</epage><pages>343-350</pages><issn>0959-6526</issn><eissn>1879-1786</eissn><abstract>Intercropping is a sustainable method for crop production used to maximize utilization of available resources. The aim of this study, conducted in 2009 and 2010, was to determine an optimal strip width in maize/bean strip intercropping. Treatments evaluated in the study were contribution of different strip width and intercrops of 2 rows bean and 2 rows maize (II), 3 rows bean and 3 rows maize (III), 4 rows bean and 4 rows maize (IV), 5 rows bean and 5 rows maize (V), maize and bean monocultures. The higher than average temperature in 2010, led to decrease crop yields in that year. The climatic conditions had more effect on reduction of bean yield than maize. Radiation absorption, radiation use efficiency, biological yield, land equivalent ratio, crowding coefficient and system productivity index were greater in 2009 than in 2010. Radiation use efficiency for maize and bean were higher in 2009 than 2010 (8.9% and 17.6% respectively). The strip intercropping system enhanced radiation absorption, radiation use efficiency, biological yield, land equivalent ratio, crowding coefficient and system productivity index compared with the monoculture system. Increasing strip width from 2 to 5 rows resulted in a decrease all the criteria measured. The best strip width was with II and III strip intercropping treatments. Although biological yield in intercropping was less than in monoculture, total land productivity was improved by greater land equivalent ratio (1.39 and 1.37). This means that 39% and 37% more land was required for monoculture than intercropping to produce the same yields in 2009 and 2010, respectively. Therefore it was demonstrated that an intercropping system is more effective than a monoculture system in resource utilization. It also appears that equivalent row numbers of 3 and 4 for each crop in a strip manner is more promising in resource use than other combination of rows. •Strip intercropping is an appropriate to optimize yield in low input systems.•Strip intercropping is a justified method to present technology in agroecosystems.•Light use efficiency approved in maize and bean strip intercropping.•System productivity has been shown to improve under strip intercropping.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.099</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-6526
ispartof Journal of cleaner production, 2015-11, Vol.106, p.343-350
issn 0959-6526
1879-1786
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718938747
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Beans
Biological
Crops
Crowding coefficient
Equivalence
Land
Land equivalent ratio
Maize
Phaseolus vulgaris
Productivity
Radiation absorption
Radiation use efficiency
Strip
System productivity index
Temperature
Zea mays
title Determination of optimal strip width in strip intercropping of maize (Zea mays L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Northeast Iran
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T21%3A31%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determination%20of%20optimal%20strip%20width%20in%20strip%20intercropping%20of%20maize%20(Zea%20mays%20L.)%20and%20bean%20(Phaseolus%20vulgaris%20L.)%20in%20Northeast%20Iran&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cleaner%20production&rft.au=Nassiri%20Mahallati,%20Mehdi&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=106&rft.spage=343&rft.epage=350&rft.pages=343-350&rft.issn=0959-6526&rft.eissn=1879-1786&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.099&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1705065052%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1705065052&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0959652614011779&rfr_iscdi=true