Non-Standard Work Schedules and Childbearing in the Netherlands: A Mixed-Method Couple Analysis
This study examined the effect of working at non-standard times on the transition to first and second childbirth. Using quantitative couple data from two waves of the Netherlands Kinship Panel Study (N = 742) and semi-structured qualitative interviews (N = 29), we found a lower probability of having...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Social forces 2015-03, Vol.93 (3), p.957-988 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 988 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 957 |
| container_title | Social forces |
| container_volume | 93 |
| creator | Begall, Katia Mills, Melinda Ganzeboom, Harry B. G. |
| description | This study examined the effect of working at non-standard times on the transition to first and second childbirth. Using quantitative couple data from two waves of the Netherlands Kinship Panel Study (N = 742) and semi-structured qualitative interviews (N = 29), we found a lower probability of having a first child when the female partner was engaged in non-standard schedules, and a higher likelihood of second childbirth for couples where either partner worked in a non-standard schedule. In line with expectations about the institutional and normative context of the Netherlands, we concluded that women adjusted their work schedules to their fertility plans and that couples had a preference for the personal care of their children rather than relying on formal care arrangements. Non-standard schedules served as a means to achieve this. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/sf/sou110 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718085527</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A420182937</galeid><jstor_id>24754210</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1093/sf/sou110</oup_id><sourcerecordid>A420182937</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-667f2a2d69f7db3e2d05e5c2ddcf85a7e8b1d57c6db49a19aba8636bba147c2e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk2LFDEQhoMoOK4e_AFCQA_uod18p9vbMLgq7MdhFI8hnVTP9JjpjEk37P5707Ss4EH2koKqJ1UvbxVCryn5QEnDL3J3keNEKXmCVlRyUWlF5FO0IoTrSmvOnqMXOR8IIVSIeoXMTRyq7WgHb5PHP2L6ibduD34KkHHJ4s2-D74Fm_phh_sBj3vAN1DeFEo5f8RrfN3fga-uSzIWPk6nAHg92HCf-_wSPetsyPDqTzxD3y8_fdt8qa5uP3_drK8qJxoyVkrpjlnmVdNp33JgnkiQjnnvulpaDXVLvdRO-VY0lja2tbXiqm0tFdox4Gfo_dL3lOKvCfJojn12EIpIiFM2VNOa1FIy_QiUEKWlZs0jUcqJLOjbf9BDnFJxoVBKFbcla-aG1ULtbADTDy4OI9yNLoYAOzDFks2tWQtGaF3Gz1rPF96lmHOCzpxSf7Tp3lBi5oWb3Jll4YUVDwoO4MbjlOGvCKmLX9xs56OYb6LEcgRiFv5u-VYW99_ubxbskMeYHkAmtBSs1H8D_4XCMA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1660145299</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Non-Standard Work Schedules and Childbearing in the Netherlands: A Mixed-Method Couple Analysis</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Begall, Katia ; Mills, Melinda ; Ganzeboom, Harry B. G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Begall, Katia ; Mills, Melinda ; Ganzeboom, Harry B. G.</creatorcontrib><description>This study examined the effect of working at non-standard times on the transition to first and second childbirth. Using quantitative couple data from two waves of the Netherlands Kinship Panel Study (N = 742) and semi-structured qualitative interviews (N = 29), we found a lower probability of having a first child when the female partner was engaged in non-standard schedules, and a higher likelihood of second childbirth for couples where either partner worked in a non-standard schedule. In line with expectations about the institutional and normative context of the Netherlands, we concluded that women adjusted their work schedules to their fertility plans and that couples had a preference for the personal care of their children rather than relying on formal care arrangements. Non-standard schedules served as a means to achieve this.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0037-7732</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-7605</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/sf/sou110</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SOFOAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Birth ; Child rearing ; Childbirth & labor ; Children ; Couples ; Employment ; Expectations ; FAMILY ; Females ; Fertility ; Hours of labour ; Interpersonal relations ; Kinship ; Netherlands ; Panel data ; Preferences ; Probability ; Qualitative Methods ; Quantitative analysis ; Quantitative Methods ; Work hours ; Working Women</subject><ispartof>Social forces, 2015-03, Vol.93 (3), p.957-988</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill</rights><rights>The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2014</rights><rights>Copyright © The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press, UK Mar 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-667f2a2d69f7db3e2d05e5c2ddcf85a7e8b1d57c6db49a19aba8636bba147c2e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-667f2a2d69f7db3e2d05e5c2ddcf85a7e8b1d57c6db49a19aba8636bba147c2e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24754210$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24754210$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1583,27915,27916,33765,33766,58008,58241</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Begall, Katia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mills, Melinda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganzeboom, Harry B. G.</creatorcontrib><title>Non-Standard Work Schedules and Childbearing in the Netherlands: A Mixed-Method Couple Analysis</title><title>Social forces</title><addtitle>Social Forces</addtitle><description>This study examined the effect of working at non-standard times on the transition to first and second childbirth. Using quantitative couple data from two waves of the Netherlands Kinship Panel Study (N = 742) and semi-structured qualitative interviews (N = 29), we found a lower probability of having a first child when the female partner was engaged in non-standard schedules, and a higher likelihood of second childbirth for couples where either partner worked in a non-standard schedule. In line with expectations about the institutional and normative context of the Netherlands, we concluded that women adjusted their work schedules to their fertility plans and that couples had a preference for the personal care of their children rather than relying on formal care arrangements. Non-standard schedules served as a means to achieve this.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Birth</subject><subject>Child rearing</subject><subject>Childbirth & labor</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Couples</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Expectations</subject><subject>FAMILY</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Hours of labour</subject><subject>Interpersonal relations</subject><subject>Kinship</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Panel data</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Qualitative Methods</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Quantitative Methods</subject><subject>Work hours</subject><subject>Working Women</subject><issn>0037-7732</issn><issn>1534-7605</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk2LFDEQhoMoOK4e_AFCQA_uod18p9vbMLgq7MdhFI8hnVTP9JjpjEk37P5707Ss4EH2koKqJ1UvbxVCryn5QEnDL3J3keNEKXmCVlRyUWlF5FO0IoTrSmvOnqMXOR8IIVSIeoXMTRyq7WgHb5PHP2L6ibduD34KkHHJ4s2-D74Fm_phh_sBj3vAN1DeFEo5f8RrfN3fga-uSzIWPk6nAHg92HCf-_wSPetsyPDqTzxD3y8_fdt8qa5uP3_drK8qJxoyVkrpjlnmVdNp33JgnkiQjnnvulpaDXVLvdRO-VY0lja2tbXiqm0tFdox4Gfo_dL3lOKvCfJojn12EIpIiFM2VNOa1FIy_QiUEKWlZs0jUcqJLOjbf9BDnFJxoVBKFbcla-aG1ULtbADTDy4OI9yNLoYAOzDFks2tWQtGaF3Gz1rPF96lmHOCzpxSf7Tp3lBi5oWb3Jll4YUVDwoO4MbjlOGvCKmLX9xs56OYb6LEcgRiFv5u-VYW99_ubxbskMeYHkAmtBSs1H8D_4XCMA</recordid><startdate>20150301</startdate><enddate>20150301</enddate><creator>Begall, Katia</creator><creator>Mills, Melinda</creator><creator>Ganzeboom, Harry B. G.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150301</creationdate><title>Non-Standard Work Schedules and Childbearing in the Netherlands: A Mixed-Method Couple Analysis</title><author>Begall, Katia ; Mills, Melinda ; Ganzeboom, Harry B. G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-667f2a2d69f7db3e2d05e5c2ddcf85a7e8b1d57c6db49a19aba8636bba147c2e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Birth</topic><topic>Child rearing</topic><topic>Childbirth & labor</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Couples</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Expectations</topic><topic>FAMILY</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Hours of labour</topic><topic>Interpersonal relations</topic><topic>Kinship</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Panel data</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Qualitative Methods</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Quantitative Methods</topic><topic>Work hours</topic><topic>Working Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Begall, Katia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mills, Melinda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganzeboom, Harry B. G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Social forces</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Begall, Katia</au><au>Mills, Melinda</au><au>Ganzeboom, Harry B. G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Non-Standard Work Schedules and Childbearing in the Netherlands: A Mixed-Method Couple Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Social forces</jtitle><addtitle>Social Forces</addtitle><date>2015-03-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>957</spage><epage>988</epage><pages>957-988</pages><issn>0037-7732</issn><eissn>1534-7605</eissn><coden>SOFOAP</coden><abstract>This study examined the effect of working at non-standard times on the transition to first and second childbirth. Using quantitative couple data from two waves of the Netherlands Kinship Panel Study (N = 742) and semi-structured qualitative interviews (N = 29), we found a lower probability of having a first child when the female partner was engaged in non-standard schedules, and a higher likelihood of second childbirth for couples where either partner worked in a non-standard schedule. In line with expectations about the institutional and normative context of the Netherlands, we concluded that women adjusted their work schedules to their fertility plans and that couples had a preference for the personal care of their children rather than relying on formal care arrangements. Non-standard schedules served as a means to achieve this.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/sf/sou110</doi><tpages>32</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0037-7732 |
| ispartof | Social forces, 2015-03, Vol.93 (3), p.957-988 |
| issn | 0037-7732 1534-7605 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1718085527 |
| source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Business Source Complete; Sociological Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Education Source |
| subjects | Analysis Birth Child rearing Childbirth & labor Children Couples Employment Expectations FAMILY Females Fertility Hours of labour Interpersonal relations Kinship Netherlands Panel data Preferences Probability Qualitative Methods Quantitative analysis Quantitative Methods Work hours Working Women |
| title | Non-Standard Work Schedules and Childbearing in the Netherlands: A Mixed-Method Couple Analysis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T05%3A36%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Non-Standard%20Work%20Schedules%20and%20Childbearing%20in%20the%20Netherlands:%20A%20Mixed-Method%20Couple%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Social%20forces&rft.au=Begall,%20Katia&rft.date=2015-03-01&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=957&rft.epage=988&rft.pages=957-988&rft.issn=0037-7732&rft.eissn=1534-7605&rft.coden=SOFOAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/sf/sou110&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA420182937%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1660145299&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A420182937&rft_jstor_id=24754210&rft_oup_id=10.1093/sf/sou110&rfr_iscdi=true |