Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: is it worth the risk and cost not to offer prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip?

Controversy remains whether the contralateral hip should be fixed in patients presenting with unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). This retrospective study compares the outcomes and cost of those patients who had prophylactic fixation with those who did not. Between January 2000 and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The bone & joint journal 2015-10, Vol.97-B (10), p.1428-1434
Hauptverfasser: Clement, N D, Vats, A, Duckworth, A D, Gaston, M S, Murray, A W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1434
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1428
container_title The bone & joint journal
container_volume 97-B
creator Clement, N D
Vats, A
Duckworth, A D
Gaston, M S
Murray, A W
description Controversy remains whether the contralateral hip should be fixed in patients presenting with unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). This retrospective study compares the outcomes and cost of those patients who had prophylactic fixation with those who did not. Between January 2000 and December 2010 a total of 50 patients underwent unilateral fixation and 36 had prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip. There were 54 males and 32 females with a mean age of 12.3 years (9 to 16). The rate of a subsequent slip without prophylactic fixation was 46%. The risk of complications was greater, the generic health measures (Short Form-12 physical (p < 0.001) and mental (p = 0.004) summary scores) were worse. Radiographic cam lesions in patients presenting with unilateral SCFE were only seen in patients who did not have prophylactic fixation. Furthermore, prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip was found to be a cost-effective procedure, with a cost per quality adjusted life year gained of £1431 at the time of last follow-up. Prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip is a cost-effective operation that limits the morbidity from the complications of a further slip, and the diminished functional outcome associated with unilateral fixation.
doi_str_mv 10.1302/0301-620X.97B10.33931
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718909002</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1718909002</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c187t-3a76d58f6e22fc3c345b88bc84f75e6648b7a4fdba7773f1921d18a6e319ae523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtLxDAQgIMouqz-BCVHL13zapN6EV18wYIHFbyFNE3YaLepSRb14H83XV1zmTAz38zwAXCM0QxTRM4QRbioCHqZ1fwqJymtKd4BE4JYXTCGxO72T2t2AI5ifEX5CYQxw_vggFSMIkTwBHw_dm4YTAu1GlxSHbRm5UOOZnDD8iu6eA5dhC7BDx_SEqalgcHFN6j6zPiYYO8TTB56a02AQ_CZ6pROTkPrPlVyvs-1Dad9n_Jolcy4YOmGi0OwZ1UXzdFfnILnm-un-V2xeLi9n18uCo0FTwVVvGpLYStDiNVUU1Y2QjRaMMtLU1VMNFwx2zaKc04trglusVCVobhWpiR0Ck5_5-b73tcmJrlyUZuuU73x6ygxx6JGdVaSW8vfVh18jMFYOQS3UuFLYiRH-XKUL0f5ciNfbuRn7uRvxbpZmfaf2qqmP9TzgQY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1718909002</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: is it worth the risk and cost not to offer prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Clement, N D ; Vats, A ; Duckworth, A D ; Gaston, M S ; Murray, A W</creator><creatorcontrib>Clement, N D ; Vats, A ; Duckworth, A D ; Gaston, M S ; Murray, A W</creatorcontrib><description>Controversy remains whether the contralateral hip should be fixed in patients presenting with unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). This retrospective study compares the outcomes and cost of those patients who had prophylactic fixation with those who did not. Between January 2000 and December 2010 a total of 50 patients underwent unilateral fixation and 36 had prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip. There were 54 males and 32 females with a mean age of 12.3 years (9 to 16). The rate of a subsequent slip without prophylactic fixation was 46%. The risk of complications was greater, the generic health measures (Short Form-12 physical (p &lt; 0.001) and mental (p = 0.004) summary scores) were worse. Radiographic cam lesions in patients presenting with unilateral SCFE were only seen in patients who did not have prophylactic fixation. Furthermore, prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip was found to be a cost-effective procedure, with a cost per quality adjusted life year gained of £1431 at the time of last follow-up. Prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip is a cost-effective operation that limits the morbidity from the complications of a further slip, and the diminished functional outcome associated with unilateral fixation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2049-4394</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2049-4408</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B10.33931</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26430021</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Child ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Radiography ; Retrospective Studies ; Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphyses - diagnostic imaging ; Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphyses - economics ; Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphyses - prevention &amp; control ; Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphyses - surgery</subject><ispartof>The bone &amp; joint journal, 2015-10, Vol.97-B (10), p.1428-1434</ispartof><rights>2015 The British Editorial Society of Bone &amp; Joint Surgery.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c187t-3a76d58f6e22fc3c345b88bc84f75e6648b7a4fdba7773f1921d18a6e319ae523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26430021$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clement, N D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vats, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duckworth, A D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaston, M S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, A W</creatorcontrib><title>Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: is it worth the risk and cost not to offer prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip?</title><title>The bone &amp; joint journal</title><addtitle>Bone Joint J</addtitle><description>Controversy remains whether the contralateral hip should be fixed in patients presenting with unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). This retrospective study compares the outcomes and cost of those patients who had prophylactic fixation with those who did not. Between January 2000 and December 2010 a total of 50 patients underwent unilateral fixation and 36 had prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip. There were 54 males and 32 females with a mean age of 12.3 years (9 to 16). The rate of a subsequent slip without prophylactic fixation was 46%. The risk of complications was greater, the generic health measures (Short Form-12 physical (p &lt; 0.001) and mental (p = 0.004) summary scores) were worse. Radiographic cam lesions in patients presenting with unilateral SCFE were only seen in patients who did not have prophylactic fixation. Furthermore, prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip was found to be a cost-effective procedure, with a cost per quality adjusted life year gained of £1431 at the time of last follow-up. Prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip is a cost-effective operation that limits the morbidity from the complications of a further slip, and the diminished functional outcome associated with unilateral fixation.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphyses - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphyses - economics</subject><subject>Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphyses - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphyses - surgery</subject><issn>2049-4394</issn><issn>2049-4408</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEtLxDAQgIMouqz-BCVHL13zapN6EV18wYIHFbyFNE3YaLepSRb14H83XV1zmTAz38zwAXCM0QxTRM4QRbioCHqZ1fwqJymtKd4BE4JYXTCGxO72T2t2AI5ifEX5CYQxw_vggFSMIkTwBHw_dm4YTAu1GlxSHbRm5UOOZnDD8iu6eA5dhC7BDx_SEqalgcHFN6j6zPiYYO8TTB56a02AQ_CZ6pROTkPrPlVyvs-1Dad9n_Jolcy4YOmGi0OwZ1UXzdFfnILnm-un-V2xeLi9n18uCo0FTwVVvGpLYStDiNVUU1Y2QjRaMMtLU1VMNFwx2zaKc04trglusVCVobhWpiR0Ck5_5-b73tcmJrlyUZuuU73x6ygxx6JGdVaSW8vfVh18jMFYOQS3UuFLYiRH-XKUL0f5ciNfbuRn7uRvxbpZmfaf2qqmP9TzgQY</recordid><startdate>201510</startdate><enddate>201510</enddate><creator>Clement, N D</creator><creator>Vats, A</creator><creator>Duckworth, A D</creator><creator>Gaston, M S</creator><creator>Murray, A W</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201510</creationdate><title>Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: is it worth the risk and cost not to offer prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip?</title><author>Clement, N D ; Vats, A ; Duckworth, A D ; Gaston, M S ; Murray, A W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c187t-3a76d58f6e22fc3c345b88bc84f75e6648b7a4fdba7773f1921d18a6e319ae523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphyses - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphyses - economics</topic><topic>Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphyses - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphyses - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clement, N D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vats, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duckworth, A D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaston, M S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, A W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The bone &amp; joint journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clement, N D</au><au>Vats, A</au><au>Duckworth, A D</au><au>Gaston, M S</au><au>Murray, A W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: is it worth the risk and cost not to offer prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip?</atitle><jtitle>The bone &amp; joint journal</jtitle><addtitle>Bone Joint J</addtitle><date>2015-10</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>97-B</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1428</spage><epage>1434</epage><pages>1428-1434</pages><issn>2049-4394</issn><eissn>2049-4408</eissn><abstract>Controversy remains whether the contralateral hip should be fixed in patients presenting with unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). This retrospective study compares the outcomes and cost of those patients who had prophylactic fixation with those who did not. Between January 2000 and December 2010 a total of 50 patients underwent unilateral fixation and 36 had prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip. There were 54 males and 32 females with a mean age of 12.3 years (9 to 16). The rate of a subsequent slip without prophylactic fixation was 46%. The risk of complications was greater, the generic health measures (Short Form-12 physical (p &lt; 0.001) and mental (p = 0.004) summary scores) were worse. Radiographic cam lesions in patients presenting with unilateral SCFE were only seen in patients who did not have prophylactic fixation. Furthermore, prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip was found to be a cost-effective procedure, with a cost per quality adjusted life year gained of £1431 at the time of last follow-up. Prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip is a cost-effective operation that limits the morbidity from the complications of a further slip, and the diminished functional outcome associated with unilateral fixation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>26430021</pmid><doi>10.1302/0301-620X.97B10.33931</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2049-4394
ispartof The bone & joint journal, 2015-10, Vol.97-B (10), p.1428-1434
issn 2049-4394
2049-4408
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718909002
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Child
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Female
Humans
Male
Radiography
Retrospective Studies
Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphyses - diagnostic imaging
Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphyses - economics
Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphyses - prevention & control
Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphyses - surgery
title Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: is it worth the risk and cost not to offer prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T08%3A28%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Slipped%20capital%20femoral%20epiphysis:%20is%20it%20worth%20the%20risk%20and%20cost%20not%20to%20offer%20prophylactic%20fixation%20of%20the%20contralateral%20hip?&rft.jtitle=The%20bone%20&%20joint%20journal&rft.au=Clement,%20N%20D&rft.date=2015-10&rft.volume=97-B&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1428&rft.epage=1434&rft.pages=1428-1434&rft.issn=2049-4394&rft.eissn=2049-4408&rft_id=info:doi/10.1302/0301-620X.97B10.33931&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1718909002%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1718909002&rft_id=info:pmid/26430021&rfr_iscdi=true