Probabilistic Risk Assessment: Piping Fragility due to Earthquake Fault Mechanisms
A lifeline system, serving as an energy-supply system, is an essential component of urban infrastructure. In a hospital, for example, the piping system supplies elements essential for hospital operations, such as water and fire-suppression foam. Such nonstructural components, especially piping syste...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Mathematical problems in engineering 2015-01, Vol.2015 (2015), p.1-8 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 8 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2015 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Mathematical problems in engineering |
container_volume | 2015 |
creator | Ju, Bu Seog Noh, Myung-Hyun Jung, Woo Young |
description | A lifeline system, serving as an energy-supply system, is an essential component of urban infrastructure. In a hospital, for example, the piping system supplies elements essential for hospital operations, such as water and fire-suppression foam. Such nonstructural components, especially piping systems and their subcomponents, must remain operational and functional during earthquake-induced fires. But the behavior of piping systems as subjected to seismic ground motions is very complex, owing particularly to the nonlinearity affected by the existence of many connections such as T-joints and elbows. The present study carried out a probabilistic risk assessment on a hospital fire-protection piping system’s acceleration-sensitive 2-inch T-joint sprinkler components under seismic ground motions. Specifically, the system’s seismic capacity, using an experimental-test-based nonlinear finite element (FE) model, was evaluated for the probability of failure under different earthquake-fault mechanisms including normal fault, reverse fault, strike-slip fault, and near-source ground motions. It was observed that the probabilistic failure of the T-joint of the fire-protection piping system varied significantly according to the fault mechanisms. The normal-fault mechanism led to a higher probability of system failure at locations 1 and 2. The strike-slip fault mechanism, contrastingly, affected the lowest fragility of the piping system at a higher PGA. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1155/2015/525921 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718920291</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3714684141</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-456d1867c319371aed1fe3158ba5c247bed40da03cddd4a1b954e3cbff57356b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0M1LwzAYBvAgCs7pybsEvIhSlzcfTettjE2FiWMoeCtpkrq4rp1Ji-y_t6MexIun9z38eHh4EDoHcgsgxIgSECNBRUrhAA1AxCwSwOVh9xPKI6Ds7RidhPBBCAUByQAtF77OVe5KFxqn8dKFNR6HYEPY2Kq5wwu3ddU7nnn13plmh01rcVPjqfLN6rNVa4tnqi0b_GT1SlUubMIpOipUGezZzx2i19n0ZfIQzZ_vHyfjeaRZkjYRF7GBJJaaQcokKGugsAxEkiuhKZe5NZwYRZg2xnAFeSq4ZTovCiGZiHM2RFd97tbXn60NTbZxQduyVJWt25CBhCSlhKbQ0cs_9KNufdW1yyBOZCpi2oUO0U2vtK9D8LbItt5tlN9lQLL9vtl-36zft9PXvV65yqgv9w--6LHtiC3ULyw54ZJ9AxyXg1c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1687956257</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Probabilistic Risk Assessment: Piping Fragility due to Earthquake Fault Mechanisms</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ju, Bu Seog ; Noh, Myung-Hyun ; Jung, Woo Young</creator><contributor>Lee, Sang-Youl</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ju, Bu Seog ; Noh, Myung-Hyun ; Jung, Woo Young ; Lee, Sang-Youl</creatorcontrib><description>A lifeline system, serving as an energy-supply system, is an essential component of urban infrastructure. In a hospital, for example, the piping system supplies elements essential for hospital operations, such as water and fire-suppression foam. Such nonstructural components, especially piping systems and their subcomponents, must remain operational and functional during earthquake-induced fires. But the behavior of piping systems as subjected to seismic ground motions is very complex, owing particularly to the nonlinearity affected by the existence of many connections such as T-joints and elbows. The present study carried out a probabilistic risk assessment on a hospital fire-protection piping system’s acceleration-sensitive 2-inch T-joint sprinkler components under seismic ground motions. Specifically, the system’s seismic capacity, using an experimental-test-based nonlinear finite element (FE) model, was evaluated for the probability of failure under different earthquake-fault mechanisms including normal fault, reverse fault, strike-slip fault, and near-source ground motions. It was observed that the probabilistic failure of the T-joint of the fire-protection piping system varied significantly according to the fault mechanisms. The normal-fault mechanism led to a higher probability of system failure at locations 1 and 2. The strike-slip fault mechanism, contrastingly, affected the lowest fragility of the piping system at a higher PGA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1024-123X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1563-5147</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2015/525921</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo, Egypt: Hindawi Publishing Corporation</publisher><subject>Civil engineering ; Earthquakes ; Failure ; Faults ; Fragility ; Geological faults ; Ground motion ; Ground-based observation ; Hospitals ; HVAC ; Infrastructure ; Mathematical problems ; Monte Carlo simulation ; Nonlinearity ; Pipes ; Piping ; Piping systems ; Polyvinyl chloride ; Probabilistic risk assessment ; Random variables ; Risk assessment ; Seismic engineering ; Seismic response ; Statistical analysis ; Studies ; Tee joints</subject><ispartof>Mathematical problems in engineering, 2015-01, Vol.2015 (2015), p.1-8</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 Bu Seog Ju et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Bu Seog Ju et al. Bu Seog Ju et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-456d1867c319371aed1fe3158ba5c247bed40da03cddd4a1b954e3cbff57356b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-456d1867c319371aed1fe3158ba5c247bed40da03cddd4a1b954e3cbff57356b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1126-184X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Lee, Sang-Youl</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ju, Bu Seog</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noh, Myung-Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Woo Young</creatorcontrib><title>Probabilistic Risk Assessment: Piping Fragility due to Earthquake Fault Mechanisms</title><title>Mathematical problems in engineering</title><description>A lifeline system, serving as an energy-supply system, is an essential component of urban infrastructure. In a hospital, for example, the piping system supplies elements essential for hospital operations, such as water and fire-suppression foam. Such nonstructural components, especially piping systems and their subcomponents, must remain operational and functional during earthquake-induced fires. But the behavior of piping systems as subjected to seismic ground motions is very complex, owing particularly to the nonlinearity affected by the existence of many connections such as T-joints and elbows. The present study carried out a probabilistic risk assessment on a hospital fire-protection piping system’s acceleration-sensitive 2-inch T-joint sprinkler components under seismic ground motions. Specifically, the system’s seismic capacity, using an experimental-test-based nonlinear finite element (FE) model, was evaluated for the probability of failure under different earthquake-fault mechanisms including normal fault, reverse fault, strike-slip fault, and near-source ground motions. It was observed that the probabilistic failure of the T-joint of the fire-protection piping system varied significantly according to the fault mechanisms. The normal-fault mechanism led to a higher probability of system failure at locations 1 and 2. The strike-slip fault mechanism, contrastingly, affected the lowest fragility of the piping system at a higher PGA.</description><subject>Civil engineering</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Faults</subject><subject>Fragility</subject><subject>Geological faults</subject><subject>Ground motion</subject><subject>Ground-based observation</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>HVAC</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Mathematical problems</subject><subject>Monte Carlo simulation</subject><subject>Nonlinearity</subject><subject>Pipes</subject><subject>Piping</subject><subject>Piping systems</subject><subject>Polyvinyl chloride</subject><subject>Probabilistic risk assessment</subject><subject>Random variables</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Seismic engineering</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tee joints</subject><issn>1024-123X</issn><issn>1563-5147</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RHX</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0M1LwzAYBvAgCs7pybsEvIhSlzcfTettjE2FiWMoeCtpkrq4rp1Ji-y_t6MexIun9z38eHh4EDoHcgsgxIgSECNBRUrhAA1AxCwSwOVh9xPKI6Ds7RidhPBBCAUByQAtF77OVe5KFxqn8dKFNR6HYEPY2Kq5wwu3ddU7nnn13plmh01rcVPjqfLN6rNVa4tnqi0b_GT1SlUubMIpOipUGezZzx2i19n0ZfIQzZ_vHyfjeaRZkjYRF7GBJJaaQcokKGugsAxEkiuhKZe5NZwYRZg2xnAFeSq4ZTovCiGZiHM2RFd97tbXn60NTbZxQduyVJWt25CBhCSlhKbQ0cs_9KNufdW1yyBOZCpi2oUO0U2vtK9D8LbItt5tlN9lQLL9vtl-36zft9PXvV65yqgv9w--6LHtiC3ULyw54ZJ9AxyXg1c</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Ju, Bu Seog</creator><creator>Noh, Myung-Hyun</creator><creator>Jung, Woo Young</creator><general>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>ADJCN</scope><scope>AHFXO</scope><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1126-184X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Probabilistic Risk Assessment: Piping Fragility due to Earthquake Fault Mechanisms</title><author>Ju, Bu Seog ; Noh, Myung-Hyun ; Jung, Woo Young</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-456d1867c319371aed1fe3158ba5c247bed40da03cddd4a1b954e3cbff57356b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Civil engineering</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Faults</topic><topic>Fragility</topic><topic>Geological faults</topic><topic>Ground motion</topic><topic>Ground-based observation</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>HVAC</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Mathematical problems</topic><topic>Monte Carlo simulation</topic><topic>Nonlinearity</topic><topic>Pipes</topic><topic>Piping</topic><topic>Piping systems</topic><topic>Polyvinyl chloride</topic><topic>Probabilistic risk assessment</topic><topic>Random variables</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Seismic engineering</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tee joints</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ju, Bu Seog</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noh, Myung-Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Woo Young</creatorcontrib><collection>الدوريات العلمية والإحصائية - e-Marefa Academic and Statistical Periodicals</collection><collection>معرفة - المحتوى العربي الأكاديمي المتكامل - e-Marefa Academic Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East & Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>Mathematical problems in engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ju, Bu Seog</au><au>Noh, Myung-Hyun</au><au>Jung, Woo Young</au><au>Lee, Sang-Youl</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Probabilistic Risk Assessment: Piping Fragility due to Earthquake Fault Mechanisms</atitle><jtitle>Mathematical problems in engineering</jtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>2015</volume><issue>2015</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>8</epage><pages>1-8</pages><issn>1024-123X</issn><eissn>1563-5147</eissn><abstract>A lifeline system, serving as an energy-supply system, is an essential component of urban infrastructure. In a hospital, for example, the piping system supplies elements essential for hospital operations, such as water and fire-suppression foam. Such nonstructural components, especially piping systems and their subcomponents, must remain operational and functional during earthquake-induced fires. But the behavior of piping systems as subjected to seismic ground motions is very complex, owing particularly to the nonlinearity affected by the existence of many connections such as T-joints and elbows. The present study carried out a probabilistic risk assessment on a hospital fire-protection piping system’s acceleration-sensitive 2-inch T-joint sprinkler components under seismic ground motions. Specifically, the system’s seismic capacity, using an experimental-test-based nonlinear finite element (FE) model, was evaluated for the probability of failure under different earthquake-fault mechanisms including normal fault, reverse fault, strike-slip fault, and near-source ground motions. It was observed that the probabilistic failure of the T-joint of the fire-protection piping system varied significantly according to the fault mechanisms. The normal-fault mechanism led to a higher probability of system failure at locations 1 and 2. The strike-slip fault mechanism, contrastingly, affected the lowest fragility of the piping system at a higher PGA.</abstract><cop>Cairo, Egypt</cop><pub>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</pub><doi>10.1155/2015/525921</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1126-184X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1024-123X |
ispartof | Mathematical problems in engineering, 2015-01, Vol.2015 (2015), p.1-8 |
issn | 1024-123X 1563-5147 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718920291 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley Online Library Open Access; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Civil engineering Earthquakes Failure Faults Fragility Geological faults Ground motion Ground-based observation Hospitals HVAC Infrastructure Mathematical problems Monte Carlo simulation Nonlinearity Pipes Piping Piping systems Polyvinyl chloride Probabilistic risk assessment Random variables Risk assessment Seismic engineering Seismic response Statistical analysis Studies Tee joints |
title | Probabilistic Risk Assessment: Piping Fragility due to Earthquake Fault Mechanisms |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T23%3A48%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Probabilistic%20Risk%20Assessment:%20Piping%20Fragility%20due%20to%20Earthquake%20Fault%20Mechanisms&rft.jtitle=Mathematical%20problems%20in%20engineering&rft.au=Ju,%20Bu%20Seog&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=2015&rft.issue=2015&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=8&rft.pages=1-8&rft.issn=1024-123X&rft.eissn=1563-5147&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2015/525921&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3714684141%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1687956257&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |